# data[].attributes.headline
Primera entrega: Nombre de los integrantes, temática y keywordsque utilizarán para realizar la búsqueda.

# data[].attributes.subject
Primera entrega: Nombre de los integrantes, temática y keywordsque utilizarán para realizar la búsqueda.

# data[].attributes.headline
Segunda entrega: 4 noticias + resumen de cada una. Link de cada artículo.

# data[].attributes.subject
Segunda entrega: 4 noticias + resumen de cada una. Link de cada artículo.

# data[].attributes.body
Noticia Nº1: “Juror in Johnny Depp Trial Says Amber Heard’s Testimony ‘Didn’t Add Up’, Jury Believed She Was ‘the Aggressor’”

Resúmen:

La noticia habla sobre la falta de credibilidad que tiene el jurado con la actriz, Amber Heard. El jurado dijo que el testimonio “no parecía creíble” porque las emociones de ella eran eufóricas y después, frías. También, algunos miembros del jurado describieron el testimonio de Heard como “lagrimas de cocodrilo”.

Johnny Depp ganó del juicio $10 millones de dólares por daños compensatorios y $5 millones de dólares por daños punitivos. La actriz ganó una de las tres demandas y recibió $2 millones de dólares.

Tras el veredicto, los abogados de Heard culparon el hate de las personas en las redes sociales dirigido a la actriz por, en parte, influir en la decisión del jurado. Sin embargo, el jurado negó esa afirmación, diciendo que tres de los siete miembros del jurado ni siquiera tenían una cuenta de Twitter.

Finalmente, el jurado consideró que la actriz era la “agresora” en la relación.

Traducción:

The news story talks about the jury's lack of credibility with the actress, Amber Heard. The jury said the testimony "did not seem credible" because her emotions were euphoric and then cold. Also, some jurors described Heard's testimony as "crocodile tears".

Johnny Depp won $10 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages from the trial. The actress won one of the three lawsuits and received $2 million.

After the verdict, Heard's lawyers blamed hate from people on social media directed at the actress for, in part, influencing the jury's decision. However, the jury denied that claim, saying that three of the seven jurors did not even have a Twitter account.

Ultimately, the jury found that the actress was the "aggressor" in the relationship.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
A juror from the Johnny Depp and Amber Heard defamation trial spoke for the first time about the jury's decision to side with Depp in an interview Thursday with Good Morning America.

The male juror - GMA did not reveal his name or juror number, per request - said that verdict ultimately swayed in Depp's favor because "a lot of Amber's story didn't add up."

"It didn't come across as believable," the juror said. "It seemed like she was able to flip the switch on her emotions. She would answer one question, and she would be crying, and two seconds later, she would turn ice cold. It didn't seem natural."

The juror added that some members of the trial's seven-person jury used the word "crocodile tears" amongst each other to describe Heard's testimony.

Depp prevailed on all three claims in his civil suit and was awarded $10 million in compensatory damages, plus punitive damages of $5 million. The actress won one of three claims in the countersuit against her former husband and was awarded $2 million.

As the juror told GMA, the jury thought Heard's defense ultimately did not prove that Depp was physically abusive toward the actress; on the contrary, the jury found that Heard was actually the "aggressor" in the relationship.

"They had their husband-wife arguments. They were both yelling at each other," the juror said. "I don't think that makes either of them right or wrong. That's what you do when you get into an argument, I guess. But to rise to the level of what she was claiming, there wasn't enough or any evidence that really supported what she was saying."

Other missteps from Heard's defense, according to the juror, included testimony regarding the $7 million from the actors' divorce agreement that Heard pledged (but largely didn't donate) to charity. "The fact is, she didn't give much of it away at all," the juror said. "It was disingenuous."

The jury also questioned why - if Heard was in an abusive relationship - she would gift Depp a large knife. "If you have a battered wife or spouse situation, why would you buy the other person, the 'aggressor,' a knife," the juror said.

