# data[].attributes.body
Title: agarrando pueblo

Address: Carlos Mayolo,

Luis Ospina.

Production: Carlos

Mayolo, Luis Ospina.

Screenplay: Luis Ospina, Carlos Mayolo.

Sound: Luis Ospina.

Country: Colombia. Year: 1978
“ Agarrando pueblo” is a critic hidden in a mockumentary which tries to shed some light on the fact that some documentaries exploit sensible topics of poverty to hopefully make themselves rich but not actually help in any way the issue they are talking about in their own movie

# data[].attributes.body
Title: agarrando pueblo

Address: Carlos Mayolo, Luis Ospina.

Production: Carlos Mayolo, Luis Ospina.

Screenplay: Luis Ospina, Carlos Mayolo.

Sound: Luis Ospina.

Country: Colombia. Year: 1978.

The documentary "Agarrando Pueblo" is a Colombian mockumentary directed and produced by Carlos Mayolo and Luis Ospina. It is a documentary which criticizes previously produced Colombian cinema, thus showing misery as a "spectacle"; baptizing this as "Pornomisery". This mockumentary tells two "stories", one in black and white, and the other in color. The story in color, being a story that focuses on showing the deplorable part of a Colombian community, specifically from Cali, is based on what was seen by some foreign filmmakers who show events such as poverty, drug addiction, and among other social problems. further. On the other hand, in the black and white story, they show how the director and producer manipulate information in the public eye, showing this behind the scenes of the first story and, thus, evidencing the concept of "Pornomisery", thus being a spectacle for whoever sees it.

# data[].attributes.body
Title: Agarrando pueblo.

Director: Carlos Mayolo, Luis Ospina.

Production: Carlos Mayolo, Luis Ospina.

Screenplay: Luis Ospina, Carlos Mayolo.

Sound: Luis Ospina.

Country: Colombia. Year: 1978.

Agarrando Pueblo Documentary is a Colombian mockumentary directed and produced by Carlos Mayolo and Luis Ospina. This is a documentary film that criticizes the previous Colombian films that show misery as a 'spectacle', calling it 'porno miseria'. This mockumentary tells two 'stories'. One is black and white and the other is color. Focused on showing the unhappy side of  Colombian communities, especially in Cali, the color stories are based on what  foreign filmmakers have shown events such as poverty, drug addiction, and other social problems. Black-and-white narratives, on the other hand, show how directors and producers manipulate information for the masses, showing this behind the scenes in the first narrative, and the concept of "porno miselia", that is, take a look. .

# data[].attributes.body
Juan Pablo de la barrera

Carlos Mayolo and Luis Ospina were the directors. It is a satire on the exploitation of poverty in Cali. The plot follows a film crew looking to make a documentary about the lives of poor city dwellers, but their focus is more on how they can exploit the poverty and misery of the people to get sensational stories that sell. The film criticizes the role of the media in exploiting the poor and uses a mockumentary style to do so.

# data[].attributes.body
"Agarrando Pueblo" is a Colombian documentary about a group of people making a documentary, it's situated in Bogota and Cali, and it's main purpose is showing the difficult situations of poverty happening here in Colombia in places like Germany, this is a 1977 film directed by Carlos Mayolo and Luis Ospina, who are seen all through the documentary. The way this film is made is really fun to watch, putting the viewer at the perspective of the directors and showing their way of thinking the stuff through, we also get to see the opinions of some people about the film.

# data[].attributes.body
The way this movie is directed is just different, or at least for me. it is pretty obvious that a lot of movies are inspired by this one, but the way it is directed just makes it different, they don't need that much dialogue to make the movie work, one can know what is happening without someone telling you that, the way the main character has 2 faces of when he talks with other people and when he is alone feels really well done, the music of each scene it's well put and overall I liked the style of this movie. another thing I want to highlight is the cartoons one can see all through the movie, which for me represented the way the kind of "mafia" saw the world which is just a parallel of the way ghost dog saw the world. how the mafia guys saw the world was just a plain view of everything and ghost dog really had a deep comprehension of everything he did wich is reflected in the paragraphs he narrates through out the movie.

