# data[].attributes.body
SPEECH CRITERIA

CONTENT (40%)
ORGANIZATION (30%) Even the most interesting content will fail to convince if the speech is disorganised
LANGUAGE (20%)
STYLE (10%) It should be given thought and practiced by the students, so its importance has to be reflected in the grade somewhat

# data[].attributes.body
1. Body Language 20-stands with confidence, eye contact, body gestures
2. Content 40-organization and message
3. Vocabulary 20 -use of different words appropriate to the level
4. Clarity 10-speaks clearly, slowly, in a loud voice in a fashion that we can understand
5. Interesting 10 (bonus)-persuades the class to listen

# data[].attributes.body
Rubric
1. Content (40)- The speech should be relevant to the motion and the ideas should be well organized in order to make the ground strong for the motion.
2. Language(30) - Use of correct grammar and formal speech.
3. Presentation(10)- Body Language and eye contact.
4. Fluency and Clarity (20)

# data[].attributes.body
I would suggest FACE
Fluency and flow-structured and coherent(200
Accuracy- few mistakes appropriate voc.(20)
content- relevant and clear to the point(40)
effort- has to do with style and contact with the audience(20)

# data[].attributes.body
Never easy adjudicating a speech and being absolutely objective about it.
Content and organisation are so intertwined but it has to be well organised so that the point is clear and the content relevant to the debate 40pts
Delivery and style have to be good as they are the main method of communication 30pts
Language includes vocabulary grammar etc 30pts

# data[].attributes.body
Rubric for adjudicating a speech:
I struggled with this rubric because I believe that all of these issues are so intertwined. Without good organization, your content is meaningless. With too many language mistakes, it's hard to follow your organization... and again, content is therefore rendered meaningless. And I believe the same can be said for style, because if a presentation is too boring or too fast, it doesn't matter how good your organization, content and language is, no one is going to be listening.

Organization:  20 points
Content:  40 points
Language:  20 points
Style:  20 points

# data[].attributes.body
Susan Strikovsky

1. Content, organisation, language and presentation

2. Content is important because we need to judge our students on their ability to explain themselves and provide relevant arguments.

Organisation- building up a logical structure is important.
Language- Accuracy in grammar and spelling. Use of high level grammar forms and varied vocabulary is necessary. As well as working on their English skills, it is part of giving a convincing speech.
Presentation- Body language and eye contact is important to convince one's audience.

3) Most important is content, then organisation. Following that language and presentation.

4) Content- 50%
Organisation- 20%
Language-20%
Style-10%

# data[].attributes.body
My students need to prepare a three-point speech based on three clashes they have reviewed with the class before.  The evaluation of their work will be based upon the following:
Structure – students will use an opening, body and a closing/conclusion. (20 pts)
Content  - students will explain and illustrate each clash of the three clashes (3 x 20pts)
Presentation – students will speak loud enough and clearly, will use appropriate body language, and be confident in their message.   (20 pts)

# data[].attributes.headline
Adjudicating a speech structure which is the same as any essay they would write.   The speech should be organised and contain a Introduction, Body and Conclusion.                                            The speaker must pull in the listeners with interesting facts as well as having their speech be relevant and flowing.

# data[].attributes.subject
Adjudicating a speech structure which is the same as any essay they would write.   The speech should be organised and contain a Introduction, Body and Conclusion.                                            The speaker must pull in the listeners with interesting facts as well as having their speech be relevant and flowing.

# data[].attributes.body
Inna Dukorskaya

# data[].attributes.body
Rubric for assessing a Speech

1.Organisation- logical, well structured and clear.

2.Content - appropriate and clear , good arguements.

3.Language- High level , fluent.
4.Presentation- clear and confident , good body language.

# data[].attributes.body
Adjudicating a speech

* structure- Introduction
Body
Closing
* Flow
* Relevance  of the argument
* Creating an interest in the audience

# data[].attributes.body
Elina Averbouch
1. Structure:
Proper openinga nd closing, well-defined arguments and explanation
2. Style:
clarity, being convincing, persuading techniques, body language, tone
3. Language
4. Content:
good arguments, appropriate explanation, examples, research involved

# data[].attributes.body
Rubrics for speech delivery:
Content: 50 points
content is relevant and to the point
Delivery and Style: 30 points
The speaker is fluent and clear. Uses his body language to convey a message, uses eye contact
Organization and Time: 20 points
Speech has an organized structure, and is used within the range of time allowed.

# data[].attributes.body
Rubrics for adjudicating  a speech:
1. content-
* audience relevant topic- is the topic sited to the target audience?
*  relevancy of arguments
*examples
* main idea
*structure- is the speech clear, is it organized correctly?
2. style-
* clarity of speaking ( tone, projection)
*body language, confidence, enthusiasm- do thy support the speech?
3. language register- language register should correlate with the targeted audience  as well as the topic.

