# data[].attributes.body
1. [그룹+개인] 첫 번째 게시물:

자신의 모둠 섹션에 Writer가 하나의 게시물에 각 조원의 질문을 수합하여 올린다.

(제목: 본문 제목 / 내용: 각 조원의 질문 )

2. [그룹]두 번째 게시물:

우리 조에서 나온 질문 중 대표 질문 하나를 선정하고 선정 이유를 적는다.

(제목: 질문 / 내용: 질문 선정이유)

3. [개인] 두 번째 게시물 댓글 칸에 질문에 대한 답을 올린다. (다른 조의 질문에 답을 적어도 됨)

* 질문 선정 이유만 한국어로 작성 가능.

# data[].attributes.body
Background1

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
[선공개] '인류 화석' 사기극 범인으로 지목된 ☞코난 도일(!?) 차이나는 클라스 89회

# data[].attributes.body
Think about why you are learning English. If you could sum up your goal in just one word, what would it be?

# data[].attributes.body
source

1.confirmation bias

2.scientific fraud

3.Ethics in modern scientific research

4. scientific validation

# data[].attributes.body
Leader: 10509 박찬일

Writer: 10519 엄희서

Speaker: 10510 박태준

Researcher: 10529 최우영, 10520 윤성환

# data[].attributes.body
하람: Leader

태환: Writer

홍준: Speaker

승민: Researcher

# data[].attributes.body
WRITER: 준우

Leader: 현수

Speaker: 정민

Researcher: 예준

# data[].attributes.body
곽승헌:writer

권용현:researcher

김민재:speaker

김상운leader

# data[].attributes.body
이서우:leader

이승훈:writer

이규영:speaker

이수찬:researcher

# data[].attributes.body
Leader 10518 양건우

researcher 10517 안지환

writer 10515 송지훈

speaker 10516 신승욱

# data[].attributes.body
Leader: 10528 조성민

Writer: 10526 이준성

Speaker: 10527 이현찬

Speaker 2: 10530 허현민

Researcher: 10525 이윤상

# data[].attributes.body
용현:patient

Because I will never give up

민재:passion

Because I will participate class passionately to get a good grade

상운:honest

Because I will never speak lie

승헌:express

Because I will express my thinking and present in front of classmate a lot

# data[].attributes.body
찬일: passion

I chose passion because I want to learn English hard with passion.

태준: creativity

I want to write something creative related to my future dream by myself in English through the English class.

우영: improvement

I want to become good at English so that I can use English very fluently.

성환: naturalness

I want to speak and listen naturally.

희서: deligence

I chose deligence because I didn't study English hard before.

# data[].attributes.body
준성: consistence

Because I want to get high grade

성민: participate

Because I want to focus on teacher's lesson

현찬:Grammar

Because I'm not good at it

현민: opportunity

Because I want to learn many things

윤상: system

Because I'm bad at solving with evidence

# data[].attributes.body
준우: speaking

I chose 'speaking' because I want to speak English with foreign people.

예준: Funny

I chose 'funny' because I want to enjoy class.

정민: Fluency

I chose 'fluency' because I want to be good at writing English sentence

현수: sincerity

I chose 'sincerity' because I wasn't sincerity. I want to be sincerity.

# data[].attributes.body
지훈: passion

I chose passion because I hope participate class passionately every time to get a good grade

안지환 10517: Hard-working Hard- working is my goal because I want to do my best every time.

건우: skill

I want to improve my English skill and get a good grade. I'm not good at English now, but I'm gonna learn hard and be English master one day.

승욱: Optimist

I chose the term 'optimist' because I think my English skill will be in progress though I had bad grade in it. What I consider most is not the score of my test, but my development.

# data[].attributes.body
홍준: Consistency

The reason that I choose 'Consistency' is not to give up and to study hard always.

승민: Success

The reason I came to Bugil Academy is to find my life's new turning point.

하람: Participate

'Participate' is my word goal because I want to participate in English class.

태환: Fluency

I always thought it would be awesome to use other language as good as Korean.

# data[].attributes.body
서우: active

Because I want to actively participate in English class

승훈: passionate

Because I want to participate enthusiastically in English classes

규영: brave

when I was thinking about english, I feel small. I want to get a brave through english class and I want to improve mty english skill.

