# data[].attributes.headline
This quote is showing that there is a wide range of moral pathways one can take.

# data[].attributes.subject
This quote is showing that there is a wide range of moral pathways one can take.

# data[].attributes.body
Through Lady Macbeth's quote, Shakespeare is saying that while two people may be similar in their actions, they can either be truthful and admit to their faults, or pretend to be innocent and continue to lie and deceive others to keep them from discovering the truth.Through this play, Shakespeare is showing the audience how taking the path full of lies, deceit, and cowardice will ultimately lead to one's downfall. Lady Macbeth was the main perpetrator in chastising Macbeth into stop showing regret and guilt for killing Duncan and to just move past it and be strong willed, whereas she turned on her own advice and mentally deteriorated as the play progressed. While Lady Macbeth's efforts were wrongly placed, she is nonetheless a very strong character, at least in the beginning of the play, who has the determination to do whatever it takes to achieve her and her husband's goals. In this scene especially, she is able to show emotional strength with mental clarity in a time of heightened stress and anxiety to refocus Macbeth. Without her support and guidance, Macbeth would probably not have been as successful in obtaining the crown. Although the cause to which her efforts were supporting were heinous crimes, her mental sharpness and strength should still be commemorated.

# data[].attributes.body
This would be a euphemized version of Lady Macbeth's conversation with Macbeth in which she tells him to stop acting so cowardice and to have courage to move past the emotions from killing Duncan and re-focus on the goal of becoming King of Scotland.

# data[].attributes.body
Bonnie and Clyde are the infamous power couple who represent the ruthlessness and strong will that Lady Macbeth hoped her and Macbeth could have after Macbeth killed Duncan.

# data[].attributes.body
This picture is a still frame of one re-enacted version of Macbeth by Rupert Goold's of Act II, scene 2 in which Lady Macbeth is speaking the quote.

# data[].attributes.headline
"The fears that once controlled me, can't get to me at all...conceal, don't feel, don't let them know... don't let them see... I'm never going back, the past is in the past! Let it go, let it go... That perfect girl is gone."

# data[].attributes.subject
"The fears that once controlled me, can't get to me at all...conceal, don't feel, don't let them know... don't let them see... I'm never going back, the past is in the past! Let it go, let it go... That perfect girl is gone."

# data[].attributes.body
Lady Macbeth has aided in the murder of Duncan thus her hands are not clean from the murder and she is forever changed from the woman she used to be, as seen in her psychotic breakdown later in the play. The lyrics in this song also echo the advice Lady Macbeth is giving Macbeth in this scene of not worrying about the implications of his actions and to stop being such a coward and to conceal his emotions from the rest of the world.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
FROZEN | Let It Go Sing-along | Official Disney UK

# data[].attributes.body
Lady Macbeth realizes after her and her husband have worked together to kill Duncan, that neither of them should pretend to have a white heart that represents innocence, purity, and good-naturedness.

# data[].attributes.headline
There was and is much controversy if O.J. Simpson was truly guilty or innocent for the murder of Nicole Simpson because he never showed the public if his heart was truly white, pure, and innocent or the opposite.

# data[].attributes.subject
There was and is much controversy if O.J. Simpson was truly guilty or innocent for the murder of Nicole Simpson because he never showed the public if his heart was truly white, pure, and innocent or the opposite.

# data[].attributes.body
"He remains imprisoned in the Waupun Correctional Institution in Waupon, Wisc....She plans to order new testing, some of which was not possible during the original trial..hopes that the new evidence, combined with new theories and the revisiting of old evidence, could be enough to free Mr. Avery, 54."

Increased attention and publicity about the trial and convicting evidence in Steven Avery's murder case of 2005 due to a Netflix documentary has rallied for the release and exoneration of Mr. Avery. In the case, there is reason to believe crucial pieces of evidence may have been falsely staged and access to advanced DNA screening could provide substantial evidence to free Mr. Avery. In Mr. Avery's previous arrest for sexually assaulting a woman, he was freed from prison after DNA testing revealed he was not the murderer. The courts realized their mistake and corrected their wrongful conviction, however they still are not cleared of giving Mr. Avery the justice he deserves in reopening his current case.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
She hopes that the new evidence, combined with new theories and the revisiting of old evidence, could be enough to free Mr. Avery, 54.

