# data[].attributes.body
Use the available points you calculated earlier, to help respond to this scenario. A notable scholarly journal has had discussions over the past 2 years about switching to your program.  About a year ago, while waiting for their journal application form, you conducted the initial consultation and editorial training (3 points total). Now, your point of contact reaches out to ask you to redo the initial consultation and editorial training session because there is a new Chief Editor and some board members have changed. The application form is still outstanding but based on your conversations you use the Journal Evaluation form to calculate that 48 points will be needed to onboard and maintain the journal over the next quarter (38 points for transferring 19 back issues, 4 points for the journal flipping consultation, 1 point for DOI minting & 5 points for mandatory activities).   How do you respond?

# data[].attributes.body
We have plenty of points available in our program to accommodate this journal. However, if they had a huge turnover in a year and want to completely redo the initial consult, I would be wary. Our initial evaluation of numbers could be off if we didn't anticipate huge turnover and repeated actions. I would have to verify that these editorial board members will be on for a number of years and there would be some kind of continuity.

# data[].attributes.body
Points-wise, I calculated 84 points available so could definitely take this on.

# data[].attributes.headline
Yes because our program is small and getting a flagship journal would be really useful

# data[].attributes.subject
Yes because our program is small and getting a flagship journal would be really useful

# data[].attributes.headline
Yes, but will need to ensure commitment this time since points had previously been dedicated. Flagship journal adds impact.

# data[].attributes.subject
Yes, but will need to ensure commitment this time since points had previously been dedicated. Flagship journal adds impact.

# data[].attributes.headline
We are a small program so baseline level of work is not high - think we could accommodate if we thought follow through would be better this time.

# data[].attributes.subject
We are a small program so baseline level of work is not high - think we could accommodate if we thought follow through would be better this time.

# data[].attributes.body
We would not have enough points as I had estimated about .25FTE in the previous exercise.

# data[].attributes.headline
Our program is too small to deal with folks who can't even be bothered to complete a form.  Given the estimated hours, we could probably handle them, but not if they weren't cooperating with our efforts.  I might consider using an MOU that included explicit deliverables  from them as necessary precursors to our work.

# data[].attributes.subject
Our program is too small to deal with folks who can't even be bothered to complete a form.  Given the estimated hours, we could probably handle them, but not if they weren't cooperating with our efforts.  I might consider using an MOU that included explicit deliverables  from them as necessary precursors to our work.

# data[].attributes.body
We would be more willing to accommodate as it is a flagship journal, but I would preface  the conversation with the editor with a warning that we might not be able to accommodate all requests right away and try to get a sense of which requests are most important

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the exercise, we would be able to move forward because we would have enough points available to do so. I would be interested to see their response to the MOU though given their lack of responsiveness initially.

# data[].attributes.body
We would have the points to do this

# data[].attributes.headline
Yes -- have points for the quarter (but I would maybe want to pad the total just in case) 

# data[].attributes.subject
Yes -- have points for the quarter (but I would maybe want to pad the total just in case) 

# data[].attributes.headline
I would ask for a letter of support from the governing body of the journal as a condition of hosting the journal, given their lack of responsiveness. Library funding is precarious and we have to show impact of everything we do.

# data[].attributes.subject
I would ask for a letter of support from the governing body of the journal as a condition of hosting the journal, given their lack of responsiveness. Library funding is precarious and we have to show impact of everything we do.