# data[].attributes.body
1. What structure did they use? How do you know?
2. What did you like/not like about how the essay is structured? Be specific.
3. Does the author reflect on their experiences in a meaningful way?
4. Would you admit this student based on this essay?

# data[].attributes.body
1. What structure did they use? How do you know?
2. What did you like/not like about how the essay is structured? Be specific.
3. Does the author reflect on their experiences in a meaningful way?
4. Would you admit this student based on this essay?

# data[].attributes.body
1. What structure did they use? How do you know?
2. What did you like/not like about how the essay is structured? Be specific.
3. Does the author reflect on their experiences in a meaningful way?
4. Would you admit this student based on this essay?

# data[].attributes.body
1.
2.

# data[].attributes.body
1. montage, they talked about many different moments in their life
2. i really liked the first sentence and how it was a piece of dialogue
3. yes
4. yes

# data[].attributes.body
1. Montage structure - the story spanned several years and included details from different parts of their life
2. I liked that even though it wasn't a strictly narrative structure, there was a clear set of experiences that were connected and told the writer's life story
3. Yes, the author has reflected on their life experiences meaningfully. He moves past raw emotion and analyzes his feelings and reactions.
4. Honestly, the typos really get me. I wish it had been proofread. But I'd admit the student.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Montage
2. I liked how it related their childhood to how it shaped them and that their past only made them a better person
3. Yeah 100%, the author reflects about how these instances mad them more mature but at the same time put a burden on themselves.
4. Yeah I would admit them, this is a pretty sad but inspiring story at the same time and it shows this persons true character

# data[].attributes.body
2. I think I prefer montage styled essays so I liked how it gave us insight into the speakers childhood and how they were brought up shaped them into the person they are
3. I believe they do reflect in a meaningful way, they're able to take in the hardships of growing up and turn it into a positive
4. yes, but struck between this and the last one
- lexi

# data[].attributes.body
1. montage because she shared many stories about her childhood
2. i liked all the different skills she learned about how she used them to support her brother
3. yes
4. yes

# data[].attributes.body
1. they used montage, as it was a series of examples from their childhood and adolescence
2. I liked how it was a chronological series of events that centered around and led up to a main idea
3. yes, they acknowledged their growth and the things they had learned
4. no

# data[].attributes.body
1. Montage because they talk about multiple events that separately happened and relate to his independence
2. I liked how the author talks about their experiences rather than their brother's experiences more, however I did not like how they seem to tell rather than show as much.
3. Yes, they reflect on their experiences well because they come back to their role and what they had learned.
4. I feel like I would not admit the student because although they learn a lesson and reflect on their experiences, I feel like the essay is more about his childhood rather than high school.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Narrative structure- events are chronological and build upon each other
2.

# data[].attributes.body
1-Montage
2-I liked how he talks about how much the lack of a parental presence can influence people and its effects.
3- Yes
4- I would admit this student, because we can see that this students have a lot of good qualities that by reading, such as leadership, etc.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Montage of multiple events occurring and connecting to being a mature individual overcoming adversity.
2. I liked how the writer used this motivation of taking care of the family and applying this hard work into other things besides that.
3. They do
4. I would admit this student for how they are willing to endure through hardships and persevere it

# data[].attributes.body
1. montage
2. i liked how the final line connected to what they had written earlier
3. i believe so, the other essays i think do it better
4. possibly? i mean it's good but i kinda don't feel emotional reading it, it's very straightforward

# data[].attributes.body
1. montage, as they used a series of examples from their childhood to college
2. i liked the variety and specificity in the examples
3. sort of, they demonstrated confidence in and knowledge of themselves, but did not acknowledge any growth or change
4. no

# data[].attributes.body
1. Montage because they use their experiences throughout their life
2. the final line was the best part because it was funny, but it also related their detail obsession with the thing they wanted to study.
3. Yeah, the author reflects in a meaningful way because they talk about how the things they did when they were younger can help them become a good Endodontist
4. i would admit them they seem like a smart person and really enthusiastic about their subject. Also i don't know of any other endodontists.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Montage since they writer recounts past experiences with tinkering various things
2. I like how the writer recounts experiences to create a plot twist in wanting to study endodontics but applying those concepts of detailed  designs they learned
3. Yes
4. This student would be admitted on their dedication for a hobby they do and applying that to something they are passionate about learning.

