# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Scaling up and reducing cost of lab meat

# data[].attributes.body
2.0

Main Question?

How can the fashion industry such as Missguided focus on environmental sustainability?

What is the impact of fast fashion industry such as Missguided help prevent dangers to the environment?

Sub Questions

1.  What are the main concerns of chemical waste and water pollution of fashion industry, such as Missguided?

2. How can the fashion industry such as Missguided promote better recycling?

3. How can the fashion industry such as Missguided reduce its microplastics?

4. How can the fashion industry such as Missguided prevent prevent their clothes being so disposable?

5. How can the fashion industry such as Missguided implement the
idea of shared value?

# data[].attributes.body
Evaluation of the corporate social responsibility of the fashion brand ‘Misguided’ in terms of its environmental impact

2.0

Main Question?

How can the fashion industry such as Missguided focus on the ethical responsibility, environmental sustainability?

Sub Questions

1.  PROBLEM 1?
How the fashion industry emits CO2 by producing its product such as Missguided?

2. PROBLEM 2?
what are the main concerns of fashion industry in terms of chemical waste which increase the level of water pollution such as Missguided?

3. PROBLEM 3?

3. SOLUTION?

What type of different methods can be used by the fashion industry for recycling such as Missguided?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Evaluation of the corporate social responsibility of the fashion brand

# data[].attributes.body
Main Question
What is the impact of fast fashion if industry needs to fundamental change in order to mitigate the environment?

Sub question
1.How fashion industry needs to change to deal with some of the many associated problems?
2.The fashion industry produces 10% of global carbon dioxide emissions every year. It is impact on environment?

3.Clothes made outside the EU where it is difficult to know what substances have been used?

Solution
Fashion industry can use production to retailing and recycling, must begin to work together future where the rate of fibre production and disposal was lowered need not mean a dearth of new outfits, if garments were rented or re-sold. “It might be fast fashion from the perspective of the fashionista.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Evaluation of the corporate social responsibility of the fashion brand

# data[].attributes.body
Evaluation of the corporate social responsibility of the fashion brand 'Misguided' in terms of its environmental impact

2.0

Main Question?

Sub Questions

1.  PROBLEM 1?

2. PROBLEM 2?

3. PROBLEM 3?

3. SOLUTION?

# data[].attributes.body
Missguided(no date)corporate responsibility. Available at:https://www.missguided.co.uk/csr (Accessed: 10 March 2022).

# data[].attributes.body
Missguided (No Date) corporate responsibility. Available at: https://www.missguided.co.uk/csr (Accessed date: 10/03/2022)

# data[].attributes.body
MISSGUIDED( no date) corporate responsibility. Available at:https://www.missguided.co.uk/csr(accessed :10 march 2022)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:

You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser.

You're a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.

You've disabled cookies in your web browser.

A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article.

# data[].attributes.body
Missguided (No Date) Corporate responsibility. Available at: https://www.missguided.co.uk/csr (Accessed: 10 march,2022)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
By Janet Jacobs @janetjacobs1919

Meat in the grocery store is expensive.

It really doesn't matter if you are trying to get pork chops or chicken or steak, the meat section is one the priciest around.

Although your local grocery store may not have lamb available for purchase, you can usually find some at a butcher.

Lamb is one of the most expensive cuts of meat out there.

Some people really enjoy the taste of lamb while others find it a bit difficult to chew.

Here are some reasons lamb is so expensive.

Why Is Lamb So Expensive?

1. Healthy Meat

The biggest thing people look for in a meat is that it is healthy.

They want something lean, which will give them nourishment without being loaded with extra fat.

With lamb, this is quite easy to achieve.

In fact, lamb is one of the leaner meats available.

If you have a standard cut of lamb meat about three ounces in size, you will get more than 20 grams of protein.

The protein is entirely natural and not chemically derived.

This is a good amount of protein for a piece of meat of this size.

However, protein is not the only nutritional benefit of lamb.

Lamb has iron and magnesium in it as well.

In addition to the iron and magnesium, you will also get good amounts of potassium and B-12.

Overall, lamb can be a very healthy meal as long as you prepare it properly.

Once you start adding butter and oils to the lamb, it will lose some of its healthy qualities, and it will gain some extra fat that you probably did not need to add.

One thing you will notice with any type of food that starts to get expensive, chances are it is good for you.

Before avocados were known as being such a great fat, they were affordable, but now they

sell for a few dollars apiece in some areas.

There is no way to win once foods start being considered healthy.

2. Not Factory Farmed

A good portion of the meat we eat in America is factory farmed.

