# data[].attributes.body
Creation of the advisory board - what are the next steps and when should we start to contact potential members?

# data[].attributes.body
Please, have a reflection whether we may think to design a set of mobilities along the duration of the project. I think to citizens and artists visiting other similar groups within the partners' countries in order to have a trans-national co-creative process. This would be much beneficial for the quality of the proposals BUT only if it will be greatly, logically integrated into the whole proposal's balance

# data[].attributes.body
Outi yes this is interesting, how can we co-create these new imaginative/conceptual blueprints, taking account of reclusive perspectives etc, how to involve different stakeholders esp policymakers and create generative outcomes

# data[].attributes.body
Really interested in studying prevailing narratives of (sustainable and just) transitions and futures and the emerging narratives and how to construct introduce and root new narratives (positive, hopeful, motivating)
I’ll combine two things for you to add to the padlet:
We at Demos Helsinki would be interested in experiments on progressing supporting behavior change of organizations and industries through e.g. radical (transdisciplinary and transnational) forerunner communities and how art and artists can be involved in this (e.g. art as means of imagine the unimagined (non-linear development) and try out new behaviors)

And also really interested in studying prevailing narratives of (sustainable and just) transitions and futures and the emerging narratives and how to construct introduce and root new narratives (positive, hopeful, motivating)
And from earlier:
Our Research & Innovation interests
● What is the role of Art in (Sustainability) Transformations?
○ How can we achieve collective and community level behaviour change
with Art and Imagination?
○ What is “art-driven innovation” or “imagination-driven policy-making?”
● What is transformative Art?
● Re-narrating and re-imagining the preferred futures goes beyond “more rigid”
scope of “Art” > Imagination a more inclusive concept?
● How can we plan and run experiments in this? In societal co-creation?
○ With businesses, decision-makers, institutional actors all involved?
● How to empower organisations, and people in them, to lead and enable
radical behaviour change?
● Untitled as a process, method and network to examine these questions
●  we’d like to curate and produce Art as well

- Bring in continuous policy maker/artist/stakeholder interaction throughout the lifecycle
- Outputs e.g. innovative recommendations, social and business innovation and joint experiments on them
- Develop participatory, transdisciplinary and transnational curation process examining “Art in Transformation & Reimagining the Future” that co-creates both
-new knowledge and
-transdisciplinary collaboration projects between artists and other organisations that drive behaviour change among communities, businesses, decision makers and institutional actors
- Act as effective dissemination platform
Untitled impact areas e.g.:
"1. Structured trandisciplinary expertise etc. networks",
"3. Behavioral change and long-term commitment etc. and buy-in from people, communities and organisations, through effective new strategies..including innovative recommendations”,
“6. Changed behaviour at individual & collective levels, among communities, businesses, decision makers and institutional actors
These have been very initial thoughts

# data[].attributes.body
Strane will definitively be part of the new WP exploitation as we use to lead this WP in the different H2020 projects we have

# data[].attributes.body
OGR has been involved in this EU project: http://caravanext.eu/about

# data[].attributes.body
Initial additional thoughts on impact evaluation principles for WP5:
Important for the evaluation structures to be ITERATIVE, that is more than just a comparability of results, but rather a continuing reflection process with feedback loops and certain levels for re-adjusting certain activities throughout the project lifecycle (experiments, co-creation activities, stakeholder engagement, individual level behaviour change, etc). Also important to have robust feedback management processes to enable mutual learning between the countries and sites for experiments.
Making use of the MoRRI indicators in evaluation structures

# data[].attributes.body
We had a good discussion about this, Ana, and the idea is that it is more convincing to have them separate (WP1-administration, budget, etc, and a separate WP for quality management to ensure the high quality of the operations.)

# data[].attributes.body
- In terms of countries, besides EU MS, we should seek to involve associate countries also
- couldn't quality management be considered within the project management, as an individual task? not sure we need a full workpackage for QM

- being a RIA involving experimentations with citizens, IMO it would be more relevant to have a WP dedicated to Ethics Management

# data[].attributes.body
thanks ana for the question, the same one in fact had by Maja in our group A. the reason is that yes, by a substancial view you're right but there are reason advising to keep it separated: 1. it is not usually run by the coordinator but by another partner; 2. it has its own large activities who suggest a dedicated WP to be presented and commented; 3. it is part of the four so called transversal activities which in fact as per a standard of project writing are kept separated: management, quality, exploitation and dissemination

# data[].attributes.body
In which countries the experimentations are going to take place?

# data[].attributes.body
- To have a WP dedicated to exploitation phase
- To have a WP dedicated to quality management
- What are the tangible (expected) results from the proposal?
- If needed, we Dlearn can lead any of the two WP quality and dissemination or both according your needs