# data[].attributes.headline
1. montage because of the multiple events they recount

# data[].attributes.subject
1. montage because of the multiple events they recount

# data[].attributes.body
2. I was a bit torn over this one. While I do like the montage style, I feel like this one was some sort of list. There was a personal connection but it wasn't as strong as the others
3. As said before it feels like a list, while I don't doubt there was reflection as the author speaks about the realization they had into their future passion, I feel it isn't as strong as the others
4. Its a good essay but looking at the other two, I personally don't feel its as good
- lexi

# data[].attributes.body
1. montage, it was a collection of stories from their childhood and adolescence
2. I liked how deeply personal and almost poetic it was, and how they found a way to grow
3. yes, they acknowledge the hardship they have gone through, and how they have grown and learned from their experiences
4. yes

# data[].attributes.body
1. This is a montage because they go through the things they have accomplished in their life.
2. I like how he goes into high school and childhood experience.
3. Yes they do.
4. I would not admit this person as a student because they tell basically the whole time, and the way they write their essay seems to not really go into depth about what they like to do.

# data[].attributes.headline
1. montage again? bruv Im not sure if they all are

# data[].attributes.subject
1. montage again? bruv Im not sure if they all are

# data[].attributes.body
2. I actually like the use of dialogue, it makes it feel a bit more personal to me.
3. Absolutely, I think talking about their exterior and interior struggles with their identity and the loss of their mother who was a large beam of support showed her how to manage grief and accept themselves on their own
4. yes but I am torn between this one and the first one
- lexi

# data[].attributes.body
1. This seems like a montage because they connect many experiences.
2. I like that they go in order and it showed more about the person that they were.
3. Yes they do, and they connected back to the start.
4. Yes I would.

# data[].attributes.body
1.
2

# data[].attributes.body
1. It's a narrative about how the narrator demonstrated growth and how he overcame adversity.
2. I like how the essay starts with a problem, then explains the affects of the problem, and finally offers the solution to the problem and how it shaped them as a person.
3. I think the author does reflect on their experiences in a meaningful way, and demonstrates many good characteristics of a leader.
4. I would admit this student

# data[].attributes.body
1. This is a narrative because it is the story of the childhood that the author had and how he grew from the challenges that he faced.
2. I like how the essay delves into the emotional past of the author.
3. Yes because he says in the end how these conflicts made him grow as a person.
4. Idk, this is the first essay I ever read so I don't really know how good it actually is.

# data[].attributes.body
1. This essayed used narrative structure. The author told their story in chronological order (childhood to adulthood)
2. I liked how the author used several examples of struggle to provoke emotion
3. I think the author does, but not as much as I would have liked them to
4. Yes, this was the most connected and comprehensive essay I've read.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Montage -- several different moments that come together to demonstrate a common theme
2. I appreciate how the author uses many experiences to portray his critical thinking and curiosity.
3. I would say no because his essay does not support his interest in endodontics.
4. No, this essay was unfocused

# data[].attributes.body
1. This essay is a montage, because it talks about many different details from the authors life and puts them all together.
2. I thought the essay was really specific, but I didn't like how there were so many examples from the student, I would rather have seen a more in-depth look at one or two and they explain the significance of them.
3. I think they do, and they state their fascination with repairing things throughout their life.
4. No I wouldn't admit this student, only because tit came off as too scattered and there was a lack of focus on the specific things.

# data[].attributes.body
1. This is a montage because it shows the many different reasons that led to why the author chose the career path they chose.
2. I like how the author used the color different that they used to obsess about in their childhood at the end to show that they never lost that obsession. I'm not really sure why exactly the author started talking about math and helping others because better at math but maybe I just didn't get it.
3. Sort of since they show that they have always been interested in what their essays about.
4.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Montage
2. I liked the hook and different examples
3. The examples are not analyzed very well and the end of the essay does not seem to fit with the beginning
4. No

# data[].attributes.body
1. This essay used a montage structure to discuss several different ways in his life that he engaged in problem solving.
2. I liked how the essay touched on several different reasons as to why this student has these critical thinking skills.
3. I would say not especially; this student's essay had nothing to do with his message, which was that he wants to pursue Endodontics.
4. I would not; this essay is pretty unfocused

# data[].attributes.body
1. He used narrative
2. I liked how it was in chronological order and that the events were fitted in on a good pace.
3. Yes
4. Yes cause its very connected and shows the reflection of his traits in the end.

