# data[].attributes.headline
Image 1: Maria Shepherd's Acquittal Celebration

# data[].attributes.subject
Image 1: Maria Shepherd's Acquittal Celebration

# data[].attributes.body
Relevance to Topic: This image likely captures a moment from Maria Shepherd's life post-acquittal. Summary: The image shows a celebratory moment, presumably after Maria Shepherd's acquittal, representing her triumph over a wrongful conviction.

# data[].attributes.headline
Image 2: TV News Channel Screen Featuring Headlines on Maria Shepherd's Case

# data[].attributes.subject
Image 2: TV News Channel Screen Featuring Headlines on Maria Shepherd's Case

# data[].attributes.body
Relevance to Topic: This TV news channel screen appears to showcase headlines and information related to Maria Shepherd's case.

Summary: The image is a snapshot of a TV news channel screen with headlines and updates regarding Maria Shepherd's case, likely highlighting her wrongful conviction, subsequent exoneration, and the role of Charles Smith in the case. It provides a visual representation of the media coverage surrounding the case

# data[].attributes.headline
Image 3: Newspaper Cutting About Maria Shepherd's Acquittal

# data[].attributes.subject
Image 3: Newspaper Cutting About Maria Shepherd's Acquittal

# data[].attributes.body
Relevance to Topic: This newspaper cutting likely reports on Maria Shepherd's acquittal.

Summary: The newspaper cutting is a historical record of Maria Shepherd's acquittal, a pivotal moment in her life, marking her exoneration from a wrongful conviction and highlighting the issues with Charles Smith's forensic work in her case.

# data[].attributes.body
Relevance: This article is highly relevant as it provides a detailed account of the wrongful conviction of Maria Shepherd, shedding light on the critical role played by Charles Smith's flawed forensic work. It highlights the profound consequences of wrongful convictions and the subsequent efforts to rectify them.

Summary: Maria Shepherd's case is a tragic example of a wrongful conviction. Her stepdaughter's illness, Smith's erroneous forensic conclusions, and Shepherd's guilty plea due to overwhelming evidence are outlined. A decade later, revelations of Smith's misconduct led to an appeal and exoneration in 2016. Maria Shepherd now advocates for the wrongfully convicted.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
In January 1991, Maria Shepherd's three-year-old stepdaughter, Kasandra, developed stomach flu symptoms. Her illness did not resolve and she suffered significant weight loss. Kasandra was hospitalized in February and placed on an IV drip. Doctors were unable to reach a diagnosis, but she was released four weeks later since her condition had somewhat improved.

Charles Smith, then regarded as a leading pediatric forensic pathologist, conducted Kasandra's post-mortem examination. Smith observed a bruise on the underside of Kasandra's scalp at the back of her head, and bleeding in her brain in that area. He concluded that she had died from one or more "blows to the back of her head." At Smith's request, police searched Kasandra's home for objects roughly corresponding to the shape of her bruise. They seized Shepherd's watch, which Smith concluded matched up to the bruise. He told police his opinion that Shepherd had struck and killed Kasandra.

Shepherd's lawyer attempted, without success, to find an expert witness who could challenge Smith's opinion. If she chose to stand trial, she would almost certainly be convicted. The Crown prosecutor intended to ask for a significant prison sentence. Shepherd had also learned that she was three months' pregnant, which meant she would have to give birth in the penitentiary. However, if Shepherd pled guilty, the Crown would agree to a shorter sentence in a minimum security setting, where she could have family visits and likely be granted early parole. The Children's Aid Society also agreed that Shepherd could regain custody of her children in the future if she pled guilty and thus showed remorse.

In the wake of these troubling conclusions, Justice Stephen Goudge was appointed to lead a public inquiry into pediatric forensic pathology in Ontario. In 2007, the Goudge Inquiry Report revealed a staggering list of serious problems with Smith's methodology and impartiality. Justice Goudge noted that Smith's background in forensic pathology was "woefully inadequate," since he had only been trained as a pediatric pathologist. Moreover, Smith "did not always ensure that he had all the relevant medical information before he conducted an autopsy," and he was "sloppy and inconsistent in documenting the information" that he did have. In addition, Smith failed in his role as an expert witness by presenting his opinion in a "dogmatic and certain manner when the evidence was far from certain." Justice Goudge found that Smith often "provided unbalanced or emotive testimony, which tended to invite inappropriate and adverse conclusions."

Justice Goudge sharply criticized Smith's handling of Kasandra's case. The Inquiry determined that Smith's method of "matching" Shepherd's watch to Kasandra's bruise was baseless pseudoscience. Since the bruising was not on the surface of her scalp, "the presence of thick hair and scalp tissues altered the appearance of the injury, making such a technique useless." There was no basis for Smith's conclusion that Shepherd's watch had struck Kasandra, but merely that some sort of impact occurred.

