# data[].attributes.body
Twelve boys and their soccer coach stranded in Thailand cave.

Who: A coach and his 12 boy soccer team (the Wild Boars) ventured in to caves for a teammates birthday
What:
Where: Tham Luang caves
When: summer 2018, about a week after they went in British divers found the group
Why: heavy rains showered soon after they went in, that flooded the caves so they were trapped inside
How: 100 divers from all over the world came to the rescue, one former Thai Navy SEAL diver died in the process of bringing them oxygen.

# data[].attributes.body
Donald Trump government shutdown

Who: Donald Trump
What: Donald Trump the president of the USA, shutdown the the government for over 30 days because he wants to build a wall between Mexico and the US.
Where: The USA and Mexico border.
When: Trump will build the wall when he gets the funding but if he does not get the funding he needs he will shutdown the government again and use the emergency power and will get the $5.7 billion to help build his wall.
Why: Trump wants to build a wall between the US and Mexico because the US is a rich country but yet Mexico is a poor country. Donald Trump said" he believes in a strong country which is a closed country"
How: It was affecting the US because people weren't getting payed for over a month and schools were also on strike . Now if trump still doesn't get his funding he will go over his powers to find a way to build a wall even if people are losing their jobs or students aren't going to school. He will do whatever it takes to build a wall between the rich and the poor.

Links:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/jan/31/trump-border-wall-national-emergency-negotiations

https://education.francetv.fr/matiere/anglais/cinquieme/video/why-does-trump-want-to-build-a-wall-between-the-united-states-and-mexico

# data[].attributes.body
Power Outage at New York Federal Prison

Who: Inmates of the New York Federal Prison
What: The power outage at the New York Federal Prison has left inmates shivering in the dark, and unable to read instructions
on medication. Tempetures have been as low as 49 degrees farenheit and are expected to drop to 30 degrees on Sunday.
When: This dreadful situation has been going on since the night of January 31 2019 and federal officers say it will not be fixed till Febuary 4 2019
Where: Brooklyn, New York
Why: According to The Bureau of Prisons the facility had a fire in the room cointaining electrical switches and a partial power outage occurred in one of the two buildings. Installation of a new electrical panel has taken place but crews need to restore power.
How: Many people gathered outside of the prisonprotesting with signs saying, “Shut it down,” and “Torture at the MDC”.
Link: https://www.cnn.com/2019/02/02/us/new-york-federal-prison-no-heat/index.html

# data[].attributes.body
Controversies surrounding the Super Bowl
Who: Colin Kaepernick who was a backup quarterback for the San Francisco 49ers, more than a 100 million people watching the Super Bowl.
What: In 2016, Colin Kaepernick was a backup quarterback for the San Francisco 49ers. Colin Kaepernick decided that he would no longer stand during the singing of the national anthem before games, to support the police shootings of unarmed black Americans. Some Singers also turned down performing at the half time to support the protest of Black Lives Matter, and don’t agree with the NFL’ s stance.
When: Febuary 3 2019
Where: Mercedes Benz Stadium, in Atlanta
Why: Colin Kaepernick took a silent act of protest against the police shootings of unarmed black Americans, he would kneel while they sang the national anthem “I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color,” he said.
How: Athletes have knelt in protest this season without consequence, However, Colin Kaepernick remains off the field.

Link:

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
On Sunday, February 3, more than 100 million Americans are expected to watch Super Bowl 53 and its halftime show. That kind of viewership means that most years, the halftime show is a coveted performance slot - but this year, it's shrouded in controversy.

Maroon 5 are set to perform, with Travis Scott and Big Boi making guest appearances. But all three acts were added to the slate late in the process, after multiple stars reportedly turned down the opportunity to appear during the halftime show. And both Maroon 5 and Travis Scott have fielded major backlash after announcing their performances.

Here's how the Super Bowl halftime show, an institution that was once the biggest showcase in American music, ended up begging for performers in 2019.

