# data[].attributes.body
I think he made a really good case for his argument about how and why business needs to change.

“There is a mismatch between what science knows, and what business does”

# data[].attributes.headline
Agree- "There’s a mismatch in what science knows and what business does"

# data[].attributes.subject
Agree- "There’s a mismatch in what science knows and what business does"

# data[].attributes.body
Contingent motivator- It dulls thinking and blocks creativity –

# data[].attributes.body
Strongly Agree: "Rewards, by their nature, narrow our focus"

"If you want engagement, self-direction works better"

# data[].attributes.body
"If you do this, then you get that."

“The solution is not to do more of the wrong things.”

“Autonomy, mastery, and purpose are keys to the solution”

“If, then rewards often destroy creativity”

# data[].attributes.body
Creative Type of Learning Curriculum vs Repetitive type of Learning Curriculum should be approached with different motivations (extrinsic vs intrinsic).

# data[].attributes.body
Strong Agree:   “If-then rewards often destroy creativity”

Strongly disagree:

“If you want people to perform better, you reward them right? No! It doesn't work.”

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The puzzle of motivation | Dan Pink | TED