# data[].attributes.body
1. How does Udall set the tone for his essay in his exordium in the first paragraph.
In the beginning, Udall's tone seems to be sincere, trustworthy and descriptive. His selective diction such as "glory," "wonder," "gaze," and "masterpiece" assert this. Udall speaks fondly of the country's landscape, building towards his mention of the natives. He believes that it is the natives that appreciate and preserve the land the most.

# data[].attributes.body
Udall compares the Natives and the Europeans most commonly in their tools and cultures, one example we see him use is in the sentence in which he discusses the modern tools made available to them and how the allure was too great as read to be "Once seen, a musket became essential to an Indian warrior; and once an Indian woman had used a steel needle or a woven blanket, she could never again be satisfied with a bone awl or a skin robe".We also see the cultural effect this holds when Udall says "So the Indian, too, became a raider of the American earth, and at the same time was himself raided for his lands by the superior technology and increasingly superior numbers of the white man", as to compare how similar the new Indians were becoming to the Settlers.

# data[].attributes.headline
Estevan Lopez, "Mr" Zheng, & Ye "St. Lauren Don" West

# data[].attributes.subject
Estevan Lopez, "Mr" Zheng, & Ye "St. Lauren Don" West

# data[].attributes.body
Udall makes comparisons between the natives by highlighting the difference their lifestyles. Udall speaks about the difference in the way of life of the natives and the Americans. He talks about how they treat the land, and how there is no such thought of ownership of the land. He speaks highly of this, saying "The land and the Indians were bound together by the ties of kinship and nature, rather than by an understanding of property ownership. "

# data[].attributes.body
Udall make comparisons between European colonists and Indian people by cultural differences. Udall talks about the European colonists have different lifestyles compare with Native Indians. According to paragraph 11, Udall says “The two cultures had produced irreconcilable concepts of landownership, and once the first white man set foot on American soil, the drama unfolded with all the certain sweep of a Greek tragedy.”

# data[].attributes.body
Udall emphasizes the positive characteristics of American Indians -- including the respectful, caring, and respectable. Udall has praised the lifestyle of Natives in comparison to the Americans as stated in paragraph 2, "Superlatives alone could describe the bewildering abundance of fora and fauna that enlivened its landscapes..." -- while also stating that they are "primitive" people instead of the typical descriptive of "savage". In paragraphs 30-34, Udall acknowledges the Indians contribution and offering of peace to the settlers on their land as stated, "...better understanding of how to live in harmony with the land..." -- demonstrating their care for the Earth.

# data[].attributes.body
Udall emphasizes the kindness and openness that is shown in paragraph 4, where it states that, "Indians brought them gifts..." and "...acquiring the rudiments of a higher civilization." He obviously respects the acts that the Indians have done for the land as he highlights the deeds that the Natives have given to the Americans and their attempts to become more "civilized" by accepting American innovations. Additionally, in paragraph 20, where it states that, "...made peace, and some...selling parts of their domain..." is made to represent the Native's sense of mutuality and pragmatism. To strive for peace, the Natives sought to make an agreement while not benefitting much from it, strengthening the Natives' humble attitude.

# data[].attributes.body
Udall demonstrates his credibility as a writer by maintaining a diplomatic, and neutral tone throughout the text. By providing facts and information about the Natives throughout history, he was able to further contribute to a sense of credibility. He states, “The 1887 Allotment Act…” (Udall 29), establishing logos, which develops his credibility as an educated man. This usage of a diplomatic tone, and reference to facts, as well as Acts, demonstrates ethos, for people will further trust him since he is educated. His knowledge on Native Americans also showcases his credibility. He says, “In Massachusetts, too, Indians not only schooled the Pilgrims in the culture of maize and squashes… The Five Nations and the Algonqians of the Northeast; the Creeks, Choctawas, Chickasaws, Cherokees, and Seminoles of the South…” (Udall 4) indicating that he understands Native culture. The usage of their names, in contrast to just calling them “savages,” displays that he knows what he is talking about.

# data[].attributes.body
Throughout the exordium of the text, Udall sets the tone by explaining the landscape of N. America--he compliments the geography of the land and those who inhabit it. Words such as "gaze," "ideal," "rich," "and "promised land" suggest that Udall sets the tone that is welcoming, while at the same time, to educate his audience on the topic before going in depth, the explanation.