The controversy over this year's Super Bowl begins with Colin Kaepernick

In 2016, Colin Kaepernick was a backup quarterback for the San Francisco 49ers. After speaking with a former NFL player who had served as a Green Beret, he decided that he would no longer stand during the singing of the national anthem before games. Instead, in a silent act of protest against police shootings of unarmed black Americans, he would kneel. "I am not going to stand up to show pride in a flag for a country that oppresses black people and people of color," he said.

Slowly, other NFL players joined the protest, and conservative outrage mounted in response. Kneeling athletes, argued some on the right, were disrespecting the American flag, and by extension American veterans. Some conservatives urged a general NFL boycott.

President Trump chimed in, with rhetoric that amplified the already charged racial politics surrounding the protest. "You know what's hurting the game: when people like yourselves turn on television," he said at a rally with mostly white attendees in September 2017, "and you see those people" - meaning the mostly black athletes of the NFL - "taking the knee when they are playing our great national anthem."That October, Vice President Mike Pence walked out of a game when players knelt during the anthem.

The NFL at first supported its players, saying that they were encouraged but not required to stand during the playing of the national anthem. But as outrage mounted, the league changed its tune.

After becoming a free agent in the spring of 2017, Colin Kaepernick was not offered a contract from any team in the league. ( He has since filed an official grievance against the NFL, saying it colluded to keep him from working.) And in May2018, the NFL announced a new policy. Now players would be expected to stand for the anthem if they were on the sidelines but were given the option of remaining in the locker room instead. If they protested, they would be fined.

The policy was wildly unpopular, and last fall, the NFL announced that it would no longer enforce it. (Athletes have knelt in protest this season without consequence.) Kaepernick, however, remains off the field.

Rihanna, always a trendsetter, reportedly turned down the Super Bowl halftime gig. Others followed suit.

Rumblings that the 2019 Super Bowl halftime show would be unusual first began to surface in the fall, when reports emerged that the NFL had offered the headlining spot to Rihanna and she declined. Reportedly, she cited Kaepernick in her reasoning.

"The NFL and CBS really wanted Rihanna to be next year's performer in Atlanta," a source told Us Weekly in October. "They offered it to her, but she said no because of the kneeling controversy. She doesn't agree with the NFL's stance."

According to Entertainment Weekly, the NFL also reached out to Pink, but she turned them down too, when contract negotiations dragged on too long.

Eventually, reports emerged that Maroon 5 would perform at the Super Bowl. And before the story was ever confirmed by either the NFL or Maroon 5, thousands of people signed a Change.org petition calling on the group to drop out.

"Kaepernick risked his career to take a knee for equality, and the NFL punished him for it," wrote petition starter Vic Oyedeji. "Until the league changes their policy and support players' constitutional right to protest, no artists should agree to work with the NFL. Join me in asking Maroon 5 to drop out of the 2019 Super Bowl halftime show." The petition currently has over 110,000 signatures.

"I think it would be cool if [Maroon 5] backed out of super bowl like [Rihanna] Did," wrote comedian Amy Schumer on Instagram. She added that she was refusing to appear in any Super Bowl commercials for 2019. (Schumer did not say whether she was offered any commercials this year, but she's done Super Bowl commercials in the past, including a Bud Light commercial with Seth Rogen in 2016.) "I know opposing the nfl is like opposing the nra," she wrote. "Very tough, but don't you want to be proud of how you're living?"

"You know, I think that when you look back at every single halftime show, people just can't - it's this like insatiable urge to hate a little bit," Maroon 5 frontman Adam Levine told Entertainment Tonight of the controversy. "I'm not in the right profession if I can't handle a little bit of controversy. It's what it is. We expected it. We'd like to move on from it."

In the wake of the controversy, Maroon 5 were reportedly desperate for an artist of color to perform with

As the Super Bowl approached with no sign of a guest performer, rumors emerged that Maroon 5 were desperate to find someone, ideally an artist of color, to perform with them, and they couldn't get anyone to say yes.

In December, Variety reported that the band had reached out to "more than a half-dozen stars" to join them for the halftime show, including André Benjamin (a.k.a. André 3000 of Outkast), Mary J. Blige, Usher, Lauryn Hill, and Nicki Minaj. But every last one, Variety reported, said no.