수찬: honest

Because I want to say what I know or what I don't know. I want to improve my English skills through this

# data[].attributes.body
희서: What happened if the Piltdown man was not fraud?

태준: What can be the way to judge whether an accident of scientific phenomenon is genuine or fake?

찬일: Why Charles Dawson suggested that Piltdown man were missing link although this theory was not profitable?

우영: How confirmation bias affects to research result of the Piltdown man.

성환: What perpetrators fabricated the Piltdown man?

# data[].attributes.body
정민:Are there other events that also have fraud in other science field?

예준:What is the filtdown man fraud of evidence?

현수:Were there any doubts of missing links?

준우:Are there some fake evidence of science?

# data[].attributes.body
승헌: Why the perpetrators use Asian orangutan's jawbone?

용현: How much financial benefit did prominent scientists earn?

민재: why didn't people revealed who pepatrated th hoax?

상운: why the scientists had the confirmation bias?

# data[].attributes.body
홍준: Why the fraudsters preperated The Piltdown Man?

하람: How the 'Confirmation bias' worked in this case?

승민: Is there any case that a scientific frauds had contributed to development of science?

태환: How are 'missing link' important in paleontological research?

대표 질문: Is there any case that a scientific frauds had contributed to development of science?

# data[].attributes.body
지환: Is there any the examples of scientific fraud which perpetrator is not revealed like the case of Piltdown man?

지훈: What is the greatest lesson that the Piltdown Man incident has left for modern science?

건우:If the Piltdown Man hoax had been exposed later, how might the study of human evolution have changed?

승욱:After you hear the Filtdown Man fraud, as an adult, imagine you became an ancient anthropologist or scientist. In order to develop science and technology that is beneficial to people, to contribute to the scientific paradigm, or to contribute greatly to ancient paleontology, how should we study? Write your answer mentioning one prominent philosopher's perspective.

# data[].attributes.body
성민: why Conan Doyle was suspected to be the culprit?

현찬: shouldn't there be such scientific frauds

윤상: how can we confirm that a statement is true?

준성: who is the real culprit?

현민: What is the impact of confirmatory bias on society?

# data[].attributes.body
수찬:Why did the person bury bones in that place?

승훈:Who cheated

규영:How was it possible to combine the bones of chimpanzees and humans

서우:When was piltdown man II discovered?

# data[].attributes.body
Background 2

# data[].attributes.body
What happend if it were not proved that Piltdown man was a fraud?

이유: 만약 이것이 밝혀지지 않았다면 현재 인류 진화의 과정에 관한 이론에 어떤 차이가 있었을까에 대한 상상력을 자극하는 고급 질문

# data[].attributes.headline
Why did the person bury his bones in that place?

# data[].attributes.subject
Why did the person bury his bones in that place?

# data[].attributes.body
우리 모둠이 이 질문을 선택한 이유는 왜 하필 많고 많은 장소들 중에서 Piltdown Man을 뼈를 묻은 장소가 자갈 채석장이라는 사실이 굉장히 특이해서 궁금했다.

# data[].attributes.body
대표질문: Were other missing links suspected? If not, why not?

이유: Piltdownman을 제외한 다른 missing link는 언급이 없어서

# data[].attributes.body
what is the impact of confirmatory bias on society?

이유:가장 궁금증을 많이 유발하는 질문이긴 떄문에

# data[].attributes.headline
Is There any case that a scientific frauds had contributed to development of science?

# data[].attributes.subject
Is There any case that a scientific frauds had contributed to development of science?

# data[].attributes.body
저희가 '과학 사기극이 과학 발전에 이바지할 수 있는가?'라는 질문을 선택한 이유는 과학 전반의 역사나 본질에 기반하여 깊은 고찰을 이끌 수 있는 질문이기 때문입니다.

# data[].attributes.body
대표질문: If the Piltdown Man hoax had been exposed later, how might the study of human evolution have changed?

선정 이유: Imagination is enjoyable because it brings joy

# data[].attributes.body
why didn't people revealed who perpetrated the hoax?

이유:이 점을 더 생각해보았다면 사기의 범인에 대한 증거기 더 확보될수 있었기 때문

# data[].attributes.body
1. Digital Dependency (디지털 의존성)

우리는 인터넷 없이는 생각하거나 기억할 수 없게 된 걸까?