"There is evidence that already exists in the case that points to a different location and a different suspect," Ms. Zellner said. "We've got a combination of forensic evidence and a tip from somebody that we've interviewed multiple times that we think is credible."

Her alternate-suspect theory has not been presented before, she said. But she declined to elaborate, saying details would emerge after the new forensic testing.

What evidence tied Mr. Avery to the murder?

Prosecutors cited several pieces of physical evidence linking Mr. Avery to the crime when he was convicted. Investigators discovered:

■ His blood in Ms. Halbach's car, which was found on his salvage yard property;

■ His sweat under the latch of her car's hood;

■ Her DNA on a bullet in his garage;

■ And his DNA on a key to her car that was found in his bedroom.

Ms. Zellner said new forms of testing could prove that the physical evidence had been planted, echoing a prominent suggestion of the Netflix series. Most of the tests can be done within a few weeks, she said, adding, "It's possible all of it will be done within 60 days."

She added: "It may not all be successful, but I believe if even one bit of evidence is planted, the conviction is going to be vacated."

What about Mr. Dassey?

Mr. Dassey was 16 at the time of the murder in Manitowoc County, Wisc. The judge ruled that he had been improperly interrogated without a parent or lawyer present, leading to a coerced confession.

He will be released from prison unless the authorities decide within 90 days to schedule a new trial. The judge's ruling does not directly affect Mr. Avery's case.

What do prosecutors say?

At this point, Ms. Zellner's arguments for Mr. Avery's innocence are absent any point-by-point rebuttal from prosecutors, as would happen in a trial.

"The attorney general and Wisconsin Department of Justice will make their arguments in court and feel confident Mr. Avery's conviction will be upheld," Johnny Koremenos, a spokesman for Attorney General Brad Schimel, said in a statement.

"Of course, the attorney general wants to see justice prevail and will evaluate any new, credible evidence brought forward."

The prosecutor in Mr. Avery's murder trial, Ken Kratz, said in January that the Netflix documentary "really presents misinformation," and he accused the filmmakers of withholding details that were unflattering to Mr. Avery.

"Steven Avery committed this murder and this mutilation, and Steven Avery is exactly where he needs to be," he said.

What questions did the Netflix series raise?

"Making a Murderer," the 10-part series created by Laura Ricciardi and Moira Demos, focused on the intertwined cases of Mr. Avery and Mr. Dassey and left doubts about the legitimacy of their convictions.

The filmmakers have said that they were inspired by a front-page 2005 story in The New York Times, but the case mostly drew only local attention until the Netflix series was released in December. That spurred an onslaught of support for Mr. Avery, including a defense fund and petitions to free him.

Before the murder case unfolded, Mr. Avery was convicted of sexual assault in 1985, spending 18 years in prison - only to be exonerated in 2003. Less than two years after his release, he was arrested in the killing of Ms. Halbach, who had gone to his property to photograph a car for Auto Trader magazine.

Ms. Zellner, who is based in Chicago and has helped exonerate 17 people of wrongful convictions, said she was motivated to take Mr. Avery's case partly because "Making a Murderer" showed the public that law enforcement officials can coerce false confessions.

"I've never seen a more graphic, compelling illustration of a crime scene that was fabricated," she said.

The documentary raised the possibility that Mr. Avery's blood that was recovered from the inside Ms. Halbach's car had been planted from a vial collected in 1996 for the sexual assault case.

Ms. Zellner said one of the tests she hopes to run will date Mr. Avery's blood used as evidence in the murder conviction.

Additional tests would identify the source of other physical evidence cited by prosecutors. For instance, the lawyer says that among the evidence she believes had been planted is Ms. Halbach's bones, which were found in a burn pit on his property.

Ms. Zellner also points to Ms. Halbach's car, where Mr. Avery's blood was found in the front and Ms. Halbach's was found in the back. The forensic scientists she spoke to said there would likely be a mixture of their blood, she said.

"This is a crime scene that just doesn't make sense," she said.

New experts would speak to the findings from those new tests, she said. One expert "could have been called at the trial but wasn't," she added.

What are Mr. Avery's next steps?

Mr. Avery's past legal maneuverings have failed.

A federal judge denied his request for a new trial in 2010, and the Wisconsin Supreme Court declined to review the case. He filed an appeal on his own behalf in January; it is pending. He remains imprisoned in the Waupun Correctional Institution in Waupon, Wisc.