# data[].attributes.headline
Allison "Gusher" Ojeda-Santos and Giovanni "Kinder Egg" Aguilar

# data[].attributes.subject
Allison "Gusher" Ojeda-Santos and Giovanni "Kinder Egg" Aguilar

# data[].attributes.body
Throughout the text, Udall is able to show his credibility through making connections of man and nature. We can see this in the second to last paragraph, he states, "... we are recovering a sense of reverence for the land." He continues to show a deep understand of Native Americans and their culture and lifestyle. He speaks of the Natives as to have "...a better understanding of how to life in harmony with the land." He continues to speak not only highly, but well versed in the Native practices while also continuing to show his respect.

# data[].attributes.body
1. How does Udall set the tone for his essay in his exordium in the first paragraph?

Udall uses words such as ideal, wonder, and masterpiece when describing the North American continent. He has a tone of worship and is glorifying North America. In par. 1, he states,

“Geologically and geographically this continent was, and is, a masterpiece.” With this, we can infer that Udall has an appreciation for nature, since he holds positive ideas of the continent's geography(which relates to the land), the continuing essay will mostly be of praise for whatever he would be talking about.

ew.

# data[].attributes.body
Udall demonstrates his credibility as a writer by referencing to historical allusions, such as the events that took place during Nazi Germany (para.22) and the colonization of the Native Americans (para.13). Udall's knowledge of the Native tribes add to his credibility by showing he is knowledgeable of  the Native lifestyle. An example is shown in paragraph 3  & 5 where Udall talks about their connections to their land and how they valued it. Udall even states "..the Indian's emotional attachment for his woods, valleys, and prairies were the very essences of life." This also appeals to pathos, sympathy for the Natives who are being robbed of their land.

# data[].attributes.headline
Giovanni "Mordecai" Aguilar and Armando "Jacob Chavez" Bustillo 

# data[].attributes.subject
Giovanni "Mordecai" Aguilar and Armando "Jacob Chavez" Bustillo 

# data[].attributes.body
In the paragraphs we have read we can see that Udall is seeing that many settlers are starting to have the same values and beliefs as the Native Americans. Many white settlers are now open to provide for Native health and education as stated by Andy. Throughout the reading we can see the irony of the situation the Americans's beliefs are similar to that of the Native's.

# data[].attributes.body
Within paragraphs 30-34, the ironic statements of how the American beliefs have been slowly influenced by nature contradict the idea of how the Americans have been ignoring the Native customs of nature itself. Ironically as well, the Natives have additionally changed to fit into the American society, but the Americans themselves are beginning to admire the previous Natives' ideas, making it seem like they are switching beliefs and making the arguments they had to be an act of buffoonery.

# data[].attributes.body
According to paragraphs 30 to 34, Udall says "They have made a contribution to our agriculture and to a better understanding of how to live in harmony with the land." He talks about the influence of Indian culture on the American way of life. This is ironic because after the settlers labeled the Indians "savages" and their land "too savage" and "too natural," people returned to these effects of reverence for the land.

# data[].attributes.headline
Amy(hahahahhaahh it's spelled Aimee) and Victoria 

# data[].attributes.subject
Amy(hahahahhaahh it's spelled Aimee) and Victoria 

# data[].attributes.body
In paragraph 34, Udall introduces Thoreau and Muir, from the context we can infer they are advocates and writers for the Conservation Movement. Phrases such as, "Though within a generation that wildness would begin to convert some of their sons...." Sons is a reference to the white generations, Udall is a white man as well. Additionally earlier in par. 32 Udall directly mentions the Conservation Movement.

# data[].attributes.body
In paragraphs 30-34, discusses in the new generations of natives are becoming more like the white settlers. By this we mean they are coming to terms with the white people. When Stewart states that "After long years... on the American way of life." But it also seems ironic due to white settlers beginning to take on the same ideas as the Natives such as their beliefs.

# data[].attributes.body
Udall is alluding to the Americans being naive when they originally arrived because they did not care about caring for the land. This went against the natives beliefs because they valued their land allot. This led to conflict between the two parties, when we see now that the Americans have aligned themselves with the natives belief. We see this through the works of literature by Thoreau and Muir.

# data[].attributes.body
Udall explains the irony of the situation in which the Americans had found themselves in pages 30-34. They illustrate how American views about the land have reverted to the way Native Americans had previously seen their areas. They explain the irony of the conservationist movement's expansion, which was formerly practiced by Native Americans.

