# data[].attributes.body
1. The Marbury vs. Madison court case is important because it has established Judicial review for the supreme court.

2.The Judicial Branch interprets what it means and that it can stop the other two branches going against the constitutional.

3.Judicial Review is the supreme court power whether to say that something is constitutional or not

4. Yes, I do believe the supreme court should have a say that a law is or is not constitutional.

# data[].attributes.body
Why is Marbury v. Madison (1803) considered one of the most important court cases in U.S. History?  First time the Supreme Court declared something unconstitutional.

What power did it give the Judicial Branch over the other two branches?The Judicial branch can interpret  what it means and stop the other two branches from going against the constitution.

What is "Judicial Review"?the Supreme court reviews a case or another thing and decides if follows the constitution or goes against it.

Do you think the Supreme Court should have the ultimate power to determine if a law is constitutional or not? Why?Yes, I think the supreme court should have the power to determine whether or not a law is constitutional.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The Marbury vs. Madisons is really important due to it came to be the first unconstitutional law and also was reviewing the Supreme Court in the US.
2. The Judicial branch was created to help enforce the constitution and peoples rights. It was also created to make sure no branch gets to powerful with to many tasks.
3.The Judicial review is when the Supreme court reviews a case or another thing and decides if follows the constitution or goes against it.
4. I believe yes the Supreme court or mainly any court system should have a say either something is unconstitutional or not.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The Marbury V. Madison case is important because it established Judicial Review for the U.S supreme court.
2.  The Judicial Branch was given 2 powers. The power to interpret the constitution and decide what it means and to stop the executive and legislative branches from doing things that go against the constitution.
3. Judicial Review is the idea that supreme court has the final say about what is constitutional.
4. Yes, I think the supreme court should have the power to determine whether or not a law is constitutional. I think this because they are the higest of all the courts.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Marbury V. Madison case is important because it was the first time people saw the court was constitutional

2. Gave the Judicial Branch power to the supreme court called the judicial review

3. Judicial review gives the supreme court the power to say if something is constitutional or not

4. yes the supreme court should have a say

# data[].attributes.body
1.  Its considered to be the most important cases because it was the first law to be considered as unconstitutional.
2. It gave them them all the power
3. Judicial Review is when the supreme court gives authority to declare acts of congress unconstitutional
4. I think it depends, a lot of people in the supreme court are unconstitutional themselves in my opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Marbury v. Madison is a landmark case because it was the first time that an act done by the executive and legislative branches was deemed unconstitutional.
2) It gave the Judicial branch the power of Judicial review.
3) Judicial Review is when the sitting members of the Supreme Court review legislation and see if it is constitutional or not.
4) Yes, I believe the Supreme Court should have the last say in deciding if a law is constitutional or not because that is their duty in analyzing the currents laws.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The Marbury v Madison case is significant in light of the fact that it was the first run through a law was viewed as illegal.
2. The Judicial branch can decipher what it means and prevent the other two branches from conflicting with the constitution.
3. Legal Review is the place the Supreme court has the last say about what is sacred.
4. Truly the preeminent court ought to have capacity to decide whether the law is unlawful or not.

# data[].attributes.body
Its important because this gave the american courts the chance to stop laws that violated the constitution and went through a judicial review.

The judicial review gave the judicial branch power over all.

Judicial review is reviewed by the supreme court and they have the final say to state what is constitutional.

Yes, I believe they should have the final say because they are the top people we have and without there say, who knows if our government would be ran the same way,.

# data[].attributes.body
1.  stated in the Constitution including the Amendments. abuse the The reason Marbury V. Madison is in important case because it set the principle of Judicial Review.

2.  The case gave the Judicial Branch the power to say if the other two branches are doing or did something considered unconstitutional which is called Judicial Review.

3. The Judicial Review gave the supreme court the authority to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional. The Judicial Review is the ultimate Power of Supreme Court

4. yes the supreme court should have the ultimate power. The reason is because without it will be a free for all. People will abuse the ruling stated in the Constitution including the Amendments.

# data[].attributes.body
1.

The Marbury v Madison case is very important because it was the first time a law was considered unconstitutional.

2. The Judicial branch can interpret  what it means and stop the other two branches from going against the constitution.
3. Judicial Review is where the Supreme court has the final say about what is constitutional.
4. Yes the supreme court should have power to determine if the law is unconstitutionsl or not.

