# data[].attributes.body
This study examines the behaviour of high CO2 emitters who are required to report emissions to governments but not stakeholders. It found a negative link between poor environmental performance and disclosure, suggesting potential greenwashing. It emphasises the importance of thorough rules and mandatory disclosure to prevent such behaviours, which aligns with Sustainable Development Goal 13's call for immediate action to tackle climate change and its consequences(Wedari et al., 2021).

# data[].attributes.body
The study largely adopts utilitarianism as the principal ethical philosophy in analysing the topic of greenwashing among high-emitting Australian corporations. Utilitarianism, a consequentialist ethical framework, assesses activities based on their results in order to maximise total happiness or utility. The study investigates the link between corporations' actual environmental performance and climate-related voluntary disclosures made under the Australian National Greenhouse Energy Reporting Act 2007 (NGER) (Shaw et al., 2020, pp. 66 68).

# data[].attributes.body
The paper evaluates the effects of misleading disclosure techniques on stakeholders and the environment by evaluating the possible greenwashing behaviour of poor environmental performers, in line with the utilitarian concept of maximising societal well-being. This utilitarian viewpoint emphasises the significance of openness and accountability in corporate environmental reporting in order to improve overall society welfare. (Wedari et al., 2021)

# data[].attributes.body
Shaw, W., Barry, V., & Muntean, D. (2020). Victoria University Login Service - Loading Session Information. In ebookcentral.proquest.com (pp. 66 68). https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/vu/detail.action?docID=6511766

Wedari, L. K., Jubb, C., & Moradi‐Motlagh, A. (2021). Corporate climate‐related voluntary disclosures: Does potential greenwash exist among Australian high emitters reports? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3721–3739. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2836

# data[].attributes.body
This padlet provides a thorough examination of a critical corporate ethical issue: greenwashing. The chosen journal article investigates the misleading practice of offering ecologically friendly pictures without actual benefits. It is linked to Sustainable Development Goal 13, and it emphasizes the need for ethical behaviour when addressing environmental difficulties in the corporate arena.

# data[].attributes.body
The problem of greenwashing, which is fully discussed in the Padlet, looks into the dishonest techniques used by companies, as emphasised in the selected journal article. This unethical behaviour, which is characterised by the false depiction of environmentally beneficial projects with no substantial advantages, has a direct influence on the actual execution of Sustainable Development Goal 13. The article investigates the behaviour of high CO2 emitters that, while required to disclose emissions to governments, fail to be transparent with stakeholders, perhaps participating in greenwashing. Such behaviours hinder true progress towards climate action as urged by SDG 13. The report emphasises the importance of strict rules and obligatory disclosure in controlling such behaviours, which aligns with the SDGs' call for quick and ethical action to mitigate climate change (Wedari et al., 2021).

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The chapter begins the analysis by showing how the wider concept of ethical behaviour in organisations can be considered as the starting point to interpret the rise of environmental concerns in business operations as well as of greenwashing, primarily seen as a form of business misconduct. The focus on corporate environmentalism, intended as the deliberate process by which companies assimilate environmental concerns into their decision-making, provides the proper background to examine the birth of the concept of greenwashing. The discussion about ever-growing ethical issues, such as the conflict between private gain and public good, the tension between moral principles and profits, intertwines with the discourse on corporate sustainability and corporate social responsibility. Specifically, a distinction is made between mandatory and voluntary CSR disclosures, with the aim of elucidating further reasons behind greenwashing temptations. Lastly, the chapter concludes with the discussion of deceptive communication activities of companies that are described as different forms of identity-washing.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Understanding Greenwashing | Emerald Insight

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Understanding Greenwashing - Author: Agostino Vollero

# data[].attributes.body
The analysis of greenwashing in Padlet and the related journal article highlights the moral dilemmas that companies face in relation to environmental accountability. Malicious tactics discussed in the article impede advancements towards Sustainable Development Goal 13, emphasizing the need for immediate measures on combating climate change. The utilitarian viewpoint of the research highlights the importance of transparency and accountability in order to achieve the greatest possible benefit for society. In essence, combatting greenwashing necessitates strong regulations and ethical behavior to guarantee true advancements in sustainability on a local and global scale.