# data[].attributes.headline
재민 정훈 대훈 미유 다은

# data[].attributes.subject
재민 정훈 대훈 미유 다은

# data[].attributes.headline
지예 소예 예은 서진 윤호

# data[].attributes.subject
지예 소예 예은 서진 윤호

# data[].attributes.body
해석: (값 따위가) 끌어올려지다
맥락: 낙태가 여성의 노동 참여를 끌어올려주는 데에 있어서 주요한 역할을 한다
Abortion access is a major force that has driven up women's labor force participation.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 넓은 구역의
맥락: 넓은 구역의 가난한 이들, 약자들, 경제적 약자들인 딥사우스와 미드웨스트의 여성들
"the poorest, the most vulnerable, the most financially fragile women in a wide swath of the Deep South and the Midwest"

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 전복되다
맥락: Roe vs. Wade (낙태 합법)가 전복되었다(무효화 되었다)
Roe vs. Wade is now overturned, which will soon effectively make abortion illegal in about half of US states.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 1973년 미국 연방 대법원 판결에서 여성의 성적 자기 결정권 중 하나로서 낙태 할 권리를 법으로써 존중한 판결.

맥락: Roe vs. Wade의 판결은 이제 뒤집혔고, 이는 곧 미국의 약 절반에서 낙태를 불법으로 만들 것이다.

Roe vs. Wade is now overturned, which will soon effectively make abortion illegal in about half of US states.

# data[].attributes.body
해석 : 여성 정책 연구 기관
맥락 : IWPR(여성 정책 연구 기관)은 만약 존재하는 낙태 규제들이 사라진다면, 미국 전역의 여성들은 매년 214만 5,440 원을 더 벌것이라고 추정했다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 위태롭게하다
맥락: Roe vs. Wade의 폐지가 여성의 노동활동을 위태롭게한다
If that happens, historical data tells us that not only will this affect women personally, but it will jeopardize their professional lives, too.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 계속 진행 중인
맥락: 미국은 계속적인(지속적인) 노동력 부족에 직면해있다 ~

As the US faces an ongoing labor shortage ~

# data[].attributes.body
의미 : 결과적으로, 그 결과
맥락 : 결과적으로 수입은 원치 않은 임신을 겪어야 하는 여성들 뿐만 아니라 그들의 살아가는 아이들의 빈곤 비율에도 영향을 미친다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 노동을 그만두다, 자신이 노동을 할 자리(일자리)에서 떠나다
맥락: 팬데믹 동안 아이들과 노인을 돌보기위해 일자리를 떠나게된 여성들
women who have left the workforce to care for children and elders during the pandemic

# data[].attributes.body
의미 : 직업을 가지고 싶은 열망, 꿈
맥락 : 낙태 허용의 제한은 여성들의 원하는 직업을 갖는데 제한을 둔다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석 : 전문적인 직업
맥락 : 존스의 연구는 젊은 여성의 임신에 대한 합법적인 낙태 허용은 전문적인 직업을 가질 가능성을 35프로 가까이 올렸다.
Jones's research found that legal abortion access for pregnant young women increased their likelihood of entering a professional occupation by 35 percentage points.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 구체적이고 덧없는(구체적이고 일시적인)
맥락: 여성의 생식권에 대한 여성의 자율성을 제한하는 것은 구체적이고 일시적인 방식으로 여성의 불평등한 지위를 강화한다.
Limiting women's autonomy over their reproductive right reinforces the unequal status of women in ways that are both concrete and ephemeral.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: ~를 기반하여, ~를 바탕으로
맥락: Turnaway study에 있는 그녀의 팀의 연구를 바탕으로
Building on her team's research in the Turnaway Study

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 미국 정치 전문 매체
맥락: 그 초안은 5월에 정치 매체에게 유출되었다~

A draft of which was leaked to politico in May~

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 연쇄적인, 연속적인
맥락: ~ 이것은 사회에서 여성의 지위에 연속적으로 영향을 미친다.

~ Which has cascading effects on women's place in society.

