# data[].attributes.body
Case 8 was the most interesting to me because I feel like both sides are correct. To plan to murder someone is absolutely heinous and who ever planned it should be locked up. But when someone only a few years older than me is sentenced to death I feel like it is wrong. Yes they should be locked up forever, but not murdered.

# data[].attributes.body
Case 8 sounds the most interesting to me because this could be perceived in various aspects. For one, they could have been forced into committing an act leading to this death sentence. They could have grown up in a poor environment and experienced something which might have triggered them to do this. The intention behind their action should be taken into consideration as well.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence does violate the 8th Amendment. They may be pressured or forced into committing such heinous acts by an adult. The environment in which they grew up from may have affected them as well, even before the person has developed individual thoughts and feelings without the influence of others.

# data[].attributes.body
Case 8 sounds the most interesting to me because of the how controversial and unusual the matter is.

# data[].attributes.body
No the death sentence violate the 8th Amendment. If a child was givin the death penalty then the person must have committed such a heinous crime that a jury unanimously agreed that this theoretical child deserved this punishment. Most of the time people on death row are not executed immediately. Often times criminals are kept in prison for multiple years before they are executed, so a child could be held in prison until they are an adult to execute the person.

# data[].attributes.body
The case that was most interesting to me was Case 4- "Does the Fourth Amendment protect students from searches by school officials?" I couldn't decide whether it protects students or not. I understand that schools have to be able to search students, but as a student, I can also understand that one can feel violated.

# data[].attributes.body
A school's random drug test do not violate the 4th Amendment. They are to protect students and peers from harm. They prevent students from taking illegal drugs which could hurt them.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence does violate the eighth amendment. Even though you have to do heinous crime to receive a death sentence, they are still a juvenile. Their brain has not yet developed and they still have a long life ahead of them.

# data[].attributes.body
The case that sounds interesting to me is Case 8. Case 8 gave two sides to it because it depends on what the juvenile did to recieve it but again they are young and if let go they will go and commit even more crimes again.

# data[].attributes.body
This is not a violation. schools need to keep kids safe and make sure students are not doing drugs.

# data[].attributes.body
Case eight was most interesting to me because I would like to know what the juvenile did to receive a death penalty.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence does not violate the 8th Amendment. The death penalty is granted to an individual who has committed a deed cruel and unspeakably wicked. This fact should not exclude juveniles.

# data[].attributes.body
The reason why this case is the most interesting to me because we don't know what a child has to do to get a death penalty. There are so many different circumstances, and takes on that topic.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence does not violate the 8th Amendment. To have such a deadly sentence means that they have commited a crime serious enough for you to receive that punishment. If they were to be let off, they may grow up to do something even worse.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading does not violate a student's right to privacy and confidentiality. A student's work does not reveal any personal or sensitive information. Peer grading is for the purpose of preventing cheating or lack of integrity from a student.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes if someone does in fact search you without permission. You have the right to not submit to the search.

# data[].attributes.body
Case 7 seems the most interesting for me. It seems weird as to why a school would need to do a random drug test.

# data[].attributes.body
A school's random drug test does not violate the fourth amendment. It is purely for the students safety and does no harm. Students are allowed to be subjected to drug tests because they are not yet legal adults as well.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence does not violate the Eigth Admenment. This is because it depends on what crime they have committed to get the death sentence and if they are let go they could go and commit even more crime.

# data[].attributes.body
Case 8 is interesting because it is very vague. We do not know what the juvenile has committed to be put to the death sentence, so that may change our opinions. Children or minors are humans, so they should still be treated as normal humans.

# data[].attributes.body
A school's random drug test does not violate the 4th Amendment. If the school has reasonable suspicion of drug use then a random drug test would be a valid response.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that peer grading is violating privacy.  The person grading can sabotage the paper.

# data[].attributes.body
Case 8 sounds the most interesting to me because I haven't thought about if a child should get the death sentence or not. I generally don't support the death sentence for mostly moral reasons and having a person under 18 be executed is also something I generally don't support.

# data[].attributes.body
Case 8 is interesting to me because I have never heard that case before. It is interesting to think about what side you are on and why a child's death violates the 8th Amendment.

