# data[].attributes.body
Topic: Cell Phone radiation

Stakeholders:
1. Cell phone users
2. Mobile phone manufacturers
3. Radio-biology

Ethical Questions:
- How will mass radiation affect the environment?
- Should cell phones be toned down to reduce radiation.
-  Can we prevent the amount of radiation being produced.

Solutions:
- Companies begin a process of reducing cell phone radiation.

Heart Of The Controversy:
Does Cell phone radiation cause cancer?

# data[].attributes.body
Period 2

Topic: Trumps war on science

Stakeholders:

1. Scientists

2. American People

3. Members of the EPA

Questions of Controversy:

1. How will appointing unqualified people into scientific positions effect our environment?

2. Will having a president that discourages scientific research in the fields of global warming, rising sea levels, and other environmental issues change the amount of government research funding?

3. How will the recent surge of support for the declining coal mining industry by President Trump effect our environmental views on the practice as a whole?

# data[].attributes.body
Topic: Animal Testing

Stakeholders:
1. Animal Rights Advocates
2. Scientists
3. Buyers of the products that use
animal testing.
4. Consumers of cosmetic products.

Event: When the public found out that a cosmetic company, L'Oreal, tests their products on animals.

Questions of Controversy:
1. How much of animal research is actually for the the benefit of the human race?
2. How much of the animal research is just out of curiosity?
3. Should animals be used for research even though it harms them?
4. Should we allow scientists to test on animals even though the result, whether good or bad, might not benefit humans?

Solutions:
1. Stop buying animal tested products.
2. Protests against animal testing companies.
3. Protect animals and their environment.

Heart of the Controversy:
Is animal testing ethically right?

# data[].attributes.body
Animal Testing
Stakeholders:
Scientists, companies and consumers, and animal rights activists

Event: Scientists are testing on animals for the sake of products and scientific advancement

Questions:
- Should we be testing on animals?
- Is testing be safe for the animals?
- Are there and alternate solutions?

Solutions:

Heart of the controversy - Should we be testing on animals and is it safe?

# data[].attributes.body
Topic: Gene Editing
Stakeholders: Scientist, People expecting children, People of the future
Ethical Questions:
-How will gene editing affect the lives of future generations?
-Should gene editing be available for everyone?
-How long will it take to perfect the methods of gene editing?
-How far will the technology go in order to have the "perfect baby"?
Solutions:
-Allow evolution to take place by only using gene editing when it is absolutely necessary and limit the use of gene editing
Heart Of The Controversy:
Should we use gene editing in order to make "perfect humans"?

# data[].attributes.body
Topic: Artificial wombs
Stakeholders:
1.Premature babies
2.The mother if the relationship with the baby isn't developed due to the baby being in an artificial womb
3. Abortion rights
4. Foster kids if parents can create their own child instead of adopting
5. Babies born from artificial wombs

Event:Four lamb babies were premature and put into an artificial womb it was successful

Questions of controversy: What will happen to abortion rights if artificial wombs can be used for premature babies? What affects will the artificial womb have on the babies that finish development in the artificial wombs?

# data[].attributes.body
topic: deforestation
stakeholders: ~manufactures
~ WWF
~citizens
~lumber companies
Event
Questions of controversy: should there be a limit on how many trees companies are allowed to cut down? should their be certain parks/areas where trees can't be cut down? Is deforestation taking away too much from the life quality of the animals that live in them?
solutions: clear cutting of forests should be banned, cutting should be replaced with planting trees, and provide laws to protect the trees from different manufactures
Heart of the controversy: Should we stop deforestation?

# data[].attributes.body
Artificial wombs
1) stakeholders:  scientists, parents of child from artificial womb, doctors, the child itself
2) event/context: premature babies had little chance of survival and people wanted to make a bio bag that could finish carrying the baby the rest of the way.
3) controversy: should we allow children be born from an artificial womb?
4) ethical questions: How would it effect the child? how would this effect race and would the child have different capabilities compared to other children who weren't born from Artificial wombs? could this prevent
5) solutions: let the children who are born extremely prematurely, or have difficulties during pregnancy, or could benefit from it to survive use the artificial womb instead of letting some one use it who just doesn't want to carry a child by themselfs.

# data[].attributes.body
Topic: Gene Editing
Stakeholders:  People who can not afford it, disabled kids, children at risk getting their genes changed, scientists, the public, bioethicist , parents

Questions of controversy: should we allow gene editing to take place even though the technology is risky? What affects will gene editing have if the experimentation is not successful on children? Should we believe that gene editing is necessary for altering genes? How is gene editing going to affect the human body?

Solutions: Only using gene editing for purposeful reasoning.
Waiting until this technology has full developed and is completely safe.

Heart of the Controversy: Should gene editing be preformed

# data[].attributes.body
Artificial wombs

Event/Context: We don't know much about the technology that is being used.

Stakeholders: Women with health issues, trans women, male same sex couples, premature babies

Controversy Questions: how will this change the ideas of parent hood? Will this ultimately be a safer alternative for women? Will artificial wombs will resolve the controversy of abortion rights?

Solutions: Could gave premature babies more of a chance to survive. Women don't have to go through the struggles of health issues.

Heart of controversy: How will this idea change the ideas of parenthood?

# data[].attributes.body
Topic: Wearable Technology
Stakeholders:  Developers of Wearable Tech, Consumers of Wearable Tech, Tech security companies.
Event that caused controversy:
Ethical questions: If wearable tech can be tracked, is it still safe to use? Should developers make the tech they're making more secured? Should

# data[].attributes.body
Topic: Animal Testing

Stakeholders: Scientists, companies that rely on animal testing, and activists.

