# data[].attributes.body
Learners were expected to have more knowledge on this topic before entering the classroom.

# data[].attributes.body
The learners were asked to start with the creation of a model and then given time to test their model.

# data[].attributes.body
Began with skit modeling the concept; learners then tested prescribed set of materials.

# data[].attributes.body
The learners were given different experiences / tools to use at different times of the lesson

# data[].attributes.body
As a learner I was having a more challenging time thinking of and building a model to demonstrate how electricity is conducted. Ideas for models at my group was confusing for me. I had to think about this from my grade level perspective then I was able to visualize and understand how how electricity is conducted a little better.

# data[].attributes.body
This room we got to brainstorm with our peers and develop a model that we could then test.
We were also able to have a discussion about what we did and learned.

# data[].attributes.body
Fun and interactive, got us up and moving, then allowed us to experiment with different materials. Provided us with a model and encouraged us to gather evidence that supported that model

# data[].attributes.body
The learners were actively engaged and delivered information about electricity and performing the same hands on activity before determining how electricity flows.

# data[].attributes.body
The models provided in room B help simplify, but maybe oversimplified some concepts.
I felt I had a clearer understanding of electricity after attending room B than room A.

# data[].attributes.body
The learner was a passive observer. Even with the testing kits there wasn't anything to figure out (patterns, explanations), just stuff to do (predict, test, record).

# data[].attributes.body
Learners were able to watch a demonstration on what was going to happen, then explore with various materials.

# data[].attributes.body
Learners built a model collaboratively in the group. In this case, it seemed that building the model was part of the process.

# data[].attributes.body
interactive - very guided

# data[].attributes.body
Enjoyed the play, however, still needed deeper understanding for how and why?

# data[].attributes.body
There was an interactive activity that modeled conductivity and then had the students test some items for their conductivity.

# data[].attributes.body
The learners were forced to rely upon prior knowledge to complete the model of electron movement.

# data[].attributes.body
In this room we watched a demo and description of what we were investigating.
Then we got use materials to investigate electricity.

# data[].attributes.body
We were asked to develop a model and then test it ourselves.

# data[].attributes.body
Interesting demo but I wasn't confident answering the assessment

# data[].attributes.body
Cooperative Collaborative learning with hands-on investigation...
Teachers modeled/demonstrated
Students participated by also demonstrating.

# data[].attributes.body
As a learner we were to create a model, based off of prior knowledge.

# data[].attributes.body
I left somewhat puzzled

# data[].attributes.body
we watched a presentation and were told the answer, then we explored stuff and were thinking about what we'd learned first

# data[].attributes.body
We were  given a model and were given an experiment to try out.  We were held accountable to making a  prediction

# data[].attributes.body
In this room, what we tested, how we were testing it, and why, was guided by our initial models and the gaps in our models. However, many of the questions we had inspired by our models were not answerable with the materials we had available.

# data[].attributes.body
Began with demonstration & interactive "play", followed by a hands-on activity

# data[].attributes.body
The learner was expected to figure out the answer.

# data[].attributes.body
In room B, students developed a model without much guidance and then explored without understanding the model.

# data[].attributes.body
In depth discussion with peers to develop an understanding of conductivity

# data[].attributes.body
Learners were audience members that were fed information and then asked to confirm the theory with experiments

# data[].attributes.body
The students observed to gain content, and then explored.

# data[].attributes.headline
A was interactive with the play, then we were given explicit directions on what to do.

# data[].attributes.subject
A was interactive with the play, then we were given explicit directions on what to do.

# data[].attributes.body
Making models, testing materials, talking to learners in another group

# data[].attributes.body
Hands on is always good!  Some of the results of the conductivity test were not what I predicted, which was cool.  I had a hard time with connecting the experiment to the model of electrons that we drew.

# data[].attributes.body
Guided investigation followed by demo

# data[].attributes.body
Exploring, trying to explain a model and make sense of stuff

# data[].attributes.body
Cooperative Collaborative with hands-on investigation.

# data[].attributes.body
As a learner I felt that there was a lot of missing information in room A.
Not much information to complete the assignment.

In room B the learning was more interactive and the learners were engaged in the lesson.

# data[].attributes.body
We were told to make our own model and then test it with very little directions. In the room I got to experiment but at times I didn't really know what I was trying to accomplish

# data[].attributes.body
It was great to have a model presented before conducting the experiments. It helped to think about what will likely work and what will not. Collaboration with teammates was helpful to process the results of the experiments

# data[].attributes.body
In room A, I felt as if I needed to bring much more previous knoweldge

# data[].attributes.body
There was more active learning and participation in room A.  Developing models (room A) is really important, yet very challenging.

# data[].attributes.body
Learners were trying to build on their own models, developing knowledge (but in the dark).

# data[].attributes.body
In this room, learners were more engaged and motivated.

# data[].attributes.body
Learners were responsible for coming up with the information/content.

# data[].attributes.body
Learners were heavily guided and information/content was given at the start of the lesson. Felt somewhat exploratory with the lab portion.

# data[].attributes.body
Asked to create a model based on prior knowledge, then use it to explain/predict

# data[].attributes.body
Exploratory based, student led and more of student's voices throughout the lesson. Given much more freedom in lab and discussion. Guided by teachers to help students direct their learning.

# data[].attributes.body
In this room we were given direct instruction first (although the class as a whole was supposed to make sense of the + and - atoms in salt by acting out how those atoms re-arranged when dissolved in water). What we tested, why we were testing it, and the kind of data we would be collecting was more prescribed.

# data[].attributes.body
As a learner, I felt that other learners posted a model with little or no discussion and it was accepted

# data[].attributes.body
Mostly listening and moving to where I was told. Passive learner doing what I was told.

# data[].attributes.body
I

# data[].attributes.body
We created our own models, tested materials and discussed with one another different ideas about how effective our model was.  It left us with a lot of questions and may encourage development of a working model for conductivity if we were deeply engaged in the question and invested in developing understanding

# data[].attributes.body
In this room, learners were more passive and hesitant