# data[].attributes.body
-tina did a really good job of questioning someone else's point in a respectful way.
-make sure to announce when you are citing something, maybe with "according to" instead of saying "in the article"
-maybe dig a little deeper into the certifications of a service dog, I am not sure, but think that you can't just label the pet as a service pet, but need to complete actual classes enable to get a legal certification

# data[].attributes.body
I like how they all stated there idea and had good eye contact with each other. The only things I found that
was a bit of a negetive was the discusion got a bit off track and didnt keep the discussion going.

# data[].attributes.body
Hailey and Jolie have good volume

# data[].attributes.body
Good detail. Supporting the point with confidence. Are not afraid to disagree. Good in trying to defend others point, belief. good job in asking questions to each other.  Talking about their point with evidence. Ask questions. Talk about facts and mentioned article. Good job on talking about pros and cons about the option they want.

# data[].attributes.body
-did a good job going through the criteria
-mostly everyone asked a question
-all were good with making eye contact as someone new started talking
-everyone wet back to the criteria as they analyzed the problem which was good
-good job responding to questions posed

# data[].attributes.body
tina
- needs to talk louder
- good eye contact
paige
- talk louder
- hardly ever talks, if at all
kaitlyn
- talk louder
- good eye contact
jolie
- good eye contact
caden
- good eye contact
hayley
- sounds like shes reading
- good eye contact
ALL
- speak up
- haven't heard anyone use a source to back up information
- awkward start
- from what I could hear it was well explained
- usually same opinion and same animal(dogs)
- doesn't just have to be about cats and dogs
- ONLY Hayley seemed prepared
- drags on conversation

# data[].attributes.body
Awkward start & transitions
stuck to her role
Quiet
Some evidence wasn't supported by an article
Needs to speak up
They dont seem as prepared as they should be
Sounds like  an awkward conversation
In the beginning it seemed like they were already set on a dog, they didn't introduce the problem right away, they just were talking about whether a dog would be a good idea. They should've said they were first deciding on whether they should get a pet or not, and if they decided it was a good idea then they should've started the discussion on which animal to choose.

Their discussion point changed a lot.
Tina didn't have research to back up all of her points, she was just relying on something she had read somewhere else.
Paige and kaden didn't talk that much
Joking at "inappropriate times"
Discussion was a little messy
Forgot a step

# data[].attributes.body
-Awkward moment in the beginning
-Very quiet - hard to hear
-There's good eye contact
-Good listening, no side discussions
-The transitions are a little awkward
-They answered each others questions
-The discussion is sort of choppy
-Some are making good points but should site their sources
-Awkward silence when one stops
-key points are repetitive

# data[].attributes.body
There is side conversations that i couldn't hear and i was one of the closest people to the groupNo reading but quiet filled with awkward silences Not much reference to articles. would be nice if they put the actual step other than just "step 1".
Hayley- good reasons why you should get a dog. Goes to college. Could be a service dog.
Caden- Is parent so would have to take care of the dog because the kids wont
Price im sure if hayley wants a service dog it would cost a lot of money to train it
Jolie-it doesnt have to be about dogs
Paige- needs to talk more
Tina-Will be home because she is a grandma but if they take the dog to college grandma wouldn't need to see it. ferrets are pretty aggressive
Kaitlyn- artice cited

# data[].attributes.body
Tina-making good points about the grandma being at home all day
Paige-haven't said much
Kaitlyn-good background about cats what sources did you get it from
Jolie-good point it does help tech kids responsibility
Caden- good point about dogs being $$
Hayley-service dogs good idea
seem very nervous awkward start
very quit
sources?
didn't seem very prepared for this
dragged on the same thing for so long
didn't hear Paige very much
very well talking and keeping going by hayley tina and caden

# data[].attributes.body
Needs to speak up
They had an awkward start
Very well explained
Good reasoning on why or why not to get an animal
Seems to be dragging on the same opinions
A lot of pauses
Needs to carry through instead of going silent
Could only hear Caden, Hayley and Kaitlyn
Seems unprepared or uncomfortable
Couldn't hear any role besides daughter with autism, father and mother
Very repetitive of key points
Should've defined the problem better
No sources were used
The criteria doesn't add to what they're deciding on
Didn't have the slides they needed done
Went off topic
Only Hayley was prepared

# data[].attributes.body
Good job stating criteria
Good eye contact
Prepared
Talk louder
I like how they all figured out if they want to have a dog or not.
Talk like they are having a discussion not like they are presenting which is good.
Good job backing up their evidence with information from articles.
Went through all the steps they needed to.

# data[].attributes.body
- Didn't really define the problem
- Lots of random silences when transitioning
- Caden did a good job citing a source
- Not discussing other possible animals besides dogs
- Group needs to speak up
- Not comfortable when discussing
- Discussion is not flowing well
- Tina is using prior knowledge instead of using her articles which is okay
- Talk more evenly
- The group seemed very unprepared for the discussion
-  The group didn't follow the steps of Dewey's

# data[].attributes.body
Everyone is thinking about how to take care of the pet. Kaitlin has a good fact and is thinking about the health of the dog. Kaden is thinking about the low cost because of the big family. Haley is very knowledgeable about her animal. Tina is good at saying how to solve problems. They are thinking about if this animal will work in their everyday life.

# data[].attributes.body
Kaitlyn- Cites article and supports her point by stating facts.
Caden- I would like to hear Caden talk more. Asks question.
Jolie- I would like to hear Jolie talk more
Paige- I would like to hear Paige talk more about her opinion.
Hayley- Say facts to support her character role. Uses a lot of facts from her article.
Tina- Good talking but should talk louder so other people can hear. Asks a question to keep the discussion. Asks questions to people who haven't talked a lot.
They don't really have a comfortable discussion, they have awkward transitions. Not all of them are talking equally. More are talking a lot more than others while others aren't speaking much. Everyone listens to the person who is speaking.  They suggest possible solutions.

# data[].attributes.body
-They had an awkward moment of silence before starting the discussion
-  Tina could use a louder volume when making her key point in the discussion
-They could try to keep the discussion flowing more  by asking more questions to certain members on their opinion on why they should get a certain pet
-Hayley good point on how having a service animal at college would help her get through her years at a university
-Kaitlyn refers to one of her articles to help back up her criteria of which is best for of all them
-Paige could ask more questions or  more with using research that she found in one of her articles
- They could be more elaborate in their group instead of three out all them speaking the most
- Most of the group seems unprepared for the discussion also not comfortable when asked a question by another group member
-I feel that some of their reasons don't line up with their criteria
- change the topic many times and, some times it went off topic
-Paige could speak a little more louder

# data[].attributes.body
Awkward transitions
Moved along well from should we get a pet to what type of pet to get
have not heard a source
Caden did a good job summarizing tina's point
Seem kind of unprepared
Seems like they dragged it on with points off the main problem or question

# data[].attributes.body
- Good job defining the problem
- Bit of a rocky start
- Sounds a little too planned out
- The discussion is a bit messy
Haley
- good job explaining and elaborating on the reasons why
- Good volume
- Came prepared
Tina
- Got to the point right away
- Needs to talk a bit louder
- Good job asking questions
- Good job defending her points
- Good job keeping the discussion going
Kaitlyn
- Good job explaining reasons
- Good job explaining sources
- Good job staying away from reading voice
Cade
- Should have elaborated a bit more
- Good volume
- Good job incorporating sources
Jolie
- Good eye contact
- Answered questions clearly
- Needs to speak more
Paige
- Should speak a little louder
- Good job with sources
- Needs to speak more