The obvious choice to fill the featured guest artist slot would have been Cardi B. Cardi collaborated with Maroon 5 on a remix of "Girls Like Us" in 2018, and her star is only rising; her name had been in the mix for featured guest artist starting in September, well before Maroon 5 was even confirmed. But in December, she reportedly declined the offer.

Reports vary as to why Cardi said no. One source told Page Six that she would only do it if the NFL offered her $1 million (halftime performers are typically unpaid). But another said that Cardi, like Rihanna, was standing in solidarity with Colin Kaepernick, and that she would only consider performing "when they hire Colin Kaepernick back."

Cardi has long been vocal in her support of Kaepernick. At the 2017 MTVVideo Music Awards, she used her acceptance speech for Best New Artist as an opportunity to shout him out, saying, "Colin Kaepernick: As long as you kneel with us, we gonna be standing for you, baby."

A rep for Cardi B told Page Six that the reports she was demanding $1 million are false, and that while "she was not particularly interested in participating because of how she feels about Colin Kaepernick and the whole movement," she didn't actually turn down the Super Bowl because "there was never a solid offer for her to say yes or no to."

Travis Scott has tried to avoid backlash for taking the halftime gig. It might have backfired.

Shortly after news leaked that Cardi B would not be performing, two new names took center stage: Outkast rapper Big Boi and rapper Travis Scott.

Big Boi has largely avoided making too much noise about his appearance, and considering that Super Bowl 53 is taking place at Atlanta's Mercedes-Benz Stadium, his status as a representative of the Atlanta music scene at an Atlanta-hosted Super Bowl may have softened the criticism against him. ( A sub-controversy of sorts, hidden beneath the Kaepernick protests, centered on outrage over the idea that a Super Bowl halftime show in a city with a rich hip-hop history like Atlanta would spotlight primarily white artists.)

But Scott, who told Rolling Stone in December that he was beginning to get involved with progressive politics, and who stumped for Texas Senate candidate and Ted Cruz challenger Beto O'Rourke in last fall's midterm elections, immediately drew heavy criticism. Jay-Z reportedly tried to talk him out of taking the job.

"I think he should do what a lot of other major artists have done: say 'I'm not going to participate," said Rev. Al Sharpton. "You can't fight against Jim Crow and then go sit in the back of the bus."

In an apparent move to neutralize the criticism against him, Scott announced in January that he will donate $500,000 in partnership with the NFL to the nonprofit organization Dream Corps, along with "other initiatives that he will work with the League on."

"I back anyone who takes a stand for what they believe in," said Scott. "I know being an artist that it's in my power to inspire."

Almost immediately after he announced his donation, Scott officially confirmed that he would be performing with Maroon 5 at the Super Bowl halftime show. A "source close to Scott" told Variety that Scott spoke with Kaepernick before he made his decision and that the two had reached a place of "mutual respect," but Kaepernick later retweeted a statement from his girlfriend that declared that "there is NO mutual respect" between them.

"Colin doesn't tell Travis what he can and can't do," fired back a Scott source. "That's Travis' decision."

Meanwhile, Gladys Knight, the Empress of Soul, announced in January that she would be singing the national anthem to open the game. She defended her choice strongly.

"I understand that Mr. Kaepernick is protesting two things and they are police violence and injustice. It is unfortunate that our National Anthem has been dragged into this debate when the distinctive senses of the National Anthem and fighting for justice should each stand alone," Knight said in a statement to E! News. "I am here today and on Sunday, Feb. 3 to give the Anthem back its voice, to stand for that historic choice of words, the way it unites us when we hear it and to free it from the same prejudices and struggles I have fought long and hard for all my life."

For his part, Kaepernick has declined to comment directly on the controversy. He occasionally retweets others' statements about the issue, but he doesn't tweet about ithimself, and he never grants interviews. "He has grown wise to the power of his silence," said a GQ profile in 2017.