How much do you rely on Google or smartphones for remembering things in your daily life?

2. Transactive Memory (분산 기억, 상호 기억)

정보는 더 이상 '개인의 기억'이 아니라 '공유 시스템' 속에 있다?

Do you agree with the idea that Google is part of our collective brain? Why or why not?

3. Human vs Machine Memory (인간 기억 vs 기계 기억)

인간의 기억은 틀릴 수 있지만, 인터넷은 틀리지 않는다?

Do you think human memory is still more valuable than digital memory?

4. Cognitive Offloading (인지 외주화)

우리는 이제 뇌 대신 기계에 생각을 맡기고 있지 않을까?

Is it okay to forget information because we can just "Google it" later?

# data[].attributes.body
성환: What is the example about plasticity of human memory in life?

태준: There are cases that some information on the Internet is distorted. Is it able to be considered plasticity of the Internet?

우영: Why the average IQ of American increased 3 points per decades?

희서: How can we increase Google effect's advantage and decrease Google effect's disadvantage?

찬일: What way does memory plasticity apply in the brain?

# data[].attributes.body
민재:Though Google effect doesn't influence on our memory, is there any other factors that affect on our retention?

용현:Is it certain that Socrates disaprove new technology?

승헌:Why our brains remember not information itself but where to find it?

상운:Were there other skeptics that dislike writing like Socrates?

# data[].attributes.headline
Why our brains remember not information itself but where to find it?

# data[].attributes.subject
Why our brains remember not information itself but where to find it?

# data[].attributes.body
Why our brains remember not information itself but where to find it?

선정이유:구글 효과는 그 정보에 대한 기억능력이 떨어져 제기되었는데, 실제로는 어디서 찾는지를 기억하기 때문에 구글 효과가 틀렸음이 입증되었다. 그렇다면 우리 뇌는 정보가 아닌 찾는 방법을 기억하는 지에 의문이 들어 다른 질문과는 격이 다른 고오오오급질문을 제기하였다.

# data[].attributes.headline
There are cases that some information on the Internet is distorted. Is it able to be considered plasticity of the Internet?

# data[].attributes.subject
There are cases that some information on the Internet is distorted. Is it able to be considered plasticity of the Internet?

# data[].attributes.body
이유: 본문에서 인터넷 정보의 가소성에 대한 내용을 봤는데 그것에 대해 의문을 품은 고급 질문이기 때문이다.

# data[].attributes.body
준우: When we independent of internet, will we have what happen?

정민: Where is the part that performs something about human memory, and why the plasticity occurs in that part?

현수: Will the internet like Google be perceived as positive in the future, just as writing was rejected by Socrates in the past but is now perceived as positive?

예준: What will the future of transactive memory be like?

# data[].attributes.body
태환: What is the meaning of 'dependence on internet information' in brain physiology?

하람: If we can't find informations on internet, how our society would change?

홍준: Is there any other thing except memory that can be affected by 'Google Effect'?

승민: We have always lost our inevitable faculty when the facilities like google is developed. Then, our we the more weaker people than the past?

# data[].attributes.body
준성: Will there still be any negative effects on people's memory after a long time?

현찬: So, compared to the past, has the ability of people today to come up with new ideas improved?

성민: Can it be said that simply forgetting destroys our brains?

현민: How far do memories change due to plasticity?

윤상: computers operate in binary, but the brain operates in the strength of synapses. Does the brain's plasticity come from the conversion of analog signals into digital signals?

# data[].attributes.body
승훈:Can we live without the Internet in the future?

규영: When Open AI like a Chat gpt learn low-quality information or misinformation on the Internet, wouldn't they wrong like a people?

수찬: Is the Google effect really the same for everyone?

서우:When using a search engine, which part of the brain is affected and how?

# data[].attributes.body
지훈:If the Google Effect does not impact the brain, what are some other examples of how the internet might have an influence?

건우:It is almost fcat that Google effect doesn't have a serious negative effect as we think. Than doesn't the internet have any other side effect on our brain?

지환:In the United States, which has a high Internet usage , the average IQ increased 3 points per decades after using the Internet. Is it really related to internet usage?? Could it be that the increase in IQ is related to something else?

