# data[].attributes.body
2. Some opponents state that online friends are not "real friends

# data[].attributes.body
Firstly, close monitoring of text can damage the trust between parents and children. Although parents prefer to monitor their children’s social media for safety reasons, it sometimes tends to be counterproductive as it commonly damages the parent-child relationship. According to Schozman (2015), when teenagers aren’t awarded with privacy and independence by their parents, they tend to engage in riskier behavior. This means that children require certain aspects of their lives to sheltered from their parents and would go out of their way to achieve that, which can prove to be dangerous in the long term for the child and his/her relationship with their parents.

# data[].attributes.body
Close monitoring of text messages can damage trust between parents and children. Parents need to respect the privacy of their children so that they feel as if they are in control of their lives. According to Schozman (2015), if teenagers do not feel independent, they will attempt to partake “in riskier behavior”. It can send an incorrect message to children, especially those that are very obedient (Lehman, 2010). It is understandable that parents want to monitor their children, as social media is rapidly growing and more accessible, however parents should indirectly monitor their children, through features such as parental controls.

# data[].attributes.body
Close Monitoring of text can damage the trust between parents and children. Children feel an  invasion if their parents impose. As a youngster, children are at the age of wanting to keep secrets with their group of friends. According to Schozman (2015), children should be independent and should be more free from the surveillance of the parents or the children will be encouraged for risky behaviour. It is seen that parents observing the social life of children will be a privacy breach for children.

# data[].attributes.body
1.Weak, no support or research or any reference it only stated a opinion
2.Strong,  It introduces the topic in a formal manner and splits up the aspects in a orderly fashion

3.weak- no support or research or any reference it only stated a opinion
4 strong- show different topics and view

# data[].attributes.body
1) Weak- Not using Academic Writing and It is not specific
2) Strong - It is specific and it shows a certain order
3) Weak - Not showing opinion, it is not specific
4) Strong - Specific and has shown different topics for paragraph division
5) Weak - Does not provide a reason as to why he or she is interested in learning and does not provide opinion

# data[].attributes.body
1. Weak, because it presents no actual statement, informal
2. Strong, as it introduces the topic and explains the statement thoroughly
3. Weak, no opinion, vague
4. Strong, states the point, opinion and the solution
5. Weak, no statement, informal, no solution

# data[].attributes.body
1. Weak/Strong because....