# data[].attributes.body
Throughout these paragraphs, Udall expresses that it is ironic how the White settlers began to conserve the environment as a result of Indian wisdom. Udall also exposes the irony that white people are going back to the Natives that they kicked out of their land, and their homes, and now realize that the whole ideals of the Natives that they once viewed as barbaric are needed to fix the irreversible effects of their “civilized society.”

# data[].attributes.body
Look at this hippie Yak, he loves nature. Like a lot of people nowadays.

This is so bad, lmao.

cope.

Anyway, in par.30, Udall comments on the government's apology towards the Natives and how they've worked to compensate them. And goes over how the sons of the Natives have accepted the ideas that they're fathers could not, which is similar to the sons of the white folks who've come to realize the importance of the Native man's original idea of being with nature. He uses this opportunity to talk about the effect Natives had on the American way of life. He specifically points out the Native's understanding and love of nature. In par. 33, it states, "we are recovering a sense of reverence for the land." In this peaceful era, the conservation and protection of nature is accepted by the white man, like how the Native has accepted the systems of a former adversary.

# data[].attributes.body
In paragraphs 30-34 we can see that Udall is recognizing that people are starting to recognize the values and traditions of the Native Americans which they are starting to use. We can see that the Americans are starting to assimilate to the ways of the natives. His use of words like conservation and subjugate, diction, all add a greater meaning to his writing. We can compare both Thoreau and Muir to Jackson who both believed they wanted to "subjugate" or conquer the land of the natives who were "too wild" or as Jackson would said "savage tribes."

# data[].attributes.body
In these paragraphs we can see the atrocities committed by the settlers and how they ravaged and pillaged the Natives Land out of greed and a sense of duty to their countries or people, we can also see the way the removal affected the idea of Natives from the American people where as once they wanted to totally eradicate them they then changed the goal to pay them off, which helps show the attitude that changed from the Natives from being less of a threat and more of a nuisance.We also hear about the irony of Natives ideals and practices are being used to preserve the woods and how the cultures have similarities regarding their ideas but the settlers who had a problem with the lifestyle of the natives. Much like the riddler who took away the Batmans normal way of life and make a new threat for him to overcome.

# data[].attributes.body
In paragraphs 30-34, Udall acknowledges the Indians contribution and offering of peace to the settlers on their land as stated, "...better understanding of how to live in harmony with the land..." Then he continues to bring an ironic act of conserving wild life from Indian ideas when the white settlers "...found the Indians continent too natural and too wild..". This connects us today because we establish many national parks today.

# data[].attributes.body
In Paragraph 33, Udall points out the irony in the fact that we settlers began to value the same ideas and beliefs as the Native Americans, in terms of property right, conservation of nature and learning from it, as well as keeping in contact with the land and its creatures.

# data[].attributes.body
The new generations of natives are becoming more like the white settlers and accepting the white people's system. With the natives accepting the white people, the white people try to provide for the native with health and education to bring out their inner humanity. Stewart talks about how the natives have left the white men with "more than the magic of place names that identify our rivers and forests and cities and mountains". The natives have taught the white men how to live in harmony with the land and better conserve the continent along with the culture. While Stewart explains how some try to conserve the land, others see the land as too wild and natural. Such as Thoreau and Muir looking at the new world and reforming it. People looking back at the natives will see the natives has the correct way of living with the land instead of the white.

# data[].attributes.body
Throughout paragraphs 30-34, the main takeaway of the passage is that the land which the Indians lived in were natural, and that the system of the lands that the present Indians view would not align with their fathers. However, the settlers, such as Thoreau and Muir, found the Indian continent too wild, and looked upon subjugating it. Today, conservation movements are looking to revert back to the Ancient Ideas.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
It feels like only the other day that things seemed to be settling into a copacetic rhythm with Kanye West and Kim Kardashian. She was on a roller coaster and at a Staten Island restaurant with her new beau Pete Davidson; he was lavishing Julia Fox with a hotel suite full of gifts. Everybody was happy, right?

Well, maybe not.

Let's start with Ye's interview with Hollywood Unlocked, in which he explained that "there's nothing with this career, with this rap, with this media, with none of that, that's going to keep me from my kids." He went on to say that "no security" will come between him and his children.

West insinuated that it was because of "the new boyfriend" that he was blocked by Kardashian's security, as detailed by ET Online.

