# data[].attributes.body
Global South

The intersection of climate change and technology

# data[].attributes.body
Kinship: Akrabalık, benzerlik

Notion: Düşünce, kavram

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Researcher's View: Pramod K Nayar on Post-humanism

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
History is kept by the non-human, and paradoxically history is what differentiates us from non-human organisms. Within us is our soul, but so far it seems, it is in the history of technics, the linguistic conceptions of self, material and immaterial. The technical cannot be trusted, but it is all we have, it stores the blueprint for machines and societies, it articulates our laws, and declares 'guilty' or 'not guilty'. Society as well as what can be produced increases in complexity; long-winded texts of subjectivity and engineering blueprints make up the saved histories that form our posterity. The reward? To deflect the prospect of starting at square one.

While we appear to be in power as users of tools, language and media, technology grows in complexity and feeds on us; it develops through our consciousness. Even though it is not conscious, it impels our philosophy, and leads us in directions activated by the medium. Media theorist, Marshall McLuhan, theorised that man obtained from the technology of literacy the potential to act without reacting. This development allowed for an aloof transcendence of rationality that separated man entirely from nature, but the illusion of transcendence masked the material contingency of its construction, like a magician covering his tracks, this sleight of hand concealed the dominion of technology over humanity. As the trees veil the forest, the function hides the machine. Through the technology of literacy, mankind has carved out this notion of transcendence, as if we were separate from the earth that sustains us. Yet, this is a deception, for as the sun and the stars are part of the universe, so are we a part of nature, not separate from it, not beyond it, but rather, enmeshed within it.

Conceived into the world, mankind is a subject marked by perpetual processes of histories and technologies, all these entities have come to coexist with us and exert their influence on our past, present and future. The self is generated by the interaction with the external, that which is not human and not us. Because of our ability to incorporate the world into our bodies, humans break apart from animals. Not due to any divine investment, but rather, thanks to the tools that we use in a distinct way, which suggests a symbiotic relationship, where tools as parasites use hosts. It is unclear who or what is doing the inventing and what is being invented. Humans use tools to invent and to outsource their memory and agency, particularly through art and science. This deployment of technology and tools has steered our evolution, although this was not a deliberate or rational decision. Rather, it was a lucky accident, or that which may end up with unforeseen consequences for the biosphere. As we outsource our memory, agency, and history to the material outside, our brain appears relatively ephemeral in comparison to the long memories of the external mediums.

From the first flaked flintstone to the development of robotics and artificial intelligence, the technical evolution builds on centuries of innovation, from the earliest water clocks and automatons to modern computers that can perform complex tasks. Without these technologies, humans would be back to square one. The evolution of technology is for now contingent on the survival of its host, humans. Yet, the emergence of artificial intelligence could render humans superfluous to the evolution of technology. Like a parasite growing from human intelligence, branching out into various forms of technology. This organism is dependent on nourishment on humans to survive, but one day it may grow beyond the need for humans, becoming a new kind of life, whereby a world where the boundary between humans and machines may become indistinct, with machines eventually surpassing human capabilities. This convergence of humanity and technology, where the soul and the silicon chip fuses, may seem like a work of science fiction, but this could be a possible reality in centuries to come.

A significant portion of human memory and knowledge flows outside of our minds through media, language, and other technical phenomena. Without the technical, history vanishes before our eyes; the technicality of language, media, and tools not only drive history but shapes our understanding of it, as different narratives are constructed and disseminated. To navigate the complex currents of human experience, the technical can suggest a desire for a singular and stable historical truth, and weave itself into the very fabric of human society, consequently the technical rules the past and charts a course towards a new understanding of the world.
Bibliography
McLuhan, M. (2013). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Gingko Press.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
History is kept by the non-human, and paradoxically history is what differentiates us from non-human organisms. Within us is our soul, but so far it seems, it is in the history of technics, the...

# data[].attributes.body
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25684377/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The .gov means it's official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site.

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Abstract

Posthumanism entails the idea of transcendence of the human being achieved through technology. The article begins by distinguishing perfection and change (or growth). It also attempts to show the anthropological premises of posthumanism itself and suggests that we can identify two roots: the liberal humanistic subject (autonomous and unrelated that simply realizes herself/himself through her/his own project) and the interpretation of thought as a computable process. Starting from these premises, many authors call for the loosening of the clear boundaries of one's own subject in favour of blending with other beings. According to these theories, we should become post-human: if the human being is thought and thought is a computable process, whatever is able to process information broader and faster is better than the actual human being and has to be considered as the way towards the real completeness of the human being itself. The paper endeavours to discuss the adequacy of these premises highlighting the structural dependency of the human being, the role of the human body, the difference between thought and a computational process, the singularity of some useless and unexpected human acts. It also puts forward the need for axiological criteria to define growth as perfectionism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Post-human and scientific research: how engineering carried out the project.