승욱:If Human Being's Digital dependency continues to incerease, what will happen to people's memorzing ability? Will they continuously increase like the case in America?

# data[].attributes.headline
When Open AI like a Chat gpt learn low-quality information or misinformation on the Internet, wouldn't they wrong like a people?

# data[].attributes.subject
When Open AI like a Chat gpt learn low-quality information or misinformation on the Internet, wouldn't they wrong like a people?

# data[].attributes.body
When I used ChatGPT, I trusted it and used it, but it turned out to be the wrong answer, so I was wondering if ChatGPT was always right.

챗 지피티를 사용할 때 챗 지피티에서 나온 답을 믿고 사용했던 적이 있지만 알고 보니 틀린 답이 였다. 그래서 챗 지피티와 같은 오픈형 AI들이 사람과 같이 트릴 수도 있지 않을까라는 의문이 들었다.

# data[].attributes.headline
Where is the part that performs something about human memory, and why the plasticity occurs in that part?

# data[].attributes.subject
Where is the part that performs something about human memory, and why the plasticity occurs in that part?

# data[].attributes.body
선정 이유: 인간의 기억력은 컴퓨터와는 다르게 기억을계속 떠올릴 수록 기억내용이 왜곡된다고 하는데, 이러한 인간 기억력의 가소성이 일어나는 뇌 영역이 무엇이며, 그 뇌 영역이 기억을 회상하는 과정이 컴퓨터의 정보 회상 과정과 어떤 부분이 다르고 어떤 원리로 수행하기에 이러한 차이점이 발생하는 지 궁금해 이 질문을 선택했습니다.

# data[].attributes.headline
If Human Being's Digital dependency continues to incerease, what will happen to people's memorzing ability? Will they continuously increase like the case in America?

# data[].attributes.subject
If Human Being's Digital dependency continues to incerease, what will happen to people's memorzing ability? Will they continuously increase like the case in America?

# data[].attributes.body
이유: 글을 읽으면서, 미국에서 아이큐가 10년당 3씩 증가했다는 것을 보고, 나는 디지털 의존성과 아이큐는 상관관계가 없는 것 같다고 생각했다. 따라서, 이러한 질문을 통해서 친구들의 반응을 확인해 보고 싶었다.

# data[].attributes.headline
We have always lost our inevitable faculty when the facilities like google is developed. Then, are we weaker people than the past?

# data[].attributes.subject
We have always lost our inevitable faculty when the facilities like google is developed. Then, are we weaker people than the past?

# data[].attributes.body
인류 역사상 많은 기술,과학적 진보가 있었다. 그리고 이들은 항상 편의 증대라는 결과를 가져왔다. 편의가 증대됨에 따라 우리는 그 전에 요구되는 능력을 잃어버린다. 이때 인문학적 관점까지 연계할 때 이 발전을 어떻게 보아야할지 궁금했다.

# data[].attributes.headline
Computers operate in binary, but the brain operates in the strength of synapses. Does the brain’s plasticity come from the conversion of analog signals into digital signals?

# data[].attributes.subject
Computers operate in binary, but the brain operates in the strength of synapses. Does the brain’s plasticity come from the conversion of analog signals into digital signals?

# data[].attributes.body
선정이유: 컴퓨터와 뇌의 정보처리방식이 다른데 어떻게 기억의 가소성이 작용하는지 의문이 들었다

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
What’s the best way to treat the common cold?

# data[].attributes.body
1.Viral Mutation & Scientific Limits

Should we still invest in trying to find a cure? Or just focus on treatment?

2.Holistic vs Scientific Remedies (자연요법 vs 과학적 치료)

Should natural remedies be considered equal to scientifically-tested medicine?

3.Prevention vs Cure (예방 vs 치료)

Since there’s no permanent cure for the cold, should more effort go into prevention (like hygiene, rest, nutrition) instead of developing expensive drugs?

4.Consumerism & Health
Pharmaceutical companies make billions from cold remedies that don’t cure the illness.
Should we question the true goals of the health industry?

# data[].attributes.body
태준: How the cold viruses change their molecular structure and why there can be a lot of mutations of cold viruses?

우영: Is the cold virus always mutate for its genetical benefit?

성환: Is it possible to make cure not effected virus mutation?