Now, Kardashian "is fuming" over this allegation, Page Six reports. A source tells them that Davidson has yet to be introduced to the West children, and that "it's widely known that whenever he visits her in L.A., he stays at a hotel in Beverly Hills where she's been spotted with him."

As if this were not enough tumult and strife, Ye and The Game just dropped a new track, " Eazy," which features some pointed words for the Saturday Night Live comic. Referencing an automobile accident West survived in 2002, he raps: "God saved me from that crash/Just so I can beat Pete Davidson's ass."

We hope that everyone metaphorically goes back to Knott's Berry Farm and chills out.

More Great Stories From Vanity Fair

- Camilla: The Controversial Figure Who May Become Queen
- Ghislaine Maxwell's Guilty Verdict Comes Into Question
- Caitríona Balfe's Celtic Conquest, From Outlander to Belfast
- Can a New Perfume Rekindle Eroticism?
- The Queen Is Mourning Two of Her Ladies-in-Waiting
- 21 Wardrobe Winners Inspired by And Just Like That...
- The Life and Death of Rosanne Boyland, a Capitol Rioter
- From the Archive: Princesses Behaving Badly
- Sign up for "The Buyline" to receive a curated list of fashion, books, and beauty buys in one weekly newsletter.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Kanye West Is Very Focused on Pete Davidson at the Moment

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
It feels like only the other day that things seemed to be settling into a copacetic rhythm with Kanye West and Kim Kardashian. She was on a roller coaster and at a Staten Island restaurant with her new beau Pete Davidson; he was lavishing Julia Fox with a hotel suite full of gifts.

# data[].attributes.body
Through paragraphs 30-34, Udall describes the irony of the scenario in which the Americans had found themselves in. They describe how American ideals towards the land had turned right back around to the way that Natives had previously regarded their lands. They describe the irony of the growth of the Conservationism movement that had previously been practiced by the Natives. "It is ironical that today the conservation movement finds itself turning back to ancient Indian land ideas...."

# data[].attributes.body
In groups, complete your assigned Read question. Include at least one reference to specific passages within the text(quotes or paraphrases), as well as 3~4 sentences of analysis.

After completing your response, use the posts from your peers to complete the "Read" questions that your group was NOT assigned. (For example, someone assigned "#1" will look at posts under the "#2~4" columns)

After completing all "Read" questions, individually answer "Write" questions 2 and 3. Write a full paragraph of 6 or more sentences for each question. Once again, include at least one  reference to specific passages from the text.

Optional: "Likes" have been enabled for all posts, so feel free to like the posts that you used answer your Read and Write questions.

# data[].attributes.body
In paragraphs 21-22, Udall talks about the attraction to new goods toward Indians that were brought from the white men. This had resulted in Native people using the new tools instead of their traditional ones such as muskets now being essential weapons toward Native warriors. But also Americans were raiding the land of the Native Americans due to wanting the Americans wanting more land. White men then took advantage of the natives by trading in their goods since Americans were their source of new goods.

# data[].attributes.body
In paragraph 20-21 it shows that the native had always had a resource of some sort to trade with the White man. Therefore the only right thing to do is tor trade a new resource. It then says how the white man trades metal needles to make blanket for buffalo hides. (sorry about this one being short)

# data[].attributes.body
According to Paragraphs 21-22, Udall presents his audience with various stances towards the way how the Native American lives their life. He states that "So the Indian, too, became a raider of the American earth, and at the same time was himself raided for his land by the superior technology and increasingly superior number of the white man." He shows that the Indians are raiding others, but they’re also being raided by the White Settlers at the same time.

# data[].attributes.body
Udall explains how European's items, "steel needle/ woven blanket" as listed in paragraph 21, "Once seen, a musket became essential to an Indian warrior; and once an Indian woman had used a steel needle or a woven blanket, she could never again be satisfied with a bone awl or a skin robe.." are superior compared to the Indian's "bone awl or skin robe". He states how the Indians would need to trade with their more advanced technology/tools but the Europeans were greedy and wanted more. Such as "..meat, beaver—and later and farther west, pemmican and buffalo
robes..." which robbed everything from the Indians. Indians have no choice of trading because the Europeans were more superior and had better equipment which led to Udall's statement, "The only good Indian is a dead Indian..".

