# data[].attributes.body
Madam, do we need to put the full citation of the case or just the name of the case, without the year?

# data[].attributes.body
Salam madam, kan if it's case of  private nuisance, we have to fulfilled all the three elements. but how about public nuisance? should we just prove on the damage that occurred to the members of the public or need to prove common injury as well?

# data[].attributes.body
Madam, what would be marks allocation for the questions nanti ?

# data[].attributes.body
madam, presumption social agreement tu boleh guna case Coward v MIB ke untuk refer nanti? sebab case ni dah dikira as bad law

# data[].attributes.body
Salam madam, in the case of Kirkham v CC Greater Manchester Police, is it okay if we do not mention the defence of ex turpi causa? As we mainly talking and discussing about the defence of volenti non fit injuria.

# data[].attributes.body
Salam madam, can i know the number of questions on the paper later? would it be 4 or 5 questions?

# data[].attributes.body
madam, for defences in private nuisance, abatement tu need to grant by the court or not sebenarnya?

# data[].attributes.body
madam, if they ask about definition of consideration, kalau saya cakap 'the exchange of benefit or detriment between promisor and promisee' boleh tak?

# data[].attributes.body
madam, kalau social agreement tu boleh ke kita kata the decision made by the court in the case of Coward v MIB was overruled and considered as a bad law hence not binding anymore

# data[].attributes.body
madam, for false imprisonment, yg requirement of mental element tu, kan false imprisonment tu strict liability which means apa pun reason orang tu restrain someone, they will still be liable as long as the act has been commited kan, so means if reason dia negligent dia still tak liable kan? kiranya defendant will not be liable if the reason is negligent?

# data[].attributes.body
madam, for the example of presumption of purely social agreement, the case of Coward v Motor Insurers Bureau ni dah tak valid / tak boleh guna la kan? So skrg kalau ada case similar with that case kena ikut Albert v Motor Insurers Bureau right? Does it mean that now there's no example to illustrates the presumption?
So, madam, if there's a problem-solving question regarding this, which case should we use; coward or albert?

# data[].attributes.body
madam in past consideration yang contoh club ni sign a contract with a minor. kan consideration dari club dah ada, dia dah bayar minor athlete tu. kalau budak tu reach 18, tiba tiba dia nk reject the offer, join club lain, club yg dah bayar dia tu tak boleh buat apa2 ke utk dpt balik bayaran budak tu atau nak budak tu masuk club dia ke?

# data[].attributes.body
madam, untuk rebuttal of presumption in social agreement, boleh guna kes albert v MIB la kan? ke mdm galakkan guna kes simpkins v pays?

# data[].attributes.body
Madam, in proving that nuisance happened, does all three elements must be fulfilled or only one of it is enough?

# data[].attributes.body
madam, how can people claim for public nuisance? do they have to hire a prosecutor?

# data[].attributes.body
Salam Madam. maksudnya, the topics that have been assessed in Quiz 1 & Quiz 2 also masuk dalam final exam juga kan?

# data[].attributes.body
If someone suffered loss of sleep and being prescribed with insomnia by the doctor because of nuisance, is it considered as health problem? what element is it under nuisance?

# data[].attributes.body
Salam Madam. I have a question regarding the topic of nuisance. Physical loss such as property loss, injury and health problems are under the element "The interference have caused damage to the claimant", right? What about emotional loss, madam? Is it under the same element or under the element "An indirect interference with the enjoyment of land"?

# data[].attributes.body
in the slides of nuisance, there's a video that you've included, and in the video, the action is not a continuous act whereby a person pour waters towards the neighbour; does it still considered as nuisance, madam?

# data[].attributes.body
Madam, is it okay to highlight our main points on the essay or you prefer us not to highlight anything?

# data[].attributes.body
asalam madam, just for confirmation, topic nuisance included kan because dh assessed waktu quiz but some said ada jugak that topic

# data[].attributes.body
Assalamualaikum Madam, I have a question. If there's a construction in my neighbourhood and it causes me to suffer disturbance such as loss of sleep, I can sue the constructor under nuisance right? Under what element of nuisance?

# data[].attributes.body
madam, do we have to use english act or Malaysia act?

# data[].attributes.body
Assalamualaikum Madam, I just want your confirmation. For short essay questions, there is no need to support the answer with authority right? Only main point and elaboration?

# data[].attributes.body
Assalammualaikum madam. I want to ask about consideration. Kan if anyone promise to give me something as reward before the end of January, in return I need to do his work. However, on february, he refused to give me  the reward. is it same as consideration must not be past.

# data[].attributes.body
Salam all..please post all your questions here. I will answer asap.

Please state your name and section as well.