희서: If the scientific technology develop in the future, can we make the absolute cure of cold viruses?

찬일: Is the conventional wisdom we know really effective?

# data[].attributes.body
서우: The virus evolves on its own, rendering existing treatments ineffective. Conversely, can we make the treatments evolve on their own?

승훈: Why do I catch a cold

규영:How much is the economic benefit of pharmaceutical companies selling palliatives greater than the expected benefit of developing a vaccine?

수찬: Are there any common weaknesses between the constantly mutating virus and the existing virus? Couldn’t we develop a cure based on those common weaknesses?

# data[].attributes.headline
If the scientific technology develops in the future, can we make the absolute cure of cold viruses?

# data[].attributes.subject
If the scientific technology develops in the future, can we make the absolute cure of cold viruses?

# data[].attributes.body
이유: 글의 내용을 상기했을뿐만 아니라 글을 통해 미래 사회의 발전에 대해 생각할 수 있는 최고급 질문!

# data[].attributes.body
준우: How can we produce commom cold drugs more quickly and cheaply with machine?

정민: How many cold viruses cause common symptoms of cold?

현수: Can't we make a vaccine that keeps mutating and staying effective like a mutating virus?

예준: Could a remedy be developed to suppress the mutation of colds?

# data[].attributes.body
이준성:Wouldn't it be possible to make the perfect treatment if we find out the process and cause of the cold virus continuously changing?

이현찬:Is it ethically right not to make cold cure just because of economical reason?

허현민:Where did our people's folk remedies for colds come from?

이윤상: Is there any way that we can physically damage or deactivate the cold virus using nano robots?

조성민:Does virus exit is the universe? If virus exist in the universe, there is no a hospital or a pharmacy in the universe only emergency medicine is there. Then how astronauts can treat the changeable virus like covid-19?

# data[].attributes.headline
 How much greater are the economic benefits of pharmaceutical companies selling palliatives than the expected benefits of vaccine development so that pharmaceutical companies don't make vaccines?

# data[].attributes.subject
 How much greater are the economic benefits of pharmaceutical companies selling palliatives than the expected benefits of vaccine development so that pharmaceutical companies don't make vaccines?

# data[].attributes.body
완화제를 통해서 약학 회사들이 많은 이익을 얻는다 했는데 백신을 통해서도 많은 이익을 얻을 수 있지 않을까라는 의문이 들어서 질문을 만들었다.

# data[].attributes.body
승욱: The research of BIRR4 was dropped because people didn't know when to take the medicine. If there were any technology that determines the virus in advance, will BIRR4 contribute to the reducement of virus infection?

지훈: The text mentions that Pleconaril was not approved by the FDA. What specific reasons led to the FDA's decision to withhold approval for Pleconaril?

지환: Is there any remedy that is not obsolete although time goes by? Can’t we invent a medicine which can cure large spectrum of disease?

건우: Is there's no definitive cure for the cold virus, which would be more effecive to focus on strengthening the immune system or to rely on palliative and risking side effects? What do you think about this?

# data[].attributes.body
건우: Is there's no definitive cure for the cold virus, which would be more effecive to focus on strengthening the immune system or to rely on palliative and risking side effects? What do you think about this?

선정 이유: 이 질문은 가정 치료, 즉 스스로 면역을 기르는 것과 약을 통한 치료의 가치 판단을 묻는 문제이다. 우리는 이것을 통해서 현대 사회에서 과학 기술에만 의존하는 것만이 무조건 옳은 것인가에 대한 의문을 제기하여 우리가 과학 기술을 어떠한 태도로 대해야 하는지에 대한 질문을 제기하기 때문에, 우리의 정서적 성장에 도움을 줄 것이라 생각했다.

# data[].attributes.body
태환: Can the AI technology help to calculate every possible mutations and develop a cure suitable to all kinds of colds?

하람: Are demands of pallitives will be entirely removed when the cure of all kinds of cold are invented?

홍준: Can humans analyze 200 different viruses and create a cure that could treat all 200 kinds of viruses?

승민: As the time passes, the kinds of germs and viruses are increasing. Their antibodies are inherited, and persisted by memory cells. Then, How "The Uncommon Cold" is changing to hinder the inheriting antibodies?