# data[].attributes.body
Adjudicating a speech
Relevance: Presentations should be relevant to the motion and the definition of the motion. Competitors should not avoid specific issues that need to be addressed. Analysis: A Speaker should demonstrate an understanding of the larger issues, including the overall theme of the Debating Competition. All points should be tied to the motion. Examples should be used to prove points. Presentations should not contain unsubstantiated assertions or logical flaws. Evidence: Relevant examples and authorities are vital and their absence should be penalised. However, if an Adjudicator has expert knowledge in a particular field and sees a mistaken use of an example in a Speaker's case, the Speaker should not be penalised unless the opposition has highlighted the error. Logic: Logic is the chain of reasoning used to prove an argument. The Speaker must state, explain and illustrate each of his or her arguments.

# data[].attributes.body
Adjudicating a speech
Organization- The speaker begins with a proper opening and moves along properly. (30 points)
Content  The message is to the point and well explained. (50 points)
Coherence Proper use of language. Student is clearly understood. (20 points)

# data[].attributes.body
1.  Content - the speaker conveys his message, gets his points across. (40 points)
2.  Delivery - The speaker was interesting, connected to the audience, kept eye contact. (20 points)
3. Organization - The speech was logical, clear and well structured. (40 points)

# data[].attributes.body
Ellen Haskell
1. Content and Organization: has an introduction, body and conclusion. Clear arguments. Use of connecting words. (40 points )
2. Delivery: holds attention of the audience, makes eye contact. Tone of voice adds to speech, body language (35 points)
3. Language: use of proper basic language structures. Some advanced language (35 points)

# data[].attributes.body
Naomi Feinmesser
1. Organisation - speech contains a clear opening, body and conclusion. Does not repeat oneself (30)
2. Content - chose a good clash, gave appropriate examples, included facts where relevant (30)
3. Language - use of high level and appropriate language (20)
4. Presentation - speaks clearly, good body language, engages the audience (20)

# data[].attributes.body
1.)introduction of the teme-(20)
2)structure of the debate (opening,body and closing.relevant arguments and clashes (20)
3)speech-clarity of speech+style(20)
4)body language(20)
5)organizing
time(20)

# data[].attributes.headline
netanela levy- criteria for judging a speech:

# data[].attributes.subject
netanela levy- criteria for judging a speech:

# data[].attributes.body
1. organization - proper opening, body and ending (good clashes and arguments) 40p
2. examples/ facts relevant to the topic. each clash has to be supported by examples/ facts. 20p
3. appropriate language - use proper English and grammar. Avoide using "every day language"/ slang. 20p
4. style - tone, gesture, eye contact. Avoide touching your hair, your clothes or have a fast/ slow pace. 10p
5. time - speak within time limits given. 10p

# data[].attributes.headline
Criteria for judging a speech (Sharon Foreman)

# data[].attributes.subject
Criteria for judging a speech (Sharon Foreman)

# data[].attributes.body
1. Organization - proper opening, body and closing are clearly presented and on topic (30).
2. Use of examples and / or facts - use of relevant research data and relevant examples (20).
3.Use of appropriate language register (20).
4. Presentation style - tone of voice, use of gestures, passion, eye contact. (20).
5. Time - within allotted time (10).

# data[].attributes.body
introduction of the debate  theme-opening(20)
structure of the debate-using clear clashes and arguments(20)
speech-understandable and comprehensible speech(20)
team work(20)
summary(20)

# data[].attributes.body
Argument (40 pts) refers to the following: use of definitions; relevance and content of the arguments; use of evidence and logic;
Presentation and style (40 pts) describes the way the speaker handled himself during the debate and related to fluency, conviction, clarity, the use of gestures, etc.
Structure (20 pts)– refers to the way overall organization and integration of concepts, examples, explanations.

# data[].attributes.headline
Rubric for Adjudicating a Speech                                    1.Good structure, proper introduction and conclusion, and use of signal words 25 pts;  This is important in order to make a speech easy to understand.                                    Clarity of speech (articulation, pronunciation, appropriate pace)- 25 pts; this also helps make a speech tangible.                         Use of relevant examples- 10 points; the proper examples make the speech moreinteresting and help the audience connect to the topic.                           Logically  developed explanation and analyzed substance-25 points; this is important for further understanding of the topic. Convincing way of delivering-25 points ; important for a better perception of the speech.        

# data[].attributes.subject
Rubric for Adjudicating a Speech                                    1.Good structure, proper introduction and conclusion, and use of signal words 25 pts;  This is important in order to make a speech easy to understand.                                    Clarity of speech (articulation, pronunciation, appropriate pace)- 25 pts; this also helps make a speech tangible.                         Use of relevant examples- 10 points; the proper examples make the speech moreinteresting and help the audience connect to the topic.                           Logically  developed explanation and analyzed substance-25 points; this is important for further understanding of the topic. Convincing way of delivering-25 points ; important for a better perception of the speech.        