This means that animals are raised in small areas, and they are raised with the idea in place to get them to the point of sale.

Some animals do well with factory farming.

They will handle the stress and enclosures with ease.

Lamb is not one of these animals.

Lambs do not thrive in a factory type of environment.

They are going to get easily stressed, and this will cause them to grow at a slower rate.

The lamb will also end up getting sick when raised in this kind of environment.

Once the lamb is sick and smaller, it is going to be hard to sell and they will probably need to give the lamb a lot of medication.

This kind of meat is then going to be somewhat contaminated and could end up costing less to purchase and to sell.

In other words, the markup is not going to be nearly as good.

Since factory farming does not work quite as well for lambs, they are mostly farm raised.

Although this is great for both the animal and, ultimately, the consumer, the price is going to be considerably higher.

Having the land necessary to raise the lamb and the staff in place to take care of them is a much more complicated process than the factory farming.

Many people who are looking to purely make a profit are going to prefer the factory farming.

Most of the lamb meat you find in the stores is going to be farm raised lamb.

The process works better this way, and people are more likely to purchase this type of lamb.

It will have a noticeably better flavor, and since lamb is known for being expensive, this extra price for farm raised lamb will be worth it for most people.

3. Less Meat Per Animal

Another reason lamb is so expensive is that you don't get all that much meat from each animal.

In fact, lamb has one of the lowest yields of any of the meat we normally eat.

Lambs are not as large as cows, and they don't have as many useable parts as something like a pig.

When a farmer raises a lamb and sells it for meat, they will end up having to sell many lambs to make the same money they would with other animals.

When you have to sell large amounts of lamb just to make a profit, you will obviously be in a difficult situation.

Many of the farmers who sell lambs are going to be smaller scale operations that will try and sell a few lambs per year to sustain their lamb farming.

If a farmer is supplying a large amount of lamb to stores, he will need thousands and thousands of sheep to be able to supply enough meat.

4. Butchering

Most of the time, lamb are sold as the whole lamb.

They are often sold alive as well.

Live sheep will go to a dealer who will then find a butcher who wants to purchase the sheep.

The butcher usually gets the sheep when it has first been killed.

At this point, the butcher must then take the lamb and cut it into the pieces it needs to sell the lamb to the final customers.

This process is lengthy, and you have to understand a great deal about lambs and their anatomy to do this properly.

For anyone who thought that butchering just means chopping up large slabs of meat, you are quite wrong.

The inside of the animal is divided into many different sections.

Many of these sections are going to be great to sell, while others will be considered waste.

Only a butcher is going to know how to properly prepare the lamb for resale.

5. Profit for the Farmers who Raise Lamb

When farmers raise lamb, they usually sell it to a dealer.

The dealer then sells the lamb to the butcher.

This means the lamb has to pass through a few different people before it makes it to you.

We know from other products that the more people who are involved, the higher the price is going to be for the end user.

Of course, the butcher expects to make money on the meat they sell.

The dealer needs to make money from the butcher.

Let's not forget that the farmer is the one who actually raised the lamb the entire time, and they clearly depend on their share of the profit.

By the time everyone gets paid out on a lamb, the margins are actually quite slim.

You should be aware of these things when you buy a lamb to eat.

You shouldn't think that you are being ripped off by the butcher.

This is not the case as you really are just paying for everyone to have their cut as part of this process.

6. Delivery

As we mentioned, most of the lambs that are sold are going to go as live lambs.

Once they are sold by the dealer, they then need to go to the butcher.

This is quite a bit of transport and delivery that is involved.

If you are purchasing lamb, you will probably see quite a bit of delivery built into your price.

If a lamb is shipped while it is alive, it is going to need a lot of space and a special hauler specially built for animals.

When a lamb that has been killed is shipped, it will need to be sent in a refrigerated vehicle.

Anytime you start adding in refrigerated shipping, the pricing is going to increase considerably.

With almost any product out there, delivery is going to add to the cost of the product.

Shipping and delivery are quite expensive, and no matter where you are located, the rates are universally high.

7. Older Lambs

Lambs have to be a little older than some animals when they get to selling weight.

This ends up meaning that farmers will need to care for a lamb much longer before it can be sold.

When they have to care for lambs, they also have to feed them, maintain the land, and make sure the animals are healthy and have shelter.

Housing large numbers of lambs while they grow and get to a weight at which they can be sold takes time, but it also takes a lot of money.

For a farmer to be profitable after having to hold on to a lamb for almost a full year, they need to sell it for quite a bit of money.