# data[].attributes.body
The marbury VS Madison case become the most important case because it was the first ever time they had come across/prove an act was unconstitutional.
2. The judicial branch was  given power.
3. They ensure everything remains constitutional.
4. Yes, because if not our systems would be wack.

# data[].attributes.body
1) This case is important because it established judicial review.
2) It gives the judicial branch the power to use judicial review.
3) Judicial review is a process under which executive or legislative actions are subject to review by the judiciary.
4)Yes and no. I feel they should have a say, but I also feel that we need more voices to determine if something is or isn't constitutional cause it is a big decision.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The reason being is that they, for the first time, brought down congress for being unconstitutional.
2.The Judicial branch can interpret  what it means and stop the other two branches from going against the constitution.
3. The Judicial review lets the Supreme court have the final say on what is constitutional.
4.  Yes, because if the supreme court never had this power than all the three branches wouldn't be equal in power.

# data[].attributes.body
1. It was the first time people saw the unconstitutional court
2. They (The Judicial Branch) gave something called a judicial review
3. Almost a semi checklist of if something is conditional or not.
4. I believe that the supreme court is the most fit for finding the ins and outs or the constitutions and there fore should be fit to make those types of decisions.

# data[].attributes.body
1) It was the first time the courts showed it was unconstitutional.
2) It gave Judicial Branch power, which is called judicial review.
3)Makes sure everything stays constitutional.
4)I think the supreme court can handle constitutional and unconstitutional cases.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The case was so important because that was the first time the Supreme Court had ever decided that an act was unconstitutional, which set the base for many laws made in the future, and also officially helped the Judicial branch be considered the third governmental branch.

2. It gave the Judicial branch the power to stop the other two branches from doing acts that were unconstitutional, called judicial review.

3. Judicial review ensures that the whole government is following the Constitution.

4. I think that the Supreme Court should definitely have the power to make the decision of whether something is constitutional, because if they are in that position of power, we as citizens should trust them with the document that they have studied extensively to be able to attain their leadership.

# data[].attributes.body
1.Marbury V. Madison opened the peoples eyes to unconstitutional court.
2.Judicial review was given to supreme court.
3.determines wether its constitutional or non constitutional.
4.I think the supreme court is fit to handle the constitutional vs. unconstitutional problem

# data[].attributes.body
1.  The Marbury V. madison case became very important because for the first time a law was unconstitutional and started opening others eyes
2. It gave Judicial Review a new power, called Judicial review
3. The judicial Review is a power given to Supreme court to say if something is constitutional or not
4.yes, it lets it be looked over by other and from different stand points. They are the highest level so they better understand what's good for the people and the people need to stay under control

# data[].attributes.body
The Marbury v Madison case is very important because it was the first time a law was considered unconstitutional.

This case gave the Judicial Review power to the Supreme Court

The Judicial Review is a power the Supreme Court has to determine if a law is constitutional or not.

Since the Supreme Court handles the law, I absolutely think the Supreme Court should have the power to decide if something is constitutional or not.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Marbury V. Madison case was important because the case was the opening eye of showing that the courts were being unconstitutional.
2)  It gave the Judicial Branch the power of judicial review.
3) Judicial review is simply the power of saying if something is unconstitutional or constitutional.
4) Yes, the supreme court should because it allows things to be reviewed and taken into hands and different views everything is un pre cautions and decided by smart people that understand the importance of what laws we should have and laws we shouldn't have.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Because the case established the power of the judicial branch with the principle that the Supreme Court may declare an act of Congress void if it is inconsistent with the United States Constitution.