Ghilardi G, Accoto D. Ghilardi G, et al. Cuad Bioet. 2014 Sep-Dec;25(85):379-86. Cuad Bioet. 2014. PMID: 25684378

From Darwinian to technological evolution: forgetting the human lottery.

The autonomy of biological individuals and artificial models.

Moreno A, Etxeberria A, Umerez J. Moreno A, et al. Biosystems. 2008 Feb;91(2):309-19. doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2007.05.009. Epub 2007 Jul 17. Biosystems. 2008. PMID: 17719170 Review.

How to make an autonomous robot as a partner with humans: design approach versus emergent approach.

Fujita M. Fujita M. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2007 Jan 15;365(1850):21-47. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2006.1923. Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2007. PMID: 17148048 Review.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
national center for biotechnology information

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Contemporary post-humanism: technological and human singularity - PubMed

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Posthumanism entails the idea of transcendence of the human being achieved through technology. The article begins by distinguishing perfection and change (or growth). It also attempts to show the anthropological premises of posthumanism itself and suggests that we can identify two roots: the liberal ...

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.jstor.org/stable/24569993

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Editor’s Introduction: Technology, the Posthuman, and Aesthetics in Multi-Ethnic Literature on JSTOR

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Gary Totten, Editor’s Introduction: Technology, the Posthuman, and Aesthetics in Multi-Ethnic Literature, MELUS, Vol. 40, No. 4, Technology, the Posthuman, and Aesthetics in Multi-Ethnic Literature (WINTER 2015), pp. 1-7

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Modern technology seems always to have been judged according to its utility for human beings. To the extent that technologies have been viewed as tools, instruments, or prostheses for human use, and thus under human control, they have largely been seen in positive, utopian terms. When technologies have, on the other hand, been seen as not serving human ends and interests - or as threatening to control or enslave human beings - they have almost invariably been interpreted as dystopian, even monstrous forces. This opposition has defined not only human beings' direct interactions with technologies, but also the abundant examples of technology in arts and culture. Even personifications of technologies as living beings seem largely constrained by this utopian/dystopian dialectic, from anodyne robot helpmates to Frankensteinian threats to humanity.

This instrumentalist conception of technology remains the dominant conception of technology even today. Yet, despite its persistence, representations of technology show evidence that they are moving beyond the extremes of utopian and dystopian depictions. This shift may itself be seen an effect of rapid technological change. Continual technical innovation and the changes associated with it have led to what Bernard Stiegler has called a state of "permanent innovation", where technologies sometimes seem to have exceeded the ability of human beings to conceptualize them. Since the advent of industrial society, Stiegler argues, "Technics evolves more quickly than culture".[1] Thus, Stiegler seems to suggest, contemporary technologies have themselves begun to destabilize the categories and concepts through which "technology" has traditionally been defined.

It should, however, be noted that seeing technology as 'beyond' or 'in advance' of human cognition necessarily involves viewing technology as an autonomous, seemingly evolutionary force that affects and even moulds human/cultural behaviours. Yet, any conception of technology as a force unto itself inevitably runs the risk of becoming a species of technological determinism. It conceives of technology as an a priori causal force that operates independently of environmental, cultural, economic, political-ideological, or even human determinants.

Seeing technology as autonomous may seem counter to the instrumental idea of technology as a tool for human use, but these two concepts are not necessarily opposed. Frankfurt School theorists have, for example, argued that the instrumentalist tendency of technology eventually becomes so entrenched that it surpasses human control and becomes a " technological a priori" (Marcuse) that precedes and directs particular technological developments.[2] From this perspective, instrumental rationality may have begun as a means for human enlightenment and mastery, but it eventually begins to operate on its own, imposing its own systemic, calculative logic on humanity. In this sense, the apparent opposition between technological determinism and the instrumental idea of technology is less an opposition than a dialectic: indeed, it is precisely the 'dialectic of enlightenment'.