# data[].attributes.body
I like all the action that we see in the movie, i noticed that this movie inspirate on the famous movie jhon wick, from the beginning og the film they show us a text narrated by the protagonist and its always related with the way of the samurai

# data[].attributes.headline
The Action Sequences and the Sound Design

# data[].attributes.subject
The Action Sequences and the Sound Design

# data[].attributes.body
I really liked the action sequences in this movie and something I noticed a lot is how this movie was clearly an inspiration to the creators of one of my favorite franchises; John Wick. I also really enjoyed the background music that gives a sort of “hood” vibe to the film, especially when it has so many samurai and japanese type of scenes. The mixture of cultures and the crazy action scenes made the film very immersive and I enjoyed the film very much.

# data[].attributes.body
I found it too interesting since the professional assassin is a follower of the samurai instinct, following his values ​​and respect, this does not mean that he does not kill anyone who causes him problems in the future, so the film causes interest and a sensation of emotion, it is similar to john wick, so the plot is good and its route too.

# data[].attributes.body
I really like this movie, but something that i found very curious or that is just a coincidence is that in the minute 16:10 the women looks same like the cartoon, a thing that makes very special the movie is that from the beginning they show us a text narrated by the protagonist and is always related with the way of the samurai, but in the end Pearline is now narrating the text which means that is the new protagonist. But the only thing that i dislike about the movie is when Ghost dog enters to the mansion and start killing them, the transitions were very strange because when he shot someone the sound was first, and they show us the person already dead, maybe they could use another type of shot.

# data[].attributes.body
The movie features changing gender roles, political satire, and a survival story that criticizes global class differences. The conclusion may be disturbing but the overall message is a strong critique of class divisions.

I liked this restaurant scene to the car sequence because in addition to giving us a taste of the relationship of these two characters in the movie, it introduces us to the character of Carl, who is a good person but sometimes gets carried away and ends up doing bad things.

# data[].attributes.body
I really liked how they represent that “rich world” where everything is material, everything is “happiness”, all that matters is money and there are no consequences. The perfect example of this are the Russians, they are the representation of this world, pure chaos dressed as beauty. I also liked this scene because it not only shows the rich people in their world, it also shows how desespérate the people are to enter that world even going into the point of behaving like animals.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Eduardo Giannotti (Triangle of Sadness 1:48:48)

# data[].attributes.body
I loved the movie, and the scene I liked the most was this one with Dimitry looting his wife's body. Throughout all the movie we see rich old people bossing everyone around, dirsupting the employees lifes, being rude and exerting the power they had to get whatever they want. But after the pirate's attack they finally drop the masks and the superiority complex and show that in the end they are just people, greedy people that are willing to do anything for their personal gain. This is reflected with Abigail as well, the oppressed and disrespected employee suddenly rising to power thanks to her surviving capabilities and proceeding to keep the circle of mistreatment by rewarding those that ''satisfy'' her, either with jewels or other ways. That's why this scene is so perfect, it shows a man's grief, turned into greed; being willing to loot the corpse of his own wife with such little hesitations in order to get some more fish for that day. Comes to show that in that in the end rich or poor, we are all susceptible to temptations and we forget all moral code when away from society. Truly comes to show how selfish and uncivilized people are away from a society to keep us in order as showed in the last scene with the probable murder of Yaya.

# data[].attributes.body
The film in general was very good but one of the things that I did not like about this was the fact that it left many things that were not resolved, like many doubts, that if there is something that needs to be clarified is that one of the things that I liked the most was the performance of thomas and carl, i feel they did it very well, i think that they now how to express all that happen on the movie and make this to be more easier to understand.

# data[].attributes.body
I really liked the movie and all the details that movie show, and some questions that the movie does not solve. The part that I most like is in the scene 2 when they are eating with the captain, in that scene we can see that the ship is moving because of the waves, but the camera stays in the same angle and never start shaking because of the waves, and other interesting thing is that the piano plays itself throughout the entire restaurant scene. In all, that scene is starts with a little of chaos and starts progressing the amount of chaos until the scene ends and start the scene 3. But the peak of chaos is when the Russian takes the speaker and start talking and saying that the ship is going down until Thomas got to the room and say that the ship is not going down, but then start telling a whole speech about politics.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Tomas Arango (Triangle of Sadness) 1:16:00