# data[].attributes.body
Stewart discusses how the Indians are drawn to the new things provided by the white man in paragraphs 20-21. For males, muskets were significant, whereas for women, steel needles and woven blankets became vital. With the Indians' increasing desire, they had no option but to let white men remain in their country, becoming "a robber of the American ground." The Indians had to hunt and trade to keep up with the white men's demands.

# data[].attributes.body
While Native Americans were independent, and capable of establishing their own agricultural resources, tools, and governments, it was also difficult for them to resist European goods. Once they were in contact with the technological advances of the White man, they became dependent on those goods, which the White settlers used to their advantage. As the demand for European items, such as muskets, and woven blankets grew, they could “never be satisfied,” (Udall 21) and White settlers began exploiting them for their land, and resources in exchange for those tools. Constantly having demand for land, the Natives had to comply, as they had no choice but to allow the White men to inhabit their territories.

# data[].attributes.body
Udall is talking about how the Natives had an irresistible desire towards the technology of the white man. He talks about how they eventually become "raiders of the earth" in exchange for such technology. Udall then comments on the ironic fact that the Indians would then have their lands raided by the white man. The white man also had an irresistible desire like the Natives, but this one was the taste and acquisition of territory. If they could not purchase it with money, they would resort to other methods. In par. 22, it states, "...what money could not buy, muskets, deceit, and official ruthlessness could win." So the white man would resort to trickery and force. Looking back at the Jackson speech, Jackson would pretend to care for Natives and use his presidential authority to remove the Natives by force and trickery when negotiating. The effect of such decisions would lead to the death of many Natives. Which would only serve as proof for Udall's statement.

# data[].attributes.body
Throughout paragraphs 21 and 22, I think the statement made by Udall in the two details is the idea that the arrival of the Europeans made the Indians reliant on European goods and would change the way of Indian life and hunt. The quote, "Contact with the higher technology...the Indians had known obsolete...a musket became essential to an Indian warrior; and once an Indian woman had used a steel needle or a woven blanket, she could never come back..." as described by Udall, can be seen as the over-reliance the Indians have over White technology--and as they are reliant on the technology, the White men "coined the slogan that became the byword of the American frontier: 'The only good Indian is a dead Indian.'"

# data[].attributes.body
Udall compares the Native Americans to the Americans who both wanted something and raided places to get them. The difference was that the Natives raided the earth for resources to trade for the items that the wanted from the Americans, while the Americans were raiding the land of the Native Americans because they wanted more land. Both of these groups were raiding areas to get what they wanted but Udall differentiates the two by making a historical allusion to the events of nazi Germany by saying "final solution." The natives were looking for natural resources in exchange for everyday items to make life easier, while the Americans were looking for land that they knew belonged to the Natives. Udall uses the word "insatiable" which means that the Americans really wanted this land and was impossible to satisfy the urge for this land, so they resorted to their own "final solution."

# data[].attributes.body
In paragraph 21, Udall list the new items the European brought over or how he states "higher technology." The Natives can't resist the appeal of them. They changed what they used to the new better thing. This made the Native an invader of the land just like the settler. In paragraph 22, Udall states that the settlers got violent. They wanted even newer and better technology. If they could not buy it they would get it with blood.

# data[].attributes.body
In paragraph 21-22 we can see a comparison Udall is making. Udall is making a comparison that the Natives and Americans both had things they wanted and raided lands to achieve these things. The Natives raided the earth for resources to trade with the Americans, but the Americans raided the land even though their insatiable demand for land was quite difficult to satisfy.

# data[].attributes.body
American settlers brought tools and technologies that improved the way of life for native Americans. They used these tools to barter for meat, skins, and most importantly, land. The natives had forever been changed by these technologies, and with no choice but to give up their new way of life, they gave more land. Eventually after gaining all they could and increasing their numbers the Americans had resulted to a final solution to gain their land, killing all of the indians.

# data[].attributes.headline
Elian and Jennifer and Zoe Kravitz and Robert Pattinson

# data[].attributes.subject
Elian and Jennifer and Zoe Kravitz and Robert Pattinson

# data[].attributes.body
Udall speaks of the modernization of technology and how it affected the Native Population. As only the White Man was the source of these goods, Natives had to trade with them for these products, trading all their resources, in turn "raiding the earth" for these substances. What could not be bought "Land", would be taken by force, violent force. Zoe is hot

# data[].attributes.headline
Allison "Jeff Hardy" Soledad Ojeda-Santos and Giovanni "Machine Gun Kelly" Aguilar Jose Luis 

