# data[].attributes.body
neckye- wars in the world are fought and the outcome is always losses of life
--
lens-  its their law, we shouldnt mess with it

# data[].attributes.body
bar·bar·ic

bärˈberik/

adjective

1. 1.

2. savagely cruel; exceedingly brutal.

# data[].attributes.body
doc. 1: every empire conquered land
doc.10: doesn't have to be incest.
made up exaggerated stories from the POV of those being conquered.

# data[].attributes.body
How do you kill peacefully.

# data[].attributes.body
They would not take the land from the people they killed but would rather just leave the land. (Russia)

# data[].attributes.body
If they were so barbaric then why would they care to save some people for development in a society?

Cultures were flourishing under Mongol control. If they were destroying cultures then how would they be assimilated into Mongol culture.

# data[].attributes.body
Killing may be wrong but it isn't barbaric because killing is important to expanding of many of the empires back then

# data[].attributes.body
Arnav- They executed people only because they committed one crime
Jacque-

# data[].attributes.body
Dennis: They did not want their enemies to sleep they wanted them to be tired so they won the battle.It was not centered they would have their battle planned out and they were organized which shows how they were civilized.They were not

Chris:

# data[].attributes.body
They were cruel and had harsh punishment.

# data[].attributes.body
Although that the mongols killed a lot of people, they still helped out the area

# data[].attributes.body
document 2 it says that in a battle in a group of 100... doesn't make any sense because why would you kill 100 people. And for the people who flee are not killed but those who fight are killed.

# data[].attributes.body
Every thing the mongols did was very bad.They killed lots of people and stole lots of land. Also some of the rules they had were cruel. For example. If someone from a team is captured and the team does not save him they all die. If someone is captured there is a chance they won't be able to get saved. If they try to save them it could do more harm then good. The army could lose men that they need to keep the fight going. Also they would take the fat from dead people and spread it around. Then they would lit it on fire. They would take dead people's head and just cut them off.
Something that is barbaric is unorganized and all out crazy. The mongols were organized. They had battle strategies and plans. Even though they did some bad things that makes them bad people not barbaric people.

# data[].attributes.body
sometimes they even take the fat from dead people and lit it on fire.

# data[].attributes.body
- Sons are allowed to take on the father's wives after his death and so on...
- Had no reason to take land
- Agrees that their military code of "if some flee all are put to death".
- Mongols only helped conquered lands to just benefit for themselves.
- The Mongols have the power to kill people, and they did with without gaining anything

# data[].attributes.body
Maria- In doc 4 it states that the town should be laid to waste and not even cats and dogs should be left. This is really barbaric because they aren't even leaving the pets alive. Unless the husband was killed, they could not enter a relation ship. So that means that men would kill husbands to enter relationships with women.

Alan- We're saying they're barbaric because the WAY the killed people, not because they killed people. In doc 5 it shows that the general buried them alive.

# data[].attributes.body
document 10 they show sympathy because they did not have a lot of food and they gave the food they had to the people
if women are captured by mongols... they will not be forced to be in any relationship.

If it is said that the Mongols are barbaric, then this makes every single empire barbaric?
Any way that you die is brutal

# data[].attributes.body
does that prove if they're barbaric or not

# data[].attributes.body
Adultery was frowned upon in many societies & in other societies death was also punishable.

The whole point of war is to get rid of your enemy

# data[].attributes.body
They killed of other people in general is barbaric

xxa

# data[].attributes.body
definition of barbaric is  savagely cruel; exceedingly brutal.

# data[].attributes.body
They used bodily function to kill off their enemies and they would kill off soldier's if they didn't really fight.
Does a sacrifice have to cost a life?
They wanted to kill which shows they're really barbaric.

Elieser:
they were barbaric because of document 10
compared to other civilizations their ways of killing could be considered more barbaric

# data[].attributes.body
mongol helped the land politically and economically and culturally , also

# data[].attributes.body
They weren't barbaric because they had strategy, Them killing people helped them conquer and gain power. Killing them keeps them from fighting back? A life is a life everybody dies in the end.

# data[].attributes.body
The mongolians didn't kill the soldiers that fled from battle instead they killed the men that stayed back
roasting lance for his statement on laws

# data[].attributes.body
They used violence to show that they are on top.  All civilizations did it back then, and they were not considered barbaric.

# data[].attributes.body
Alice and Aimer
How were they barbaric
Every system was like that and they had women inequality and the system is barbaric