In many ways, that's fitting. This Super Bowl 53 halftime show controversy is one that, like Kaepernick's activism, is defined by silence. It is defined by artists declining to raise their voices in service of the NFL - despite the 100 million viewers the NFL can offer them.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Super Bowl halftime show controversies, explained

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
On Sunday, February 3, more than 100 million Americans are expected to watch Super Bowl 53 and its halftime show. That kind of viewership means that most years, the halftime show is a coveted performance slot - but this year, it's shrouded in controversy.

# data[].attributes.body
Shooting at Surrey Skytrain Station
Who : 35-year-old Daon Gordon Glasgow and  27 Year old Transit police Constable Joshua Harms
What: Daon shot a transit officer in the arm twice at the Surrey Skytrain Station. "Daon Gordon Glasgow is the prime suspect in Wednesday’s shooting, in which the constable was hit twice in the arm. Police are not saying much about what led to it, but Glasgow was wanted on an alleged parole violation at the time the trigger was pulled."
When: January 30th 2019, on a Wednesday just after 4:00Pm
Where: Scott Road SkyTrain Station  located near the south end of the Pattullo Bridge in the South Westminster BC
Why: There is no information as of right now from investigators as why he has been shot, suspecting that the officer may have been trying to arrest him for his parole. There is a Canada wide warrant on the suspect
How: "Glasgow should be sentenced to 10 years in prison but deducted a year because he had been in custody since his arrest in April 2010. He also prohibited Glasgow from possessing any firearm or ammunition for life.
On April 14, 2015 the appeal court in Vancouver reduced Glasgow’s sentence to eight years ad six months with a pre-sentence custody credit of one year and six months."

Links:https://www.surreynowleader.com/news/surrey-skytrain-station-shooting-suspect-was-released-from-prison-on-reduced-sentence/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The many faces of Surrey SkyTrain shooting suspect Daon Gordon Glasgow. Surrey RCMP said at the time of the shooting, Glasgow was described as dark skinned with a black stubble mustache, however, police added Glasgow is "known to quickly alter his appearance." (Submitted photos: Surrey RCMP)

Shooting

Surrey SkyTrain station shooting suspect was released from prison on reduced sentence

Judge in Glasgow's shooting case was 'particularly impressed' victim's parents urged Glasgow to become a 'better person'

The convicted killer accused of shooting Transit Police Constable Josh Harms at the Scott Road SkyTrain Station got a break from the Court of Appeal in April 2015 when his nine-year sentence for the 2010 shooting death of a man at a Surrey McDonald's restaurant was reduced.

Daon Gordon Glasgow is the prime suspect in Wednesday's shooting, in which the constable was hit twice in the arm. Police are not saying much about what led to it, but Glasgow was wanted on an alleged parole violation at the time the trigger was pulled.
READ ALSO: Surrey RCMP now say they can't confirm if wounded transit cop shot at suspect OUR VIEW: Transit cop shooting reminds us to be thankful for those who protect us READ ALSO: Transit Police have been in deadly Surrey situations before
"I have no information from investigators as to what was going on during the time of the shooting, or leading up to the shooting," Surrey RCMP Sergeant Chad Grieg told the Now-Leader Friday, when asked if Harms had been trying to arrest Gordon for the alleged breach of parole.

"The unlawfully at large warrant is in respect to violating parole," Grieg said. "The warrant for unlawfully at large was issued prior to this occurrence, and it is not linked, I guess you can say, to this investigation."

In April 2011 Glasgow, who had originally been charged with second-degree murder, pleaded guilty to the lesser charge of manslaughter for shooting Terry Blake Scott in the chest inside the men's washroom of the McDonald's restaurant at 11011 Scott Road, during dinner hour when families were present.

Scott's mom and dad told Justice Geoffrey Gaul, during the 2011 sentencing hearing at B.C. Supreme Court in New Westminster, that the loss of their son was "devastatingly painful."

"However, to their enormous credit they appear to be a forgiving family and one that will not allow bitterness or hatred to enter into their lives on account of the tragic loss of their son," Gaul noted. "I was particularly impressed by the portion of the victim impact statement where Mr. and Mrs. Scott urge and encourage Mr. Glasgow to become a better person."

