# data[].attributes.body
King Louis XIV things.

# data[].attributes.body
If the parliamentary forces would not have won the English Civil War, the French Revolution could've been avoided. Why? Charles 1 would not have been executed and the people wouldn't have been mad about that. Also, if Oliver Cromswell wouldn't have been the individual leader, the peasants wouldn't have wanted to rebel.

# data[].attributes.body
https://alphahistory.com/frenchrevolution/third-estate/
A lot of the pictures represents things and it helps understand why the third estate was important to the cause of the French Revolution.

# data[].attributes.body
if the king wouldn't have started all the wars then France wouldn't have became poor. if the manufactured goods weren't confiscated then manufactors wouldn't have heavy fines on them. and teach person that was appointed by the king was dismissed because they couldn't minimise the spending of the royal court.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.historyguide.org/intellect/cahiers.html#third
This just shows what rules were set for the third estate

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.biography.com/people/louis-xvi-9386943
This source explains King Louis XVI's early life and how much lacked confidence, how shy he was, how young and immature he was.

# data[].attributes.body
Without the authoritative power’s easily seen Monarchical Disinterest, The French Revolution would not have happened. The reasons included are: 1) If the Monarchs hadn’t spent most of France’s money on pitiful things, the people would have a better economy. 2) If the Monarchs had worked with their people or cared, the Monarchs would have a better relationship with the citizens they were ruling. 3) If the Monarchs knew how to rule, then France would have been in better hands at the time.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.historywiz.com/rousseau.htm

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.history.com/news/who-invented-the-flush-toilet

This source explains how the toilet was an improvement in society and I will be able to use it to show that the toilet was a luxury that most of the people in France couldn’t afford.

# data[].attributes.body
https://alphahistory.com/frenchrevolution/third-estate/ This secondary source explains the ways the third estate was treated unfairly. It supports my argument because if we didn't have social classes that were treated differently then the french revolution would not have happened.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/resources/french-revolution/
This source itself has pieces of articles from the actual time that Louis XVI was in ruling. It explains what King Louis is doing during the time.
http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/louis.htm
This source also talks about Louis's decisions and also his execution.

# data[].attributes.body
http://historicaltexts.org/Rev/Index.htm
https://alphahistory.com/frenchrevolution/french-revolution-documents/

# data[].attributes.body
/https://www.accessible-archives.com/2016/02/godeys-profile-marie-antoinette/
This article is from the book "Godey's Lady's Book: Marie Antoinette."
https://alphahistory.com/frenchrevolution/marie-antoinette/
This article goes through Marie Antoinette's life from when she married King Louis.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/resources/french-revolution/
Talked about how wars shaped the way the French Revolution happened. Relates to thesis because it talked about some aftermaths of war.
https://alphahistory.com/frenchrevolution/revolutionary-war/
Talked about how war can multiple bad things. Relates to thesis because it talks about causes.

# data[].attributes.body
This source explains what was was happening during the Harsh Winter so it backs up my thesis statement
https://www.moneymuseum.com/en/for-sunflower/the-french-revolution-1789-449?&slbox=true

# data[].attributes.body
http://mrscordovafrenchrevolution.weebly.com/the-three-estates.html
This source describes the importance of each estate and what type of people live in it

# data[].attributes.body
https://prezi.com/6npqw7maitpd/newspapers-during-the-french-revolution/
This source explains how newspaper and journalism affected France during the revolution.
https://www.ducksters.com/history/french_revolution/timeline.php
This source gives a timeline of major events in chronological order in revolutionary France.

# data[].attributes.body
http://teaattrianon.blogspot.com/2007/05/last-letter-of-marie-antoinette.html

# data[].attributes.body
If there would've been a different and more fair government the third estate wouldn't have suffered as much and they wouldn't of had to of lose so much money because everyone would have been paying fair taxes.

# data[].attributes.body
The French Revolution was inevitable because if the king had not become king when he did, eventually France would have gone into virtually financial bankruptcy from the war, causing the people in the third estate to starve, while also increasing the amount of money they have to pay for taxes.

# data[].attributes.body
My thoughts on the French revolution, is that it was inevitable. For we know of the economic crisis that happened in France because of the 100 years war, that couldn't have been avoided. Another thing to take into notice in this time period, is the amount Monarchies going on. One other thing that would

# data[].attributes.body
The French revolution would not have happened if King Louis XVI had a better teacher or a teacher at all. Considering the fact that his dad focused teaching elsewhere there was no way for him to learn which is why he made bad decisions and pushed the people over the edge starting the revolution.