# data[].attributes.body
승헌:If researcher success to develop vaccine against to Rhinoviruses, is it really work?

용현:Can we make perfect cold cure until we extinct?

상운:If the cold vaccine is developed, how amazing sensation for entire society will emerge?

민재: BIRR4 should be taken before we catch a cold, so there was a problem that we didn' know when to take it. But is it impossible to dwindle tolerance and extend the time duration of efficacy and make people intake it in-between seasons

# data[].attributes.headline
Where did our people's folk remedies for colds come from?

# data[].attributes.subject
Where did our people's folk remedies for colds come from?

# data[].attributes.body
선정이유: 우리 친구들도 감기에 걸렸을 때 하는 치료들이 집마다 같을수도 있고 다를 수도 있는데 이러한 우리 민족의 민간요법은 어디에서 왔는지 전교생이 궁금해할 것 같았다.

# data[].attributes.body
Can't we make a vaccine that keeps mutating and staying effective like a mutating virus?

선정이유: 감기 바이러스들이 변이하는 것처럼 백신도 변이하는 바이러스를 치료할 수는 없을까? 궁금해서 이 질문을 선정했다

# data[].attributes.headline
If researcher success to develop vaccine against to Rhinoviruses, is it really work?

# data[].attributes.subject
If researcher success to develop vaccine against to Rhinoviruses, is it really work?

# data[].attributes.body
감기의 바이러스중 33%만이 라이노 바이러스로 인해 발생하므로 과연 라이노 바이러스를 억제하는것아 전체적안 감기 치유에 도움이 될까 의문이 생겨 이 차원이 다른 고오오오오급 질문을 제기하였다.

# data[].attributes.headline
Are demands of palliatives will be entirely removed when the cure of all kinds of cold are invented?

# data[].attributes.subject
Are demands of palliatives will be entirely removed when the cure of all kinds of cold are invented?

# data[].attributes.body
감기의 치료제가 개발되면 치료제의 수요가 매우 높아 치료제의 가격이 높을 것으로 예측하여, 완화제의 수요가 감소하거나 완전히 사라질지에 대한 궁금증을 해결하고자 이 질문을 선택했다.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
제목을-입력해주세요_-001

# data[].attributes.body
발@표자료

# data[].attributes.body
Should we be responsible for the environmental damage caused by the food we eat?

우리가 먹는 음식이 야기하는 환경 파괴에 대해 책임을 져야할까?

*아래 키워드를 참고해서 생각을 확장해봅시다*

1. 소비자 책임 (Consumer Responsibility)

:Are we responsible for knowing where our food comes from?

2. 기업/정부 책임 (Corporate/Government Responsibility)

3. 정보 접근성 (Access to Information)

: Do most people even know the environmental impact of their food?

4. 경제적 여건 (Economic Reality)

: Is it fair to expect poor people to choose environmentally friendly food when it’s more expensive?

5. 윤리적 가치관 (Ethical Values)

: Human's superiority to animals

# data[].attributes.body
Should we be responsible for the environment damage caused by the food we eat? 우리가 먹는 음식이 야기하는 환경 파괴에 대해 책임을 져야 할까?

4. 경제적 여건 (Economic Reality)

: Is it fair to expect poor people to choose environmentally friendly food when it's more expensive?

# data[].attributes.body
관점: 정보 접근성(Access to Information)

Do most people even know the environmental impact of their food?

# data[].attributes.body
should we be responfible forr the environmental damage caused by the food we eat?

3.정보 접근성

Do most people even know the environmental impact of their food?

# data[].attributes.body
Should we be responsible for the environmental damage caused by the food we eat? (우리가 먹는 음식이 야기하는 환경 파괴에 대해 책임을 져야할까?)

->윤리적 가치관 (Ethical Values)
: Human's superiority to animals

# data[].attributes.body
Should we be responsible for the environmental damage caused by the food we eat?

경제적 여건 (Economic Reality)

Is it fair to expect poor people to choose environmentally friendly food when it’s more expensive?

# data[].attributes.body
관점: 정보 접근성(Access to information)

Do most people even know the environmental impact of their food?

# data[].attributes.body
Should we be responsible for the environmental damage caused by the food we eat?

4. 경제적 여건 (Economic Reality)

: Is it fair to expect poor people to choose environmentally friendly food when it's more expensive?