# data[].attributes.body
This scene is such an interesting and unique scene, this scene was after the captain's dinner and we could see the amount of chaos happening in the yacht after all the disasters that happened during the dinner, and all this happening with an incredible scenography and something that really make me love this scene is Thomas and the Russian just talking in the semi background to all the ship with no responsibility in all creating way more chaos and making the scene just way better. during this scene, there was a phrase that I just loved and that made me remember this scene better and it was "the ship is not going under", it is just perfectly fitting for the character and shows the zero consciences that both Thomas and the Russian (mostly the Russian) have at that moment, this scene, in my opinion, was one of the funniest, well directed, it didn't felt forced, the way the shots changed to show the situation of almost all the important character was amazing, and it shows a lot about the characters in the movie. this movie has a lot of things one could talk about and i would love to talk about but this is one of the scenes that really represent the unique essence the movie has.

# data[].attributes.body
What I liked most about this movie is the fact that the character Carl is portrayed at the beginning as a good person tired of the traditional, who only wants his dysfunctional relationship to be equitable. Throughout the movie, we see that Carl is a somewhat jealous person who takes care of his girlfriend from everything. Throughout the movie, we see how Carl deals more with his girlfriend and it is seen in the plot that this movie shows very strange relationships that can sometimes be functional

# data[].attributes.body
I like a lot the opening scene of triangle of sadness because it first show how the periodist somehow threatens and attack all the models but then they just do not give any importance, second the audition and the explosion of colors when the paint is thrown in their bodies with the colors of America, I think this is a pretty good introduction to the movie itself, also in a scene the judges tell a model to relax a little his “triangle of sadness” which is a term of a face muscle but is a very good way of mention the title of the movie.

# data[].attributes.body
There is a political ideology in this concept, which the director and screenwriter tries to show, but which he only develops theoretically through a drunken dialectic between the captain of the yacht communist American and one of the passengers a capitalist Russian millionaire.

His crossing of quotes from thinkers from both sides in the middle of a stormy night on the open sea is simplistic and reductive. does better when he translates all that verbiage into experiences, in what happens when some passengers and crew members find themselves reduced to their human condition on a deserted island.

# data[].attributes.body
what i liked the most about triangle of sadness it the way in which the main character carl is a good person inside but the society and the environment he lives in makes him do stuff that is bad. For an example of this, when carl and yaya are tanning up and a worker from the boat takes his shirt off, Carl is jelous of yaya looking at him and talks to the manager anout this worker. When he notices that the worker is being sacked he gets upset and shows his hidden empathy. another example of this is when Carl and dimirty are mocking about the german man that tries to seduce their girlfriends, at the end they both get mad that he actually made it to talk to both and be friends with them.

# data[].attributes.body
I really did not understand the movie, but i liked some concepts of it. I liked how they handled the concept of something or someone "Nice" and what is long-lasting. That discussion between Colm and drunk Padraic in the pub is just art. They have completily different visions of life. One of them focuses on the long-lasting and in the complex, the other just focuses on the simple and in being nice, and both of them can be right about their philosofy of life despite being so different. Being nice in this movie is deeper than usual, is not just being nice a irrelevant thing, like Colm think it is. Being nice defines you as a person and in Padraic eyes, it is the reason of why you will be remembered. The totally contrary of Colm´s thoughts, he thinks that if you dont have something physical to prove your existence, you will not be remembered. Its hard to think that two persons with so different mindsets, were best friends for so long. So i dont trully understand the decisions of Colm. He thought like that his whole life ? Or he changed his mind and thats why he treated Padraic like that ? How do you change your mindset so savagely in some days or weeks. I guess i just did not understand fully the character of Colm, and also Padraic. I guess the next time i see it, i will get it.

# data[].attributes.body
I really didn't understand the movie, I felt some of the emotional beats it was attempting to construct, but it was way too messy and all over the place for me to say that I enjoyed it. If anything I liked seeing Fabietto's journey and learning how to learn to pursue his dreams and live his life now that his parents were gone and the contrast between his brother and him was interesting, but I feel like the movie spent too much time developing movie threads that didn't lead anywhere; but then again that could be trying to make a parody of Fabietto's own journey. Overall I didn't like the movie but it was a worthwhile experience.