# data[].attributes.body
Without the economic depression the french revolution would not have happened because the king spent a lot of their money on unecessary things, having manufactured goods being taken away. France became poor due to all the wars and having to pay for everything.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.egr.msu.edu/~lira/supp/steam/
this is a secondary source describing the history of the steam engine and its main innovators. it helps my thesis because it actually explains how it was used and how it had made it easier to transport supplies long distances.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the French Revolution wouldn't have happened if the 100 years war didn't happen. They would have had more money and food for the coming harsh winter if not for the war.

# data[].attributes.body
There were three groups of people affected by the French revolution they were the three estates. The third estate was starting to have to pay more and more taxes this lead to starving people. Soon people started to die of starvation because they had no money to pay for food it all went to taxes. The first and second estate were not required to pay taxes. This made the third estate angry. They had to do something about it before it got any worse.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.history.com/topics/france/marie-antoinette
The beginning of this articles explains that Marie Antoinette didn't have much power in ruling. It also says that she was very young and spent most of her time socializing and indulging in her extravagant tastes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marie_Antoinette
About half way through the article it states that the King suffered from depression. King Louis looked to Marie for help. In my opinion Marie was not ready to help rule . She missed a meeting that made parliament think Marie was undermining the meaning of the meetings.

# data[].attributes.body
https://alphahistory.com/frenchrevolution/a-businessman-on-problems-in-the-french-economy-1789/
this source helps my thesis because it talks about the domestic problems in the french economy.
https://alphahistory.com/frenchrevolution/summary-french-royal-spending-1789/
this helps my thesis because it talks about how much money the king spent and what he spent it on.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.sparknotes.com/history/european/frenchrev/section4/
this source helps me me by talking about how he(Louis) was in contact with other monarchs in the surrounding countries for help restoring him to full power. Showing that he was not willing to share his power with the people.
It also talks about how the failure of the constitutional monarchy was in the hands of the corrupt members of parliament.

# data[].attributes.body
In 1780, Jean-Paul Marat began focusing on politics. He became a political journalist. He created his own newspaper, the People's Friend (L'Ami du Peuple). Marat became a very influential voice in the French Revolution.
Jacques Hebert became a journalist through political satire. became the chief spokesman for the Parisian sansculottes.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/education/resources/french-revolution/
This talks a lot about King Louis XVI, which will help me compare him to his dad.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the kings and queens are the cause of the french revolution and if they were better leaders they could've avoided or at least had one that wasn't as dangerous and bloody with better leadership

# data[].attributes.headline
The Harsh Winter caused the French evolution

# data[].attributes.subject
The Harsh Winter caused the French evolution

# data[].attributes.body
1. The Harsh Winter affected the crops which led to a shortage of food
2. The Harsh Winter affected the third estates amount of money. Most farmers were from the third estate so without crops came debt.
3. Without the Harsh Winter the third estate wouldn't have revolted because they wouldn't have had a reason.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe if we would've had a different government the French Revolution wouldn't of happened because people could've had more of a say and they would've had more rights and a better life

# data[].attributes.body
1. The rise of the taxes on the third estate.
2. The shortage of food that was caused by harsh winters and the price of food going up.
3. Why did the the high taxes only have to apply to the third estate? A lot of them already didn't have enough money and just because they made up 95% of the population doesn't mean they have to be the only ones paying them.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.biography.com/people/louis-xvi-9386943
This source helps me a lot by telling me what decisions Louis XVI made before the french revolution. This Article shows the bad decisions he made and proves that without them the French revolution may not have happened.

# data[].attributes.body
there would have been no riots  caused by the people from each estate because of the conditions they suffered through. They took their anger out by conducting riots against the King.
The King wouldn't have been executed because the people would have liked him and been in favor of him for not separating them into groups. Instead of people hating him, they would have loved him as a leader.
There would have been no shortage of food because the price for bread wouldn't have increased. Nothing would've been taxed higher because the King would've received love and kept prices down