We already mentioned that lambs have a fairly low yield when it comes to weight.

If a farmer sells the lamb prior to it being full-grown, then the yield will be even lower.

Younger lambs are going to have a very low yield, and it will not be profitable to sell and butcher these animals.

8. Live Lamb vs. Weight Sold to Final Customer

When a lamb is sold to a dealer, it will be sold at the weight of the actual lamb.

Once it is sold, it will then be sent to the butcher.

The butcher will then find that about 50 percent of the lamb is meat.

That meat will then need to be trimmed down further so that the parts are cut up how they need to be to sell to customers.

At this point, the butcher will then lose another portion of the meat they paid for.

Essentially, this means they will have to make up for this difference in their profitability.

To break this down simply, when you purchase a product for ten and find out it is only worth five, you will then have to try and sell it for 15 or more.

This process is something butchers are used to but it still is going to have an impact on the price that is paid by the consumer.

There is no way to tell the exact poundage of meat a butcher can get from a lamb.

It is a bit like gambling when they purchase a lamb.

There are estimates and ideas, but for the most part, it is a bit of a guessing game.

A butcher can either be lucky or be a bit unlucky when it comes to these types of situations.

This is partly why lamb is more expensive than other meat.

9. A Lot of Work for Small Package of Meat

Have you ever noticed that some things come in bulk discounts?

The larger the package of meat, the easier it is for sellers to offer discounts.

Since they are selling such a large amount, they can lower the price and still make money.

When you consider all of the steps that lamb has to go through to get to the final consumer's table, there are lots of factors that come into play.

This is not as much of a high-volume business with room for error when it comes to pricing and profit.

The margins are slim, and there are many people who need to get a cut in order for the business to work.

10. Luxury

The last reason lamb is so expensive is that it is considered to be a luxury cut of meat.

Lamb is often saved for holidays or special occasions.

People know that lamb has to be prepared a certain way, and it is usually more of a high-end sit-down dinner type of meal.

At a high-end restaurant, you will very likely see lamb on the menu.

At a lower price or chain restaurant, chances are they will not bother cooking with lamb at all.

Since lamb has been portrayed as being more of a luxury item, the pricing is usually considerably higher than it is on other lower priced meats like chicken.

Certainly, in a restaurant, people are going to want to spend more money on a rack of lamb than a chicken breast.

This is because lamb has been described as being a luxury food.

Conclusion

As you can see, there are many reasons behind lamb being so expensive.

Some are very well justified and just a part of this process.

Once you enjoy a great lamb dinner, you will likely not be worried about the price you paid for the cut.

Look for sales on lamb meat, or see if a local farmer will sell you lamb in bulk.

Those are the two best ways to try and save a little money on a lamb.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Why Is Lamb So Expensive? (Top 10 Reasons)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
By Janet Jacobs @janetjacobs1919 Meat in the grocery store is expensive. It really doesn't matter if you are trying to get pork chops or chicken or steak, the meat section is one the priciest around. Although your local grocery store may not have lamb available for purchase, you can usually find some at a butcher.

# data[].attributes.headline
Shared Value - Corporate Social Responsibility 

# data[].attributes.subject
Shared Value - Corporate Social Responsibility 

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
What Is Shared Value - Driving Corporate Purpose | Shared Value Initiative

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Shared value creation focuses on identifying and expanding the connections between societal and economic progress. Tap here to learn more.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
As you were browsing something about your browser made us think you were a bot. There are a few reasons this might happen:

You've disabled JavaScript in your web browser.

You're a power user moving through this website with super-human speed.

You've disabled cookies in your web browser.

A third-party browser plugin, such as Ghostery or NoScript, is preventing JavaScript from running. Additional information is available in this support article.

# data[].attributes.body
Nicola Davis(2020)'Fast fashion speeding toward environmental disaster, report warns’. available at :https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2020/apr/07/fast-fashion-speeding-toward-environmental-disaster-report-warns (Accessesed: 9 March 2022)

# data[].attributes.body
Davis,N. (2020) Fast fashion speeding toward environmental disaster, report warns; available at: Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2020/apr/07/fast-fashion-speeding-toward-environmental-disaster-report-warns (Accessesed: 9 March 2022)

# data[].attributes.body
Davis, N. (2020) Fast fashion speeding toward environmental disaster, report warns. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2020/apr/07/fast-fashion-speeding-toward-environmental-disaster-report-warns  The Guardian, 8. Accessed 9 March 2022

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The fashion industry needs to fundamentally change in order to mitigate the environmental impact of fast fashion, experts have said.

