# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the United States does not have the right to intervene in the affairs of other nations because in the Monroe Doctrine and the Roosevelt Corollary, the United States was basically in charge of the Western Hemisphere and they didn’t even discuss this situation with the South American nations meaning that they were basically in charge of them. Also just like we saw in the 9/11 attacks, the United States attacked countries that were not even involved in the attacks killing hundreds of thousands of American soldiers and innocent people from the middle east. However, I do believe that the United States has the right to intervene if they have solid evidence of other countries hurting the United States, there should be a valid reason behind it and the United States should consider the consequences of intervening in the affairs of other nations first.

# data[].attributes.body
The US has the right to intervene in the affairs of other nations if and only if they pose an existential threat to America or to American life, or to an American ally. It is not America’s responsibility to maintain the freedoms or rights of non-American citizens, and only when our county, our citizens’, our own lives, or a significant damage to American lifestyle are at stake should America ever intervene in world affairs.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel that the U.S. has the right to intervene in the affairs of other nations because we have one of the most powerful military in the world and we have the ability to help save lives in other countries. We also have the right when it comes to something like what happened on 9/11 that our nation was attacked and it is out job to find out who did it and bring them to justice.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that it depends on the situation. I don't think that if the country isn't asking for help we shouldn't help, but if it is a direct threat to us we should interfere.

# data[].attributes.body
it depends on the situation i think. The US is able to intervene. I don't think we should unless it affects us directly.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it depends on the situation. I believe that in some cases yes, it is ok for the US to intervene in the affairs of other nations. However, not all cases call for the US to intervene, and the US needs a very valid reason to intervene with other nations. Additionally, if the US intervenes it doesn’t need to mean violence, and the US could approach in a different way (more peaceful). I also believe if the US intervened it could make things worse and it could cost people’s lives. Overall, I don’t think the US should intervene unless they have a valid reason.

# data[].attributes.body
No because it is our military's job to protect and keep stability of land around the US and along with other countries as well. The U.S should not invade or press conflict on another country weaker than them but instead should be protecting them from more bigger countries than those smaller countries themselves. But they have the right to do so if main resources are taken that are needed, people's lives are jeopardized, a hugely corrupted government, or alot is being taken from them by force.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the United States does have the rights to intervene in the affairs of other nations sometimes because we have a lot of power in the world and are viewed very highly in the world. Many countries could use our help and want our help but if we are unwanted then we should stay out of it.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the US does have the right to intervene in the affairs of other nations. I say this because there would be more problems in the world if the US didn't.

# data[].attributes.body
Under certain circumstances yes, in that case if it is threatening many lives of those in both countries. If it’s just to get information out of them then No.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes when its becomes a threat to the us and or allies and the definition of threat is up to them

# data[].attributes.body
Donut
No because it is not our job to keep stability everywhere in the world. The only exception is if many of the people's lives are in danger because of corrupt government.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe it depends on the situation I think that if a country is asking for help and they have a solution but they cannot  execute it I believe that is a time America should step in but or if a country is clearly planning to do harm to another country or causing harm to their citizens. I believe that is another reason we should step in, But I don't think America should pledge troops and money to a country immediately I believe sanctions is a strong way to hurt a country without violence. The reason I believe we should help certain countries in certain situations is because it is always good to have allies and friends and when other countries do good we do good and I feel like everyone can  prosper if we are all on the same page and agree.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the US does have the right to intervene, if the purpose is to protect US citizens or help maintain world peace. When the nation is posing a threat to the safety of the US, I see that they are justified to interrupt international affairs. However, if it is for economic gain, the right to intervene gets blurry. I would not have supported the Roosevelt Corollary if he hadn’t approached it in a diplomatic way.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that it’s a very sensitive subject to approach a matter like this so directly. The US has the ability to intervene; however it might need more background information and other’s judgement in choosing if it’s morally correct to do so, as well as if the risks are acceptable for such decision. The United States must also be willing to accept the reparations and risks involved when in the case that they’re wrong and the damages they’ve caused to reach such a conclusion should be acknowledged.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the US does have the right to intervene in the affairs of other nations, but there needs to be a very valid reason. When determining whether to intervene or not it would be extremely important that the costs- both monetary and people's lives- are considered and are considered to as some of the main determining factors.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, the world can be in serious trouble if we don't. But we should at least prove that there is dangers that can hurt more than 1 nation at once .

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that the US has the right to intervene in the affairs of other nations based on the Roosevelt Corollary, but I believe that the US should not just charge in fight first, but should start with a diplomatic approach first.

# data[].attributes.body
Donut
Because...