# data[].attributes.body
The king was the reason the French Revolution happened.
1. Lacking Confidence
Since the King was lacking confidence this caused for a chain reaction throughout the country because they started to lose confidence in their king and start to believe he can't lead the country.
2. Economic Decline
The king was wasting the country's money this caused to the economy to decline tremendously. The country started to go into debt.King Louis made bad decisions, like getting rid of financial aid
3. The way the king treated people
The king raised taxes for only one estate and that made the country upset more than they already were. With the people having to pay high taxes. they didn't have much money for food or anything they actually need and that is because of King Louis.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the French Revolution was inevitable for many reasons. The bad monarchy, financial status of France, and the state of the third estate.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.historydiscussion.net/world-history/french-revolution/causes-of-french-revolution-political-social-and-economic-causes/1881

The source helped me a lot by telling me why war caused the french revolution. The article shows that war cause lots of poverty and political disruption in governments. And if this didn't happen then the French revolution wouldn't have happened

# data[].attributes.body
https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/basis/suger-louisthefat.asp
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/3875/3875-h/3875-h.htm
The first and second website detail how King Louis was as King. Specifically in the second site, King Louis' series of memories, show his narcissistic and disinterested attitude.
The first website tells the public's shared view on their king and how he acted as other perceived King Louis XIV.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the harsh winter is what caused the french revolution and could of prevented the French revolution. Because of the starvation and lack of nutrition, lack of warm clothes with the cold temperatures.

# data[].attributes.body
1. NOV 1, 1770, Corrupt Taxes

2. JUL 28, 1788, Crop Failure/Shortage

3. agrarian crisis of 1788-89

# data[].attributes.body
http://uhs.twpunionschools.org/subsites/swhitley/documents/Chapter%207%20-%20The%20French%20revolution/TheExecutionofLouisXVIReading1.pdf This source supports my thesis because it gives facts on how and why King Louis XVI was executed.
http://www.historywiz.com/primarysources/abbesieyes.htm

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.loc.gov/teachers/classroommaterials/presentationsandactivities/presentations/timeline/amrev/turning/valley.html
This website helps support my claim that the harsh winter caused the french revolution because of the cold temperatures and not enough food and supplies.

https://alphahistory.com/frenchrevolution/harvest-failures/  This site helps my reason because food couldn't be produced/harvested and be used for the soldiers.

# data[].attributes.body
The French Revolution was unavoidable because economic decline, bad spending habits by the king, and a bias society were inevitable.

# data[].attributes.body
https://agendarepublicain.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/calendrier-rc3a9publicain.jpg
Above is an image of the French Revolutionary Calendar, which was a big deal because it was French Revolutionists trying to de-Christianize France
The Storming of the Bastille by Jean-Pierre Houêl (1789)
Below is a painting of the storming of Bastille, which was a key event in the FR.

# data[].attributes.body
Without the Enlightenment, the French Revolution would not have happened because of The Philosophers, The Estates, and The King.

# data[].attributes.body
Without King Louis the FR would not have happened because: he led his country deeper into poverty, starvation, and danger.

# data[].attributes.body
Source #1 https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/basis/suger-louisthefat.asp
Basically just gives an overview of Louis as king and how people felt.
Source #2
The Red History Book
It helps explain more in depth the way he treated his people.

# data[].attributes.body
https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/modsbook13.asp
This source supports my thesis because it gives valuable information supporting that France was already set up for failing.
https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1789platiere.asp
This source supports my thesis because it shows that even if there was a different king some problems were just going to happen.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.biography.com/people/louis-xiv-9386885
This source helps me get information about King Louis XVI. It will help me figure out more about him and his relationships with the people. With that information, it could lead to many more facts and reasons he was so terrible.

# data[].attributes.body
A Biography of King Louis XVI of France by Robert Wilde
Biography describing his life and what happened throughout it.
Backs up my thesis, agrees with what I'm saying.

# data[].attributes.body
Without economical problems the French Revolution would not have happened because of money, food supply and the want of the peoples needs.

# data[].attributes.body
My thesis was that without poverty French citizens wouldn’t of gotten taxed heavily, they would be able to pay off their taxes that they got, and they wouldn’t have gotten angry or stressed and rioted about the taxes. This website talks about how the peasants were got stressed and how they lived their life in poverty.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.thecatholicthing.org/2011/07/14/the-french-revolution-and-the-church/
Title: The French Revolution and the Church
The article proves that the change in religion and how all of that affected the outcome of the FR.
http://www.webexhibits.org/calendars/calendar-french.html
The french revolutionary calendar and translator

# data[].attributes.body
Without the three estates in France, the French revolution would have never happened. The 3rd estate was treated really badly and the were taxed so heavily that they got so upset, and they were tired of being treated bad and they are one of the main causes of the French revolution.