Clothes rental, better recycling processes, pollution control technology and the innovative use of offcuts are among measures that could help, they said.

The researchers produced a report - pubished in the journal Nature Reviews Earth & Environment - into the environmental cost of the industry, and how it needs to change to deal with some of the many associated problems.

While the figures are debated, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has calculated the fashion industry produces 10% of global carbon dioxide emissions every year, while it is estimated to use around 1.5 trillion litres of water annually. Meanwhile concerns have been rising about pollution, from chemical waste to microplastics.

Among the developments deemed to be exacerbating the problems, is fast fashion - cheap clothes bought and cast aside in rapid succession as trends change - such as the £1 bikini sold by Missguided last year.

The £1 Missguided bikini highlighted the issue of fast fashion last year. Photograph: Missguided

"It is really a global problem," said Dr Patsy Perry, a co-author of the research from Manchester University.

Perry and an international group of colleagues point out that the global nature of the fashion industry means clothes may have travelled around the world several times during manufacture, while it is estimated that if 3% of garment transportation shifted from ship to air cargo - a burgeoning trend in the industry - it could result in over 100% more carbon emissions than if all garment transportation was by ship.

The team also points to the industry's water consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, textile waste, and use of chemicals - substances they say not only pose environmental risks, but health risks for those involved in the industry. "In one example, a single European textile-finishing company uses over 466g of chemicals per kilogram of textile," they write.

And while many garments are designed in the US or EU, they are often produced in developing countries. The team says that not only increases fabric waste through poor communication of requirements, but regulations around pollution are often less strict in the countries of manufacture. "The waste water is going out into freshwater streams and polluting the rivers that people are fishing from [and] living from," said Perry.

A garment factory in Dhaka, Bangladesh. The production of clothes for foreign designers is one of the issues highlighted in the report. Photograph: NurPhoto/NurPhoto via Getty Images

The report stresses limited natural resources mean the fashion industry must change, and sets out a number of ways it could become greener, including embracing renewable energy and developing new methods for recycling, as well as reducing the use of polyester - a non-biodegradable fibre, produced from petrochemicals, that dominates the fashion industry.

They also argue the industry should focus on producing better quality, long-lived items, while innovations like clothes rental and new approaches to resale should be scaled up.

But they add: "Consumers must understand fashion as more of a functional product rather than entertainment, and be ready to pay higher prices that account for the environmental impact of fashion."

It is not the first time solutions to fast fashion have been mooted. Last year, MPs on the Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) proposed a number of measures, including a 1p charge on each new item of clothing to fund better recycling and collection. All were rejected by the government.

Extinction Rebellion protests outside London Fashion Week in February targeted fast fashion. Photograph: Ollie Millington/Getty Images

Libby Peake of the Green Alliance said the UK had a particular problem when it came to fast fashion.

"We buy more clothing per head than any other country in Europe, including nearly twice as much as Italians, who are better known for their fashion sense," she said.

As well as emphasising the need for improved quality and clothing rental schemes, she said, the report highlighted the importance of buying clothing second hand. Industry-led initiatives to reduce environmental costs had been ineffective while consumption continued to rise.

"Slow fashion is the only sustainable future for the industry and the planet," she said.

Carry Somers, the co-founder of the campaign Fashion Revolution, also stressed the use of chemicals in the fashion industry, as flagged by the new report, is of particular concern, especially in clothes made outside the EU where it is difficult to know what substances have been used.

Prof Steve Evans, an expert in industrial sustainability at Cambridge University, also welcomed the report. But he said it was unclear what proportion of the industry's environmental impact was down to fast fashion per se. A key challenge for the "closed loop" industry was that different sectors, from production to retailing and recycling, must begin to work together.

But Evans said a future where the rate of fibre production and disposal was lowered need not mean a dearth of new outfits, if garments were rented or re-sold. "It might be fast fashion from the perspective of the fashionista," he said, "but it is slow from the perspective of the planet."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Fast fashion speeding toward environmental disaster, report warns

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Study highlights industry failures and calls for shift in consumer attitudes

# data[].attributes.body
Nicola Davis(2020)’Fast fashion speeding toward environmental disaster, report warns’. available at :https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2020/apr/07/fast-fashion-speeding-toward-environmental-disaster-report-warns (Accessesed: 9 March)

# data[].attributes.body
Nicola Davis (2020) Fast fashion speeding toward environmental disaster, report warns. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2020/apr/07/fast-fashion-speeding-toward-environmental-disaster-report-warns (Accessesed: 9 March 2022)

# data[].attributes.body
Davis, N.( 2020). 'Fast fashion speeding toward environmental disaster', report warns. The Guardian, 8. Available at :

https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2020/apr/07/fast-fashion-speeding-toward-environmental-disaster-report-warns (Accessesed: 9 March)

# data[].attributes.body
Davis, N. (2020) Fast fashion speeding toward environmental disaster, report warns. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2020/apr/07/fast-fashion-speeding-toward-environmental-disaster-report-warns(Accessesed: 09/03/2022)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The fashion industry needs to fundamentally change in order to mitigate the environmental impact of fast fashion, experts have said.

