# data[].attributes.body
By the year 2000, it had increased sharply to 90%

From 1995 to 2000, it decreased slowly after reaching a peak.

For the next ten years, it will fall dramatically, reaching its lowest point.

Between 2010 and now, it has risen consistently to twice the amount before.

By the year 2030, it will have climbed gradually, surpassing its competitors.

Since 2016, it has dropped steadily to 50%

# data[].attributes.body
1) By the year 2000, sales had increased dramatically to 90%

2) From 1995 to 2000, sales decreased slowly to 50%.

3) For the next ten years, sales will fall sharply to 10%.

4) Between 2010 and now, sales have risen consistently to 80%.

5) By the year 2030, sales are predicted to climb gradually to 70%.

6) Since 2016, sales have dropped steadily to 40%.

# data[].attributes.body
By the year 2000, it had increased dramatically

From 1995 to 2000, it decreased slowly

For the next ten years, it will fall sharply

Between 2010 and now, it has risen consistently

By the year 2030, it will has climbed gradually

Since 2016, it have dropped steadily

# data[].attributes.body
By the year 2000, it had increased dramatically to 90%.

From 1995 to 2000, it decreased slowly to 50%.

For the next ten years, it is predicted to fall sharply to 10%.

Between 2010 and now, it has risen consistently to 60%.

By the year 2030, it will have climbed gradually to 70%.

Since 2016, it has dropped steadily to 30%.

# data[].attributes.body
By the year 2000, it had increased dramatically to 90%.

From 1995 to 2000, it fell sharply to 20.

Between 2010 and now, it have climbed to 3000.

By the year 2030, it will have risen to 100.

Since 2016, it have dropped down gradually to 10.

For the next 10 years, it will steadily rise to 5000.

# data[].attributes.body
By the year 2000, it had increased to 100,000

From 1995 to 2000, it gradually dropped to 150

For the next ten years, it will rise to the top

Between 2010 and now, the amount of money I had has remain fluctuated

By the year 2030, it will have fallen sharply due to the economy:V

Since 2016, it has decreased dramatically

# data[].attributes.body
Between the year 1990 and 2000, the highest figure was the rising cost of living, while the lowest was the figure for lifestyle. (that for ...)

Starting at X in 1990, The number of people moving for the rising cost of living climbed gradually before reaching a peak at approximately 85,000 people.

In 1990, the figures for traffic and lifestyle started at 20,000 people and showed an upwards trend later from the year 2000 to 2010.

From 1990 to 2000, the figure for traffic rose slowly before showing a sharp change in the year 2000. (data)

From 1990 to 2010, the figure for lifestyle increased consistently from 20,000 to 40,000 people, remaining the least com....

# data[].attributes.body
From 2000 to 2010, the figure for traffic saw a significant increased, from about 35,000 to 60,000

By the year 2010, 40,000 people had left the city due to the city's lifestyle (data)

In 2010, only 80,000 people relocated because of the rising cost of living. The number has experience a decreased compared to 2000, where 85,000 citizens left the city.

In 2000, 85K citizens left the city bc of the rising cost of living, but this figure fell slightly to 80K in 2010.

The rise of in living cost was the main reason over the examined period.

Although the figures for traffic and lifestyle have sharply increased over the year 1990 and 2010, it still remains two of the less reason for people to move.

past simple

least common reason

# data[].attributes.body
From 1990 to 2000, the figure for all 3 reasons showed an upward trend, with [..] being the most common reason.

The number of people relocating due to the rising cost of living started at X, then it increased gradually from 1990 before reaching its peak at X in 2000, then fell slowly to ... during the last 10 years. (data)

Starting at X from 1990, the number of people moved due to lifestyle climbed steadily throughout the period without any abrupt changes. Nonetheless, it remained the least common reason, with X people citing it.

While the figure for traffic and lifestyle continued to display/ experience a growing trend from 2000 to 2010 in the last ... (from X to X and from X to X respectively), that for the rising cost of living decreased gradually from X to 80,000. However, it remained the most common reason over the examined period.

X: data

# data[].attributes.body
From 1990 to 2010, the figure for lyfestyle increased gradually from 20000 to 40000

The number of people moving for the rising cost of living started at 65000 in 1990 and increased steadily before reaching its peak of 85000 in 20000, before decreased/ decreasing gradually to 80000 in 2010

The number of people relocating for traffic rose consistently from 20000 to 35000 between 1990 and 2000. From 2000 to 2010 Afterward, the figure for traffic increased sharply to 60000

# data[].attributes.body
Between 1990 and 2000, the number of people moving for the cost of living increased gradually from 65k and peaked at 85k but in the next 10 years, it decreased slowly to 80k./ before seeing a gradual decrease to 80K at the end of the period.

During the same period, people migrated from cities to the countryside because of traffic and lifestyle had the same start point with 20k people but the number of people left the cities by the traffic/ the figure for traffic was up to 35k in 2000 and for the next 10 years, it continued to increase sharply to 60k.

In contrast, lifestyle remained the least common reason, with the figure ending at 40k in 2010.

# data[].attributes.body
The number of people who moved away due to the rising cost of living was significantly higher than those who moved due to the other 2 reasons, at any given point in time from 1990 to 2010.

The figure for traffic rose gradually from 20000 to around 35000 in the first 10 years, then increased semi-rapidly to 60000 in the next 10 years.

The number of people who relocated due to lifestyle increased steadily from 20000 to 40000 over the course of 20 years, remaining the least common reason.

The figure for the rising cost of living steadily rose, peaking (which peaked) at approximately 85000, before falling minimally to 80000 in 2010.

Between 1990 and 2010, the rising cost of living consistently remained the most popular reason for moving to the countryside, despite a slight growth in the last 10 years.