# data[].attributes.body
Comments:
1. The design looks neat
2. It would be preferable if you can add more selection of trees at the top part of the design and the bottom left. Currently, there's on four trees proposed.
3. Don't forget the masterplan setup, which includes the north point, scale, and so on.

# data[].attributes.body
Comments:
1. The title is not design development
2. Both the Key Plan and the NTS are the same size and have a hierarchy. Indicate the site's boundary.
3. Improve the planting layout. Make use of your knowledge of design principles such as balance, alignment, repetition and so on.
4. Section B-B seems to be empty.  You can make them better. Sections may contain multiple human figures. The section's tree illustration is quite nice.
5. Don't forget to include the masterplan and section setup, including the north point, scale, and so on.

# data[].attributes.body
Comments:
1. Avoid colouring your site in the location plan. Simply dot them.
2. Complete the area immediately adjacent to your boundary (development plan). It appears to float. Complete the site context surrounding your plan. You are not required to colour them.
3. Enhance the human figure in the section. Although we are not architects, it is better to use appropriate references to draw the building. It is not proportionate at the moment.
4. Don't forget to include the masterplan and section setup, including the north point, scale, and so on.

# data[].attributes.body
Comments:
1. Make sure you put extra concern on the neatness of the outcome.
2. The section is attractive. You can include a few human figures in the section to help bring the them to life.
3. Complete the area immediately adjacent to your site boundary (development plan). It appears to float in mid-air. Complete the site context for your design. They are not required to be coloured.
4. The development plan appears to be good, but I am concerned about the proposed softscape and hardscape scales. Check the scale proportions.
5. If your shrubs are smaller, find an appropriate graphic to represent them. Otherwise, it appears questionable.
6. Don't forget to include the masterplan and section setup, including the north point, scale, labelling and so on.

# data[].attributes.body
Comments:
1.  In the masterplan, properly define the boundary for space selection.
2. Complete the area immediately adjacent to your site boundary (development plan). It appears to float in mid-air. Complete the site context for your design. They are not required to be coloured.
3. Add human figure in the section
4. The paving detailing is excessively large. Check the scale.
5. Ensure that the final submission is properly formatted and neat.
6. Don't forget to include the masterplan and section setup, including the north point, scale, labelling and so on.

# data[].attributes.body
Comments:
1. Your paper is crumbled. Pay high attention to cleanliness and neatness.
2. Section is poorly drawn. Improve human figure. t
3. Complete the area immediately adjacent to your site boundary (development plan). It appears to float in mid-air. Complete the site context for your design. They are not required to be coloured.
4. Development plan has potential but lack of detailing.
5. Don't forget to include the masterplan and section setup, including the north point, scale, labelling and so on.

# data[].attributes.body
Comments:
1. Put high concern on the tidiness of your submission.
2. Complete the area immediately adjacent to your site boundary (development plan). It appears to float in mid-air. They are not required to be coloured.
3.  Incomplete development plan. Detailing of the plan is important.
4. Section is poorly drawn.
5. Don't forget to include the masterplan and section setup, including the north point, scale, labelling and so on.

# data[].attributes.body
Comments:
1.Pay close attention to the neatness of your submission. Ascertain that the final outcome does not contain patches on A1.
2. Complete the area immediately adjacent to your site boundary (development plan). It appears to float in mid-air. They are not required to be coloured.
3.  The scale of the section is too obvious to be incorrect. Check them. If the scale is wrong, your section is not counted.
4. The section is lack of skill on graphic and detailing.
5. Don't forget to include the masterplan and section setup, including the north point, scale, labelling and so on.

# data[].attributes.body
Comments:
1.Pay close attention to the neatness of your submission.
2. Complete the area immediately adjacent to your site boundary (development plan). It appears to float in mid-air. They are not required to be coloured.
3. The section is poorly drawn. Lack of skill on graphic and detailing. Check the scale, it appears to be significantly off.
4. Don't forget to include the masterplan and section setup, including the north point, scale, labelling and so on.

# data[].attributes.body
Cannot read your drawing; scan it before uploading!

# data[].attributes.body
Comments:
1. Ensure the final submission does not have patches of different material papers pasted together.
2. Complete the area immediately adjacent to your site boundary (development plan). It appears to float in mid-air. They are not required to be coloured.
3.  The development plan is interesting. You might want to check the open lawn. My question is this: Is the area too large to be left as an open lawn? Do you intend to propose an activity in the area? It does not have to be complicated, but some thoughts on the space would be nice.
4. Name the section such as A-A and B-B. Section No 2 incomplete. Add human figure.
5. Don't forget to include the masterplan and section setup, including the north point, scale, labelling and so on.