Ms. Zellner said her interest was not in the existing appeal, which would not allow her to present new evidence. She said she intended to take it to the trial-court level and request an evidentiary hearing for the new material.

She said she believed he's innocent. She said she had visited Mr. Avery in prison after Mr. Dassey's ruling, and he appeared happy and shocked by the news.

"I think he just couldn't believe anything good had happened," she said.

Netflix has signed on for a second season of "Making a Murderer," and Ms. Zellner has granted the filmmakers interviews. No release date has been revealed.

Ms. Ricciardi and Ms. Demos said in a statement, "As we have done for the past 10 years, we will continue to document the story as it unfolds, and follow it wherever it may lead."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
murders  attempted murders and homicides

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Steven Avery, of 'Making a Murderer,' Eyes Freedom After Co-Defendant's Conviction Is Overturned

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
She hopes that the new evidence, combined with new theories and the revisiting of old evidence, could be enough to free Mr. Avery, 54. "There is evidence that already exists in the case that points to a different location and a different suspect," Ms. Zellner said.

# data[].attributes.body
"Med-West, a medical marijuana business, paid federal and state taxes and was licensed by San Diego County to distribute marijuana and cannabis products. Medicinal marijuana is legal in California...But in January, San Diego police and agents from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency raided the business and seized everything, even though it did not charge anyone. The district attorney then used asset forfeiture to seize the bank accounts of Slatic, his wife and their two teenage daughters."
The Justice System is meant to protect the people from injustice and abide by the law when they are the ones confiscating a man's property without warrant or arrest, going against US citizen's fourth amendment right . Even if the Slatic family is guilty of the crime accused of, the Justice system should not act as if they are innocently following the law because their methods of investigation, in this case at least, are not always correct.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
James Slatic was never charged with a crime, but he now has to go to court to get his legal business, his inventory and his $324,000 in cash back from the San Diego County district attorney's office.

To make matters worse, 35 employees at Slatic's company, Med-West Distribution, lost their jobs, their health insurance and their retirement accounts due to the seizure.

"It's the dirty little secret of the American justice system," Slatic told The San Diego Union-Tribune. "They can come in and take all your money and property just on the say-so of a police officer. Once they do that, you have to go to court and prove why your money is not guilty."

Med-West, a medical marijuana business, paid federal and state taxes and was licensed by San Diego County to distribute marijuana and cannabis products. Medicinal marijuana is legal in California. The company even had a website. But in January, San Diego police and agents from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency raided the business and seized everything, even though it did not charge anyone. The district attorney then used asset forfeiture to seize the bank accounts of Slatic, his wife and their two teenage daughters.
Get Out Of The Rat-Race And Make Money Off-Grid!
Without any money, the business folded.

"I'm a 57-year-old entrepreneur and businessman," Slatic told the newspaper. "You always think the laws are designed to protect middle-class gray-haired guys supplying jobs, then one day you wake up with 28 helmeted SWAT guys with automatic weapons breaking down your front door with a sledge hammer."
Story continues below video
He added, "I have a drawer full of business tax certificates. We weren't some clandestine operation. We were across the street from a Mercedes-Benz dealership."

According to The Union-Tribune, San Diego police Detective Mark Carlson cited state law that "doesn't allow manufacture of a controlled substance using a process of chemical extraction." Slatic, though, countered that his business refined the oils but didn't extract them.

"Based upon my review of Wells Fargo documents and documents provided by Schools First and North Island Credit Union, James Slatic has transferred significant funds from his concentrated cannabis extraction business to his wife Annette Slatic, who in turn has deposited some of these funds, at least $210,200 into her Wells Fargo accounts," Carlson wrote.

Slatic is represented by the Institute for Justice.

"This case is not about crime fighting," Institute for Justice attorney Wesley Hottot said. "This case is about policing for profit, and it illustrates the abusive power of civil forfeiture at its worst."
Want To Know About The REAL Constitution And What The Founders Truly Intended?
The Institute for Justice argued in its legal motion: "Writing a check to one's wife is hardly suspicious and the government has made no effort to show why it is suspicious in this case."

A court hearing is scheduled for Nov. 14.

"The equipment that Carlson describes - a rotary evaporator - can only be used for refinement," the motion said. "Indeed it is impossible to use a rotary evaporator to extract cannabis oil from raw marijuana, as expert testimony at the hearing will show."