New information technologies do not escape this dialectic; indeed, they routinely promise expanded empowerment to their human users. The attraction of these technologies lies precisely in their promise to allow users to be free, active creators and producers. Yet, this promise of increased freedom, creative expression, and mastery is premised upon converting virtually every aspect of life, nature, and culture into quantitative terms, into data - including human life. Users of information technologies and social media are not only encouraged to volunteer data about themselves but to feel empowered and expressive for having done so. This situation bears a strong resemblance to Walter Benjamin's observation that in place of people's right to change society, Fascism instead offered the masses a chance to express themselves.[3] In a digital age, this desire for expression has by no means dissipated, but generates ever more customized, individualized forms of self-expression. And just as in Benjamin's time, class and property structures, as well as their basis in humanist individualism, remain generally unnoticed and unchanged.

Here, a new digital dialectic comes to replace and amplify the dialectic of enlightenment. It is not just users who gain a sense, however illusory, of mastery or self-empowerment from information technologies; in many ways, the entire system is based on a presumed mastery. All stakeholders in 'information society' imagine themselves empowered at some level, whether this means seeming themselves as in control, 'ahead of the curve', or as rebellious disruptors. Yet, information technologies inevitably convert individualized expressions and feelings into quantified and commodifiable data, and in the process, they subject users to increasing levels of surveillance and control. Users, no doubt sensing at some level that they are little more than a series of biopolitical and commercial data-points, continually feel a need to reassert their individuality and mastery, which means deploying ever newer, more effective technologies to achieve this end. This desire to maintain a sense of individual control and autonomy drives a technological vicious circle. Escaping this cycle will therefore require a reconceptualization of both human identity and technology in non-humanist and non-instrumental terms.

A 'posthumanism' that continues to rely on humanist and instrumental ideas will inevitably have difficulty imagining posthumans who are anything other than enhanced humans, augmented human subjects, humans with added 'superpowers'. The superheroes, mutants, and metahumans that populate comic books, young adult literature, and superhero movies are clearly not posthuman in any significant way; they are merely humans with 'special powers'. Their powers are prostheses to an a priori humanity. Spiderman may have 'spider' senses, strength, and agility, but in every other way, he is a fairly typical U.S. teenager/young man. Superman may supposedly be an alien, Wolverine a mutant, the Mighty Thor a god, and Harry Potter a wizard, but they are nevertheless quite recognizably human in their attitudes, hopes, and desires.

Similarly, surrounding humans with more technologies or even integrating technology into the human body does little to produce more posthuman identities; these developments, for the most part, merely provide more readily available technological prostheses. Any serious notion of posthumanist identity must not only challenge the idea that 'humanity' refers to autonomous human subjects capable of controlling the object world, but also the idea that technologies enable this human mastery of the world. Of course, if human beings can no longer be defined in terms of this subject-instrument-object order, this also means abandoning many related assumptions, including notions of homeostatic identity, autonomous individuation, humanist exceptionalism, and the idea that humans are by definition separate from their surrounding environment or world.

In this context, Donna Haraway's discussions of mixed, non-unitary, and 'monstrous', options for identity,[4] as well as N. Katherine Hayles's suggestion of a plural, "posthuman collectivity",[5] provide useful figurations for envisioning nonhumanist posthuman identities. Of course, suggestions of networked and relational identities, actor-network theories, swarm identity, and similar concepts have appeared in a variety of disciplinary fields. Worthy of note here is physicist Karen Barad's 'posthumanist notion of performativity', which would "question the givenness of the differential categories of 'human' and 'nonhuman', examining the practices through which these differential boundaries are stabilized and destabilized".[6] Barad outlines a performative, relational notion of agency, in which humans are positioned not as separate from the world, but as an interactive - or in Barad's preferred terminology, "intra-active" - part of it.

As Barad hints, posthuman performativity involves not merely a transformation of human identity, but a much broader re-conception of the entire environment - natural, cultural, technological - in which human beings are necessarily and complexly implicated. No longer conceived as subject to human use and control, these spaces are often cast as ambiguous, inhuman, alien, or simply 'weird'. Indeed, a number of science-fiction and 'weird fiction' narratives in recent years have been set in strange, largely incomprehensible zones where 'natural' Newtonian physical laws no longer seem to function.[7] These environments are generally not explicitly technological; they might, however, be labelled as biotechnological, since they alter humans, animals, and the environment in invisible and unpredictable ways.