Clothes rental, better recycling processes, pollution control technology and the innovative use of offcuts are among measures that could help, they said.

The researchers produced a report - pubished in the journal Nature Reviews Earth & Environment - into the environmental cost of the industry, and how it needs to change to deal with some of the many associated problems.

While the figures are debated, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has calculated the fashion industry produces 10% of global carbon dioxide emissions every year, while it is estimated to use around 1.5 trillion litres of water annually. Meanwhile concerns have been rising about pollution, from chemical waste to microplastics.

Among the developments deemed to be exacerbating the problems, is fast fashion - cheap clothes bought and cast aside in rapid succession as trends change - such as the £1 bikini sold by Missguided last year.

The £1 Missguided bikini highlighted the issue of fast fashion last year. Photograph: Missguided

"It is really a global problem," said Dr Patsy Perry, a co-author of the research from Manchester University.

Perry and an international group of colleagues point out that the global nature of the fashion industry means clothes may have travelled around the world several times during manufacture, while it is estimated that if 3% of garment transportation shifted from ship to air cargo - a burgeoning trend in the industry - it could result in over 100% more carbon emissions than if all garment transportation was by ship.

The team also points to the industry's water consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, textile waste, and use of chemicals - substances they say not only pose environmental risks, but health risks for those involved in the industry. "In one example, a single European textile-finishing company uses over 466g of chemicals per kilogram of textile," they write.

And while many garments are designed in the US or EU, they are often produced in developing countries. The team says that not only increases fabric waste through poor communication of requirements, but regulations around pollution are often less strict in the countries of manufacture. "The waste water is going out into freshwater streams and polluting the rivers that people are fishing from [and] living from," said Perry.

A garment factory in Dhaka, Bangladesh. The production of clothes for foreign designers is one of the issues highlighted in the report. Photograph: NurPhoto/NurPhoto via Getty Images

The report stresses limited natural resources mean the fashion industry must change, and sets out a number of ways it could become greener, including embracing renewable energy and developing new methods for recycling, as well as reducing the use of polyester - a non-biodegradable fibre, produced from petrochemicals, that dominates the fashion industry.

They also argue the industry should focus on producing better quality, long-lived items, while innovations like clothes rental and new approaches to resale should be scaled up.

But they add: "Consumers must understand fashion as more of a functional product rather than entertainment, and be ready to pay higher prices that account for the environmental impact of fashion."

It is not the first time solutions to fast fashion have been mooted. Last year, MPs on the Environmental Audit Committee (EAC) proposed a number of measures, including a 1p charge on each new item of clothing to fund better recycling and collection. All were rejected by the government.

Extinction Rebellion protests outside London Fashion Week in February targeted fast fashion. Photograph: Ollie Millington/Getty Images

Libby Peake of the Green Alliance said the UK had a particular problem when it came to fast fashion.

"We buy more clothing per head than any other country in Europe, including nearly twice as much as Italians, who are better known for their fashion sense," she said.

As well as emphasising the need for improved quality and clothing rental schemes, she said, the report highlighted the importance of buying clothing second hand. Industry-led initiatives to reduce environmental costs had been ineffective while consumption continued to rise.

"Slow fashion is the only sustainable future for the industry and the planet," she said.

Carry Somers, the co-founder of the campaign Fashion Revolution, also stressed the use of chemicals in the fashion industry, as flagged by the new report, is of particular concern, especially in clothes made outside the EU where it is difficult to know what substances have been used.

Prof Steve Evans, an expert in industrial sustainability at Cambridge University, also welcomed the report. But he said it was unclear what proportion of the industry's environmental impact was down to fast fashion per se. A key challenge for the "closed loop" industry was that different sectors, from production to retailing and recycling, must begin to work together.