# data[].attributes.body
I really liked how the friendship turned to hatred represented by the incredible acting from the main characters really made a great allusion to the Irish Civil War with their themes and time period; after all tiny island they live is just a downscaled version of Ireland. And just like the Civil War, no one wanted to fight but both sides had done too much harm for there to be reconciliation, in this case shown by the death of Padraic's donkey and the Burning of the house in the end. At the beginning of the movie the viewer couldn't imagine these two protagonists not being friends but as the movie ends it is also very hard to see how any form of reconciliation would be possible. The movie showed how complicated relationships are and that sometimes it is too hard to forgive, and the movie isn't afraid to end in a negative note. After all the situation it's being molded around too didn't not end happily and grudges were held.

# data[].attributes.body
The film shows us how a relationship is perhaps very interesting on the part of the characters, how it evolves from the fact that before these two hated each other and how a simple invitation everything got better. the story is made from humor more or less making it more entertaining, another thing that I like about this movie is that its story is not so forced in how to give the protagonist a problem, I think it is something a little more natural.

# data[].attributes.body
The film is very good they way is showed, the film doesn't force the history to put a problem to the protagonist, and that problem is showed in all the movie but are some parts that you can forget about that because the relationship of the principal characters, the characters and their relationship is the thing that the movie focus, and all the movie is showing us that, until the end that is a little unexpected when Colm cut his fingers and because of that is lead to the dead of Padriac pet.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Tomas Arango (The Banshees of Inishierng)

# data[].attributes.body
the way this story is told is one of my favorite things about this film, all through the movie you can see how the story just keeps developing naturally, and while it advances you start to know more about the characters that are presented, one huge example of this is the policeman, if we follow his story in the film we can see how slowly they present us more about him, and it isn't until the end to the death of his son that he finally has some development. but the fact that this development isn't until the end of the film isn't something bad, but something that fits him and seems natural to a person like him, another thing I loved about the story where the dynamics between Colm and Padraic and how they grew with their conflict, especially in the scene that I took a picture of, which is a really important point in the story for Padraic. For some context, this scene is a bit after his donkey died for eating the fingers that Colm left at his door. When Padraic saw that, he promised and burned Colm's house down something that at the start of the movie I couldn't even imagine would happen, but again this development never felt forced and is something that fits the character. overall I enjoyed watching this movie and i loved both the story and the characters.

# data[].attributes.body
I loved this scene. It was just what Fabietto needed, this is not like every motivational speech. This was a realistic speech. Capuano does not try to make things easier for you or help you emotionally, he shows you what you need, brutally, and thats what Fabietto needed. Because he is strong, he can ignore the insults and receive the real message of Capuano, that resilience is something that not everyone has, for example the brother of Fabietto, he does not want to keep going, he just want to stay in his bubble of "joy" and ignore the reality. Fabietto accepts the reality and finally with this scene, he is ready to move on and follow his dream.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Director de cine Fue la mano de dios.PNG

# data[].attributes.body
It builds a story that shows with humor, but also with a lot of heart, the crazy reasons that, on occasions, are capable of pushing the sweetest and kindest man to the brink of violence.
A story that explores human nature and the senseless reasons behind some war conflicts that have left painful traces through the centuries. It is no coincidence that the struggle between the two main characters takes place in parallel to the Irish Civil War.
The universe reflected in Inisherin is a small-scale allegory of said combat that, although it only threatens from a distance, is a constant reminder of that sad episode in the country's history, in which brothers and friends, who just a few years ago had fought together in the War of independence, they ended up divided by a cruel battle.

# data[].attributes.body
What i liked the most about the movie is the presence of the directors mark and how it is in ceirtain ways almost biographical. After reading about the director (Paolo Sorrentino) i found out that the protagonist and him have a lot in common, both are napolitanian kids that where inspired to do film because of the impact of the director Antonio capuano. Capuanno was sorrentinos mentor for a long time while being introduced to film. This added to things like the appearance of federico fellini, creator of movies that marked the italian film industry like fellini 8 1/2 or La dolce Vita, make that the directors influences and love for film add a personal touch to the movie. Finally i liked the form in wich the movie keeps the film industry allways in the life of fabio in different ways, by giving his brother the passion for acting, or by having present historical movies (Once upon a time in ney york) in his family time.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, the film was somewhat boring or at least it was not to my taste, but something to highlight about this is how it perhaps combines problems of everyday life such as poverty and drug trafficking with soccer, which can make it interesting from time to time. the movie but that to my taste does not finish convincing.