1. Review by the US Supreme Court of the constitutional validity of a legislative act.

1. Yes, the supreme court should

# data[].attributes.body
i think marbury should have just not lied about receiving his commission

# data[].attributes.body
1. The Marbury V. Madison case (1803) was important because it was the first time the Supreme Court made it known that the Congress has been unconstitutional.
2. It gave the Judicial Branch a  power called Judicial Review.
3. Judicial review is the power that the Supreme Court had to decide if something is Constitutional or Unconstitutional.
4. Yes, I think the Supreme court should have the ultimate power to determine if a law is constitutional or not because they are the highest court and they know what's best for the people.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Case was important because it was the first time the congress was seen as unruly.
2.Judicial review was given to the judicial branch, giving them more freedom.
3.Judicial review is the power of having the final say of congress.
4.it's good to have higher people look over our rights. It relieves me knowing that we have smart and honest people who can make our nation better.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The Marbury v. Madison case of 1803 was one of the most important court cases in the U.S. history because it was the first time that the Supreme Court accused the Congress for being unconstitutional.
2. It gave the Judicial Branch the power to interpret the Constitution and decide what it means and to stop the executive and legislative branches from doing things that go against the Constitution.
3. Judicial review is the idea that the Supreme Court has the final say about what is constitutional.
4. The Supreme Court should have the ultimate power to determine if a law is constitutional or not because they are keeping everything fair and equal.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Marbury v. Madison (1803) was considered one of the most important court cases in U.S. History because the Supreme Court case established the principle of Judicial review in the United States.
2. The power of Judicial Review was given to the Judicial Branch over the other two branches.
3. Judicial Review is the power to deem something to see if it is constitutional or unconstitutional.
4. I think that the Supreme Court should have the ultimate power to determine if a law is constitutional or not because it is their job to see if the laws are constitutional or not.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Because Marshall decided to rule against the supreme court and make a new rule stating that he court cannot force madison to give marbury his commission due to it being unconstitutional.
2. The power of judicial review.
3. The power to decide whether legislation is constitutional or not.
4. Yes, because these people are in the highest court and also should know more about the constitution and our nation's laws better than anyone else.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Marbury v. Madison was one of the most important cases because it was the first time that the court was said to be doing something unconstitutional.
2. It allowed the Judicial Branch the power of Judicial review.
3. The power to review something that is deemed unconstitutional.
4. I think that it is good that the Supreme Court has the power to deem something as unconstitutional because it is their job too see if all is fair and good or not and if we don't have something that can do that fairly I think there would be a lot more cases that would have been unconstitutional and cause trouble for someone that might not deserve it because he might truly be innocent.

# data[].attributes.body
1. This is one of the most important cases due to it being the first time the supreme court struck down an act for being unconstitutional.
2. The judicial branch received the power of judicial review.
3. Judicial review is the power to deem something constitutional or unconstitutional.
4. The supreme court should have the power to deem something unconstitutional, or the opposite, due to their high intelligence and understanding of their role, and how they should do their job efficiently.

# data[].attributes.body
1. it's importance stems from the case being unconstitutional
2. The judicial Branch gained the power of judicial review
3. The power to deem something constitutional or not
4. Yes, It's in their power to keep order in our country so they should have that power as well to complete their job more efficiently

# data[].attributes.body
1. The case's actions had been unconstitutional.
2. The judicial branch was given the power of judicial review.
3. The power to decide whether something is constitutional or not.
4. Yes, because all laws must be fair and acceptable.

# data[].attributes.body
1. It was so important because the case was declared unconstitutional.
2. The judicial branch got the power and duties of the judicial review.
3. It is when the Supreme court decides if whether something is unconstitutional or not.
4. yes i do think they should have that power because they know what is good for the people .

# data[].attributes.body
1. Marbury v. madison was a U.S. Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review in the United States, meaning that American courts have the power to strike down laws, statutes, and some government actions that violate the Constitution of the United States.
2.  Article III of the US Constitution establishes the judicial branch of US government. It explicitly creates one Supreme Court, but gives Congress the power to create all other inferior courts.
3. Judicial review is a process under which executive or legislative actions are subject to review by the judiciary.
4. Yes the supreme court should have power to determine if the law is unconstitutionsl or not.

# data[].attributes.body
1. It said the actions were unconstitutional.
2. Its gave judicial branch the power of judicial review.
3. Power to review legislation and decide weather it is constitutional or not.
4.yes.

# data[].attributes.body
1. It had deemed that an act of both the executive and legislative branches had done something unconstitutional.
2. It had given the judicial branch the power of judicial review.
3. It is the power to review the actions of the legislative and executive branch.
4. Yes, they should be able to since their main job is to determine whether a law or action is constitutional.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The case set a precedent for the Supreme Court to uphold the Constitution over other laws created after.
2. The judicial branch received the power of Judicial Review.
3. Judicial Review is the Supreme Court's right to check laws and court cases for conflict with the Constitution.
4. The Supreme Court should have the right to determine what is/is not constitutional so the Legislative and Executive Branches cannot pass any bias or self-benefiting laws that disrupts with rights of the people already established in the Constitution.

