# data[].attributes.body
I would choose propaganda protest since I feel expressing opposition to something with a speech or letter is far more effective than violence or destruction of property. It also shows much more respect towards others.

# data[].attributes.body
aggressive cuz it would send a message

# data[].attributes.body
I think passive is more effective because it wouldn't make the British soldiers want to kill the protesters and it is legal.

# data[].attributes.body
propaganda. It made people sympathize for the colonists, and believe the British were bad without violence. But they were hea

# data[].attributes.body
I think passive because they boycotted British goods and the goods made by Britains were probably not very good.

# data[].attributes.body
i think passive because it has been way to go so they don't have to fight

# data[].attributes.body
agressive  because it would have more effect of the british government and people who become scared and wouldnt want to fight back

# data[].attributes.body
I think aggressive because it would have more effect on british , and people were getting hurt.

# data[].attributes.body
Aggress because it's the most harsh one.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the aggresive way would be the most effective because the british are actually losing something as apposed to just not gaining anything.

# data[].attributes.body
aggressive. the feathering and tarring would make tax collecters quit.

# data[].attributes.body
aggressive because people would be scared of them and they would know not to fight with them.

# data[].attributes.body
Propaganda because violence will make people cautious around you and passive isn't giving a big enough message.

# data[].attributes.body
i think passave would have been the best way to go because they would have been able to do it without killing people

# data[].attributes.body
aggressive because it could have more of an affect on things and because being aggressive could scare the people away .

# data[].attributes.body
Aggressive because it leaves a mark to when you go to do it again you wont do it again because you will remember what happened

# data[].attributes.body
aggressive because it could have different effects on people.

# data[].attributes.body
Aggressive because it would leave more of the people acting in thins way affected mentally and or physically. The Boston tea party for example left many people hurt and shocked by what had just happened

# data[].attributes.body
aggressive because it would have more affect on the British government so they would maybe get rid of the taxes because people were getting hurt .

# data[].attributes.body
aggressive because you would be able to intimidate your enemy and be stronger then them

# data[].attributes.body
Aggressive because you would make your point clear if you were  aggressive because people wouldn't  want to fight with you.

# data[].attributes.body
The protest that would be the most effective would be the passive because eventually the British won't have any money. Passive isn't violent. Aggressive isn't effective because the British can just shoot them.

# data[].attributes.body
Passive because the British lost money when no one would buy their stuff.

# data[].attributes.body
aggressive because it would leave people knowing that they were there and they would harm people if they didn't get what they wanted.