# data[].attributes.body
Detailed Development Plan
Comments:
1) Need a proper board layout. Don't overlap your master plan with detail plan. There are enough space to place it.
2) Indicate your are in the group's master plan.
3) Detail plan is unreadable. blurry.
4) I assume the sections look promising but can't really see the detail. blurry as well.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Where is your Development Plan?
2) How can you drew Sections without Development Plan?

# data[].attributes.body
1) Scan your work next time!
2) Break away from a linear planting style to avoid boring

# data[].attributes.body
1) No activity shows in your Section!
2) Provide more interesting Section

# data[].attributes.body
Comments:
1) The plan and sections are looking good. They have a lot of characters and richness.
2) The detail plan - some of the shapes that define the hardscape elements can be simplified so as not look 'too much', e.g. the shrubs do not have to be in too many planter bed, but just can be planted on the ground so the double lines for the planter can be just one line (u can ask tomorrow if you don't understand what I mean).
3) Sections look good. Remember to make sure the cut section is true with the sections.

# data[].attributes.body
Comments:
1) Indicate your area of detail plan in the group's master plan.
2) Organization of space looks okay. Still can improve on certain aspects, e.g. space at transition or intersection area.
3) Do a bigger section to see more details on spaces, plants and structures.

# data[].attributes.body
Comments:
1) The lettering has improved a lot.
2) Need a proper introductory board that shows key plan, location plan, and the smaller version of group's master plan that also indicate your area.
3) The big tree symbols do not look good. simplify the shape and later colour them nicely.
4) Tree and other sofltscape elements need a better arrangement. They are too sparse and too little.
5) Sections still do not have good space and character. It is because your spaces in the detail plan is yet to be resolved.

# data[].attributes.body
Comments:
1. Complete the area immediately adjacent to your boundary (development plan). It appears to float. Complete the site context surrounding your plan. You are not required to colour them.
2. Development plan look OK. Can improve the planting arrangement. Try to avoid straight planting too much. Be mindful on the line weight.
3. Section need improvement. Take a look at the scale. The scale scale is 1:75 but with a different human height drawn. This demonstrates an inconsistency in scale and proportion.
4. Don't forget to include the masterplan and section setup, including the north point, scale, and so on.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Perhaps, to soften the hardscape using less rigid orientation of softscape.
2) It is not effective to let the palm stands alone; To consider add more palms;

# data[].attributes.body
Comments:
1) Do not place NTS as topics together with the key and location plans.
2) The plan looks promising and can be improved.
3) Wrong scale for the sections. How can they be the same scale as the detail plan, which looks small? And they are too small a portion. They should be cut properly to show various spaces.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Check the scale of trellis; Should be half
2) Lack of vegetation
3) Please refer to good planting styles, so that the Development Plan has better contents

# data[].attributes.body
1) The  walkway in the centre dominates the whole site, while the  the one on the top having form contradicted to the former. Revise them
2) Planting seems rigid which does not reflect the Malay landscape heritage

# data[].attributes.body
Cannot comment due unclear drawing!!!

# data[].attributes.body
Comments:
1) the trellis is too long. should have included a transition area entering the trellis to the back gardens.
2) The vegetable garden is to small and the layout needs to be improved.
3) space organization can be reformed better. Need more character to the garden design.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Have you scanned the work before uploading it? It is blur.
2) Difficult to read the drawing
3) Try to orient the tilted element so that it is 180 degree and follows similar orientation of others
4) Reduce the scale of the circular element for better scale and proportion

# data[].attributes.body
Aims: To improve the landscape to suit better to a more relaxed atmosphere while maintaining traditional values of the site

Objectives: To promote a resting area inspired by the idea of the Malay Tranquility Garden while also maintaining the traditional values that should be seen on the site. The feelings of tranquility will be achieved by providing relaxing human sensory experiences.

Comments:
Your submission falls short of the mark. This is a serious matter, given the quantity of tasks and the time constraint. Prepare your content carefully. The plan appears to be rather uncooked. Refer to our previous suggestions for improvement, on the composition + content.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Cannot determine your planting boundary
2) Plants are not interconnected effectively; Most are stand alone, especially the palm;
3) Revise the planting design by referring to prominent landscape architect works

# data[].attributes.body
1) Composition of Master Plan disturbs the view of Development Plan
2) Try to break away from regimented planting style. Loosen up the style by copying the natural planting
3) Reduce the unnecessary length of trellis

# data[].attributes.body
1) Include some site context on the left hand side
2) Which areas that support the  objectives? It is unclear on the Development Plan
3) Loosen up the planting design along the pedestrian walkway: the planting seems rigid