# data[].attributes.body
If you scroll down to where it says early life it ha a couple paragraphs talking about his life and how he wasn't taught very well then his brother died, then his father died, and his mother

# data[].attributes.body
https://deremilitari.org/2014/08/profit-and-loss-in-the-hundred-years-war-the-subcontracts-of-sir-john-strother-1374/
-This source helps to support my thesis because it show from the captains P.O.V. on how yes they were gaining things but then they would almost instantly lose it and in bigger amounts, so it just shows how they were basically just wasting all of their resources in a pointless effort. This shows how the 100 years war could have been what really put them in the downward spiral leading to the revolution.

# data[].attributes.body
https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1789platiere.asp
This source helps to support my thesis about how the French Revolution was inevitable because it shows how it wasn't just because of the king that it occurred.
https://sites.google.com/a/bhsastudent.org/mr-evans-history/french-revolution-anger
This political cartoon helps to support my thesis since it demonstrates to us just how the people felt during this time.

# data[].attributes.body
The war really affected the French Revolution.
The war made food not accessible for many citizens because they have to have a lot for the soldiers.
Debt was caused by war because the government has to spend a lot.
The third estate wouldn't have revolted because they would have food, and they would have been treated better. If there was no revolt then there would be no conflict between the estates.

# data[].attributes.body
Without the social classes (the three estates) then the French Revolution wouldn't have happened because of how terribly they treated the third estate with the taxes, shortage of food, and unfairness. It was always the third estate suffering.

# data[].attributes.body
http://historicaltexts.org/Rev/(1789-06-23)%20Memoirs%20(Bailly).pdf
This supports because it talks about some of the flaws the government had and how the government ran.
http://historicaltexts.org/Rev/(1789-06-23)%20Address%20to%20the%20Estates%20General%20(Louis%20XVI).pdf
This supports because it talks about the king and how he wanted to do things

# data[].attributes.body
Without the three estates the French Revolution would not have happened because everyone would have been treated equal and no one would be starving or in debt.

# data[].attributes.body
https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/17stsimon.asp
This website describes the court and leadership styles of King Louis XIV. It details his mediocrity and poor leaderships skills when he went into power over France. This supports my claim that King Louis XIV wasn't a good ruler because he wasn't at the age of interest to rule France.

# data[].attributes.body
Even in ancient cultures, toilets and plumbing were viewed as a status symbol, and this didn’t change with the invention of the flushing toilet. The third estate felt degraded by their lack of indoor plumbing, and saw the upper two estates spending money on toilets while they were so poor that they couldn’t buy food and were starving to death. This fed their pre-existing anger towards the estate system and caused the French Revolution. In addition, like any new invention, toilets were very expensive. The royals and upper classes spent money on toilets that could have been better spent helping the country’s poor economy, rather than growing the lavish lifestyle that Marie-Antoinette and other royals already lived.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Louis-XV My thesis was that King Louis XV dying caused the revolution to some extent. This website goes into detail on what kind of leader King Louis XVI's dad/role model was. I think the Revolution would have still happened even he was a better ruler and role model for his son, but it might have been delayed for a bit.

# data[].attributes.body
C. Harris, Queenship and Revolution in Early Modern Europe
© Carolyn Harris 2016

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1057/9781137491688_6

This chapter out of the book helps support my thesis because it explains how the outcomes of the French Revolution and the English Civil War are similar. It talks about how the downfall of monarchy is popular in both events. It also talked about how the failures of both Marie Antoinette and Henrietta Maria were prominent in both downfalls in government.

# data[].attributes.body
The printing press played a key role in causing the French Revolution because it allowed information and propaganda to spread much more efficiently, which caused the French to revolt against the king.

# data[].attributes.body
Without the harsh winter the French Revolution wouldn't have happened because there wouldn't have been a shortage of food, the poor wouldn't have been in debt, and the third estate wouldn't have revolted.

# data[].attributes.body
If King Louis XVI was never king the French Revolution would never have happened because the way he treated his people was unfair, the way he wasted his country's money which caused the economy to decline, and how much he lacked confidence which caused for his people to be less confident in their leader.

# data[].attributes.body
Without the three separate estates, the French Revolution  would not have happened because there would be no people suffering from unfair treatment and high taxes. People would also respect the King more and there wouldn't be any riots regarding the conditions.