# data[].attributes.body
In this film, we can appreciate the way that the director tell the history, in the first half of the movie they show us the family and the way they behave, all their problems, and the way they love the soccer and Maradona, then of the half of the movie starts to getting very chaotic, and the most affect to the principal character that is Fabietto, and that's the part when Fabietto start to change, and start to getting more mature and start to take his own decisions.
One of my favorite scenes is when the parents of Fabietto die, the way the actor of Fabietto express the pain of the character and why he want to see his parents for a last time.

# data[].attributes.body
I really didn't like this movie that much, but I found the relationship of the two main characters interesting, who started fighting and got better over time since Patrick decided to invite him to the bar for April Fool's Day, he thought it was good idea to do it, anyway, something that he did not like is that his friend was interested in his sister and that is why he began to be more distant, in conclusion it is a movie with a good plot and with a positive point to interpersonal relationships

# data[].attributes.body
In this film we can see the consecutive problems that arise as the film is presented, on the other hand it can be seen that there are scenes that give a lot to talk about, like the one with the young man's aunt, who kisses a little monk, which the other person who was there says that now she could get pregnant, which is why this scene caught my attention since it is somewhat assimilated to religion, on the other hand, the young man's story is moving and fun.

# data[].attributes.body
This scene at almost the start of the movie helps to introduce most of the characters that will be relevant all through the movie and believe me, the characters in this movie are one of the best aspects of it, each character is defined and well built, when you see the full movie and follow the paths of the character is when you realize how well the bases for the characters are constructed, and the movie doesn't waste this characters. We can see the huge development of each of these during the movie, I really liked how well done the acting of these characters was too and how we could see the lowest point of most of them. and overall this aspect is my favorite in all throughout the film.

# data[].attributes.body
In this movie we get to see how fabietto has to go through growing up and adolescence but I chose this particular scene because it shows us how an Italian family celebrates the goal scored by Diego Maradona which counts as a goal for Argentina, but the Italian family living in Naples with Maradona playing for napoli celebrate the goal as if it were for Italy, it shows, which then results in an explanation of the old guy of how much that goal was more than just a goal but a sign of revenge for the Argentinian folk and how it was a “political act” and a “revolution” later in the film we then see the other ways Maradona affected the movie and fabiettos life but this scene was just the most obvious and visual way of demonstrating this.

# data[].attributes.body
What I liked the most about this movie is a part of the plot on this scene is the part where padriac realizes that colm is serious and he would remove his fingers if padriac keeps bothering him, which in the future Colm will continue to cut his fingers and this will lead to the death of Padriac's pet

# data[].attributes.body
What I liked about this movie was the acting from both main characters had and the chemistry they established throughout the whole film which was interesting to see knowing that throughout the whole movie there was some type of beef between them because Brendan from one day to another had some type of existential crisis for which he did not want anything to do with anymore with his supposed best friend, I liked to see how far out and intense Brendan was with this to the point in where he says to Colin what is shown on the picture because it was interesting to see how that all unraveled, apart from this I liked how simple yet well made the script and dialogue was which made the movie more entertaining.

# data[].attributes.headline
This specific shot and what the family thinks of hid aunt

# data[].attributes.subject
This specific shot and what the family thinks of hid aunt

# data[].attributes.body
This scene caught my attention because it shows in a wide shot how the whole family and Fabieto think of the aunt in this case as crazy but what they wouldn't know later is that the story about the monk that the supposed crazy aunt told could be true because Fabieto sees the monk on his trip to Rome.

# data[].attributes.body
To build his story, the director starts from the idea that the imagination is a free territory and the only place where his characters can live without suffering inequality. The movie guides us in a world that transits between reality and dreams, where poetic symbolisms work as a guide, refuge or source of reflection. A magnificent sequence involving a brothel, for example the director symbolizes a devastated Colombia here, the women who shelter and dance with the protagonists represent the forgotten mothers who have lost their children to violence.

The director does not use explicitly violent images to protagonists who exercise it to achieve their objective, on the contrary, young people never succumb to rage, the movie does not leave you with the feeling that they are beings guided by anger, but elevated by the goodness of their hearts. There is hatred towards the world around them but love towards life itself. In that aspect the director establishes an amazing and sensitive balance between the cruelty and the hope.

