# data[].attributes.body
From P3: 'Animals should not be given human-like rights because it does not have sentience, the ability to experience feelings, that qualifies a being for rights.'

Passage 3 points out that animals lack self-awareness, consciousness, feelings, and the ability to think. Therefore they should not be conferred the same freedoms and expectations that we provide for humans. This supports the claim in paragraph 1 that they are merely a collection of bodily impulses and not at all intelligent entities capable of thought and feeling.

# data[].attributes.body
Q1)

I) Animals have a different way of experiencing the world and hence should not be given the same rights of human beings.

II) The feelings expressed by animals are lacking in judgement and hence they are not emotional states

Q2)

I) While animals have awareness, they lack the ability to see their value as individuals that would make them worthy of having rights

II) This challenges the notion that they have rights because the notion of rights require one to understand and justify.

# data[].attributes.body
Passage 3 states that animals do not have a sense of self or the capacity for emotions. They do not reflect on their past actions without emotion. This parallels the phrase in passage 1 that animals act out of a natural reflect unlike most human.

# data[].attributes.body
l3-5: The expression an animal displays upon committing a wrongdoing is not a real indication of regret but rather a reaction to the owner reprimanding it.

This proves animals react intuitively to the situation, in this case the owner’s displeasure, rather than a logical response expected in that situation, in this case regret.

# data[].attributes.body
P3 writes animals cannot feel emotions. Their lack of capacity for emotions reinforces the statement in Passage 1 saying that they lack self-awareness, their actions are instinctual and they cannot experience feelings.

# data[].attributes.body
According to Passage 3, the author claims that animals lack self-consciousness and are therefore undeserving of rights (1m)

This reinforces the idea in Passage 1 that by virtue of the fact they make decisions that is not based on cognition, animals should not be given rights. (1m)

# data[].attributes.body
From P3: 'they lack the sense of self and self-worth that would enable them to understand and describe why they deserve rights'.

Passage 3 points out that animals do not possess the capacity to recognise, process, and articulate their own value, and should therefore be excluded from human rights as a result. This undermines the idea stated in Passage 2 that animals are creatures capable of feeling and must hence necessarily be recognised as having innate worth.

# data[].attributes.body
passage 3 says that animals do not have a sense of meaning of themselves as individuals and hence this contradicts passage 2 which suggests that because animals are alive, they automatically have worth.

# data[].attributes.body
Passage 3 says animals do not have self-awareness with no sense of their own value, which contradicts the statement in Passage 2 that they have no capacity to feel and respond to their environment and no sense of self-respect.

# data[].attributes.body
The statement in Passage 3 that describes animals as not being conscious about their being, and not being cognizant of self-esteem and thus not knowing what it means to have rights, undermines the statement in Passage 2 as to be cognizant of one's value and worth, one has to have knowledge of one's position in the universe.

# data[].attributes.body
l7: Animals do not have a sense of identity and dignity.

Hence, without these, they would be unable to comprehend and justify why they are to viewed as creatures whose life has innate value.

# data[].attributes.body
Passage Three's last line states that after one has made a choice, one would be reluctant to face a revelation that the initial choice was wrong. This supports the statement in passage 2 as it asks a rhetorical question that points out that for people, there is a tendency to look at the array of options and blame it for the initial wrong choice made.