# data[].attributes.body
Not at this time.

# data[].attributes.body
Using the rubric to help improve the courses we create at my institution.

# data[].attributes.body
None at this time. Thank you for the training and email for later question.

# data[].attributes.body
I would like to keep the rubric on hand as I'm building courses as a reference to build better courses while in the process.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Learning how to apply the QM Rubric to assess and improve course design.

2. The focus on the alignment so that all major course components work together to support learners was very helpful. And the note that some pieces of alignment must be met for a course to be successful.

3. Course design is a reflective practice that with attention to detail and revision utilizing a consistent rubric will improve courses over time.

# data[].attributes.body
No plans

# data[].attributes.body
Use the self-review to make each course I design as pro-student, accessible, and intuitive as possible.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I was surprised about how thorough the rubric is.

2. I was impressed with the depth of the annotation section of the rubric and I think it'll be very helpful in building courses.

3. I was unaware of the length of the review process.

# data[].attributes.body
Our team has a few staff members who are QM peer reviewers and experts in accessiblity and student experience, so we have a few resources within our team to access when help is needed.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The extensive robust training and requirements needed to become a QM reviewer.

2. How long the review process takes.

3. That no one but the lead reviewer will see the course responses/outcomes.

# data[].attributes.body
Not at this time. I am sure I will as I go through completing self-evaluations for my courses.

# data[].attributes.body
Not at this time.

# data[].attributes.body
No plans to be a QM Peer Reviewer at this time.

# data[].attributes.body
Working to improve the courses I am currently teaching.

# data[].attributes.body
As an instructional design team, I'd like to go back to our course quality checklist to see how we can enhance/improve. I also saw a few things in the QM course that I'd like to apply to our courses (adding CLO and MLOs at the beginning of each assigment).

# data[].attributes.body
I have found the depth of information to include in each section of the development of a course is so helpful. I liked that each section will earn suggestions even if it meets the requirements to make the course even better. How to review to meet accessibility for all students.MF

# data[].attributes.body
Make sure the courses I’m working on align with QM standards as much as possible.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The robust process and timeline surrounding a QM review

2. Helpful support through the Rubric Workbook with clear guidelines, annotations, etc.

3. The identified alignment pieces that must be met.

# data[].attributes.body
I do not have plans to become a QM Peer Reviewer at this time.

# data[].attributes.body
Utilize the standards to make sure that our courses have good alignment.

# data[].attributes.body
Evaluation

To complete the evaluation:

1. Sign in to MyQM (http://qmprogram.org/myqm)

2. If prompted, accept the Terms of Use and select your preferred program.

3. Select the “My Activity” menu.

4. Select the Certificates link.

5. Select the Participant Evaluation link for the session you wish to evaluate.

6. Answer the questions in the evaluation.

7. Select the Submit button to submit your answers.

# data[].attributes.body
Do you have any general questions about the course review process, the Rubric, or Quality Matters?

# data[].attributes.body
Do you have plans to become a QM Peer Reviewer?

# data[].attributes.body
What are the three most significant (or surprising) things you learned by participating in this APPQMR workshop?

# data[].attributes.body
What do you intend to do next in regards to beginning to actively use QM and the QM Rubric with your course and/or at your institution?