# data[].attributes.body
Here we can see the place that Patrizia and Franco were fighting and when Patrzia called Saviero, Fabietto and Maria to go to her house and help her to defend from Franco because he was thinking that she was selling her body. Here in the shot we can see that the fight was very hard. Also after this fight the character of Patrizia starts to be so wierd because she starts to be naked in front of all of her family, and when she is naked Fabietto he does not stop seeing her and falls in love.

# data[].attributes.body
Luiz Eduardo Giannotti (los reyes del mundo, 0:41:39)

The camera movements mimic the view of
another character for the viewer, making the audience relate even more with the likable characters that face so many hardships. But the best camera shot in my opinion is when the boys got captured by the ''guerrilleros'' (?), showing as their perspective how they threw out their bikes and with that their most prized possession and hopes of reaching their goal, foreshadowing the end of the road for them. A close second for my favourite shot was when the camera went out of focus on the boys final battle working beautifully with the sound of the three echoed gunshots. Its positioned in an angle that clearly tells the viewer that there was no going back and conveys the heart-breaking scene without showing a drop of blood for the viewers to see.  Overall the editing, sound design and camera-work made the perfect combination to present a depressing story that perfectly englobes the life for many people on Colombia, that many times doesn't lead to a good ending; no matter how much we'd want them to have it. (Also no photo cuz netflix gay)

# data[].attributes.body
This movie has a lot of great stuff that can be talked about it, and one of these is the use of silence as a resource to make the communication with the spectator even better. This movie doesn't have unnecessary dialogue and most of the scenes are self-explanatory, a great example of this is the scene where they kidnap the main group and there is almost no dialogue during the following minutes, during this time even though the audience is never told about that being a kidnapping the audience its self can understand it. but the scene itself is better without that and it leaves an impression on the viewer. If in this scene they tried to explain with dialogue the fact that they were kidnaped it wouldn't be nearly as impactful as it is now, another example of this is one of the final scenes in which the main group finally manages to get into the land they where trying to get for so long and with only one dialogue in the whole scene you can see the happiness about them finally being able to be free and have something to share between them more as a family that as friends and that continued to the feeling of protecting this land that they searched for so long with so many sacrifices in the way, and even if that cost them their lives. the management of the silence and the way of using dialogue is one of the best things in the film and even though I only mentioned these 2 scenes there are a lot more that use this management of the dialogue to leave this weird impression that makes this movie so good.

# data[].attributes.body
Santiago dueñas los reyes del mundo
Throughout the movie we can see how under different circumstances, the main character ra is forced to become a true leader for all of the other 4 boys  of the group we are shown in the film at a very young age, aswell as having to take care of the other boys even throughout moments of poverty and desperation. Throughout the adventure the boys make in order to conquer some land they had been promised in a letter, they go through all sorts of up and down situations but they can always rely on Ra.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Jeronimo Hernandez (The banshees of insherin)

# data[].attributes.body
In the movie padraic and colm both have a mascot that in a way or another represents their personalities. Colm has a border collie, a dog that is the hole oposite of what colm represents is an irony because border collies are describe as loyal, energetic and alert menwhile the character of colm is deffenetley not loyal, he is not energetic and during all the movie the dog allways tries to stop colm of doing things such as cutting his fingers off. meanwhile padraic´s donkey is a perfect representation of the character: Dependant, silly, and docile. when the donkey dies padaric seems like a changed man, like a border collie. maybe loya to his plan and to his morality (he is no longer a friend of colm) he doesent kill the dog, he knows its against colm not the dog. The banshees of insherin is the transformation of padric from a silly donkey to a decided border collie

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Jeronimo Hernanadez (los reyes del mundo)

# data[].attributes.body
In the film "los reyes del mundo" the simbology represens diferent aspects of masculinity and of strength in which things as a group of friends on medellin are constantly asociating their loyalty, friendship and love by hiting each other or curing each others wounds.
In this film violence represents a big part of the friendship of ra, but not only violence shows masculin culpture. There is a moment in the film in which after a long walk ra and his friends hug each other in a way that feel emotional in a macro way because they are shaking off all of the social stigmas of men huging for just a brief moment. This hints and details narrate to the audience in a very suttle way how masculinity is a very important role in young colombian society.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Luiz Eduardo Giannotti (Paprika 2006, 1:19:05)

# data[].attributes.body
I really enjoyed how the surrealism of dreams helps every character grow as a person, and the primary example of this is Dr. Chiba and her alter-ego; Paprika. Paprika is such a free spirit contrasting tremendously with the more serious and sometimes cold Chiba. And we are able to see how much Chiba is repressing herself and her own feeling by the introduction of Tokita. He's preented to audience as sloppy and unlikable through Chiba's initial lenses, but the more the film goes on the more likable we realize Tokita actually is and how Chiba was only tricking herself into seeing his negative side in order to not admit her true feelings for her. That's why this scene was so powerful, because in a world-ending scenario she had nothing else to lose and no reasons to lie to herself and to Tokita any longer, finally allowing herself to be happier just like her alter-ego.

