# data[].attributes.body
was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States to uphold the exclusion of Japanese Americans from the West Coast Military Area during World War II.

# data[].attributes.body
Police officers forced their way into Dollree Mapp's house without a proper search warrant. Believed was a harboring a bomber but nothing was found. Police did discover a trunk of obscene pictures. Mapp was arrested for possessing the pictures. Mapp said it violated their 4th amendment rights.
Were the confiscated materials protected from seizure by the fourth amendment? The U.S. Supreme court ruled in 5-3 vote in favor of Mapp. The high court said that the evidence was seized unlawfully, without a search warrant, could not be used in criminal prosecutions in state courts.

# data[].attributes.body
Ernesto Miranda was arrested and questioned in connection to kidnapping and rape. The police obtained a written confession from Miranda. Officers admitted they did not advise Miranda that he had rights to have an attorney or an attorney present. This violated his 5th amendment rights. Does the 5th amendment's protection against self incrimination attend to the police interrogation of a suspect? The defendants interrogation violated the 5th amendment. They are required to be warned and would be given an attorney. Evidence obtained as a result of interrogation. This changed the way cops tell you your rights while getting arrested.

# data[].attributes.body
Does a prohibiton against the wearing of arm bands in public schools, as a form of silent process violate the rights of the first amendment? Students decided to have a meeting in support for a truce in the vietnam,wore black armbands as a form of protest, which the school did not like, he students ended up suing the school district for violation of freedom of expression.

# data[].attributes.body
He was stealing from private property when a resident of the home caught him, the gun he was carrying went off due to him tripping and killing said, the resident. Does the imposition and carrying out of the death penalty in these cases constitute cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the eighth and fourteenth Amendments? The court ruled that the death penalty in this situation was cruel and unusual punishment. This changed how we as a country should view capital punishment.

# data[].attributes.body
The Court concluded that such laws violate the Constitution's right to privacy. The Court held that, under the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause, states may only restrict abortions toward the end of a pregnancy, in order to protect the life of the woman or the fetus. This focused on the fourth amendment.

# data[].attributes.body
The court ruled that the death penalty was a cruel and unusual punishment. 7-2 descison, another court case that made our nation think more about what truly is the death penalty and what impacts americans today and forever.

# data[].attributes.body
Upheld the disciplinary corporal punishment policy of Florida's public schools by a 5–4 vote. The judgment specified that such corporal punishments have no prohibition in public schools unless those punishments are “degrading or unduly severe”.

# data[].attributes.body
A 14 year old female was caught smoking cigarettes in the girls bathroom. The school said it was a violation of the rules, as they get taken to the principals office the other 2 kids smoking and questioning them as well. The school demanded to see her purse, they found a pack of cigarettes and marijuana, drug parapherhalia, a wad of money, and a piece of paper. The girl said it was a violation of her 4th amendment rights to search and seizure. Do students have the same protection as adults against "unreasonable seizure" while at school? Can evidence found by school officials be used un Judical proceedings? The search of TLO's purse did not violate the 4th amendment. It does apply to school officials. They must have a probable cause to search ones belongings, this court case changed the way schools search your bags.

# data[].attributes.headline
Bethel School District v. Fraser  July 7, 1986,

# data[].attributes.subject
Bethel School District v. Fraser  July 7, 1986,

# data[].attributes.body
A student "Fraser" Gave a speech for a classmate running for student government. Which occured during a school assembly. Mentioned several sexual references, the principal said he had violated school policy, and removed his name from graduate speakers. Does the first amendment prevent a school district from disciplining a high school student for giving a high school student for giving a innapropriate speech at a high school assembly? The school had not violated Matthew's 1st amendment rights, schools do not like obscene speech, they want to teach by example, mature conduct cannot be conveyed in a school that tolerates lewd, indecent or offensive speech.

# data[].attributes.headline
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier January 13, 1988

# data[].attributes.subject
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier January 13, 1988

# data[].attributes.body
The school sponsered newspaper of Hazelwood Highschool. Written and edited by students. Principal Reynolds founds that 2 of the articles as offensive and innapropriate. Kids of the newspaper brought it into court. Did the principal's deletion of the articles violate the students rights under the first amendment? No, the court held that 1st amendment did not require schools to promote particular types of student speech, school admins could exercise a restraint of school sponsered expression, this court case was able to give a new perspective to kids in schools with their freedom of expression.

# data[].attributes.body
Highschool athletes were participating in drug use. The school was concerned it would cause more injuries for their athletes. So forth the district of Oregon adopted a drug test policy which meant James Acton wasn't allowed to play football. Does random drug testing of high school student athletes violate the reasonable search and seizure clause of the 4th amendment? No, highschool athletes who are under school supervision, are subject to greater control than over free adults concern over safety of minors under there supervision overrides minimal student athlete privacy. This case changed the way schools view their athletes with drug use.

# data[].attributes.body
Supreme Court decision that dealt with sexual orientation and the Colorado State Constitution. The Supreme Court ruled that Colorado could not use a constitutional amendment to abolish laws prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation. Focused on the 3rd and 6th amendment.

# data[].attributes.body
Supreme Court found that attaching a GPS tracker to a private vehicle constituted an illegal search and seizure under the fourth amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

# data[].attributes.headline
Mahoney Area Highschool v. B.L. June 23, 2021

# data[].attributes.subject
Mahoney Area Highschool v. B.L. June 23, 2021

# data[].attributes.body
B.L. failed to get into the varsity cheerleading team, posted herself with a caption offending the school, the cheerleading team, and comments about her life. District said it violated roles, Does the First amendment prohibit public school officials from regulating off-campus student speech? B.L. ended up suing the school alleging that her suspension from the team violated her first amendment rights.

# data[].attributes.body
You did a great job providing background information and explanations of some of the outcomes. You are missing some of the criteria; what amendment? how did the ruling impact the amendment? connection to a founding ideal.