# data[].attributes.subject
Allison "Jeff Hardy" Soledad Ojeda-Santos and Giovanni "Machine Gun Kelly" Aguilar Jose Luis 

# data[].attributes.body
In this section we see how Udall believes Native Americans are people who are constantly in need. We see this in the first sentence where he states that for Native Americans "the need goods had an irresistable allure." He also states that once the Native Americans were introduced to higher technology from the Europeans, they could never go back to what they once used. What the Europeans couldn't purchase off the Natives Americans they had to kill for. They had a slogan that states "The only good Indian is a dead Indian"

# data[].attributes.body
Indians became infatuated with the new technology introduced by the white settlers. This greatly benefited their society however, it made them increasingly more dependent on the white settlers because they were the only source. The white settlers became greedy and wanted more, and so they resorted to "official ruthlessness" to get what they wanted. Their new goal was not to make peace with the indians but to conquer them and strip them of all their resources. They even coined the phrase " The only good indian is a dead indian.".

# data[].attributes.body
Through paragraphs 21-22, we see how mingling between the Native and White trade would eventually mold the Natives to take on the traits of the white man. The natives would be granted the superiority and convenience of white goods and would have to pillage their own lands to continue receiving them. The whites would take advantage of the natives' lives becoming dependent on their products and in turn use this to their advantage by forcefully taking over their lands through 'muskets, deceit, and ruthlessness'.

# data[].attributes.body
Throughout paragraph 20-21, Stewart talks about how the Indians are attracted to the new goods being brought from the white man. Muskets became important to the men while steel needles and woven blankets became important to women. With this growing demand of the Indians, they had no choice but to let the white men stay on their land and therefore becoming "a raider of the American earth". The natives had to keep up with the white men's demands by hunting on trading. This basically shows how reliant the natives were towards the white men while being taken advantage of and getting their land stolen

# data[].attributes.body
Within Udall's passage, he describes how the Natives have wanted the advanced tech that the European settlers have in exchange for natural materials such as meat, animal hides, and most importantly, land. This description begins with a friendly discussion that began in the early interactions between the Natives and the whites, but in paragraph 22 as they settle down comfortably, it leads up to the point where the thirst for land by the white settlers has become a violent farce by their greed.

# data[].attributes.body
In the two paragraphs we read, we were informed on the effect the Europeans technology had on the Native people with many of them using the new tools instead of their more traditional ones which makes them more dependent on the settlers for tools and other goods.The writer then begins to describe the invasion of the White men and unlike Andrew Jackson who argued that the removal of Natives was good and better for them, these paragraphs show the brutality apparent in these beliefs and the negative effects of the Native population.

# data[].attributes.body
Armando - Udall presented this passage with lots of respect and it shows when he says things like , “The Crow country is exactly in the right place. Everything good is to be found there. There is no country like the Crow country,” and even though he didn't say this a native did he still put it in the text to show that he still listens to what the natives say. The natives care for the land and it shows when they say things like that quote.

# data[].attributes.body
Throughout paragraphs 1-10, Udall demonstrates his knowledge on the lands in which the American Natives had lived, along with the traditions they had established. He describes the landscapes and the misconceived history of the Indians.

# data[].attributes.headline
Elian and Jennifer and Taylor Swift and Tom Hiddleston and Henry Cavill and Grant Gustin

# data[].attributes.subject
Elian and Jennifer and Taylor Swift and Tom Hiddleston and Henry Cavill and Grant Gustin

# data[].attributes.body
In the first 10 paragraphs Udall praises Native American culture and traditions. He describes the way that the Native Americans respected their land and characterized the Natives as loving and caring individuals. In paragraph 3 he describes Native Americans or "Primitive people" as having a reverence for the life giving earth.

# data[].attributes.body
According to paragraph 1 - 10, Stewart Udall says "To the Indians, the homeland was the center of the universe." He discusses the Native Indians in a respectful and polite tone. On the other hand, Jackson talks about the Indian's removal from their land in his speech.

# data[].attributes.body
In paragraphs 1-10, Stewart Udell has positive attitude during these paragraphs he explains the connection the Native Americans has with the land based from paragraph 3,".... the land was alive to his loving touch, and he, its son, was brother to all creatures." This expresses the fact on how respectable Native Americans were. He is using pathos to show express this.