Authorities in San Diego County have collected more than $11 million in civil asset forfeiture over the past three years, The Union-Tribune reported. The district attorney's office received $2.4 million of that money which it used for training, rewards, memorials and grants to nonprofit groups.

"One of the insidious things about civil forfeiture is it costs a lot of money to fight for your money back," Hottot said. "The Slatics can't afford to continue paying for attorneys. The only reason they are able to challenge this now is that they found pro bono counsel."

Medical marijuana is legal in California "whether the District Attorney likes it or not," the Institute for Justice asserts on its website.

"While civil forfeiture can be complicated, the Slatics' legal argument is simple: James committed no crime; therefore, the government cannot connect the Slatics' money to a crime. All of the family's money must be returned under the California Constitution and the U.S. Constitution," the Institute for Justice argues.
What is your reaction? Share your thoughts in the section below: Tired Of Losing Freedoms - And Looking For Another Country? Read More Here.
© Copyright Off The Grid News

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Police Raided Legal Business, Seized $324,000, Forced 35 To Lose Jobs - But Never Charged Anyone

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
James Slatic was never charged with a crime, but he now has to go to court to get his legal business, his inventory and his $324,000 in cash back from the San Diego County district attorney's office. To make matters worse, 35 employees at Slatic's company, Med-West Distribution, lost their jobs, their health insurance and their retirement accounts due to the seizure.

# data[].attributes.body
"Some accuse Clinton of being a congenital liar... Hillary Clinton's defense is that her opponent is worse. Meanwhile, Trump seems to be fighting everyone, including himself. The list of those he offends is huge."
In the case of the recent election, both candidates were equally terrible in the eyes of most voters. Trump was shown in a leaked video vocally degrading women and Clinton showed her carelessness and unreliability in the Ben Gahzi case. Both candidates were guilty of participating in unfavorable acts however still acted like they were innocent upstanding people who deserved to lead our country.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Asked why he robbed banks, Willie Sutton answered, "It's where the money is." His answer remains a classic example of clarity through simplicity. This contrasts with politicians' obfuscations that are accepted and repeated by the media - or just ignored. The New York Times did not bother to mention 's first post-convention interview where she said the Director of the FBI had confirmed the truth of all she had divulged about her e-mail. She was seemingly oblivious to his point-by-point not-quite-an-indictment of her in front of Congress.

Clinton wants to be the first woman president, but Millennials are not enthusiastically waiting for this "achievement." Instead, many want governmental change, particularly the movements of Sen. and . President sought to rebrand his wife, calling her a "change-maker" during his speech at the Democratic National Convention. He ignored President Obama's touting her continuity with his administration. She is thus both for stability and change simultaneously. Typical politician.

Trump is emphatically not a politician. He does everything contrary to the political norm, speaking when he should be quiet, saying flat-out wrong things, or worse, being outrageous. He is more than politically incorrect. The "have you read the Constitution" question at the DNC struck a chord because it reflected a stereotype. He is a billionaire, whose reality show's tagline, "You're Fired," captures his, "my way or the highway" attitude.

Trump gives voice to the deep anger of so many millions in the electorate who want something done - even if they do not know what that want to be done. He is redefining the Republican Party, appealing to both Democratic and Republican voters ready for a 'Second American Revolution.' Our 'First' used guns because "Taxation without representation is tyranny."

The US is divided. The lie, "Hands up. Don't Shoot," has become the mantra of the Black Lives Movement. They ignore the increase in black-on-black murders to focus on racist police who hunt unarmed young black men; while denying any involvement in the ambushes against the police - men and women.

The gap between the political elite and our citizens is growing. There must be a reason to enter government service instead of a law firm partnership. Perhaps it is because there is so much of other's money to spend at the higher levels or the contacts with the rich that ensue. The past decade has seen the 1 percent grow richer. It does seem our laws are not applied evenly. Many felt that Hillary Clinton could never be indicted. They were right.

The negative polling for both candidates is unprecedented. Some accuse Clinton of being a congenital liar. Her supporters don't seem to care. Hillary Clinton's defense is that her opponent is worse. Meanwhile, Trump seems to be fighting everyone, including himself. The list of those he offends is huge. It includes many of the Conservative establishment, some of whom publicly eschew supporting him - which he takes as an emblem of honor.