# data[].attributes.body
1. It declared is own actions as unconstitutional.
2. it gave itself the power of judicial review.
3. The ability to review and interpret the constitution.
4. Yes because they are the highest court and they have the power to interpret the constitution. as long as they maintain their standards and dont make exceptions theyre good.

# data[].attributes.body
1. marbury v. madison is considered one if the most important cases in us history because it was the first time the supreme court declared something as unconstitutional.
2. it gave the judicial branch the power of judicial review.
3. judicial review is when the sitting members of the supreme court review the legislation and see if it is constitutional or not.
4. yes, i think that the supreme court should have the power in determining if a law is unconstitutional or not because they thy need to make sure they are all fair and acceptable if they are going to be a law.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Marbury v. Madison is considered one of the most important court cases in US history because it was declared unconstitutional.

2. It gave the Judicial Branch a certain power called "Judicial Review".

3. "Judicial Review" is the Supreme Court deciding if someone is unconstitutional or not.

4. Yes, I think that the Supreme Court should have the power in determining if a law is unconstitutional or not because they need to make sure laws are fair and acceptable.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Marbury v. Madison is a landmark court case because it was the first time that an act done by the executive and legislative branches was deemed unconstitutional.
2) It gave the Judicial branch the power of Judicial review.
3) Judicial Review is when the sitting members of the Supreme Court review legislation and see if it is constitutional or not.
4) Yes, I believe the Supreme Court should have the last say in deciding if a law is constitutional or not because that is their duty in analyzing the currents laws of this nation.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Marbury v. Madison is considered one of the most important court cases in U.S History because it
was the first time the Supreme Court struck down an act of Congress for being unconstitutional.

2. The Judicial Review gave the Judicial Branch power over the other two branches.

3. Judicial Review is where the Supreme court has the final say about what is constitutional.

4. Yes, I think the Supreme court should have the ultimate power to determine if a law is constitutional or not because they  are high educated people. Also, the Supreme court follows the constitution on high levels and if the doesn't follow the constitution they can deny it as their final answer.

# data[].attributes.body
1: Marbury v. Madison is considered one of the most important court cases in U.S. history because they had to go through the supreme court to see if madison not delivering mail was unconstitutional or not.
2: The judicial branch gave the judicial review power over the other two branches.
3: Judicial review is when the supreme court gives their final say on the case to see if it's constitutional.
4:  Yes, I think the supreme court should have the ultimate power to determine if a law is constitutional or not because they can see if it can be apart of the constitution or not and they can see if it follows the constitution and if not they can deny it as their final say.

# data[].attributes.body
1.It is  the U.S. Supreme Court first declared an act of Congress unconstitutional, thus establishing the doctrine of judicial review.

2. The judicial review gave the judicial branch power.

3. It is the review by the US Supreme Court of the constitutional validity of ad legislative act.

4. Yes i do think the Supreme court should have the power to determine if the law is constitutional because they are high educated people. Also the supreme takes a good look at the law to see if it is right or it has any flaws that are on the bill or right

# data[].attributes.body
Marbury v. Madison is considered important because it was the first time the Supreme Court declared a law passed by Congress as unconstitutional.

It gave the power to submit actions carried out by the other two branches to Judicial Review.

Judicial Review is the process by which the Supreme Court says if an action or law is Unconstitutional, or not.

I believe so, since it is the number one court in the US, the most powerful jury in the country.

# data[].attributes.body
Marbury v.Madison is considered one of the most important cases in U.S history because it was the first time the Supreme Court could declare an act of congress to be unconstitutional.
It gave the Judicial Branch a power called Judicial Review.
Judicial Review is the power the Supreme Court to declare if a law is unconstitutional or not.
Yes I think that the Supreme Court should have the power to determine if a law is constitutional because they are a group of highly educated people. The Supreme court takes a good hard look at the law to see if there are any flaws. If they see one and if it violates the U.S Constitution in any way, they will declare it as unconstitutional. The Supreme Court is the last line of defence so that is why they need this power.

# data[].attributes.body
Why is Marbury v. Madison (1803) considered one of the most important court cases in U.S. History?

What power did it give the Judicial Branch over the other two branches?

What is "Judicial Review"?

Do you think the Supreme Court should have the ultimate power to determine if a law is constitutional or not? Why?