# data[].attributes.headline
Hạnh's feedback on Nguyệt's micro teaching

# data[].attributes.subject
Hạnh's feedback on Nguyệt's micro teaching

# data[].attributes.body
1. Clarity of Objectives

Strength: The objective of the warm-up is implicitly very clear: to prepare students for a listening lesson by getting them to practice listening for specific, key instructions. The game directly mirrors the skill they will need in the main lesson—filtering important information (the command after "Simon says") from irrelevant noise (commands without it).

2. Clarity of Instructions

Strength: The instructions are very thorough. You explained the rules step-by-step, provided clear examples of both correct and incorrect actions ("Simon says touch your nose" vs. "Jump twice"), and explained the consequence of breaking a rule (elimination).

Strength: You used concept checking questions (CCQs) brilliantly. The three questions ("Do you follow every command?", etc.) are a perfect way to ensure every student understands the rules before starting. This is a best practice in teaching.

3. Activity Organisation

Strength: The activity is logically sequenced: introduction -> rule explanation -> examples -> concept checking -> execution. The flow is smooth and easy to follow.

4. Student Engagement

Strength: This activity is excellent for engagement. It is:

Kinesthetic: Gets students moving and out of their seats.

Interactive: Requires them to respond to the teacher physically.

Fun and Game-like: The competitive "elimination" aspect creates excitement and motivation.

Inclusive: The rules are simple enough for all proficiency levels to understand and participate.

# data[].attributes.headline
Ma Thị Diệu Linh - Linh's feedback on Nguyệt's video

# data[].attributes.subject
Ma Thị Diệu Linh - Linh's feedback on Nguyệt's video