# data[].attributes.body
When King Louis XV dies, it puts young, inexperienced Louis XVI on the throne.
Being just 19 years old, He has terrible spending habits, and knows not when to take affirmative action.

Since he doesn't know when to take proper action, his spending habits are terrible, and his country is in debt. So he taxes the 3rd estate so much that they can't afford their bread. So Louis XVI was simply just too young and I think he was overwhelmed by everything at just 19 years old.

# data[].attributes.body
Marie Antoinette's marriage with King Louis XVI was not helpful for France. Marie did not help rule she made the situation worse by wanting more and instead of giving to the people she took from them. This caused higher taxes so she could buy more.
Marie Antoinette was 14 when she married. She was inexperienced and immature. If she was older she may of had more knowledge on how to rule. Although the Queen doesn't have much power to rule Marie might have been able to influence the King.
Marie's age not only took a toll on her knowledge of ruling, but she didn't have an interest in the business of being Queen instead she liked the riches and luxury life more. Being a Queen from Austria and getting anything and everything she wanted angered people. Because of Marie Antoinette's greediness people like the 3rd estate had less.

# data[].attributes.body
https://alphahistory.com/frenchrevolution/louis-king-of-the-third-estate-1789/ The primary source explains the queens influence's.
https://alphahistory.com/frenchrevolution/arthur-young-july-1789/
This primary source explains the conditions that the third estate was living in.

# data[].attributes.body
If he( Louis) had been more open to a constitutional monarchy and giving up some of his power (that he didn't know how to wield properly), the parliament would have not had to be so radical with their grasp of power.
It would have been a slow transition of power from the monarchy to the republic, and would have caused almost no blood to be shed in the name of the revolution.
With a constitutional monarchy the third estate could still have gotten what they wanted out of the revolution (bill of rights, better representation in parliament, social help programs, being rid of social classes, ect.) while still being able to continue on with life, but at a higher standard with better results than an actual revolution. This would eliminate their need to revolt against the monarchy.

# data[].attributes.headline
nick                                       soldiers were affected by my thesis because the steam engine allowed them to move people/supplies. common people were affected by my thesis because without the steam engine people wouldn't have as much access to power and coal would be worth less. i think that since the steam engine was built it made thing like fighting and preparing for battles to easy.

# data[].attributes.subject
nick                                       soldiers were affected by my thesis because the steam engine allowed them to move people/supplies. common people were affected by my thesis because without the steam engine people wouldn't have as much access to power and coal would be worth less. i think that since the steam engine was built it made thing like fighting and preparing for battles to easy.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.encyclopedia.com/history/modern-europe/wars-and-battles/hundred-years-war

- It is saying how the 100 years war completely destroyed the farmland which brought famine to the pole and land which is basically what I am saying because if we wouldn't have had this war the farmland wouldn't be as bad and the food crisis wouldn't be so bad going into the harsh winter.

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.history.com/topics/france/french-revolution
My thesis is that the French Revolution was inevitable no matter what different things could have happened. This source brings up the many, many things that were wrong in France at the time and how they all were factors that made the Revolution begin. Despite that one thing or the other may not have happened, there were still enough things that did occur which would have caused it either way.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.historywiz.com/triumph3rdestate.html
The primary source image describes how the first and second estates were powerless . It connects to my thesis because the condition of the third estate was better than the others.

# data[].attributes.body
https://alphahistory.com/frenchrevolution/harvest-failures/
John Adams quote on the failure of harvest in France.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.historydiscussion.net/world-history/french-revolution/causes-of-french-revolution-political-social-and-economic-causes/1881
this relates to my thesis statement because it talks about the economy and how it became poor and the economic conditions.

# data[].attributes.body
https://alphahistory.com/frenchrevolution/rousseau-social-contract-1762/
This primary source talks about social contracts. It relates to my thesis because the writer used the printing press to spread his political ideologies.

# data[].attributes.body
King Louis XV dies, when his son is younger. This keeps the new king very inexperienced, not as wise as he could have been, and just plain immature
Being inexperienced leads the new king to have terrible spending habits, and doesn't satisfy the majority.
The lack of funds to buy food in the harsh winter, causes many to hate the king. They think it's unfair he is spending money in great quantities, when they can't even afford bread. The people revolt against them.