# data[].attributes.body
A school's random drug test does not violate the 4th Amendment. Schools have to find out if anyone is using drugs. If they don't find out and help them get better, other students may be influenced by that student and it will cause a big student for everyone in the school.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence does not violate the eighth amendment. A death sentence should apply to everyone depending on how bad the crime committed was. If a teen were to kill multiple other teens, they should receive a death sentence or penalty.

# data[].attributes.body
Case 5 sounds the most interesting to me. I've heard stories about teachers forcing their students to participate in the flag salutes just because they feel personally disrespected. To me this is a violation of the first amendment because not everyone has to agree with the same beliefs or morals you have.

# data[].attributes.body
The reason I find case so interesting is because I wonder what would drive someone to do something worthy of the death penalty at such a young age.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence violates the 8th Amendment because they have their whole life to learn and change themselves. A child's brain continuously develops until they are 25 years old. If a child has committed a crime that is so bad they have been given the death penalty then they are most likely not okay, and need some help mentally or for some different reason. It would be highly unreasonable for them to be killed before their life has even begun. They won't get to learn these things and change.

# data[].attributes.body
Case 8 seems the most interesting to me. A child getting the death penalty seems like a cruel or unusual punishment.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that case eight sounds the most interesting because a human's mind is properly developed until the age of twenty-five, but what crime is worth a juvenile death sentence?

# data[].attributes.body
Compulsory or required flag salutes in public schools do not violate the First Amendment. They are simply stated to show respect to the people which have fought for our country and defended our rights, having no negative connotations.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe peer grading does violate a student's right to privacy and confidentiality. Particularly when grading tests; many students do not feel like they did well on tests and would not like to let other people see how they did.

# data[].attributes.body
A school's random drug test does not violate the Fourth Admendament. Schools do have the right to a random drug test to any students in order to keep everyone safe

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence does not violate the 8th Amendment. I believe the death sentence should be for all ages just depending on the severity of the crime. For example, if a 14 year old went and killed 20 people, they should be able to receive the death penalty.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Case 7 is the most interesting. I think that because I don't get why they would do a random drug case unless there was a scenario so that why I think it is the most interesting

# data[].attributes.body
Case 7 is the most interesting for me. This is because a student can be exposed of pure pressured into taking drugs. Their can be students who have never once taken a drug until they were once pure pressured. Then If it so happens that a student has to take a drug test during this time, it will be on their permeant record and or be suspended.

# data[].attributes.body
This case sound the most interestin because, what crime did this child commit for them to recive the death penalty.

# data[].attributes.body
Case 8 sounds the most interesting to me because of how a minor would commit such a large crime to get punished with death. For example, a child could have a undeveloped brain but they can't commit multiply murders or crimes on accident.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading does not violate a students right to privacy and confidentiality. It is not sharing important information such as birthdates and final grades. It just is a simple worksheet or test nothing that can reveal to much about the student.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence does not violate the 8th Amendment. If the juvenile's crimes are as bad as criminals that have gotten the death sentence, then they should have the same treatment of those criminals regardless of age.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death does not violate the Eighth Amendment. The death penalty is only given to people who have made several murders, and if a juvenile did happen to make several murders they deserve the same consequence.

# data[].attributes.body
Case 1 sounds the most interesting to me because we live in an era which more people voicing your opinions. It is important for us to learn how to peacefully disagree with others, but also know how to stand up for what we believe.

# data[].attributes.body
Case 8 sounds more interesting because of all the different opinions there are about this case. I would agree that it is cruel to a teen not even over 18 because of brain development and the fact that they are younger than the adults that are put in a death sentence.

# data[].attributes.body
Case 8 because why would someone under 18 be sentenced to death. I would like to know how a juvenile got a death sentence.

# data[].attributes.body
I think case 8 would be the most interesting, because what has a child done that was so bad, it deserved a death sentence. Death sentences are only given to the worst people, and why would a child need one.

# data[].attributes.body
Case 8 sounds the most interesting to me because I believe the death penalty should be abolished and would like to learn more of what determines how a person gets on death row.