Event:
When people found out how animals were being treated during testing.

Questions of controversy:
1.) Does animal testing have accurate results?
2.) Is there a better alternative for animal testing that'll get the same results?
3.) Are animals appropriate research subjects instead of humans?
4.) Are drugs tested by animals safe?

Solutions:
Find alternative ways for research.

# data[].attributes.body
Topic: Talking Barbie

Stakeholders: Kids , Parents, and the company itself

Questions of controversy: Should we allow companies to talk back to our kids? Is it legal for the companies to use the voices of kids from the barbies for advertising purposes? Are all the conversations recorded even if they are not talking to the doll? Where does all the information and conversations end up? Who is on the other side of the doll?

Solutions: Get rid of the dolls in all. Do not give the companies the right to record your conversations. Find out more information of the companies and who is talking to the kids.

Heart of the controversy: Should we let the companies have conversations with

# data[].attributes.body
Climate Change
Stakeholders:
politicians (right wing), future generations, environmental scientists, businesses that rely heavily on fossil fuel economics
Event:
Trump's decision to withdraw from the Paris Accord
Questions:
1.) Should we believe that climate change is due to human activity?
2.) Should strict environmental regulations continue to be put it in place?
3.) How would these regulations effect America's economy relative to competing countries?
4.) Is climate change a valid issue?
Solutions:
1.) Shifting completely over to more clean, sustainable, energy sources
2.) Imposing strict environmental regulations
3.) do nothing- as some believe the issue is non-existent.
Heart of the controversy:
Is human interference causing climate change?

# data[].attributes.headline
Topic:Stakeholders(identify 3)Event/Context that caused Controversy:Ethical Questions Raised (4):Solutions to the issue proposed by stakeholders?:What is at the heart of the controversy?

# data[].attributes.subject
Topic:Stakeholders(identify 3)Event/Context that caused Controversy:Ethical Questions Raised (4):Solutions to the issue proposed by stakeholders?:What is at the heart of the controversy?

# data[].attributes.body
wearable technology

Question of controversy:
1)Could an employer require their workers to wear devices that monitor how they speak, what they eat, when they take a break, how stressed they get during a task, and then punish or reward them for good or bad data?
2)How are employers using this data?
3)Is This data and process a violation of employees privacy?
Should employees be told about this upon hiring?

Stake holders: employees of companies who decide to use this wearable technology.

Heart of controversy: Is wearable a violation of privacy

# data[].attributes.body
Animal Testing
Stakeholders: Scientists, Consumers , Activists
Event/Context that caused Controversy: (1)Experienced animal experiments first hand. (2) Experiments on animals are too inhumane.
Questions:
What else can we experiment on besides animals?
Are the results we get from animals really accurate to human results
Do animals have emotions?

# data[].attributes.body
Self-Driving Cars
Stakeholders:
Customers, Passengers, Google, Tesla
Event: Google offering rides with self-driving cars to people
Questions of controversy:
1. Are they safe for the costumer?
2. Should other drivers be worried about them?
3.How will a self-driving car react during a car accident.
4. How will we handle the inevitable software faults that result in human casualties?
Solutions:
1. Work with civic organizations, municipalities and businesses to bring the vision of self-driving vehicles to Americas roads and highways
2. Find patterns in crash-practices to develop ways to avoid it.
3.To make them the safest, highest quality and most environmentally friendly vehicles ever developed
Heart of controversy:
Will self-driving cars create a safe environment on the highways for other drivers.

# data[].attributes.body
Gene Editing

Stakeholders: Children receiving gene  editing, expensive,  disabled kids, future kids, create a baby, playing "god"
1).  Is it ethical, fair to future generations?
2).  allow for "designer babies". 3).snipping harmful DNA out of genes safe?
4). too soon to start toying with human genes?
Solutions: Pause on taking this big step until we k now more about gene editing.
Heart of controversy: Is it too soon to begin enhancing human genes?

# data[].attributes.body
Topic: Animal testing
Stakeholders: animal rights activists, scientists, companies that use animal testing, consumers of cosmetics, medicine etc.
Questions of controversy:
1.) Is using animals to test our products the best way to see if they're safe?
2.) Should we instead test new products on humans?
3.) Should companies that plan to test their products have restrictions on how frequently they are allowed to do so?
4.) How can we stop putting the animals at risk, while still ensuring the products are safe?

Solutions:
Test our products on humans.
Limit the number of animals we test on.

Heart of Controversy:
Is animal testing the best and only way we can safely test products?

# data[].attributes.body
Topic: Animal Testing for Cosmetics
Stakeholders: Animal Advocates-PETA
Everyday people who use makeup, shampoo, etc.
Question of controversy:Should makeup brands look into how many people choose to wear cruelty free makeup?
How is PETA trying to help the animals and how are they trying to make other brands stop?
Do enough  people care about the animal testing to maybe get it stopped and taken away?
Is using the product on the animals to test it enough?

# data[].attributes.body
Controversy:
Autonomous Weapons

Stake Holders:
weapon manufacturers
military
governments
civilians
engineers

Cause of controversy:
the 1988 incident in which a U.S. Navy air defense system mistakenly shot down an Iranian airliner.

Questions of controversy:

1- is technology advanced and reliable enough for autonmous weapons to be trusted?
2- Is it safe to have  a fully automated military?
3- How are autonomous weapons more reliable then human?
4- is it okay to let a machine decide the fate of a human?