Witness interviews and video surveillance footage revealed that after the single gunshot rang out Scott emerged from the washroom clutching at his chest, and collapsed on the restaurant floor while Glasgow ran towards a nearby Subway restaurant, past some railway tracks and into an industrial area where he disappeared from sight.

"Based on police and forensic investigation including cell phone text analysis and security video at McDonald's Glasgow was identified as the suspect," Gaul noted.

Security surveillance video footage has once again come back to haunt Glasgow in this Scott Road SkyTrain Station shooting, nearly nine years later, as on the night of the shooting police released to the public images of him from a transit security camera at the station as they hunted for him.
READ ALSO: Suspect in transit cop shooting was jailed in 2011 for killing man at Surrey McDonald's
"Video surveillance is quite helpful in police investigations and that's why we have our officers out there conducting neighbourhood inquiries, looking for video surveillance in the area that this occurred, as well as we're lucky to have the video surveillance from TransLink that was provided to us," Grieg said.

"We have released the video Canada-wide, it's on the RCMP website, we did release it to the media and as far as we know the media has been up in other parts of the country, yes."

Please share: video released of the suspect who shot a @TransitPolice officer earlier today. We are actively searching for him. Call 911 if you see him. pic.twitter.com/xZxM7g9zdD

- Surrey RCMP (@SurreyRCMP) January 31, 2019

Meantime, the court in 2011 heard Scott was shot was over five ounces of hashish worth about $1,000, and Glasgow dropped some of the drug during his escape.

"The firearm was never recovered but the bullet removed from the deceased was consistent with being fired from a .38 special or .357 magnum handgun," the judge noted. "The deceased died from a gunshot that entered his chest travelled through a valve in his heart, travelled down the body grazing a kidney, through the liver and coming to rest just under the surface of the skin on Scott's back."

The Crown and defence jointly called for a prison sentence of 10 years, with the range generally being seven to 13.

The judge found Glasgow "not beyond rehabilitation."

"He has also expressed a genuine remorse for the pain and loss he has caused to the Scott family."

Gaul said Glasgow should be sentenced to 10 years in prison but deducted a year because he had been in custody since his arrest in April 2010.

He also prohibited Glasgow from possessing any firearm or ammunition for life.

On April 14, 2015 the appeal court in Vancouver reduced Glasgow's sentence to eight years ad six months with a pre-sentence custody credit of one year and six months, after he applied for the adjustment.

Appeal Court Justice Edward Chiasson noted that Gaul had given Glasgow one-for-one credit for time served. Glasgow's lawyer appealed this, based on a Supreme Court of Canada ruling, seeking a credit of 1.5 years for one year pre-sentence custody served.

"The Crown does not oppose the time being extended or enhanced credit being given," Chiasson noted. "It agrees the appellant is not disqualified from receiving such credit for any statutory reason."

Appeal Court Justices David Tysoe and Richard Goepel concurred.

tom.zytaruk@surreynowleader.com
Like us on Facebook Follow us on Instagram and follow Tom on Twitter
The Now-Leader has learned that at the time of the SkyTrain shooting, Glasgow had been on statutory release from prison, with conditions.

Statutory release, which occurs two-thirds into an offender's sentence, is legislated and not based on a parole board decision. The idea is to ease an offender into society, under suspervision, instead of putting he or she back on the street the day their sentence expires, with no supervision.

Karen Reid Sidhu asks Scheer if he's going to be tough on crime, referencing Wednesday's shooting. The suspect in the SkyTrain station shooting was jailed previously for killing a man in #SurreyBC. Scheer's response: pic.twitter.com/DFYs1wCde7

- Lauren Collins (@laurenpcollins1) February 1, 2019

Surrey RCMP released a surveillance photo of the suspect following Wednesday's (Jan. 30) shooting at Scott Road SkyTrain station. (Police photo)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Surrey SkyTrain station shooting suspect was released from prison on reduced sentence - Surrey Now-Leader

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The many faces of Surrey SkyTrain shooting suspect Daon Gordon Glasgow. Surrey RCMP said at the time of the shooting, Glasgow was described as dark skinned with a black stubble mustache, however, police added Glasgow is "known to quickly alter his appearance."