But Evans said a future where the rate of fibre production and disposal was lowered need not mean a dearth of new outfits, if garments were rented or re-sold. "It might be fast fashion from the perspective of the fashionista," he said, "but it is slow from the perspective of the planet."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Fast fashion speeding toward environmental disaster, report warns

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Study highlights industry failures and calls for shift in consumer attitudes

# data[].attributes.body
Carlsson, F. Kataria, M. and Lampi, E. ( 2022)’ How much does it take? Willingness to switch to meat substitutes’ ,Ecological Economics, 193, p.107329.

# data[].attributes.body
Carlsson, F. Kataria, M. and Lampi, E. (2022)’ How much does it take? Willingness to switch to meat substitutes’, Ecological Economics, 193,p.107329

# data[].attributes.body
Carlsson, F. Kataria, M. and Lampi E. (2022). How much does it take? Willingness to switch to meat substitutes. Ecological Economics, 193, p.107329.

# data[].attributes.body
Carlsson, F., Kataria, M. and Lampi, E., (2022). How much does it take? Willingness to switch to meat substitutes. Ecological Economics, 193, (p.107329).

# data[].attributes.body
Carlsson, F. Kataria, M. and Lampi, E. (2022) ‘How much does it take? Willingness to switch to meat substitutes’, Ecological Economics, (193), p.107329.

# data[].attributes.body
Carlsson, F. Kataria, M. Lampi, E. (2022) ‘How much does it take? Willingness to switch to meat substitutes’, Ecological Economics (193), p.107329.

# data[].attributes.body
Carlsson, F., Kataria, M. and Lampi, E., (2022). ‘ How much does it take? Willingness to switch to meat substitutes’ Ecological Economics, 193, p.107329.

# data[].attributes.body
In conclusion, by agglomerating the above mentioned factor, although this essay has pointed out that there are some cons of using lab meat such as it is too expensive because of serum used in the production of lab-meat yet I would argue that benefits of adopting lab meat far outweigh the negatives. Because artificial meat is a impactful way in reducing the global environmental issues created by the livestock to exemplify, green house emissions and land degradation.

# data[].attributes.body
To conclusion that although there are some drawbacks of lab meat such as it is expensive to produce by serum and appointing scientist team. But I believe that there advantages are more because it saves the environment from emitting harmful gases and protect land from degradation ,climate change and biodiversity than its riks.

# data[].attributes.body
In conclusion, by agglomerating the above mentioned factors, no doubt there are some disadvantages of lab-meat such as lab-meat is too expensive. However, I would argue that advantages of lab-meat outweigh the drawbacks. Because artificial meat is a impactful way to reduce the global environmental issues such as greenhouse emissions and land degradation created by livestock.

# data[].attributes.body
In conclusion, after summarising the main points that mentioned above, I would argue that although lab meat has some drawbacks such as it is very expensive as the serum used for production of such meat is not affordable yet I believe that there are also many benefits of lab meat as it is helpful to reduce problems created by livestock such as greenhouse emission, land degradation.

# data[].attributes.body
In conclusion, although there are some drawbacks of lab-meat such as it is too expensive which include serum and the team of researchers , however I believe that the benefits of lab meat outweigh the disadvantages such as land degradation , greenhouse emission ,water ,air quality levels reduces are much higher.

# data[].attributes.body
To conclude, there is no doubt artificial meat is costly as contrast to the red-meat due to the expenses of serum and equipment that are used to making the the lab-meat, but it is irrefutable that the advantages are not overlooked because lab meat is more preferable as an alternate source of meat.

# data[].attributes.body
In conclusion, although artificial meat has many advantages but it is too expensive due to cost of serum and equipment that are use for the production of lab meat. However, livestock is comparatively cheap but it has many disadvantages such as greenhouse emission, land degradation and so on. I suggest that, lab meat is more preferable as an alternative source of meat because it has many advantages as compare to livestock because it create many problems for environment .

# data[].attributes.body
However, there are some drawbacks of lab-grown meat. For example, (Kissairis Munoz 2021 P-3) stated that the lab-grown meat is to expensive. To produce artificial meat, serum is mandatory which help the stem cells to grow. Along with this,  to grow and gain stem cells, animals still needs to die because it is a critical part to make artificial meat. There are some other alternatives also but the serum of animal is more attractive because with it any cell can be grown. Therefore, the whole process of creating fake meat is too expensive and not all the consumers can afford it.