Americans have to choose between the devil they know and the other. In this election, who is which? Hillary Clinton's campaign director says we will know her after we elect her. This is a bit akin to Rep. Nancy Pelosi's statement about Obamacare, that we have to pass the law to find out what is in it. Six years later, we continue to find out new reasons to be unhappy with its contents. Trump, though, seems as bad. He promises to act presidentially, and then opens his mouth. Does he have the discipline to act otherwise? It is hard to see this by his actions.

It is also hard to see the United States suffering. Our economy is sputtering but unemployment is officially low, and laughed at. The Government counts millions of part-time workers, but not those who cannot find jobs - now moved overseas. Respect for Law is passé, with the National Security violations non-indictment, and the President's executive actions on Immigration. Our nation is deeply in debt, yet our infrastructure is crumbling, with bridges falling, an obsolete power grid, and drinking waters tainted.

"Leading from behind" has given us Libya, Syria, Iran, Ukraine, Russia, China, and a host of other problems. ISIS grew after we withdrew from Iraq, ignored our 'red line' and left a void. State-sponsor of terrorism, Iran, received $150 billion - with $400 million sent in cash, at night, in an unmarked plane. A non-treaty, executive action, gives Iran a path possessing nuclear arms; even as it did not slow their work in building ICBMs. The list seems endless.

Americans do not accept this economy and daily terrorism as the new normal. Some 80 percent feel the nation is on the wrong path; that their children will have a worse life. Americans must decide which bad candidate to vote for. On the one hand, Trump has money - a great deal of it. His over 200 companies generated billions over a 40-year span. Hillary Clinton and her husband have a great deal of wealth, too. After his Presidency ended, they were dead-broke. Since then, they earned several hundred thousand dollars per hour for speaking. Hillary Clinton's going-rate increased while . Hillary Clinton was the Secretary of State, charging in some cases, $750,000.

Surprisingly, speaking fees are only a minor part of the treasure the Hillary Clinton's have at their disposal. The Clinton Foundation amassed over one billion dollars in just a few years. The FBI is investigating whether donors received special considerations from the State Department while . Hillary Clinton was the Secretary, and while so many of her emails were deleted, they were, after all, about yoga.

Donald Trump's battle against Hillary Clinton offers a huge contrast. Trump already has money made from the private sector. Hillary Clinton seems to have proven that the path through the public sector can yield millions, or more. Their vision for America starts with Trump seeing huge problems, while . Hillary Clinton thinks things are fine, and we just need a few minor adjustments to deal with inequalities.

Which of them will win? Hopefully, it will be the person who empowers the best of America to return us to that place atop a hill. Hillary Clinton's "way" has parsed words, lists of enemies, paranoia of the press, and a billion-dollar Foundation receiving huge gifts from those in power. Trump's "way" has unfiltered words, walls keeping enemies out, love of press, and a billion-dollar company giving gifts to those in power. The existence of a major FBI investigation is a 'yuuuuuge' difference - but only to some. The battle will be epic. Which "way" will prevail?
Czuchnicki led World-Wide Communications at AIG & AMEX Systems Planning and has since consulted around the world. He is the founder and author of the The views expressed by Contributors are their own and are not the views of The Hill. Be More Better book series.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Asked why he robbed banks, Willie Sutton answered, "It's where the money is." His answer remains a classic example of clarity through simplicity. This contrasts with politicians' obfuscations that are accepted and repeated by the media - or just ignored.

# data[].attributes.headline
"My hands are of your color Gabriella, but I shame to wear a heart so white."

# data[].attributes.subject
"My hands are of your color Gabriella, but I shame to wear a heart so white."

# data[].attributes.body
I said my quote to my friend's sister and she was really confused and didn't know what I was talking about and thought I was talking about race.

"My hands are of your color Ashley, but I shame to wear a heart so white."
I said this to my sister after she had stolen one of my shirts and she thought I was very weird and was insulting her.

"My hands are of your color Juliana, but I shame to wear a heart so white."
I said this to my friend Juliana who is also taking AP Lit and she had the same quote for her quote analysis project as I did.

# data[].attributes.headline
"My hands are of your color, but I shame to wear a heart so white."

# data[].attributes.subject
"My hands are of your color, but I shame to wear a heart so white."

# data[].attributes.body
Lady Macbeth, Act II scene 2, Lines 63-64
I chose this quote because it seemed like it dealt with the interesting topic of guilt in the play, a topic that would be recognizable in today's society.