# data[].attributes.body
1. narrative, while it isn't really one event, it's one chronological story about growing up with anthony
2. I enjoyed how it was a logical sequence of events, and felt like reading a story
3. yes
4. yes, they have a good reflection and their essay is structured well

# data[].attributes.body
1. Narrative, they chronologically tell the journey of raising Anthony
2. I liked the story.
3. yes
4. probably not

# data[].attributes.body
1. they used montage because she is talking about her entire life not a specific moment and narrating it.
2. I liked how the author was descriptive so I could imagine the scene but it wasnt too descriptive where it sounds weird
3.  yes
4. Yes, I felt connected to the essay and it made me want to read more if there was any

# data[].attributes.body
1. This essay uses a mix of narrative and montage structure, because while the student is telling a chronological story, he is pulling from many different experiences he has had throughout his life.
2. I liked the consequential structure to this essay because it really honed into how hectic his childhood was and what he learned from it.
3. The author took time at the end of his essay to reflect on the gratitude he has for having to mature himself early on in life.
4. I would; I feel it is the most focused and well written essay out of these three

# data[].attributes.body
1. The structure is narrative because it follows a continuous story
2. I liked the story but I think it could have been more in depth
3.yes
4.I would admit them because they are a good writer and storyteller

# data[].attributes.headline
1. The structure of the essay is an essay because it follows a cronological line of events t

# data[].attributes.subject
1. The structure of the essay is an essay because it follows a cronological line of events t

# data[].attributes.body
1. montage, it details a series of events rather than one cohesive story
2. I liked how each event was clearly tied into the main theme
3. not really, they don't say anything about how they grew from their experiences
4. no

# data[].attributes.body
1. montage because it is a bunch of stories together
2. I liked the theme
3. They could have done more personal reflection
4. no, it's no the best writing

# data[].attributes.body
Essay 1: 1. I'd say a narrative mostly, though it jumped around in time a bit.  The story generally went in chronological order, starting when the speaker was very small, and ending with the speaker being more grown up.  For the most part, the essay contained plot structures like rising action and climax.
2. I liked how the speaker introduced the situation, then gave examples, then explained the examples.  The speaker was pretty explicit in describing how raising a brother impacted them.
3. The essay does reflect on their experiences in a meaningful way, it directly mentions the qualities that the speaker has developed as a result of the experience centered in the essay.
4.   I think that I would accept this student.  Their essay is logically ordered and well written, and lays out life experiences as well as the speaker's individual characteristics.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Both -- chronological story that pulled from many different moments of his life
2. Good hook and last sentence, and the structure allowed the reader to feel the reader's heartbreak and struggle
3. I thought his story was really powerful, but he did not reflect on his experiences in a comprehensive way
4. No

# data[].attributes.body
1. narrative. went from event to event, in the form of a story
2. i like how it started young and went up to his older years
3. We liked the connection we had to the people mentioned in the essay.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Montage because it is multiple events that tie together thematically
2. I really liked how the author connected the beginning and the end together, even though the author completely changed what they wanted to do. They are still focused on designs (but instead with the human body)
3. To a certain extent they did, but no as much as some other essays. There could have been more personal meaning.
4. Now reading the others, I would not accept this students essay

# data[].attributes.body
1. Montage, compiles multiple events
2. At first they talk about curiosity, but then they "my love of details applies to schoolwork too." I thought this was about curiosity, where did you introduce love of details?
3. Not really
4. No.

# data[].attributes.body
1. montage, it details a series of events that tie into a key theme
2. I liked how deep and personal the essay was
3. yes
4. no

# data[].attributes.body
1. Narrative, it goes from event to event seamlessly
2. I like the way that the essay is organized, it's neat, it doesn't feel too over the place, it's not too much,
3. Yes they do
4. Potentially, the essay is really good at using pathos, it is an inspiring story that shows their struggles really well, but I felt like there was a lack of more meaningful self reflecting just a bit, if there was more then they're a shoe into the college I'm working for.

# data[].attributes.body
Montage

# data[].attributes.body
1. Montage, because it uses multiple separate events
2. I like the last line a lot, it ends the essay on a lighthearted note
3. Not as much as they should've
4. Also possibly, if only they strengthened the connection between their love of detail and their perspective work field

# data[].attributes.body
Essay 2. 1. This essay is a montage.  The events listed in the story aren't really related to each other.
2. I like the specific examples given by the speaker, but I think that the structure of just throwing a bunch of examples into consecutive paragraphs without much analysis is not as effective a way to present the content as it could be.
3. The speaker definitely shows how they possess this one characteristic, and what interests that one characteristic led to, but it somehow feels a bit underdeveloped, like it doesn't give a very rounded view of the speaker.
4. I think this isn't a terrible essay but the other two essays here were better, so in comparison to those I wouldn't accept them.