# data[].attributes.body
Who: Juan Guaidó vs Nicolás Maduro
What: Juan Guaidó wants to take Nicolás Maduro's power in  Venezuela. Nicolas Maduro doesn't want anyone to take his place
Where: Venezuela
When: January 23, 2019
Why: Nicolás Maduro wanted to take power of Venezuela for 5 more years. The people started to protest. The nacional assembly of Venezuela declared as an usurper. The nacional assembly pick Juan Guaidó as an interim president. The United States, Canada and many Latin American countries are supporting Juan Guaidó as the interim president. The United Nations gave Venezuela 8 days for them to organize proper elections for the country.
How: Maduro assumed the presidency after the death of his mentor, Hugo Chávez, in 2013. When he started as a president, drastic unraveling of the economy in Venezuela. Once one of the region’s most prosperous countries largely as a result of mismanagement and corruption, but he has centralized power in the executive branch, tamping down on dissent through violence and intimidation, and winning the loyalty of the military by giving it control of lucrative industries.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/24/world/americas/venezuela-news-protests-noticias-guaido-maduro.html

# data[].attributes.body
Lunar New Year fireworks explosion in China leaves 5 people dead
Who: the illegal firework stand
What: on the lunar new year a Tuesday accident happened. 5 people died after an explosion at a illegal firework stand. three children and two adults were the victims.
Where: Beijing, China
When: 2019 Lunar New Year Tuesday evening.
Why: a unexpected explosion blew up a firework stand.
How: wasn't enough testing so it blew up and killed innocent civilians.

https://www.ctvnews.ca/world

# data[].attributes.body
Tornado in Havana, Cuba
Who:The Hurricane in Havana killed four people and injured 195 but effected everyone emotionally and mentally.
What:A severe tornado hit the Cuban capital Havana. There was major flooding in the 'low lying' areas of Havana and strong winds up to 125 miles per hour that ripped roofs off houses and made trees tumble to the ground.
Where: Havana, Cuba
When:January 27, 2019
Why:  The tornado that hit Cuba on January 27 , 2019 happened because of a very rare weather pattern in that area .
How: Tornadoes form because of thunderstorms where warm humid air and cool dry air meet with high winds to create the spiral.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
cuba tornado: 4 dead and 195 injured - cnn

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Huge tornado in Cuba kills 4 and injures 195

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A rare tornado that hit the Cuban capital, Havana, on Sunday night has left four people dead and 195 injured, officials said.

# data[].attributes.body
Vancouver Parking Lot Right Gets Wild and Angry

Who: A YouTube user Kazamuco filmed a man in a small Honda fit who was older than the guy he attacked, two women later get involved, one being the wife of the older man.
What: A conflict between two grown men began over a parking spot. This began as a man in a small black Honda Fit ducked into a parking spot that a black Honda Odyssey was prepared to back into. The footage shows the fight beginning by an older man who was driving the Odyssey climbing into a younger man's vehicle, driving a Honda Fit. They grabbed and hit each other but seemed more like wrestling, a momment later a women opens the door and tries to take the man out as it seemed to be his wife. There were people asking both men to stop and leave.
Where: First Avenue Marketplace at the southwest corner of Renfrew and 1st Avenue.
When: Around the day of January 25th
Why: These to men fought because they wanted a parking spot in a full parking lot, also as one man took another man's spot knowing that he was prepared to back into the spot.
How: This affected people as there was a riot caused in a public area which brings attention and fights. This also affected others who were trying to get to their vehicle or people who were trying to park their vehicle.

Link:
https://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/video-vancouver-parking-lot-fight-gets-wild-and-angry

Photo:

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
A wild parking-lot fight video in a Vancouver mall was posted on YouTube Sunday and is now under police investigation.

The four minute and thirty second video was taken in what appears to be a packed parking lot at the First Avenue Marketplace at the southwest corner of Renfrew and 1st Avenue.

According to notes on the video posted by Youtube user Kazumaco, the conflict began when a man driving a small black Honda Fit ducked into a parking spot as a black Honda Odyssey was preparing to back into it.

