# data[].attributes.body
Fort Sumter is an island fort in Charleston Harbor, it is the site of the first shots of the War.

On April 6, Lincoln told the governor of South Carolina that he was going to send supplies to Fort Sumter, but no arms, troops, or ammunition Lincoln essentially said “hey, I am not trying to be aggressive but I am sending supplies to my troops.” instead of ether seeming like he was bad and aggressive or letting them starve.

http://www.ushistory.org/us/33a.asp

# data[].attributes.body
The southern states seceded* from the union.  *withdrew from

No, It wasn’t a solution in the first place it just got rid of the problem not solve it. We stayed separate than the south would of just formed a new country entirely.

http://go.galegroup.com/ps/retrieve.do?tabID=T003&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchResultsType=SingleTab&searchType=BasicSearchForm&currentPosition=2&docId=GALE%7CA500097398&docType=City+overview&sort=Relevance&contentSegment=&prodId=GPS&contentSet=GALE%7CA500097398&searchId=R13&userGroupName=lap17ebrp&inPS=true

# data[].attributes.body
An American presidential election held on Nov. 6, 1860, where Republican Abraham Lincoln defeated Southern Democrat John C. Breckinridge, Democrat Stephen A. Douglas,and John Bell.

The divided democratic party allowed him to win. Because the United states was split 50/50 democratic / republican so when the democratic part split i was 25/25/50 and Lincoln was at 50.

http://go.galegroup.com/ps/retrieve.do?tabID=T003&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchResultsType=SingleTab&searchType=BasicSearchForm&currentPosition=3&docId=GALE%7CA500008601&docType=Article&sort=Relevance&contentSegment=&prodId=GPS&contentSet=GALE%7CA500008601&searchId=R6&userGroupName=lap17ebrp&inPS=true

# data[].attributes.body
His plan was to raid the largest federal arsonal to supply weapons to the abolitionist “army”.

No, even though his ultimate goal, to get rid of slavery, was good he had the wrong approach. He was like a terrorist to the south.

http://go.galegroup.com/ps/retrieve.do?tabID=T003&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchResultsType=SingleTab&searchType=BasicSearchForm&currentPosition=1&docId=GALE%7CA205988365&docType=Event+overview&sort=Relevance&contentSegment=&prodId=GPS&contentSet=GALE%7CA205988365&searchId=R2&userGroupName=lap17ebrp&inPS=true

# data[].attributes.body
It suggested that localities and state legislatures could effectually undercut the Court's decision.

The “Freeport Doctrine” argued that a territory had the right to exclude slavery despite contrary U.S. Supreme Court decisions. It helped him get re-election to senate killed his chance of Southern support for the presidency in 1860.

http://go.galegroup.com/ps/retrieve.do?tabID=T003&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchResultsType=SingleTab&searchType=BasicSearchForm&currentPosition=1&docId=GALE%7CA353319202&docType=Book+review&sort=Relevance&contentSegment=&prodId=GPS&contentSet=GALE%7CA353319202&searchId=R1&userGroupName=lap17ebrp&inPS=true

# data[].attributes.body
It was a court case wear a slave's owner died in a free state and a inherited him but scott sued stating that he was a free man.

No, well first they misspelled Stanford, and second they said scott was free and then they two years later the ruled him a slave again.

http://go.galegroup.com/ps/retrieve.do?tabID=T003&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchResultsType=SingleTab&searchType=BasicSearchForm&currentPosition=2&docId=GALE%7CA159696629&docType=Article&sort=Relevance&contentSegment=&prodId=GPS&contentSet=GALE%7CA159696629&searchId=R1&userGroupName=lap17ebrp&inPS=true

# data[].attributes.body
A group of anti-slavery men including John Brown went to a pro-slavery area and 5 men. They put the bodies in bushes and creeks. This lead to an outbreak of violence in kansas.

