# data[].attributes.headline
Must cater to donors who have Donor Advised Funds

# data[].attributes.subject
Must cater to donors who have Donor Advised Funds

# data[].attributes.headline
Grantees should be grateful/appreciative for money

# data[].attributes.subject
Grantees should be grateful/appreciative for money

# data[].attributes.body
No matter how it's given or structured, or what size of grant it is

# data[].attributes.headline
Having the power to direct funds makes you better/smarter etc. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Having the power to direct funds makes you better/smarter etc. 

# data[].attributes.body
Not using feedback from grantees to make adjustments in programming

# data[].attributes.headline
Funder deserves info from grantees because we're giving them money

# data[].attributes.subject
Funder deserves info from grantees because we're giving them money

# data[].attributes.headline
funder may not have expertise but has opinion and that is what matters most.

# data[].attributes.subject
funder may not have expertise but has opinion and that is what matters most.

# data[].attributes.body
If that was a true life example, did the grants associate ever get any traction with the new application process, or did the idea die with leadership's refusal to accept it? What strategies would you recommend for implementing change in challenging

organizational cultures?

# data[].attributes.headline
grant reports - grantee needs to 'prove' how they've spent their money and show how grateful they are

# data[].attributes.subject
grant reports - grantee needs to 'prove' how they've spent their money and show how grateful they are

# data[].attributes.body
Treating grant giving as a transaction vs. partnership

# data[].attributes.body
Grantees offer the story/reason for change but aren't as integral to making the change happen. Grantmakers and donors know best.

# data[].attributes.headline
The voices of "important" community leaders (aka those who lead the biggest organizations in town) matter most

# data[].attributes.subject
The voices of "important" community leaders (aka those who lead the biggest organizations in town) matter most

# data[].attributes.headline
Grantors taking advantage of unequal power dynamics

# data[].attributes.subject
Grantors taking advantage of unequal power dynamics

# data[].attributes.body
We as grant makers must be conscientious about what we ask of grantees to ensure we are not exploiting the power dynamic

# data[].attributes.headline
Grantees cannot be trusted because they're just trying to get more money

# data[].attributes.subject
Grantees cannot be trusted because they're just trying to get more money

# data[].attributes.headline
Academic knowledge is better than lived experience

# data[].attributes.subject
Academic knowledge is better than lived experience

# data[].attributes.headline
Client facing teams are more important that service teams

# data[].attributes.subject
Client facing teams are more important that service teams

# data[].attributes.body
Leadership questioning experts in grassroots organizations but trusting established orgs know best.

# data[].attributes.body
The concept of paternalism is really fascinating. Something we should be aware of and I look forward to seeing the tools from ideas42

# data[].attributes.body
Innoculation against harmful narratives is new. Excited for the tools coming!

# data[].attributes.headline
A Project Timeline that promotes trust,  equitable input and buy-in.

# data[].attributes.subject
A Project Timeline that promotes trust,  equitable input and buy-in.

# data[].attributes.body
I love the use of the narrative iceberg- will definitely apply this approach to explore what's below the surface. Thank you!