The video begins with an older man who was driving the Odyssey on top of the other man, who was younger, in his Honda Fit. Both are grappling, with the older man on top and appearing to land a few blows to the other man's head, but it appears more of an angry wrestling match. After a minute or so, a woman opens the passenger door of the Fit and the driver manages to get out.

"He was just saving the spot, is this all necessary," an onlooker can be heard saying in Cantonese. Others can be heard speaking in Cantonese and Mandarin, asking each party to stop fighting and to leave.

The older man then takes off his white jacket and is preparing to again fight the other man, who appears at this point to goad him on.

Two women, including one who appears to be the wife of the older man, then get involved and the wife ends up in a verbal altercation with the Fit driver.

"Stop fighting," the woman can be heard saying repeatedly in Cantonese.

"Hogging the spot, are you," says the older man in Cantonese, while the younger man threatens to call police.

"He attacked me first. He attacked me first, did you see that?" the younger man can be heard asking in English toward the end of the video, as a woman attempts to place herself between the two men.

"Get out of the way," the older man says to the woman, who responds, "No more fighting."

During the shooting of the video, the videographer keeps saying the police are coming.

Sgt. Jason Robillard, of the Vancouver Police Department, confirmed to media that the police had been called and attended the scene. No arrests were made, but the case is under investigation.
-with files from Stephanie Ip dcarrigg@postmedia.com twitter.com/davidcarrigg

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Video: Vancouver parking lot fight gets wild and angry

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A wild parking-lot fight video in a Vancouver mall was posted on YouTube Sunday and is now under police investigation. The four minute and thirty second video was taken in what appears to be a packed parking lot at the First Avenue Marketplace at the southwest corner of Renfrew and 1st Avenue.

# data[].attributes.body
Who:
What:
Where: Chicago, US
When:
Why:
How:

# data[].attributes.body
who   The Dec. 1 arrest of Ms. Meng at Vancouver International Airport thrust Canada into a pitched diplomatic tiff with China, which has detained two Canadians and sentenced to death a third. U.S. prosecutors accuse Ms. Meng of fraudulently misrepresenting Huawei’s business with Iran, saying the company violated sanctions against the country and, as a result, caused banks with U.S. business to participate in illegal acts.
what
when December 1.
where Vancouver international airport.
why because huawei is one of the biggest phone companies

how because canada and the us are together.

# data[].attributes.body
Who? Bruce mcauther has admitted to killing eight men where? Toronto Ontario. With links to Toronto’s LGBTQ community when? 2010 and 2017( recently found out ) how with rope zip tie and duck tap. Investigation still under way

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/
https://vancouversun.com/
https://www.nytimes.com/
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/
https://www.theguardian.com/international
https://www.ctvnews.ca/
https://nationalpost.com/
https://www.cnn.com/
https://www.cbc.ca/kidsnews/

# data[].attributes.body
Who: Jaskirat Singh Sidhu, the driver of the truck who hit the Humboldt Broncos team bus.
What: Jaskirat pled guilty to his charges and said he didnt want to put the families through more sending them to court. The families or surviving victims also read victim impact statements talking about how the crash impacted them and their families.
Where: The victim impact statements were read in a gym in Melfort, Saskatchewan after the crash took place on a highway in Saskatchewan.
When: The victim statements were read on January 28th 2019 while the crash happened on April 6th 2018.
Why: The impact statements had to be read because of the crash and the driver pleading guilty to all charges.
How: The crash impacted the families deeply with one of the parents writing a letter to his dead son instead of writing an impact statement, his letter said that the family was moving house so that they didnt have to live in the house he grew up in.
Link: https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/wife-of-humboldt-broncos-coach-forgives-driver-who-caused-crash-1.4273167

# data[].attributes.body
who: Robert Schellenberg, a Canadian man convicted of smuggling 222kg of methamphetamine into china.
what: Robert Schellenberg was sentenced to death after a retrial.
when: Robert was sentenced to death on Monday, January 14.
where: Province of Liaoning, China
why: people suspect that this sentence was influenced by Canadian police arresting Meng Wanzhou, Huawei chief financial. officer

how: Robert was originally sentenced to 15 years in prison but after Meng's arrest they brought Robert back for a retrial and sentenced him for death.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
A Canadian man sentenced to death in China for drug smuggling will appeal the verdict, his lawyer said on Tuesday, arguing that the court should not have increased his sentence given no new evidence had been introduced during his retrial.

