# data[].attributes.body
Ernesto Miranda and the state of Arizona

# data[].attributes.body
Miranda was never informed of his constitutional rights while being interrogated. This caused him to plead guilty. His lawyer, Alvin Moore, appealed the case to the Supreme Court soon after and they took the case.

# data[].attributes.body
The Miranda vs. Arizona argument was that Miranda was stripped of his 5th and 6th Amendment rights. He was never informed of his right to not self-incriminate, or the right to an attorney.

# data[].attributes.body
In a 5-4 Supreme Court decision of Miranda vs. Arizona, ruled that Miranda is entitled to rights against self-incrimination and an attorney. Using his confession as evidence would be against his Constitutional rights. This case set forth the Miranda Rights.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Research Guides: A Latinx Resource Guide: Civil Rights Cases and Events in the United States: 1966: Miranda v. Arizona

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
This Hispanic Reading Room research guide focuses on 20th and 21st century American court cases, legislation, and events that had important impacts on civil rights in Chicana/o/x, Hispanic, Latina/o/x, Mexican-American and Puerto Rican communities