# data[].attributes.body
의미 : 재생산 권리, 여성들은 임신, 아이를 갖는것에 대한 결정을 할 권리.
맥락 : 재생산 권리에 대한 여성들의 자율성을 제한하는 것은 구체적이고 일시적인 방식으로 여성의 불평등한 지위를 심화시킨다.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 직업 전망
맥락: 교육 비율은 기본적인 직업 전망과 급여
Education rates are foundational for career prospects and pay

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 좌절 시키다
맥락:낙태 금지는 그러한 이익의 일부를 좌절 시키거나 뒤집을 수도 있다.

Abortion bans could thwart or even reverse some of those gains.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 자유화하다
맥락: Joshua Angrist와 William Evans는 1996년 연구에서 Roe v 전에 낙태법을 자유화한 주를 조사했다.

A 1996 study by Joshua Angrist and William Evans looked at states that liberalized abortion laws before Roe v.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 기존 자녀
맥락: 소득 손실은 원치 않는 임신을 한 여성들뿐만 아니라 그들의 가족과 기존 자녀들에게도 영향을 미친다.
Lost income doesn't just affect women who have unwanted pregnancies, bur also their families and their existing children.

# data[].attributes.headline
이번 주 안으로 할 일

# data[].attributes.subject
이번 주 안으로 할 일

# data[].attributes.body
- ClassCard: Food Crisis, Abortion 단어 학습하고 시험 치기
- Abortion 기사 전체 복습해두기
- 말하기 수행평가 주제 올리기
- Padlet 노락딱지 붙은 사람 수정해두기

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.vox.com/recode/23074696/abortion-illegal-supereme-court-women-work

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
This story is part of a group of stories called

Uncovering and explaining how our digital world is changing - and changing us.

Roe vs. Wade is all but certain to be overturned, which could effectively make abortion illegal in about half of US states. If that happens, historical data tells us that not only will this affect women personally, but it will jeopardize their professional lives, too.

That decision, a draft of which was leaked to Politico earlier this month, affects a woman's likelihood to work at all, what type of job she takes, how much education she receives, how much money she makes, and even the hopes and dreams she has for herself. In turn, her career affects nearly all other aspects of her life, from her likelihood to live in poverty to her view of herself.

And taking away the ability to make that decision stands to upend decades of progress women have made in the workforce, which has cascading effects on women's place in society.

As Caitlin Myers, a professor of economics at Middlebury College, put it, "Childbearing is the single most economically important decision most women make."

We know all this because of decades of research on how abortion bans hurt women - research that Myers, along with more than 150 other economists, outlined in an amicus brief to the Supreme Court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the Mississippi case that's likely to upend Roe v. Wade. In addition to long-term studies specifically looking at outcomes of women who were unable to get an abortion versus those who did, there's even more robust data around the negative causal effects of having children on women in general. It's also just common sense, according to Jason Lindo, a professor of economics at Texas A&M University.

"Anyone who has had kids or seriously thought about having kids knows it's super costly in terms of time and money," Lindo said. "So of course restrictions that make it harder for people to time when they have kids or which increase the number of children that they have is going to have serious impacts on their careers and their economic circumstances."

Even in the absence of a national ban, state anti-abortion measures have been a huge burden on women and society at large. The Institute for Women's Policy Research (IWPR) estimated that state-level restrictions have cost those economies $105 billion a year in reduced labor force participation, reduced earnings, increased turnover, and time off among prime working-age women.

An abortion ban won't affect all women equally, either. Myers says that in regions of the country where abortion is banned and where travel distances will increase for women to be able to get an abortion, about three-quarters of women seeking abortions will still do so. That means roughly a quarter of women there - in Myers's words, "the poorest, the most vulnerable, the most financially fragile women in a wide swath of the Deep South and the Midwest" - will not receive their health care services.

As the US faces an ongoing labor shortage - one led in part by women who have left the workforce to care for children and elders during the pandemic - the Supreme Court's expected decision will exacerbate the situation and potentially change women's experience in the workforce for years to come.

1) Women's labor force participation could go down

Abortion access is a major force that has driven up women's labor force participation. Nationally, women's labor force participation rates went from around 40 percent before Roe v. Wade was passed in 1973 to nearly 60 percent before the pandemic (men's participation was nearly 70 percent at that time). Abortion bans could thwart or even reverse some of those gains.

