# data[].attributes.body
The most important is weakness 6 in which it states that the government could not collect taxes. The central government could not collect taxes so it would be hard to make money, because not many people would voluntarily send in money. This means that the government would not get very much money to fund other things, so this weakness is the most important to why the articles of confederation did not work.

# data[].attributes.body
Weakness 6 was the most important. This issue states that only some sent in taxes, and you did not have to. This would not work well as the government would not get enough money to fund themselves..

# data[].attributes.body
The states can trade with other countries and states. New York could trade with France and if England attacked New York then France would protect New York.

# data[].attributes.body
This is good because maybe some states can’t make there own laws and stuff to make there people suffer more than other states but a drawback might be that if something isn’t working out the way it should be and tha yes wanted to change that and they can’t it might hurt there people more in the long run.

# data[].attributes.body
The benefit of this is that the states can get more money and work with others but the drawback is that other states are allied to others and then the states are not necessarily United and may be against each other.

# data[].attributes.headline
one drawback was that the government didn’t have the physical ability to enforce that power.One benefit was that States were able to conduct their own foreign policies.

# data[].attributes.subject
one drawback was that the government didn’t have the physical ability to enforce that power.One benefit was that States were able to conduct their own foreign policies.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that allowing all the states to conduct their own foreign affairs is beneficial because then these independent states will be able to get more diverse products and resources from these different sources, like spices and other tools that the Americans didn’t think of using first.

# data[].attributes.body
The benefits of this is that there would hopefully be less drama and more peace. The drawbacks of this would be like the review said it would be hard to keep track of who is dating who.

# data[].attributes.body
The benefits is that all states can have their own trade and share. A drawback would be if they got in conflict they would have to deal with it themselves with no help.

# data[].attributes.body
They collected them voluntary taxes because that’s why they broke away from uk

# data[].attributes.body
I think that they decided to collect taxes voluntarily because without taxes the government could not pay for things for their community. If they didn’t decide to keep taxes then our society as we know it would not be the same because the government couldn’t help support us.

# data[].attributes.body
This is appropriate

# data[].attributes.body
They probably did this so that the people could volunteer to do taxes if they had the money too.

# data[].attributes.headline
This percentage is  appropriate,fair because it’s pushing states to earn their spot to pass the law.

# data[].attributes.subject
This percentage is  appropriate,fair because it’s pushing states to earn their spot to pass the law.

# data[].attributes.body
They decided to collect based on volunteering because it would be fair to those that could not afford, did not need to. But this was bad as the government needed money.

# data[].attributes.body
They needed money and people relied on voluntary efforts to send taxes.

# data[].attributes.body
I think they decided to collect on a volunteer basis because they broke away from England because of the taxes so they would not want to impose taxes on their citizens.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel they did this because they needed money and people relied on voluntary efforts to send taxes.

# data[].attributes.body
The central government couldn’t collect money on a voluntary basis because they couldn’t demand anything, they just had to hope that they would get volunteers.

# data[].attributes.body
It would take a while because they need at least 9/13 states to be able to pass a law or something like that

# data[].attributes.body
This is not an appropriate percentage needed because that is too high of a percentage. The majority should be 51% or higher.

# data[].attributes.body
I think this is a good percentage because it would take too long to make all countries agree to pass a law and laws can’t take too long to be made or it will be broken in the making.

# data[].attributes.body
I do not think this was an appropriate percentage because it is a little high and if the percentage was lower the states could probably decide on things quicker and faster without as many problems.

# data[].attributes.body
No, I feel you need to have at least 12 before you make a decision that half of the states don’t even want. They need to make it fair.

# data[].attributes.headline
This is effective. This is because it is the vast majority. This would make Sense because more of the majority should vote for change. 

# data[].attributes.subject
This is effective. This is because it is the vast majority. This would make Sense because more of the majority should vote for change. 

# data[].attributes.body
Needing 9 out of 13 states to pass a law is not an appropriate percentage because like the review said we can’t agree on anything and nothing will get done

# data[].attributes.headline
This percentage is  appropriate,fair because it’s pushing states to earn their spot to pass the law.

# data[].attributes.subject
This percentage is  appropriate,fair because it’s pushing states to earn their spot to pass the law.

# data[].attributes.body
It would take. Long time

# data[].attributes.body
This would take a long time because they need 9 of 13 states in order to pass a law or something else. So I feel like this is a little high and maybe it should have been lowered a bit

# data[].attributes.headline
I think the states took so long because they had other stuff to do first and settle things.

# data[].attributes.subject
I think the states took so long because they had other stuff to do first and settle things.

# data[].attributes.body
It took so long because Maryland and Virginia had a land held argument, Maryland held back until this argument.

# data[].attributes.body
Because they needed to get everyone to do different things for different reasons. And they all had different opinions.

# data[].attributes.body
The states most likely had different opinions and had to work things out to agree on one thing which would take quite a while because the states have big opinions.

# data[].attributes.body
It was because all states needed to agree to make a change. Rivalries among states also caused issues.

# data[].attributes.body
Approving the documents took so long because Maryland and Virginia had to settle land arguments until 1781.

# data[].attributes.body
It took so long for all the states to agree because Maryland and Virginia were both in an argument over land during the time and weren’t focusing on signing or agreeing for anything.

# data[].attributes.body
Because some states might have been on the fence with things and they had to come to a agreement

# data[].attributes.headline
Virginia and Maryland have been arguing for a while.and it took Maryland 2 years to settle.

# data[].attributes.subject
Virginia and Maryland have been arguing for a while.and it took Maryland 2 years to settle.

# data[].attributes.body
The reason for the delay was that the colonists were attached to unanimity. While in New England and Virginia and More they were ready to declare independence in 1775 other colonies still hoped that British merchants would respond to Americans

# data[].attributes.headline
definitely ange renstrom had the most effective review.because she had the worst experience.

# data[].attributes.subject
definitely ange renstrom had the most effective review.because she had the worst experience.

# data[].attributes.body
Mathew Jones and Andrew Lincon had the best reviews because they were all very informational.

# data[].attributes.body
Mathew Jones because his review was the most detailed out of all reviews.

# data[].attributes.body
Number 4 had the most effective review because it said that if only 9 out of 13 states need to agree on something then nothing will get done, like what the review said we can’t even agree on a type of tea. So this just makes no sense.

# data[].attributes.body
Mathew Jones because he had the most detailed review.

# data[].attributes.body
Ange Rhenstrom had the most effective review because it made the most sense, and I would not like it if all the states had different money.

# data[].attributes.body
I would say that Jenny Klagge has the most effective review. This is because she provides good information and also represents how she feels about the articles of confederation, this is what makes her review the most effective out of all of them.

# data[].attributes.headline
Matthew Jones and Andrew Lincon because their reviews were the most informational.

# data[].attributes.subject
Matthew Jones and Andrew Lincon because their reviews were the most informational.

# data[].attributes.body
Mathew Jones had the most effective review. This is the best because the review states that any state can trade with whoever they please. He said this is foolish as they should trade together.