# data[].attributes.body
The opening scene of paprika is such an amazing work in my opinion, it not only lays the ground in which the movie is placed upon, but it also introduces 2 of the main characters while at the same time being relevant later on the movie, the sequences during this scene helps us understand the mental state of Toshimi and the personality of Paprika. This sequence of scenes are greatly animated and amazingly directed and later on the movie when contrasted to the "parallel" scene of this one in which Toshimi has to rescue Paprika we can also see the great character development that Toshimi has gotten. While directing a scene it is hard to manage to do so many things only on the opening scene, and I think that such a great animation sequence right at the start of the movie is one of the reasons of why paprika feels such a good movie to see.

# data[].attributes.body
Throughout the movie, prostitution, drug deals and violence are ever common and this scene represents that normality perfectly. The props of the absurd number of dead bodies just in a random ditch that every pass by and ditches bodies in broad day light just goes to show how the police and law enforcement in general are completely absent in the film. This can is alluding to the lack of action that the same law enforcement takes in the real world towards women abuse and such related crimes in our patriarchal society.

# data[].attributes.headline
The sound design behind the baby's death

# data[].attributes.subject
The sound design behind the baby's death

# data[].attributes.body
This scene shook me more than anything else on the film; more than the murders and the drug abuse. The prop of the baby paired with the lack of words from the actors while the narrator monotony expresses that everything won’t be ok, neither now nor in the rest of the film because of the choices of the own characters and the horrible addiction that they suffer.  The entire scene would be completely silent if it wasn't for the narrator and Allison cries, and that helps convey the despair of the situation.

# data[].attributes.body
this scene at almost the end of the movie really reflects the character development of Renton, in this scene renton steals the money from his mates because he thinks they dont deserve it and that he will use it better, by this point renton has left the heroin behind and he has seen all the bad things that his “friends'' have done with only one exception being Spout, and while he was going away from the room the only one who notices that he is stealing all the money is Spout who doesnt wake up the other guys sleeping there. i feel that this scene really shows how much has Renton grown throughout the film, because seeing back into earlier parts of the movie he would have used that money to just buy more heroin and continue in the cycle of momentary pleasure, but instead he gave a part to Spud because he knew he haven't done something bad (recognizing that spout is the only mate he had that was actually a good guy) and using the rest to start a new life away from his past decisions and regrets. In my opinion this character development feels really natural because it really feels like what he would do after passing all that he had to pass in his past. Overall I loved this scene and the buildup for this happening, Renton leaving his past and mistakes behind to just live a normal life, recognizing those who didn't do anything wrong is really something hard to imagine when the movie started but slowly started becoming something more of a possibility.

# data[].attributes.attachment_caption
Tomas Arango (A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night)

# data[].attributes.body
in this scene i want to highlight the acting of the man that appears, in a scene before the man was abusing a man while the vampire girl passes by and sees what is happening, and in order to bring justice she tricks the man into letting her into his house, while in the house the girl bites his finger off, bringing panic, horror and pain into the man´s expression. While struggling to escape due to the pain the woman starts eating him while he stops screaming knowing it is his end and not fighting back to the girl killing him. this scene really transmits all the feelings of the man to the viewer, from the excitement of having that girl in his house to the horror of dying in his hands.

# data[].attributes.body
This image is from the beginning of the movie and what I liked and what I am going to highlight is that at first it only looks like lights with warm colors and somehow showing that even though there is violence, not everything is so bad. Later on, when Rocket grows, this light changes from a warm yellow to more of a melancholic blue, and then turns into something more gray, showing a certain sadness that the place where they lived was always bad, but the characters saw it in a different way.