Perhaps the best known of these spaces appear in the work of the Strugatsky brothers,[8] particularly The Zone of Roadside Picnic, popularised even further by Andrei Tarkovsky's depiction in his film version, Stalker (1979). Another uncanny zone also appears in the perpetually wet environs of the Strugatskys' The Ugly Swans, and in its filmic adaptation by former Tarkovsky assistant Konstantin Lopushansky ( The Ugly Swans, 2006). These zones are explicitly associated with aliens or mutants, and the geography within them is confusing, even fluid, with physical laws at times seemingly suspended. Humans, particularly human children, seem prone to mutation when in proximity to these zones. The Stalker's daughter is, in the novel, covered in fur, and in Tarkovsky's film exhibits psychokinetic abilities. The children in The Ugly Swans are also clearly altered by their interaction with this fluid, nonhuman environment.

More recent examples of these sorts of posthumanist zones can be found in a host of science fiction and 'weird fiction' works (from the biotechnical spaces of Octavia E. Butler's Xenogenesis series to M. John Harrison's Kefahuchi Tract in his Empty Space trilogy to the heterotopian spaces of China Mieville's fiction). Such a zone also appears prominently in Annihilation, the first book in 'weird fiction' writer Jeff VanderMeer's Southern Reach trilogy, and in Alex Garland's 2018 filmic adaption.[9] Critics have noted the resemblances between The Zone and The Shimmer, both of which involve non-instrumental alien technologies that seem virtually incomprehensible from a human perspective. Yet while The Zone seems largely depopulated, The Shimmer seems to be biotechnical generator, affecting life at a cellular level: accelerating growth, dissolving organs, hybridizing species, mutating human beings into flowering plants in some cases and into reconstituted versions of themselves in others. In some ways, the alien presence in these works seems to blend into an ecological revenge narrative, in which the natural environment reasserts its independence from human technological control. Much as in The Zone, the humans who survive The Shimmer are clearly no longer entirely human, no longer entirely separate from these spaces. Yet, just how these figures have changed, what makes them posthuman, cannot be understood from this side of the boundary that separates us from these ambiguous zones, spaces, and heterotopias, which always seem to shimmer at the edge of our comprehension. This liminal space is the true environment of the posthuman.

- R.L. Rutsky, San Francisco State University, October 2018

[1] Bernard Stiegler, Technics and Time, 1: The Fault of Epimetheus, trans. Richard Beardsworth and George Collins (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1998), p. 15.

[2] Herbert Marcuse, One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society (Boston: Beacon Press, 1964), p. 153. Marcuse's technological a priori is not simply technological, but largely social and ideological.

[3] Walter Benjamin, "The Work of Art in the Age of Its Technological Reproducibility", Selected Writings, Vol. 4, 1938-1940, eds. Howard Eiland and Michael W. Jennings, trans. Edmund Jephcott et al. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003), p. 269.

[4] Donna J. Haraway, Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (New York: Routledge, 1991); [email protected]_Millennium.FemaleMan©Meets_OncoMouse™: Feminism and Technoscience (New York: Routledge, 1997); When Species Meet (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2007); Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene (Durham: Duke University Press, 2016).

[5] Katherine Hayles, How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999), p. 6.

[6] Karen Barad, "Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter", Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28.3 (2003), p. 808. For a more extensive discussion, see Barad, Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning (Durham: Duke University Press, 2007).

[7] It is worth noting that humanism has sometimes been cast as parallel to Newtonian physics, while posthumanism has often been figured in terms of quantum mechanics. Barad, in fact, draws heavily on Niels Bohr's "Copenhagen Interpretation" of quantum physics in her arguments about posthumanism. Similarly, Vicki Kirby's Quantum Anthropologies deploys quantum explanations in concert with Derridean theory to formulate a posthuman space in which cultural and natural, textual and material are inextricably entangled. Quantum entanglement also plays a major role in Barad's work.

[8] Arkady and Boris Strugatsky, Roadside Picnic, trans. Antonina W. Bouis (New York: MacMillan, 1977); The Ugly Swans, trans. Alice Stone Nakhimovsky and Alexander Nakhimovsky (New York: MacMillan, 1987).

[9] Jeff VanderMeer, Annihilation (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2014).

