# data[].attributes.body
Due to the scale of our film, I personally believe it would be best distributed either by us on a platform such as YouTube to save as much money in our budget as possible, or by a smaller British distributor such as Studio Canal, again to save money but also to retain our film's British identity.

# data[].attributes.body
With our film being set in Britain with an all British cast and crew and with references to the British government. It could be classed as a "British film." This allows the film producers access to additional funding from the British Film Institute. However, our film may not be classed as British if it was distributed by an American company as it may not pass the BFI "cultural test" which is a requirement to access the funding.

In order to maintain the British Status, a good idea for the distribution of our film would be an external distributor such as Studio Canal, a UK based film distribution company. This would be beneficial as we would keep our films British status but still not have to distribute the film ourselves, equally Studio Canal would be much cheaper for us the pay for than a bigger company such as TriStar, saving us money in our films budget. However, the major drawback of this is that Studio Canal do not have as much reach or power as Sony due to their size.

# data[].attributes.body
Companies such as Warner Brothers are referred to as conglomerates as they are made up of smaller companies under one "umbrella." These companies rarely distribute external productions and only tend to distribute films made internally. This means that if a film like ours was to be distributed by Warner Brothers, they would own the rights to the film, the story and the characters, allowing them to manipulate it into different new forms such as books, sequels and even toys. This takes the creative freedom away from the original production company and if any further films are produced Warner Brothers may chose to not appoint the original crew.

# data[].attributes.body
Despite these advantages, paying an external distribution company would take up a large percentage of a small budget films budget potentially decreasing the quality of production itself, Equally the distributor may ask to change certain aspects of the film that they believe will not appeal to the potential audience which some directors may not like the idea of.

# data[].attributes.body
Distribution for most films not produced by conglomerates such as Warner Bros is managed by external companies. These external companies such as Sony TriStar manage and control the entire distribution process allowing the production companies to focus on production. This is equally advantageous as Sony have a well established name making the production more appealing to potential viewers.

# data[].attributes.body
A common way for smaller independent films to be distributed is by the producers themselves uploading them online to sites like YouTube or Vimeo. This saves both time and money which are very important factors to consider for smaller companies.

# data[].attributes.body
There are many different companies that distribute films, equally in the modern world self-distribution and other smaller methods are becoming more and more popular through easier access to the internet. However, the majority of distribution is still done through big media conglomerates such as Warner Brothers.