In light of these developments, Shepherd was granted an extension of time to appeal her conviction in 2009. The Ontario Court of Appeal heard fresh evidence from forensic pathology experts, who unanimously agreed that there was nothing to support Smith's conclusion that Shepherd had killed Kasandra. There simply was no link between her watch and Kasandra's bruise; Smith's attempt to create that connection was "medically unsupportable". This injury could have occurred in many ways, including a fall. Moreover, what Smith had described as bleeding in Kasandra's brain near the site of the bruise was in fact a product of the autopsy itself.

Shepherd became a licenced paralegal mere months after her acquittal. Her areas of practice include wrongful conviction advocacy. Shepherd was elected to Innocence Canada's Board of Directors in June 2018.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Shepherd was wrongfully convicted of manslaughter after her stepdaughter, Kasandra, died from a series of seizures after a lengthy illness.

# data[].attributes.body
Relevance: This article, authored by Innocence Canada, is highly relevant as it details the prolonged struggle of Maria Shepherd, who was wrongfully convicted based on flawed evidence from Dr. Charles Smith, a respected pediatric forensic pathologist. The article showcases the 25-year journey to her exoneration and her transformation into a licensed paralegal.

Summary: Maria Shepherd's case involved a wrongful manslaughter conviction for the death of her stepdaughter, Kasandra. Dr. Charles Smith's erroneous forensic conclusions played a critical role in her conviction. She pleaded guilty under extreme pressure in 1992, fearing the separation of her family. However, the article outlines her determination to clear her name, which led to a review of her case by Innocence Canada. Expert opinions discredited Smith's findings. In 2016, the Ontario Court of Appeal acquitted her, marking the end of a 25-year ordeal. Maria Shepherd is now a licensed paralegal and shares her story to raise awareness about wrongful convictions.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The Ontario Court of Appeal on February 29, 2016 quashed Maria Shepherd's manslaughter conviction and entered an acquittal in its place. Maria, her family, friends, and members of Innocence Canada were there to support her on this momentous day that unfortunately took 25 stressful years to come to fruition.

Maria was 21-years-old, with two young children and pregnant with her third child when she was charged with causing the death of her three-and-a-half-year-old step-daughter, Kasandra, on April 24, 1991. The linchpin of Maria's case was the flawed evidence of Dr. Charles Smith who was at the time revered as a paediatric forensic pathologist at Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children.

According to Smith, who conducted Kasandra's autopsy, she died as a result of abuse, involving a blow or blows to the head, leaving a watch-shaped mark under her scalp.

In October 1992, Maria was under extreme pressure and concern that the Children's Aid Society would take her children if she continued to claim innocence. She desperately wanted to keep her family together and when her lawyer, Tom Wiley consulted with a pathologist who felt Smith's opinion was valid, Maria felt she had no choice but to plead guilty to manslaughter.

On October 22, 1992 Maria, now pregnant with her fourth child, was sentenced to two years less a day.

Maria gave birth to a little girl on March 31st, 1993, five months into her prison sentence. She was released on parole on June 21, 1993, eight months after being imprisoned and reunited with her children, Jordan, Natasha, Chelsea, Chanel and her husband Ashley, who steadfastly remained by her side.

Maria, despite her guilty plea continued to maintain her innocence and never gave up hope of one day being able to clear her name. In 2005, Kasandra's case, amongst others, were re-examined when complaints about Smith's work led to a review of his cases by the Ontario Coroner's Office. The review found that Smith had made questionable findings in 12 cases that had led to criminal convictions by mishandling autopsies and misdiagnosing causes of death. In 2007 a public inquiry was led by Ontario Court of Appeal judge Stephen Goudge. The Association in Defence of the Wrongly Convicted (AIDWYC), now Innocence Canada, contacted Maria and told her about these developments which suggested that in all probability Kasandra had died of natural causes. Maria asked Innocence Canada to investigate and if possible re-open Kasandra's case.

Innocence Canada led by its lead counsel James Lockyer had Maria's case reviewed by three experts: Dr. Simon Avis, a forensic neuropathologist from St. John's Newfoundland; Dr. David Ramsay, a forensic neuropathologist from London; and Dr. Patrick Barnes, a forensic radiologist from Stanford University, California. All the experts agreed that Smith had misattributed Kasandra's death to homicide, referring to his opinions as "unreliable in the extreme" and "pseudo-scientific."

In May 2009, the Ontario Court of Appeal allowed Maria to appeal her conviction, but it took another seven years of waiting and hoping before her case was heard by Justices David Watt, Gladys Pardu and Peter Lauwers who found that Smith's opinion had now been "thoroughly discredited", which rendered Maria's plea void.

Maria Shepherd has the distinction of being the 21st person that Innocence Canada has helped clear their name. We are humbled to have had a significant role in lifting the cloud that has for far too long hovered over the heads of her and her dedicated and loving family.