Using data from the Turnaway Study, landmark research that compares outcomes over time for women across the country who received or were denied abortions, University of California San Francisco professor Diana Greene Foster and fellow researchers found that six months after they were denied an abortion, women were less likely to be employed full-time than those who received an abortion. That difference remained significant for four years after these women were denied abortions, a gap that could affect their employment prospects even further into the future.

2) Lower educational attainment

Education rates are foundational for career prospects and pay. A 1996 study by Joshua Angrist and William Evans looked at states that liberalized abortion laws before Roe v. Wade andfound abortion access leads to higher education rates and labor-market outcomes. American University economics professor Kelly Jones used state abortion regulation data to determine that legal abortion access for young women who became pregnant increased their educational attainment by nearly a year and their likelihood of finishing college by about 20 percentage points. The evidence is largely driven by the impacts on young Black women.

Other research by Jones and Mayra Pineda-Torres found that simple exposure to targeted restrictions on abortion providers, or TRAP laws, reduced young Black teenagers' likelihood of attending or completing college. In turn, lower education affects which jobs women are qualified for.

3) The types of jobs women get will be more restricted

Having children significantly affects the types of jobs women get, often steering them to part-time work or lower-paying occupations. While a broader abortion ban is on the horizon, plenty of individual states have already enacted TRAP laws that make getting an abortion more difficult. This legislation has also provided a natural experiment for researchers like Kate Bahn, chief economist at research nonprofit Washington Center for Equitable Growth, who found women in these states were less likely to move into higher-paid occupations.

"We know a lot from previous research on the initial expansion of birth control pills and abortion care in the '70s that, when women have a little more certainty over their family planning, they just make choices differently," Bahn told Recode.

This could lead to more occupational segregation - women's overrepresentation in certain fields like health care and teaching, for example - which reduces wages in those fields, even when accounting for education, experience, and location.

4) All of the above negatively affect income

Curtailing which jobs women get, taking time out of the workforce, receiving less education - all of these hurt women's pay, which is already lower on average than men's.

One paper by economist Ali Abboud that looked at states where abortion was legal before Roe v. Wade found that young women who got an abortion to delay an unplanned pregnancy for just one year had an 11 percent increase in hourly wages compared to the mean. Jones's research found that legal abortion access for pregnant young women increased their likelihood of entering a professional occupation by 35 percentage points.

The IWPR estimates that if existing abortion restrictions went away, women across the US would make $1,600 more a year on average. Lost income doesn't just affect women who have unwanted pregnancies, but also their families and their existing children. Income, in turn, affects poverty rates of not only the women who have to go through unwanted pregnancy, but also their existing children.

5) Lack of abortion access limits women's career aspirations

Perhaps most insidiously, lack of abortion access seriously restricts women's hopes for their own careers. Building on her team's research in the Turnaway Study, Foster found that women who were unable to get a desired abortion were significantly less likely to have one-year goals related to employment than those who did, likely because those goals would be much harder to achieve while taking care of a newborn. They were also less likely to have one-year or five-year aspirational goals in general.

Limiting women's autonomy over their reproductive rights reinforces the unequal status of women in ways that are both concrete and ephemeral, C. Nicole Mason, president and CEO of IWPR, told Recode.

"That's a very psychic, emotional, psychological feeling - to feel and understand that my equality, my rights, are less than my male counterparts," she said. "The law is making it so. The Supreme Court is making it so."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
5 ways abortion bans could hurt women in the workforce

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Uncovering and explaining how our digital world is changing - and changing us. Roe vs. Wade is all but certain to be overturned, which could effectively make abortion illegal in about half of US states. If that happens, historical data tells us that not only will this affect women personally, but it will jeopardize their professional lives, too.

# data[].attributes.body
해석: 낙태 제공자를 대상으로 한 규제
맥락: Jones와 Mayra Pienda Torres 의 다른 연구에서는 TRAP법에 대한 단순한 노출이 흑인 십대의 대학 진학 또는 졸업 가능성을 감소시키는 것으로 나타났다