# data[].attributes.headline
Allison "Hornswoggle" Soledad Ojeda-Santos and Giovanni "Stan" Aguilar De La Rose Guadalupe Maria

# data[].attributes.subject
Allison "Hornswoggle" Soledad Ojeda-Santos and Giovanni "Stan" Aguilar De La Rose Guadalupe Maria

# data[].attributes.body
In the text we have read Udall speaks of the Natives in a more respectful manner compared to Jackson. For example, in paragraph 8, he states "To the Indian the homeland was the center of the universe", from here we can see that Udall has a level of respect for the Indians way of living on their land as a "universe". He also states "Here is affection for the land but no notion of private ownership." He continues to speak highly on how the Native Americans run their communities and live alongside one another.

# data[].attributes.body
Udall's text has very descriptive diction that is positive such as glory, gaze, wonder, bewildering abundance, and enlivened. All these words are used to describe the land, he seems to have strong passion and relates it to how natives appreciated the land. In paragraph 4 he speaks on about the 5 nations and how, "all put the earth to use and made it being forth." In comparison to Jackson who doesn't see the beauty of land the way Udall does nor does Jackson see the way the natives were strongly connected to land; often Jackson referred to them as "savages" or "aborigines".

# data[].attributes.body
Within this text, the use of a esteemed tone and reverent diction gives effect to the general text where it contradicts to the overall message of Jackson's oration. Udall's appreciation given to nature provides a credible source for her supportive act towards the Natives.

# data[].attributes.body
In comparison to Jackson, I believe Stewart Udall has a more positive or respectful attitude toward Native Americans. An example is when Stewart praises the native in paragraph 4 "But most tribes were acquiring the rudiments of a higher civilization".

# data[].attributes.body
Throughout the text, Udall has a modest tone in which he is not assuming the characteristics for Indians compared to Jackson. Jackson describes the Indians as savages and did not acknowledge any tribe. Udall has praised the lifestyle of Natives in comparison to the Americans as stated  in paragraph 2, "Superlatives alone could describe the bewildering abundance of fora and fauna that enlivened its landscapes...".

# data[].attributes.body
The first ten paragraphs use imagery to picture of the indigenous scenery and also to show the beauty that the natives see, but the language used helps to show the lack of materialism that the Native culture sees, in contrast to how Andrew Jackson saw their point of view as them not appreciating the land that they owned, and yet simply him not addressing social customs and ideals that the Natives held.

# data[].attributes.body
Udall characterizes the Natives as not so savage but rather developed. And says that those people were developing into a higher civilization, which contrasts with Jackson’s idea that Natives lacked liberty, civilization, and religion. In par. 6, he states, “Cherokees who, in the space of one generation, changed their whole way of life, established schools and libraries, produced an alphabet…” He gives an example of the Natives development. To denounce the stereotype that Natives were not developed.

# data[].attributes.body
Udall shows a great understanding of the Indians. He knows a lot of the tribes while Jackson looks down on the Indians  more.  In Udall's speech his tone and positive diction throughout the text reveals that he likes the Indians.

# data[].attributes.body
Udall expresses how ideal America is, with its fertile soil, and rich land, and mentions how all Native American tribes have a deep respect for the Earth. Throughout the text, Natives are characterized as Earth-loving, and caring people through Udall’s usage of diction. He refers to them as “American Indians,” or “primitive peoples,” in contrast to “savages,” which was often used in that period of time. He also uses their tribe names, stating, “Cherokees,” and “Iroquois,” thus exhibiting a respect for the Native Americans (Udall 4). In contrast to other writers, it shows that they are knowledgeable about the topic. Udall also provides examples as to why they should be respected, which can be seen in the way each individual tribe establishes their own agricultural resources, tools, governments, and buildings (Udall 6). Devoting their free time to craft and art work, having religious practice, planning a constitution, and establishing academies.

# data[].attributes.body
"Reverence" in paragraph 3 brings religious connotation because this word is often brought up in the Bible or at church. This allows Udall to use the appeal of Pathos since it allows the audience to feel emotions of faith and passion.

# data[].attributes.body
Stewart praises the natives in many ways instead of Jackson talking down on them. Jackson refers the native as "savages," while Stewart talks about them as if they were normal humans. Stewart praises the native's skills on gardening, schooling the pilgrims and the overall rudiments of a higher civilization.

# data[].attributes.body
In the first ten paragraphs Udall shows great respect for the natives and paints them in a great way. When he describes the way the natives used the land and respected it he makes the Americans seem like the real savages because they sell land.