# data[].attributes.body
Case 8 sounded the most interesting because we weren't talking about small consequnces or violations. Case 8 would talk about whethere more people are going to die in prison or not.

# data[].attributes.headline
In my opinion, case 8 because it can be interpreted many different ways.

# data[].attributes.subject
In my opinion, case 8 because it can be interpreted many different ways.

# data[].attributes.body
Case 8 was most interesting, as it was something that brings up not only the moral question of the death penalty, but also how if a child is being given the death sentence, they have been failed by education and by their parents.

# data[].attributes.body
The case that sounds the most interesting to me is case 8. It's interesting in the way that a child could commit such a crime that deserves a death sentence. Sure that children are, most of the time, more immature than adults, but it's still something that is rarely encountered, thus it deserves my curiosity.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death does not violate the 8th Amendment. The 8th Amendment protects cruel punishment which a juveniles death does not fall under that.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading violates a student's right to privacy and confidentiality. Students are obliged to show another student their grade. If they did not have a good relationship and did not recieve a good grade, the other student may go telling others what they got.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence does not violate the Right Amendment.  As long as the was a proper reason worthy of a juvenile death sentence it doesn't violate the Right Amendment.

# data[].attributes.body
A school's random drug test des violate the Fourth Amendment. For a school to do a random drug test they would need a warrant before they do anything.

# data[].attributes.body
A school's random drug test does not violate the 4th Amendment. Children and teenagers are legally not allowed to use drugs so if a student has been reportedly using drugs in school, they should be searched.

# data[].attributes.body
A schools random drug test does  the fourth amendment. This is because you cannot get a drug test for no reason, and no evidence.

# data[].attributes.body
Juvenile't death sentence dose not violate the 8th amendment. This is because the death penalty is only given to those people who have committed a heinous crime like a murder or several murders. So, if someone has done this no matter what age they are deserves the death penalty. It is not cruel and unusual if the defendant did something just as cruel.

# data[].attributes.body
The Fourth Amendment does not protect students from searches by school officials. For their own safety as well as their peers, once evidence proves something illegal such as drugs or weapons are acquired by a student, they should be searched and seized from those items.

# data[].attributes.body
Juvenle's death sentance does violate the 8th amendment. If a child does theose things they are still a child, you can wait until the are legally an adult and see what they do then.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading does violate a student's right to privacy and confidentiality. If a student desires to keep a grade private, there should be no force that can force publicity of that grade.

# data[].attributes.body
Juvenile's death sentence does not violate the 8th amendment. If someone, no matter the age, is given the death sentence, they must have done something extremely bad. Death sentence wouldn't be cruel if the minor had done crueler things than the death sentence. It wouldn't be an unusual punishment for an extreme crime.

# data[].attributes.body
School random drug test do not violate the 4th Amendment. The fourth amendment states no unreasonable search and seizures. Having a student take a drug test is to see if the child is doing drugs is illegal in America.

# data[].attributes.body
School's random drug test does not violate the 4th Amendment.  Drugs are illegal for teens to be using in the first place so if the school needs to drug test the student they should.

# data[].attributes.body
The juvenile death sentence is a violation of the 8th amendment. I consider it to be cruel to punish a child, however this does not mean that the child should not be punished at all.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death does not violate the 8th amendment. We don't know how bad the crime is.

# data[].attributes.body
Compulsory or required flag salutes in public school do violate the First Amendment. People should be able to be able to choose if they wish to salute or not. Forcing students to salute against their will is a violation of their right of speech.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence does violate the 8th amendment because that would be a cruel and unusual punishment. Children have a lot to learn and they make mistakes.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading does not violate a student's right to privacy and confidentiality. Usually, there is no confidential information on classwork or homework so peer grading shouldn't be a problem to people. Even if the person that graded your paper purposefully gave a bad grade, you can still bring the grade up to the teacher and they will most likely correct it.

# data[].attributes.body
School's random drug test dose violate the 4th amendment right. That is because you should need a warrant in order to carry out with the drug test.

# data[].attributes.body
A school's random drug test does violate the Fourth Amendment. A school doesn't have the right to take someone's bodily fluids without consent.