# data[].attributes.body
I really fell this scene for the intensity and sadness that is perceived, we see how Bistec gives a shot to another child by the order of Zé but without wanting to do it and feeling a lot of pain when executing it, also this scene shows the reality of the favelas and how dangerous they are which impacted me a lot. I also saw how expensive bad acts can become to pay in the "city of god" because although the children did something bad stealing the old man's store, the old man was clear with Zé when he told him that he did not want to hurt the children, however Zé took very seriously that this would not happen again leaving a child dead and another with a shot in his foot.

# data[].attributes.body
I really liked this scene because it represent the role of the journalist in this film. A mere spectator. A cold person who does watch ever it takes to take a good photo. That can be see in Buscap, who does not tremble on taking photos of massacres, wars, murders and emaciated bodies. They are almost omnipresent beings that are wherever there is a misfortune, arriving even before the police

# data[].attributes.body
This scene is very representative of what Dadinho's character is. In this whole scene you can see his sociopathy, this being his reason for acting at all times, not only in this scene, but also in his entire life. This scene is shown to us spectacularly, being all a party, a celebration but in contrast to all this happiness, we can see the other side of the coin, which would be Dadinho and Neguinho. Both blinded by negative emotions, they seek to get even by hurting others. But everything emerges with the death of Bene. Everything comes together there and it could be said that the side of the coin that won was that of Neguinho and Dadinho

And from this scene on, things change a lot and thanks to this death, Dadinho finally goes crazy and the war between cartels begins.

Giving the outcome to the story.

It could be said that this scene is the turning point of Dadinho, of City of God and of the film in general.

# data[].attributes.body
I liked this scene and it impressed me a lot since the camera movement makes it clear in the scene that the person with the camera is in the path of a bullet from the police and the gang, this scene reminds me a lot of cowboy movies and that the shots when they focus on the police and the gang are very similar to cowboy confrontations

# data[].attributes.body
This scene is where the kid takes revenge for the dead of his father while the war was happening, i belive this scene has a great narrative, because it stacks up a lot of thing that happened during the film that at least i thought it wasnt that relevant but ended up in something shocking. this scene can also be represented as the one that showed the consequenses of the actions taken by most of the characters because it is in the midle of the final part of the film in wich the war betwen the gang of Lil Z and the one of carrot resolves and almost every action that was taken during the movie resulted in this, from the start in wich there was only the tender trio untill the kids killing Lil Z to repeat the cycle of violence that has been happening from the start. Over all i like the narrative of not only this scene, but the whole movie. It can be said that everything was connected in an awesome way and i loved the result.

# data[].attributes.body
This scene was the most scary, sad and representative of the whole movie. It represents the whole morality of the gangs in the favela and the morality and mindset of Dadinho. This constant hypocrisy is just sad. Dadinho is the total representation of the world in La Ciudad de Dios. The caos costumed of something good. The perfect example is this scene; With this scene we can notice how this world works, they dont allow the robberies and crimes but they have no problem killing kids and teaching them how to kill. It is simply sad. Also the direction in this scene makes it very painful. The reaction of the kids just destroys you, specially with the one who survived. How you constantly get a view of his face and with the INCREDIBLE work of the actor, it is very painful and hard to see.

# data[].attributes.body
I really liked this scene, not because of what happened, but because of what didn't happen. Throughout the story all of the characters in the slumbs succumb to violence, despite some being good people, like Benny. It is also very jarring to the viewer to see such young characters being seeing violence being so normalized and how the film ends with an even younger generation of outlaws. And we also see that no one manages to escape the city  because of the cycle of violence that in some part everyone has contributed to. The only exception to this is Rocket, the protagonist. This scene is really special because even though he wanted to commit the crime and continue the cycle of violence he has known since birth, his moral values are stronger and don't let him be corrupted like the rest. In a way, the only way to escape the City of God was to not become part of it and it's violence.
(I used a real sketchy site that didn't show the time remaining on the film just a bar showing aproximately how long had passed)

# data[].attributes.body
Scene at minute 01:28:29. I believe the lighting in this scene, which makes a great use of low-keys, manages to show to crude reality of the boys in the favela, because it alternates between shots where they look like adults and shots where they look like kids again. It was the one that impacted me the most throughout the movie, even though it doesn't show any explicit violence the dread in the faces of the men is completely haunting, as well as the coldness and decadence of the building they are in.