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Modern technology seems always to have been judged according to its utility for human beings. To the extent that technologies have been viewed as tools, instruments, or prostheses for human use, and thus under human control, they have largely been seen in positive, utopian terms. When technologies have, on the other hand, been seen as not serving human ends and interests - or as threatening to control or enslave human beings - they have almost invariably been interpreted as dystopian, even monstrous forces.

# data[].attributes.body
https://scholar.google.com.tr/scholar?q=posthumanism+and+technology&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart

# data[].attributes.body
The Posthuman: Situating the Subject in Human-Tech Relations

p. 87-119 TECHNOLOGY, MEDIA LITERACY, AND THE HUMAN SUBJECT

|

Richard S. Lewis

# data[].attributes.body
We are also situated in the fourth industrial revolution (Schwab, 2017), where technologies for most, but not all, of the humans in the world have a dramatically increased role to play. And while not all of us may be directly affected by this technological revolution, we are all affected by the current mass extinction that is happening.

# data[].attributes.body
In general, posthumanists are affirmative of life, believe in the importance of de-centering the human, and approach the world with a holistic and interrelated perspective.

# data[].attributes.body
Braidotti’s (2013) research is strongly connected with Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari (1988) and builds upon feminist and post-colonialist work, specifically focusing on the interrelatedness of all life—including the human—within a vast living network. Posthumanism calls for a move away from the reductive, atomistic, rational-science mentality that attempts to understand the whole by breaking things down to its parts, and towards a productive and generative philosophy, which includes building relations and interdependencies that actually reflect the complexities of life.

# data[].attributes.body
Ferrando (2019) further explains, ‘The posthuman destabilizes the limits and symbolic borders posed by the notion of the human. Dualisms such as human/animal, human/machine, and more in general, human/ nonhuman are re-investigated through a perception which does not work on oppositional schemata’ (5; cf. Haraway, 1985).

# data[].attributes.body
A post-anthropocentric approach, discusses the human as removed from the center of all things and the exceptionalism that has surrounded this idea since the Enlightenment. There is some irony in discussing the human in a post-anthropocentric way when we so recently have claimed to be now in a new geologic age called the Anthropocene (Lewis, 2018). However, the Anthropocene focuses on the effects we have had on the planet, not our place in it.

# data[].attributes.body
Cyborg Manifesto, Donna Haraway (1985)challenges the boundaries of separation (animal/human, machine/human, male/female) and instead petitions for hybridity by using the concept of the cyborg.

N. Katherine Hayles (1999), How We Became Posthuman

Hayles specifically takes on transhumanism’s desire of mind uploading and traces the movement back through to its cybernetic roots, explaining how the disembodiment of information has led transhumanists to believe that a separation of the mind and body is possible.

Karen Barad (2007: 136)

explains posthumanism in opposition to the traditional humanist approach.

Rosi Braidotti (2002, 2011, 2013) The Posthuman. Braidotti (2013)

Ferrando (2013) identifies various types of posthumanism: critical, cultural, and philosophical.

# data[].attributes.body
Rosi Braidotti

Pramod K Nayar

Donna Haraway

Neil Badminton Professor of English Literature at Cardiff University

# data[].attributes.body
Kevin LaGrandeur,Francis Fukuyama, Michael Sandel, jürgen Habermas Bu gelişmeler bizi düşünmeye mecbur bırakıyor diyorlar.

# data[].attributes.body
"The machine has turned into companion species" Francesca Ferrando TedXSilliconAlley

# data[].attributes.body
From the podcast (posthuman.com)

Work: Cowork with robots TECHNOPHILIA

Digital control: TECHNOPHOBIA

Kevin LaGrandeur is Associate Professor of English at the New York Institute of Technology

# data[].attributes.body
Google Scholar Link for Grandeur: https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=3kHmT4UAAAAJ&view_op=list_works&citft=1&email_for_op=nlfr.76%40gmail.com&gmla=AH70aAVQQQpvaptxAfylJlk3yToYaMXdrKYOkDtdDkhy-TZlgsN-z0ayhvf7QH8s3vpZR-_4M6z9WP_6CxSOSOWr6wmiV-8jGqURLCSUdEFeBkZAMwZJkKc9d95HSLvdWHS8g7j5wfeeQI3sPmkXJJcr2CM2LFu7skPKRj2GZe06to_mCf5zkscoQ3HtcwUfsITp0QLxj2_La4HDcBRnOvAo5ncLOUTSHMnjNNiYS0M

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Humans, Cyborgs, Posthumans: Francesca Ferrando at TEDxSiliconAlley