# data[].attributes.body
However, it can be argued that there are plethoras of cons of using of livestock for environment. According to Thumba et al. (2017, p.1), livestock increases reducing global environmental issues such as greenhouse emissions, land degradation, water quality, climate change, and biodiversity. 30% of the land is used for the farm animals for the purpose of grazing and feeding. Because of overgrazing may directly leads to the land degradation and the harmful emissions for instance, CO2 and CH4  in the atmosphere which affects the climate. Furthermore, because of the transportation of live stock from one place to the other place this process also increase the green house emission which is harmful for the environment. Due to increase of demand for meat directly increases the environmental issues for example, greenhouse emissions and global warming. Additionally, insufficient use of natural resources is also the major reason for environmental problems by livestock because farmers may use various pesticides for growing of crops which may increases the chances of land degradation. To summarize, adopting the artificial meat is the best way to reduce harmful gases which is because of livestock.

# data[].attributes.body
However, it can be disputed that problem with alternatives meat such as lab-meat is that it is too expensive. For example, James (2016, p.1) states that lab-meat is manufactured by using harvesting stem cells or muscle cells  from living animals and these cells are grown using serum which is an extremely expensive product. Furthermore, there are added costs such having teams of scientist which need to cultivate the product. There is also the cost relating to the lab equipment as well as overheads. In summary, the costs of lab-meat is too expensive to enter the market and to be affordable for the global market.

It can be disputed that there are plethora of cons of using of livestock for environment. According to Thumba et al. (2017, p.1), livestock helps in reducing global environmental issues such as greenhouse emissions, land degradation, water quality, climate change, and biodiversity. 30% of the land is used for the farm animals for the purpose of grazing and feeding. Because of overgrazing may directly leads to the land degradation and the harmful emissions for instance, CO2 and CH4  in the atmosphere which affects the climate. Furthermore, because of the transportation of live stock from one place to the other place this process also increase the green house emission which is harmful for the environment. Due to increase of demand for meat directly increases the environmental issues for example, greenhouse emissions and global warming. Additionally, insufficient use of natural resources is also the major reason for environmental problems by livestock because farmers may use various pesticides for growing of crops which may increases the chances of land degradation. To summarize, adopting the artificial meat is the best way to reduce harmful gases which is because of livestock.

To conculde, artificial meat is effective way for reducing environment problems because livestocks create plethora of problems like global warming and land deterioration,Therefore,people should prefer to lab meat as compared to livestock due to this it may possible to be solve atmosphere issues.

# data[].attributes.body
In conclusion, although there are some drawbacks to lab meat such as it is not much reasonable. I believe that cons of livestock for nature is more problematic than the risks from the lab meat .

# data[].attributes.body
On the contrary, it can be argued that livestock has many disadvantages to the environment because it may harmful for environment. For example, Thumba et.al (2017, page n.. 1) state that due to livestock there are many environment problems such as land degradation, water pollution, greenhouse gas emission and air pollution. With the rapid increase in livestock, there may threat of global warming. Livestock may major cause for land degradation. About 20% land degradation may happen due to livestock activities because 30% of land is used by livestock for animal grazing which may cause land degradation. Livestock also may cause water pollution. Due to the use of antibiotics and chemicals for animal’s health it may be water pollution. Furthermore, every activities of livestock may lead greenhouse gas emission for instance, CO2 and CH4 may effect global activities. 24% of GHGs emission happened due to agricultural and farming activities in 2010 worldwide among these 80% GHGs emission was due to livestock. Whereas, lab meat may not harm environment because such activities are not done in production of lab meat. In summary, lab meat may helpful to reduce the problems created by livestock which may helpful for environment.

# data[].attributes.body
In conclusion, undoubtedly, there are some disadvantages of artificial meat as its too expensive while livestock creates major problems for environment such as greenhouse emission and land degradation. Therefore, people should go for artificial meat to save environment.

# data[].attributes.body
On the flip side, it can be argued that there are some disadvantages of livestock to the environment. According to Thumba, et al. (2017, p.1) states that artificial meat helps in reducing global environmental issues such as greenhouse emission, land degradation, water quality, climate change, and biodiversity. Farm animals are used 30% of the populated land for animal feed production and grazing that is a major cause of land degradation. In addition, 20% of the deterioration due to farming it has been described and 8% of the global freshwater also used for this process. Furthermore, antibiotic and hormones mixed in the water are used for animal health directly leads to the water pollution. Because of the livestock feeding farmers used many pesticides for growing healthy crops this may causes the land degradation which is harmful for the environment. The process of Livestock production causes greenhouse emission for instance CO2 and CH4 which may increase the chances of greenhouse emission and it directly effects on global climate change and air pollution. Additionally,  because of the transportation of livestock used for animals feed products for export or import that is also one of the major causes of greenhouse emission. In summary, lab-meat is a impactful way to overcome the environmental issues created by livestock.

