# data[].attributes.headline
Perspective One: What questions do you have about this perspective?

# data[].attributes.subject
Perspective One: What questions do you have about this perspective?

# data[].attributes.headline
Perspective One: Naming This Perspective

# data[].attributes.subject
Perspective One: Naming This Perspective

# data[].attributes.headline
Perspective Two: What questions do you have about this perspective?

# data[].attributes.subject
Perspective Two: What questions do you have about this perspective?

# data[].attributes.headline
Perspective Two: Naming This Perspective

# data[].attributes.subject
Perspective Two: Naming This Perspective

# data[].attributes.headline
Perspective Three: What questions do you have about this perspective?

# data[].attributes.subject
Perspective Three: What questions do you have about this perspective?

# data[].attributes.headline
Perspective Three: Naming This Perspective

# data[].attributes.subject
Perspective Three: Naming This Perspective

# data[].attributes.headline
Do these perspectives represent the range of views on this topic?

# data[].attributes.subject
Do these perspectives represent the range of views on this topic?

# data[].attributes.headline
What kind of outputs would you like to see from this project? E.g., infographics, list of best practices

# data[].attributes.subject
What kind of outputs would you like to see from this project? E.g., infographics, list of best practices

# data[].attributes.headline
Did you see a difference among participants views depending on whether they were grantees or other types of particpants?

# data[].attributes.subject
Did you see a difference among participants views depending on whether they were grantees or other types of particpants?

# data[].attributes.headline
Curious how you interpret the one Q-card statement ranking so high which states "I don't really understand what MCT's role is for the region, and that's a problem" among this group, compared to the other two groups

# data[].attributes.subject
Curious how you interpret the one Q-card statement ranking so high which states "I don't really understand what MCT's role is for the region, and that's a problem" among this group, compared to the other two groups

# data[].attributes.headline
There seems to be a lot of similarity between perspective 1 and 2 with "intermediaries as pathways to equity," and therefore challenging to assess

# data[].attributes.subject
There seems to be a lot of similarity between perspective 1 and 2 with "intermediaries as pathways to equity," and therefore challenging to assess

# data[].attributes.headline
Intermediaries are helpful but constrained seems to capture it well

# data[].attributes.subject
Intermediaries are helpful but constrained seems to capture it well

# data[].attributes.body
Intermediaries - grantees relationships needs support too

# data[].attributes.body
Also like helpful but constrained

# data[].attributes.headline
Were other funders disaggregated by public vs. private? Public funders in general are less flexible than private funders.

# data[].attributes.subject
Were other funders disaggregated by public vs. private? Public funders in general are less flexible than private funders.

# data[].attributes.headline
A path to justice requires more than sufficient conservation funding 

# data[].attributes.subject
A path to justice requires more than sufficient conservation funding 

# data[].attributes.headline
Intermediaries should seek to alleviate administrative needs on grantees

# data[].attributes.subject
Intermediaries should seek to alleviate administrative needs on grantees

# data[].attributes.body
Mostly

# data[].attributes.headline
It may be helpful to the Micronesia Challenge Socioeconomic Measures Working Group to have Q-methodology itself as a tool introduced and explained a bit, with best practices specifically highlighted based on your experiences here (i.e. a case study of the Q-study methodology)

# data[].attributes.subject
It may be helpful to the Micronesia Challenge Socioeconomic Measures Working Group to have Q-methodology itself as a tool introduced and explained a bit, with best practices specifically highlighted based on your experiences here (i.e. a case study of the Q-study methodology)