We extend our sincere congratulations to Maria who fulfilled one of her dreams by becoming a licensed paralegal on October 28, 2016.

Maria and her son Jordan, since her acquittal when their busy schedules allow, have taken the opportunity to share their story and expose the tragic consequences of a wrongful conviction.

Maria is a shining light!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The Ontario Court of Appeal on February 29, 2016 quashed Maria Shepherd's manslaughter conviction and entered an acquittal in its place. Maria, her family, friends, and members of Innocence Canada were there to support her on this momentous day that unfortunately took 25 stressful years to come to fruition.

# data[].attributes.body
Relevance: A video filmed post-Maria Shepherd's exoneration, it provides insight into her wrongful conviction journey and showcases her achievements and advocacy after her release.

Summary: This video captures Maria Shepherd's post-exoneration journey, highlighting her strength and dedication to advocating for wrongful conviction awareness.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Maria Shepherd's 1992 manslaughter conviction quashed

# data[].attributes.body
Relevance: This video offers a compelling post-exoneration perspective, emphasizing Maria Shepherd's triumph over wrongful conviction and her commitment to raising awareness.

Summary: In this video, Maria Shepherd's inspiring journey post-exoneration is portrayed, focusing on her resilience and advocacy for those wrongfully convicted.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Mon, Feb 29: For the past 25 years, she lived under a cloud of suspicion. But now, a Brampton, Ontario woman named Maria Shepherd has been exonerated in the death of her three-year-old stepdaughter. Allison Vuchnich reports.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Maria Shepherd exonerated in death of her stepdaughter after decades | Watch News Videos Online

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Watch Maria Shepherd exonerated in death of her stepdaughter after decades Video Online, on GlobalNews.ca

# data[].attributes.body
Relevance: Another post-exoneration video that underlines Maria Shepherd's wrongful conviction story and her role in advocating for reform in the justice system.

Summary: This video accentuates Maria Shepherd's perseverance and dedication to challenging wrongful convictions, serving as a beacon of hope and reform in the justice system.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Ontario's top court has formally acquitted Maria Shepherd of the murder of her three-year-old stepdaughter to which she pleaded guilty to 25 years ago.... | By CTV News Channel | Facebook

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Ontario's top court has formally acquitted Maria Shepherd of the murder of her three-year-old stepdaughter to which she pleaded guilty to 25 years ago....

# data[].attributes.body
Relevance: This article is highly relevant as it provides a detailed account of Maria Shepherd's life post-acquittal and her remarkable journey from a guilty plea to exoneration. It underscores the critical role of new forensic evidence in overturning her conviction and highlights her achievements as a licensed paralegal and advocate for raising awareness about wrongful convictions.

Summary: In 1992, Maria Shepherd, pregnant with her fourth child, pleaded guilty to manslaughter based on Dr. Charles Smith's expert testimony. The plea was influenced by the prospect of a shorter sentence, enabling her to keep her family together. She spent 11 months in prison. However, in 2016, the Ontario Court of Appeal set aside her conviction due to new forensic expert evidence discrediting Smith's conclusions. Since her acquittal, Maria realized her dream of becoming a licensed paralegal, established her practice, and became a member of Innocence Canada's Board of Directors. She actively raises awareness about wrongful convictions through speaking engagements nationwide.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
In 1992, at the age of 23 and while pregnant with her fourth child, Maria plead guilty to manslaughter in the death of her three-year-old stepdaughter, Kasandra. Maria entered a guilty plea mid-trial when faced with Dr. Charles Smith's expert evidence that Kasandra had been killed by a blow to the head. Defence counsel and Crown counsel entered a joint submission on a sentence of two years less a day with three years probation. This lesser sentence was a strong inducement in her decision to plead guilty, as she may otherwise have faced a much longer sentence, which would have torn her away from a family she desperately wanted to keep together. Maria was incarcerated and taken from her young family for 11 months. The Ontario Court of Appeal set aside Maria's conviction on the basis of new forensic expert evidence which demonstrated that Smith's conclusions were without scientific basis. Twenty-five years later, February 2016, Maria 's guilty plea was set aside and she was acquitted of manslaughter in the Ontario Court of Appeal. Since her acquittal Maria has realized her dream of becoming a licensed paralegal and runs her own paralegal practice. Maria is a member of the Innocence Canada Board of Directors and raises awareness regarding wrongful conviction by leading speaking engagements across the country.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Maria Shepherd - Wrongful Conviction Day

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
In 1992, at the age of 23 and while pregnant with her fourth child, Maria plead guilty to manslaughter in the death of her three-year-old stepdaughter, Kasandra. Maria entered a guilty plea mid-trial when faced with Dr. Charles Smith's expert evidence that Kasandra had been killed by a blow to the head.