# data[].attributes.body
I think a juvenile death sentence violates the 8th amendment. The death of a child is a cruel punishment and should violate the 8th Amendment.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading does not violate a student's right to privacy and confidentiality as long as it's in a general topic. This is because it is meant to help the student and all comments are purely constructive criticism to help them get better, not to degrade them of their work.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence does not violate the 8th amendment. The cruelest punishment is death meaning they must have done something extremely terrible to get to the level of the death punishment.

# data[].attributes.body
Required flag salutes do not violate the first amendment.  The flag salute is an oath to this country which we are citizens of and it is out of respect to fallen heroes  and the freedom we fought for. It does not violate the freedom of speech because it is out of respect to those who created the amendment.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, required flag salutes in public school violate the First Amendment. forcing someone to say somthing in itself violates the First Amendment.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading dose violate a student's right to privacy. This is because it can used to shame a student, and they most likely don't want their grades to be shared.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading does violate a student's right to privacy and confidentiality. Some students aren't comfortable with sharing their grades but they still have share their grades with that person who is peer grading their test.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading doesn't violate student's right to privacy and confidentiality. This is because peer grading is just grading the schoolwork and it doesn't violate any student privacy. It is more of a school strategy to learn more than a violation of privacy and confidentilaity.

# data[].attributes.body
School's random drug tests do not violate the 4th amendment. The school would have confirmed with parents and students before hand to be allowed to take bodily fluids or hair. It is also for the health of the students.

# data[].attributes.body
A school's random drug test does not violate the 4th Amendment. The drug test gives the school the data that the student has been tested.

# data[].attributes.body
No i feel that a juvenile's death sentence violate is wrong because of them being a child or teen. I feel that it is wrong and should be punished a different way.

# data[].attributes.body
A school's random drug test does violate the fourth amendment. You can not put random students though that without reason.

# data[].attributes.body
A random drug test violates the Fourth Amendment. Saying the test was random, implies that there was no valid reason to just have a drug test sprung on students.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading does not violate a students right to privacy and confidentiality. A student can use their rights in the first amendment to ask if the teacher can grade their paper.

# data[].attributes.body
If the person is forced to salute the flag, it is indeed against the First Amendment. The person has the right to choose whether to salute or not.

# data[].attributes.body
A juvenile's death sentence does not violate the 8th Amendment, The juvenile obviously has done terible things. If the juvinile Has murdered mutiple time he/she had conducted a plan.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes it does. Killing a child would be a cruel and unusual punishment.

# data[].attributes.body
No the juvenile death sentence does not go against the 8th amendment right. But a kid should not be sentenced to death, just a life in prison.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading does violate a student's right to privacy and confidentiality. The student may not feel comfortable showing others their work so they should have a right to not share their paper.

# data[].attributes.body
Compulsory or required flag salutes in public school do violate the First Amendment. If they do not wish to praise the beliefs behind the flag, they should not be obliged or forced to go against their beliefs.

# data[].attributes.body
Peer grading doesn't violate a student's right to privacy and confidentiality. As long as the students agrees with the person correcting it, it doesn't violate it.

# data[].attributes.body
Random drug tests do not violate the 4th Amendment. If the school has a history of a lot of drug use, then it should be okay for a random drug test.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, compulsory or required flag salutes in public schools do violate the first amendment. So, you should not be required to do so if you do not believe that saluting the flag is necessary to you or your belief.

# data[].attributes.body
School's random drug test does not violate the 4th amendment. Since students shouldn't have drugs in the first place and random drug testing could be a suspicion from the school.

# data[].attributes.body
A school's random drug test does not violate the 4th amendment because it is a safety issue. It is illegal for students to be using drugs and random drug tests could potentially save a student's life from overdose.

# data[].attributes.body
A schools random drug test does not violate the fourth amendment. They need to make sure everybody in there school is safe.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes schools random drug test should be aloud because of the reason that kinds who are using drugs don't risk someones else's safety.

# data[].attributes.body
Comulsory or required flag salutes in public school does violate the First Admendment. This is because students have the right and aren't forced to do it even if it is seen as disrespecful.