The sentence handed down to Robert Schellenberg on Monday is another strain on relations between China and Canada, which have been at odds since early December when Canadian police arrested Meng Wanzhou, chief financial officer of Huawei Technologies Co Ltd, on a U.S. extradition warrant.

Schellenberg had appealed against a 15-year prison sentence for smuggling 222 kg of methamphetamines. But the Dalian Intermediate People's Court in the northeastern province of Liaoning increased the sentence to death at the end of a retrial.

Schellenberg is the third Canadian to run afoul of Chinese law since Meng was arrested at the behest of U.S. authorities as part of an investigation into alleged violations of U.S. trade sanctions.

The two other detained Canadians are former diplomat Michael Kovrig and business consultant Michael Spavor - both held on suspicion of endangering state security.

China has not linked any of the three Canadians' cases to Meng's arrest.
READ MORE: Canadians urged to exercise caution in China amid 'arbitrary enforcement' of laws
Schellenberg's lawyer, Zhang Dongshuo, said his client's defence has centred around an argument there was insufficient evidence to prove he was part of a drug syndicate, or that he was involved in the smuggling of methamphetamines.

But even if the court accepted all prosecution charges, it should not have increased his sentence, given that facts the prosecution presented as new evidence had already been heard in court, Zhang told Reuters.
WATCH: Trudeau says government will intercede in Canadian facing death sentence in China
"Chinese law stipulates that during an appeal, only if new evidence is discovered and retried can there be an increase in the severity of a sentence," Zhang said.

"They are not new facts so you cannot increase the severity of the sentence."

Zhang said Schellenberg would lodge an appeal.

Earlier, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said it was of "extreme concern" that China had chosen to "arbitrarily apply" the death penalty.

'HIGHER RISKS'

A Chinese state-run newspaper rejected any suggestion China was putting pressure on Canada with the sentence, saying it was "unreasonable speculation" and showed "rude contempt" toward Chinese law.

"Public opinion in Canada has claimed recently that China is 'politicizing' Schellenberg's case, but what Canada is doing is actually politicizing law," the nationalist Global Times said in an editorial late on Monday.

International rights groups condemned Schellenberg's sentence with some saying it was too severe and may have been politically motivated.

WATCH: Dec. 27, 2018 - Canadian to appear in Chinese court over drug charges

"China is going to face lots of questions about why this particular person, of this particular nationality, had to be retried at this particular time," Human Rights Watch's Washington-based China director Sophie Richardson told Reuters.

Though Schellenberg was arrested in 2014, state media has played up coverage of his case following the deterioration in relations with Canada.

The court invited media to cover the retrial, and state television aired a five-minute segment on the proceedings.

The Global Times said the sentence would convey the message that "drug smuggling faces higher risks in China".

"The trial will also send the message that China won't yield to outside pressure in implementing its law," it said.

Drug smuggling is routinely punished severely in China, and foreigners convicted of drug crimes have been executed before, including a Briton in 2009.

Schellenberg had faced a number of charges in Canada related to drug possession and drug trafficking, according to Canadian court records.

One foreign expert on Chinese law questioned the swift verdict in Schellenberg's retrial, given the political backdrop. The death penalty was handed down at the end of a one-day hearing.
WATCH: Jan. 8, 2018 - Erin O'Toole calls on government to update travel advisory to China
"I do not know whether Schellenberg is guilty," Donald Clarke of George Washington University said in an online post.

"But I do know that before Meng Wanzhou's detention, the original trial court heard the case and then thought about it for over two and half years before deciding that a sentence of 15 years in prison was an appropriate punishment."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Canadian sentenced to death in China on drugs charges will appeal: lawyer

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A Canadian man sentenced to death in China for drug smuggling will appeal the verdict, his lawyer said on Tuesday, arguing that the court should not have increased his sentence given no new evidence had been introduced during his retrial.