# data[].attributes.body
Results were v interesting and unexpected. Wonder if 45-50 marks range difference makes any difference in the overall.

# data[].attributes.body
The 2019 batch I taught, many teachers mentioned that they were a very diligent batch and we all had high hopes for them. This year's batch, in comparison, seems less enthusiastic and more bochup but surprisely the mean score is actually the same at 61.2.

# data[].attributes.body
More pupils in 2019 than in 2021. Still have lots of improvement for quality passes for 2021 cohort

# data[].attributes.body
Comparable or getting better. But cohort size is also different. Nevertheless, we are doing well though can achieve better.

# data[].attributes.body
P6 Std - performance lower in 2021 compared to 2019 (comparing to AL 1, 2 with A* and A)

P6 Fdn - performance in 2021 better 2019 (lesser 50 marks, and below in 2021 to 2019)

# data[].attributes.headline
P6 Foundation did well or better, compared to 2019.

# data[].attributes.subject
P6 Foundation did well or better, compared to 2019.

# data[].attributes.body
I wonder if it is accurate to compare grades with AL

# data[].attributes.body
Is class size in 2021 smaller? If yes, smaller class size may result in better result. Keep classes small esp for Science for more interactions and quality experiences.

# data[].attributes.body
If we were to compare the cohorts, assuming that the current batch indeed is more bo chup, then the possible causes could be that as we go along, teachers gained more experience/ learning / mastery of teaching, hence after 2 years, we managed to bring our students, even the weaker ones, to greater heights.

# data[].attributes.body
This cohort has SLS to support their learning

# data[].attributes.body
Looks like whether or not the students get to conduct experiments in sci lab doesn't really matter but rather is the quality of teaching/apps/platforms we use in class :) Keep up the good job, teachers! :))

# data[].attributes.headline
AL1 and AL2 are they quality passes? Its lower than 2019.

# data[].attributes.subject
AL1 and AL2 are they quality passes? Its lower than 2019.

# data[].attributes.body
Our intervention comes earlier.

# data[].attributes.body
Need to "match" the old previous PSLE scores to the new AL, not very sure but it seems more difficult for them to score AL 1-4 now as most of them will hover at AL 6 (45-64) it is a wide range that spans across PSLE grade B, C and D.

# data[].attributes.body
Level teachers use the reflection journals that allowed students to consolidate learning. Intensive discussion of topics allowed Teachers to be more prepared in teaching the topic.

# data[].attributes.body
Hands-on experiments help in experiential learning but may not affect results because in 2020, they were not exposed too much with hands-on experiments but this year the marks are comparable to 2019.

# data[].attributes.body
Considering the disruption of learning in 2020, the 2021 cohort is still able to attain comparable mean mark this year. Maybe the active learning approach works and this year's cohort are more self-directed?

# data[].attributes.body
in 2021, More students obtain Band 1 and 2 than band 3, as compared to 2019. Still quite a lot pupils in band 4 in 2021 which is comparable to that in 2019.

# data[].attributes.body
Did HBL/self-directed learning help the motivated/HP pupils do better while those less motivated/LP are left behind, widening the gap?