# data[].attributes.body
1.      Judge and lawyers

Computers won’t be placed in charge of towns, cities, states, or countries. Computers won’t be creating new laws. Computers won’t be making judicial decisions. Governors, lawmakers, judges, and juries will always need some sense of human discernment that computers will never be able to offer.

2.      Teachers and lecturer

And what about teaching subjects that aren’t as objective as science and math, that aren’t simply based on knowledge? Would a computer be able to understand the nuances of music, art and literature, let alone teach it in a subjective manner? The possibility of that is doubtful, and even if it were to come to pass, it wouldn’t be for a long time.

3.      Doctors and surgeons

On the one hand, the aspects of medicine that are entirely based on medical knowledge, technical expertise, and data analysis could be reasonably automated without much consequence. However, there are elements of healthcare that computers just aren’t capable of handling: bedside manner, making tough decisions from incomplete patient data, dealing with human psychology, and so on

4.      Compute system analysis

It may seem ironic to suggest that computer-related jobs are among those least threatened by computers. In reality the more our economy relies on automation, the more we’ll need people who can implement and manage those systems. The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that there will be a 21% increase in the number of analysts by 2024, a rate much higher than for most occupations. The future for computer analysts looks bright indeed.

5.      Police and Firemen

Police and Firemen cannot be replaced by stringent computer programming. It requires intuition and problem solving to execute the task.

# data[].attributes.body
1) artist
- mei you creativity and emotion
2) comedian
- AI not funny
3) performance coach
- AI cannot identify issues of athlete poor performance and AFI .
4) zookeeper  (best job in the world)
- every individual animal need different diets based on their health, age and behaviour .
5) lifeguard
- not cost effective

# data[].attributes.body
1. Heads of Companies
-the reason the head of companies would not be replaced as it is somethings that they would not let go of and AI are owned by them
2. Mental health workers - robots cannot understand the problems of patients with mental disorders or trauma easily.
3. court judges- because the court of law  require a human touch as we need a human to sympathize with another human.
4. Professional sports-  because watching robots play sports is boring
5. robot designers- self explanatory

# data[].attributes.body
1) doctors - physchiatrist
- robots aren't able to sympathise emotionally with their patients like how humans normally would
- lack of emotions

2) politics and law
- robots do not have a moral compass, they won't be able to tell and decide between what is right and wrong

3) clergy (people with religious duties)
- the sense of spiritual being and beliefs are absent in robots

4) writers
- robots do not have as much creativity as compared to human beings, stories won't be original

5) zookeeper
- robots won't be able to understand the animals needs and won't be able to control animals when they go out of hand

# data[].attributes.body
No, workers will not be replaced by robots. In Singapore's case, there is already a lack of manpower in sectors that the majority Singaporeans would not wish to work in. this causes a need for foreign workers to fill in the gap for Singaporeans lack of manpower. At the same time, the margin of error is reduced largely. Take for example Taxi driving, a company called TESLA owned by Elon Musk has already started selling driverless cars from the America, this has greatly impacted the rates of car accidents in a just a matter of a year. In 1961, the first ever driverless car was invented and tested, by William Bertelson, so for anyone to say that driverless cars are far fetch would be ludacris. Done.

# data[].attributes.body
No. Robots will transform, not replace, human work

# data[].attributes.body
No.. AI will not take too much working jobs..There will be new jobs are available..

# data[].attributes.body
No.There will be new jobs available.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes.Because people should replace workers with robots to save our energies and unsafety. So we can get more time to do the new available jobs instead of working in risking places.(Example, assembling,welding and painting cars)

# data[].attributes.body
No, AI will not take over human's job. As MOE encourages live long learning.#skillsfuture

# data[].attributes.body
No it will not. Even though there is new technology advancements such as AIs that are able to do some of the tasks/jobs we currently are able to do, AIs/Robots are not able to perceive human perception and decision. They can only do what we humans program them to do for that specific task and they need us to build them and make those programmings for them. Therefore, even though yes, there has been a decline in job unemployment being over taken by robots and AIs, we humans are still needed to get the jobs done. These robots are there to ease our job load, to help us. Not to take over our jobs totally.

# data[].attributes.body
No as even though AI may take over some jobs it still needs people to make sure the AI does not do something that is not in its algorithm thus creating new jobs for people however the amount of jobs created may be lesser than the jobs lost but in the far future the more jobs will created to maintain the AI and its other necessities. So at first AI will cause jobs to be lost but in the long run the number of jobs will increase.

# data[].attributes.body
No. Because after all we are still the people building and commanding the technology.
For example, after our meals we put our trays in a robot which brings the trays to the washing unit where we have people washing the dishes manually.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes as the people who doesnt have the skills or the knowledge to find another job will have a hard time as a number of people are unable to have the money to get a better education and this is why they take jobs that require more labour than intellect. Additionally, the type of AI now is able to learn and able to adapt to different circumstances and this would be difficult to compete with as the competition between men and AI will get harder and harder over the years

# data[].attributes.body
No .Because new and more interesting jobs will be created in the process

# data[].attributes.body
Yes. With advance technology, most work can be done by robots. Example, taxi drivers.

# data[].attributes.body
No, some detailed and highly skilled work can't be done by robots. For example, car technicians

# data[].attributes.body
Vishan
No, because  AI free workers for more important tasks like coming up with new ideas.

# data[].attributes.body
YES.
AI technology can help to automate processes that can boost productivity. It may reduce repetitive jobs for blue-collar people. However, more management jobs will be created for the white-collar people. Thus, most of the uproar is from the older generation having lower qualification. Subsequently, they feel threatened when their jobs are taken over by robots.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, AI will take over most human's jobs. Over the years, technology has been developing rapidly and AI will develop until the equivalent of or better than a human. One of the only jobs that would be left for humans is to create these AI. There are only some jobs that require the flexibility and creativity of humans that will be available.

# data[].attributes.body
No as there are certain jobs that a robot cannot do for example, a radio dj if a robot replaced a human for that job many ppl wont be listening to the radio anymore as it will be monotonous. However at the same time there many jobs that could be replaced by robots as they would be more efficient although they might cost more to maintain?

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, since technology has been constantly improving through the years, AI might be able to do our jobs better than we can.

# data[].attributes.body
No
AI will not take human jobs because when the AI replace us, it also create new jobs that related to the job that replaced us and some jobs that need a lot of skills cannot be replace by robot.

# data[].attributes.body
1)Sales Managers.
- The reasons why sales managers cannot be replaced by AI/robots is that sales managers requires interactions and contact with humans to persuade them to buy the product that they are advertising.
2)Actors/Actress
As they need facial and emotional motions to act perfectly to make the movies to be nice. And nothing can replace these jobs.
3)Creative Arts
creativity will never be replaced by computers. Art is an expression of human creativity and imagination something that computers will never have.
4) Massage Therapist
Robots are not able to "guess" the amount of strength needed to massage a customer and might not know which exact point that is tense in the body to massage
5) Writers/Authors
Writers have to create and produce original written material which the AI can't. AI only have the ability to suggest the best titles but not the body inside. lol

# data[].attributes.body
Yes it will, as time goes on there will be less jobs for humans to work therefore, it will in turn has less people spending and helping the economy of the country as its hard to the people who lose their jobs to make money and support their family