# data[].attributes.body
SLZUSD created a family engagement survey that was distributed to all sites and all grade levels. Families had online and physical access to the survey

# data[].attributes.body
Provides an opportunity for deeper and more targeted conversation.

# data[].attributes.body
Allows us to get a broad level of input that would include representing all schools, grade levels, and student groups. One of the  values of the input is that it can be aggregated.

# data[].attributes.headline
Findings of Priority 3 relate to goals established in other areas of our LCAP:

# data[].attributes.subject
Findings of Priority 3 relate to goals established in other areas of our LCAP:

# data[].attributes.body
(OUSD) # of sites engaging parents in on-going manner with academic topics (site based data, how to support learning at home,  goal setting, etc) is directly linked to showing progress with ELL achievement, graduation, college readiness, standards.

# of sites scoring "3" on decision making rubric measures extent of meaningful shared decision making at site level with SPSA goals, strategies, practice, and budget.

# data[].attributes.body
More useful associated with individual events or projects in order to measure or solicit specific data (e.g. quantity of participants at a workshop)

# data[].attributes.body
I feel that Option One is more of an annual or semi- annual tool. When I think of Option 2, I think of sign-in sheets and info session meetings for families that staff may hold. Option 2 seems to be something that could be sustained throughout the year. Option 2 seems to be an on going process to engage families

# data[].attributes.body
(OUSD) Report progress on # of ELL parents attending reclassification workshops, and # of sites engaging their SELL committees with SPSA development. (measuring engagement of ELL parents with ELLMA (English Language Learner and Multilingual Achievement) department programs)

# data[].attributes.body
To get a broad sense of the level of family engagement and related "quality of life" indicators self-reported by family and community members

# data[].attributes.body
More specific for getting data for a particular group or situation.

Option 2

Used for overall data collection

# data[].attributes.body
Suspension rates
College/Career readiness (through college search software)
School Climate

# data[].attributes.headline
Potential Use of Option 1 (OUSD):  We may want to use a survey with a specific population of parents, for deeper inquiry/learning on specific data point (example:  Little progress with reducing suspensions of Students with Disabilities in grades 6-12).  We would develop the survey with a subcommittee of parents from our SPED Community Advisory Committee) 

# data[].attributes.subject
Potential Use of Option 1 (OUSD):  We may want to use a survey with a specific population of parents, for deeper inquiry/learning on specific data point (example:  Little progress with reducing suspensions of Students with Disabilities in grades 6-12).  We would develop the survey with a subcommittee of parents from our SPED Community Advisory Committee) 

# data[].attributes.headline
How might you respond to the prompt: “Describe how the findings of Priority 3 relate to the goals established for other LCFF priorities in the LCAP” ? 

# data[].attributes.subject
How might you respond to the prompt: “Describe how the findings of Priority 3 relate to the goals established for other LCFF priorities in the LCAP” ? 

# data[].attributes.headline
Can you describe a situation where you might encourage the use of option 1? use of option 2? 

# data[].attributes.subject
Can you describe a situation where you might encourage the use of option 1? use of option 2? 