No, the specific violence of Bleeding Kansas would not have happened because both sides like the missouri compromise and the compromise resolved the issue of the kansas territory, but there still was growing tension even if the compromise was kept.

http://go.galegroup.com/ps/retrieve.do?tabID=T003&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchResultsType=SingleTab&searchType=BasicSearchForm&currentPosition=1&docId=GALE%7CA62590456&docType=Article&sort=Relevance&contentSegment=&prodId=GPS&contentSet=GALE%7CA62590456&searchId=R2&userGroupName=lap17ebrp&inPS=true

# data[].attributes.body
This act repealed the Missouri compromise and stated that new states could be slave holding if they votes for that.

In order to get the south's support. Because this open new states to slavery if they voted for it.

http://go.galegroup.com/ps/retrieve.do?tabID=T003&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchResultsType=SingleTab&searchType=BasicSearchForm&currentPosition=4&docId=GALE%7CA511109112&docType=Book+review&sort=DA-SORT&contentSegment=&prodId=GPS&contentSet=GALE%7CA511109112&searchId=R1&userGroupName=lap17ebrp&inPS=true

# data[].attributes.body
The fugitive slave act stated that run-away slaves found in the north could be brought back to the south and the people who found them got paid for each slave returned. This lead to people taking free men.

He wrote an essay based on a speech he had made at an anti-slavery rally. He protested and helped more slaves run away.

http://go.galegroup.com/ps/retrieve.do?tabID=T003&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchResultsType=SingleTab&searchType=BasicSearchForm&currentPosition=2&docId=GALE%7CA69653950&docType=Brief+article&sort=Relevance&contentSegment=&prodId=GPS&contentSet=GALE%7CA69653950&searchId=R3&userGroupName=lap17ebrp&inPS=true

# data[].attributes.body
The compromise stated that California was a free state. It demanded stricter enforcement of the Fugitive Slave Act. It abolished the slave trade in Washington, D.C., but residents of the capital city could still own slaves.

Henry clay had to leave because he got sick and so Stephen Douglas had to take his place and then how president taylor died of food poisoning. Or how at first the bill did not pass.

http://go.galegroup.com/ps/retrieve.do?tabID=T003&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchResultsType=SingleTab&searchType=BasicSearchForm&currentPosition=4&docId=GALE%7CA472473917&docType=Article&sort=Relevance&contentSegment=&prodId=GPS&contentSet=GALE%7CA472473917&searchId=R2&userGroupName=lap17ebrp&inPS=true

# data[].attributes.body
The free soil party was created in the election of 1848. Their moto was “Free soil, free speech, free labor and free men.” And Free soilers opposed the expansion of slavery into the new territories.

The Free Soilers lead to the creation of the republican party in the 1850s.

http://go.galegroup.com/ps/retrieve.do?tabID=T001&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchResultsType=SingleTab&searchType=BasicSearchForm&currentPosition=1&docId=GALE%7CCX3048900232&docType=Topic+overview&sort=Relevance&contentSegment=&prodId=GPS&contentSet=GALE%7CCX3048900232&searchId=R1&userGroupName=lap17ebrp&inPS=true

# data[].attributes.body
The bill was stated that the California, Utah, and New Mexico territories would be free forever

Because it declared that California, Utah, and New Mexico would be closed to slavery forever. This also divided congress along regional lines.

http://go.galegroup.com/ps/retrieve.do?tabID=T003&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchResultsType=SingleTab&searchType=BasicSearchForm&currentPosition=1&docId=GALE%7CA82510523&docType=Article&sort=Relevance&contentSegment=&prodId=GPS&contentSet=GALE%7CA82510523&searchId=R3&userGroupName=lap17ebrp&inPS=true

# data[].attributes.body
A compromise for the slavery debate that stated that states north of the 36°30′ latitude in a certain area will be free states.

No, It lasted for 34 years but it was then replaced by the Kansas-Nebraska in 1854.

http://go.galegroup.com/ps/retrieve.do?tabID=T003&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchResultsType=SingleTab&searchType=BasicSearchForm&currentPosition=5&docId=GALE%7CA519935812&docType=Essay&sort=DA-SORT&contentSegment=&prodId=GPS&contentSet=GALE%7CA519935812&searchId=R1&userGroupName=lap17ebrp&inPS=true