# data[].attributes.body
3 people/events/conditions:

- execution of Charles l
- personal ruling by Oliver Cromswell
- exile of Charles ll

Charles l was affected by the English Civil War because after parliamentary forces won, they had him executed. The type of government was also affected by the English Civil War because once parliamentary forces won, Oliver Cromswell took individual power. The last thing affected by the English Civil War winner was that after Charles l was executed, his son, Charles ll was exiled.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.historydiscussion.net/world-history/french-revolution/causes-of-french-revolution-political-social-and-economic-causes/1881
This relates to my thesis statement because it talks about how the government had part in the cause and it talks about the history of each ruler and how each of them had a part.

# data[].attributes.body
Three groups of people affected by Monarchical Disinterest were the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Estates, this is because of three main reasons.
1. The 2nd Estate began to struggle because of loss f money due to the Monarchs spending without thinking. This connects to point two because...
2. The 3rd Estate was growing due to higher taxes putting more strain on the people of the 3rd Estate. People who were falling into the 3rd Estate from the 2nd Estate were going into poverty and many died because the Monarchs didn't care about their people dying or the rough conditions the 3rd Estate people had to live in. This ties into the third point because....
3. The 1st Estate was getting the backlash from the Monarch's money spending and refusal to invest themselves in problems throughout the kingdom. These problems were pushed onto some of the 1st Estate, and many stole from and did nasty things in envy for the seemingly unaffected 1st Estate.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Louis was king and had children including King Louis XVI

2. his father didn't teach all his sons how to be king and the eldest dies
3. The King died and XVI became king but couldn't very well because he had no training so he made bad decisions and that pushed the people over the edge and caused them to rebel.

all that need to be done was a bit more education on how to rule over a country then no french revolution

# data[].attributes.body
I think that the way the king treated his people was unfair.The Declaration of the Rights of Man says that "men are born equal and free in rights," and the kings did not hold true to that.
http://historicaltexts.org/Rev/(1789-06-23)%20Address%20to%20the%20Estates%20General%20(Louis%20XVI).pdf
This source is about the king and what he says about being king

# data[].attributes.body
If war never happened, the French Revolution would not have happened because there would have been no debt, no shortage of food, and the third estate wouldn't have revolted.

# data[].attributes.body
-I think that if they did not partake in the 100 years war, there wouldn't have been a enlightenment at least so soon.
- If we werent in the war we would have had money
-If we would have had that money we could have paid for food for when the harsh winter hit.
-If we had that food the people would not have been as mad because they at least wouldn't be hungry.

# data[].attributes.body
Since King Louis XVI had no experience in power, he caused the French revolution. Since he didn't have experience he put higher taxes on 3rd estate in order to try and get money to get out of debt. When bad things arose he didn't know how to react. So if King Louis XVI had been older and had more experience, the French Revolution could've been avoided.

# data[].attributes.body
If the toilet hadn’t been invented, the French Revolution wouldn’t have happened because the third estate wouldn’t have felt degraded by their lack of indoor plumbing, the upper estates wouldn’t have had the added sense of entitlement, and if the upper estates hadn’t spent money on toilets, the country’s economic state wouldn't have been so bad.

# data[].attributes.headline
nick                                                                         without steam engines the french revolution wouldn't have happened because of transportation of soldiers and supplies, and because it allowed people to give power to different things making life easier. 

# data[].attributes.subject
nick                                                                         without steam engines the french revolution wouldn't have happened because of transportation of soldiers and supplies, and because it allowed people to give power to different things making life easier. 

# data[].attributes.body
If Marie Antoinette hadn't married King Louis XVI, the king may have been more involved in the community instead of being with someone that fuels his passion for riches. Maybe if Marie Antoinette was older and more mature she might have been able to influence the King to listen to the people. Marie Antoinette was too young too understand how to rule, she was more focused on the luxury life as queen.

# data[].attributes.body
https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/mod/1789platiere.asp
This is to show how the use of money for the first estate had helped the revolution along.
https://www.britannica.com/event/French-Revolution
This is the other source for the same reason.

# data[].attributes.body
Poverty in French
-If King Louis XVI wouldn't have taxed the peasants they wouldn't of been in poverty.
- If the peasants weren't in poverty then they would've been able to pay off their taxes.
-If the peasants were able to pay off their taxes then wound't of gotten angry and rioted.

# data[].attributes.body
http://www.historydiscussion.net/world-history/french-revolution/causes-of-french-revolution-political-social-and-economic-causes/1881
Causes of the French Revolution
It supports my idea by saying political (King Louis) was one of if not the main cause of the French Revolution. It supports all of it.