# data[].attributes.body
Udall in these beginning paragraphs is bragging about the land of the Americas, and how they are in a great position. He also talks a little about the Natives and how their society is run through community, and not land ownership, as opposed to the colonists. Jackson makes a comment in his piece asking something along the lines of 'do the savages love their land more than us civilized christians do?' And we see in Udalls piece the way he describes the importance of the land to the Indians it kind of answers this question because the Indians truly honored their land, and it was very important to them.

# data[].attributes.body
In the first 10 paragraphs we see the use of imagery to paint an idea of the indigenous landscape and to show the beauty seen by the natives however the language used helps show the lack of materialism seen by the Native culture in antithesis to how Andrew Jackson saw their point of view as them not appreciating the Land owned by them but simply him not understanding the social customs and ideals held by the Natives.

# data[].attributes.body
Udall shows a great understanding of the different Indian tribes. He knows the name of the different Native American tribes and their traditions and what they did. We can compare this to Jackson who only referred to the Natives as "savage tribes," "aborigines," and "Indians" whereas Udall names out the different ones like the Cherokees and Hohokams. Also unlike Jackson, Udall recognizes the attempts of the Natives to become more civilized so that they wouldn't have to be relocated to the west, mentioning how the Cherokees were trying to establish schools and libraries along with their own constitution just like the "civilized people." Coming from this view, I believe Udall would be opposed to the relocation of the natives. Udall uses imagery to show help us picture how the Natives live and how it's just as civilized, and opposing to Jackson's view of them as savages. The use of words like "snowy mountains and sunny plains" help us picture how the conditions of the Natives are where they live.

# data[].attributes.body
In the text, Udall speaks very highly and reverentially towards the Natives. They hold them in high regard and reflect this through their use of diction. A demonstration of this was in paragraph 2 where they say "Superlatives alone could describe the bewildering abundance flora of and fauna that enlivened its landscapes." They state how abundant the wildlife population in the Native lands was to the point where it could only be described through hyperbole. He elaborates on how the Natives were able to make effective use of their lands and not be as restrictive with land use as the Americans were.

In comparison to Andrew Jackson's "On Indian Removal," this is a direct opposition in the way that Jackson heavily berated the Natives for their relationship with nature and the world around them and wanted to convince the audience that the Americans would be better able to utilize the land.

# data[].attributes.body
"The Land Wisdom of the Indians" begins on page 403 in our textbook. As we read the text, think about how this text is different from Jackson's speech. For example, how does each speaker characterize himself and the Native Americans? Would Udall have agreed with relocating the Natives, and if not, what sort of policy might Udall  propose instead?

Just like you did when reading through "On Indian Removal," make a post after each section. Your post can be a question, a comment on the text, or even a reference to other texts.

***After making a post, begin reading through the posts of your classmates. This time, I will be calling on you to read someone else's post!

# data[].attributes.body
In the very first sentence of Udal's speech, we can see D.H Lawrence talking about the dark history of the American land. The people who came here have "buried the silent races" and "buried so much of the delicate magic of life" probably meaning how we tried to get rid of the Native's identity. Udall afterwards changes the tone  by complimenting how great the North American land was. He talks about how the land was a "masterpiece" with "ideal latitude and rich resources". It was the promised land for the active men. However, he doesn't tell us who these men were. Him complimenting how great the land was helps us predict that he will have a positive tone throughout his whole speech.

# data[].attributes.body
Udall characterizes the Natives as primitive people with attachment issues in the way they relate to their land. "The land and the indians were bound together by the ties of kinship and nature" this displays their strong connection to their land because they viewed their land as family and as stitch said it best "Ohana means family, and family means nobody is left behind or forgotten."  The reason why Udall characterizes the Natives with attachment issues is because its to emphasize there was no other way to get their land peacefully. It helps justify their actions towards the natives and not just prejudice.

# data[].attributes.headline
Elian and Jennifer and the Real Slim Shady

# data[].attributes.subject
Elian and Jennifer and the Real Slim Shady

# data[].attributes.body
Udall emphasized the Native's respect and devotion for their land throughout the text, as stated in paragraph 3, "The most common trait of all primitive peoples is a reverence for the life-giving earth". Udall is acknowledging how the Native's lifestyle and wisdom is the foundation of American values like, "That men need to to learn from nature, to keep an ear to the earth,...., we are recovering a sense of reverence for the land."