# data[].attributes.body
However, it can be disputed that problem with alternatives meat such as lab-meat is that it is too expensive. For example, James (2016, p.1) states that lab-meat is manufactured by using harvesting stem cells or muscle cells  from living animals and these cells are grown using serum which is an extremely expensive product. Furthermore, there are added costs such having teams of scientist which need to cultivate the product. There is also the cost relating to the lab equipment as well as overheads. In summary, the costs of lab-meat is too expensive to enter the market and to be affordable for the global market.

# data[].attributes.body
Firstly, it can be argued that using traditional meat is responsible for greenhouse gas emission. Cai et al. (2021, p.1) stated the population is increasing day by day which increase the demand of livestock. However, the livestock bring many problems to the environment such as, deforestation, most of forests are cutting down for storage of livestock. Also, this reduce the quality of air as different type of harmful gases are emitted by livestock and their discharge such as nitroxide, carbon dioxide and so on. These problems bring many other hazardous for example, floods, drought and acid rain due of increasing impact of global warming. Further, the value of soil become degraded due to heavy rain and floods because most of nutrients which are on upper layer of land gets washed off which result into soil erosion. To summarise, increasing demand of livestock bring wide range of problems toward the environment as land degradation and air pollution.

# data[].attributes.body
LAB MEAT IS EXPENSIVE

It is argued that lab meat has some drawbacks. For example, according to Kissairis Munoz (2021, p.5)lab meat is expensive due to a serum that is necessary for the stem cells to grow because there is TGF in serum that cost million for one gram. On other hand, lab meat production takes more time but demand  of lab meat is more than production. its take a time to grow tiny cells as compare to red meat which is easily available so that is why red meat is expensive.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
This essay will argue Human risk of diseases associated with red meat intake

# data[].attributes.body
To commence with, It can be disputed that problem with alternatives meat is lab is too expensive. As  James (2016,p.1) states that lab meat is manufactured by using harvesting stem cells or muscle cells  from taking living animals without hurting or using painless method. Then,

these cells are further used to create tissues in a culture way which are combined with serum until meat is produced for doing this procedure three to four highly qualified employees or well educated technical employees are required

to operate and maintain all the process in well manner way which receive handsome salaries package from artificial meat producing companies. As the result, it increases the cost of lab meat.

# data[].attributes.body
It can be argued that reducing the livestock related green house gases emission. For example,  Indira D and Srividya G (2012 p. 1) states that cattle rearing generate more global warming green house gases than driving cars. These green house gases leads to changes in the climate. This climate change affects the livestock, man and natural environment continuously. For this reason it is important for livestock farmers to find the ways which minimize these gases emission and the causes of climate change and effects, measures to be taken by farmers and their efficiency in reducing green house gases emission were reviewed briefly to make the farmers and students aware of the reduction of global warming green house gases and measures to be taken for reducing these gases.

# data[].attributes.body
It can be argued that there are many causes of red meat. For example, Daniel B. Ibsen et al.(2018, P.1) states that red meat to increased risk of two types of diabetes. And, red meat has large quantity of  saturated fat which may create heart diseases and diabetes. however, red meat helps to make bones strong as well as make new cells in human body. but, it might be risky for eating on daily basis. There are causes may be increased such as, lungs problems, cancer and so on. In summery, red meat can create many illnesses in human life during consume regularly.

# data[].attributes.body
On the flipside, it can be argued that there are many advantages of lab meat to environment, for example according to Thumba et al.(2017,pg 1) states that lab meat reduce the environmental problems such as land degradation ,greenhouse emission, water quality and air quality level reduces. The increase in population and livestock results in the increase in level of carbon dioxide ,methane gas , nitrous gas and so many other gases ,which ultimately results in increase of CO2 as every living being require oxygen for respiration and exhales carbon dioxide so as the population increases CO2 increases which degrades the environmental level and results in some contribution to global warming Global warming give rise to many new problems to the environment such as change in seasons ,unwanted floods ,drought and so on. Moreover the livestock also responsible for greenhouse emission for instance more the livestock for will be the overgrazing which leads to soil erosion ,that remove the nutrient layer washed off .So this is proven that lab meat is good over red meat and preserve the environment.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Answers - AN INVESTIGATION TO ASSESS MENTAL HEALTH RELATED PROBLEMS (DEPRESSION, AND STRESS) EXPERIENCED BY HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS DURING THE PANDEMIC

# data[].attributes.body
It can be disputed that there are numerous reasons of livestock production.For intense,Thuma at.el(2021)page no.1 state that livestock production create more problesms in atmosphere such as water pollution, soil pollution and land degradation