# data[].attributes.body
Is Document A credible, tho?  There is a lot of mediation ( Gray is the one interpreting and writing the words down...)

# data[].attributes.body
Most people would think that he is crazy

# data[].attributes.body
I think people back then thought he was crazy in the same way people see him now

# data[].attributes.body
*prophet

# data[].attributes.body
and Document c basically says he was crazy also, but it because he was suffering from being a slave

# data[].attributes.body
crazy*

# data[].attributes.body
true i agree with sophia

# data[].attributes.body
Document b desccribes him as craxy

# data[].attributes.body
Nat Turner might be viewed the same way as Charles Manson since according to document B he believed he was a profit and was meant to do all of this.

# data[].attributes.body
Document a explains that turner thought he was a prophet

# data[].attributes.body
people dont know how they would react in these types of traumatic experiences that

# data[].attributes.body
People back int he day probably thought that he was intentionally being crazy. When in reality we can now see that he probably had a mental dissorder.

# data[].attributes.body
He wasn't mentally stable

# data[].attributes.body
Nat Turner Wildin

# data[].attributes.body
i agree with document c the most

# data[].attributes.body
he was desperate for it to stop

# data[].attributes.body
I think document A is the most trustworthy because it's the only document with a direct quote from Turner

# data[].attributes.body
I think the document A because of the outside perspective and the direct quote.

# data[].attributes.body
because kevin was subject to a traumatic experience, he responded with violence

# data[].attributes.body
he came to the conclusion that it was the only way to resolve things

# data[].attributes.body
Amy, your comment reminded me of the movie Split

# data[].attributes.body
The violence consumed his life and affected his actions thereafter

# data[].attributes.body
i would want evidence from slaves that lived on the plantation with him and also his oweners

# data[].attributes.body
slave owners were worried that more slaves were going to rebel

# data[].attributes.body
Documents A B and C all resent different perspectives on Nat Turner. Some think he was nuts others think he was alright.

# data[].attributes.body
Harriett Jacobs also mentions life after the rebellion being worse.

# data[].attributes.body
Exactly! so Nat Turner actually made things worse for slaves

# data[].attributes.body
His craziness was a direct response from the brutal conditions that he'd been forced to live in and responded with violence

# data[].attributes.body
he was enthusiastic about killing people

# data[].attributes.body
isnt it just a fan?

# data[].attributes.body
The textbook evidence that life had gotten worse for slaves. there were more restrictions placed on them after the rebellion.

# data[].attributes.body
what is a fanatic?

# data[].attributes.body
but he did kill children as well so i think he just got mentally messed up

# data[].attributes.body
he saw things = crazy

# data[].attributes.body
i think that's why many would consider him a hero is because he did something about the injustice of slavery

# data[].attributes.body
Based on documents the mentioned him as a fanatic and described his actions. They all added up to being very crazy like. He reminds me of Charles Manson.

# data[].attributes.body
From a young age, he thought he was a prophet but there is no evidence to prove that.

# data[].attributes.body
he was crazy

# data[].attributes.body
he led a rebellion in 1831

# data[].attributes.body
I think he was a madman with good intentions

# data[].attributes.body
Nat Turner was a slave

# data[].attributes.body
To me Nat Turner was a madman. His actions had no real beneficial effect on the slave industry and overall made slavery worse for those involved.

# data[].attributes.body
Hey

# data[].attributes.body
sup

# data[].attributes.body
hey