Over the televised, six-week trial, both Heard and Depp's legal teams marched a parade of friends, employees, and family members to the stand; the jury admitted that all that witness testimony didn't factor into deliberations.

In the aftermath of the verdict, Heard's lawyers blamed the onslaught of social media vitriol aimed at the actress for, in part, swaying the jury's decision. However, the juror denied that claim, saying that three of the seven jurors didn't even have a Twitter account.

"That's not true. Social media did not impact us," the juror said. "We followed the evidence. We didn't take into account anything outside [the courtroom]. We only looked at the evidence."

In her first interview since the trial earlier this week, Heard said, "This is the most humiliating and horrible thing I've ever been through. I have never felt more removed from my own humanity. I felt less than human." She added that the jury's decision to side with Depp was "surreal and difficult"

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Juror in Johnny Depp Trial Says Amber Heard's Testimony 'Didn't Add Up', Jury Believed She Was 'the Aggressor'

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
A juror from the Johnny Depp and Amber Heard defamation trial spoke for the first time about the jury's decision to side with Depp in an interview Thursday with Good Morning America . The male juror - GMA did not reveal his name or juror number, per request - said that verdict ultimately swayed in Depp's favor because "a lot of Amber's story didn't add up."

# data[].attributes.body
“Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard: The inside story of their toxic relationship”

Resumen:

La noticia habla como se presenta Johnny Depp en el juico por difamación. En especial, se habla de las situaciones de violencia que sufría el actor por parte de Amber Heard como una bofeteada, tirarle una copa de vino en la cara o arrojarle el control remoto de la TV a la cabeza, a pesar de esto la actriz, niega todo. Pero, un psicólogo trato de definir la relación como “abuso mutuo” refiriéndose al abuso verbal y físico que hubo durante la relación. También, se habló sobre las adicciones que Depp tenía con las drogas.

Mucha gente quiso participar en cada sesión del juicio, así como fans de Johnny Depp como abogados, psicólogos, terapeutas de abusos.

Traducción:

The news talks about how Johnny Depp is appearing in the defamation trial. In particular, it talks about the violence that the actor suffered from Amber Heard as a slap, throwing a glass of wine in his face or throwing the remote control of the TV to his head, despite this the actress denies everything. But a psychologist tried to define the relationship as "mutual abuse", referring to verbal and physical abuse during the relationship. There was also talk of Depp's drug addictions.

Many people wanted to participate in each session of the trial, as well as Johnny Depp's fans, lawyers, psychologists and abuse therapists.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Johnny Depp vs Amber Heard: The inside story of their toxic relationship

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The star of ‘Pirates of the Caribbean’ is suing his ex-wife for defamation in a trial that is bringing to light the sordid details of their tumultuous marriage

# data[].attributes.body
“Johnny Deep and Amber Heard defamation trial: summary and timeline”

Resumen

The couple split in 2016 and subsequently clashed in court over a  op-ed Heard wrote for The Washington Post in 2018, in which she described the domestic violence she suffered, without mentioning Depp by name. Depp sued for $50 million in damages. The jury unanimously found that Heard failed to substantiate her allegations against Depp and that she knew her claims of abuse were false when she published her 2018 essay. The jury awarded Depp $10 million in compensatory damages and $5 million in punitive damages in his defamation suit. Heard countersued Depp for $100 million and said his violence was due to self-defense or in defense of his younger sister.

Traducción

La pareja se separó en 2016 y posteriormente se enfrentaron en los tribunales por una nota de opinión que Heard escribió para The Washington Post en 2018, en la que describía la violencia domestica que sufría, sin mencionar a Depp por su nombre. Depp demandó por 50 millones de dólares en daños y perjuicios. El jurado determinó por unanimidad que Heard no pudo fundamentar sus acusaciones contra Depp y que sabía que sus afirmaciones de abuso eran falsas cuando publicó su ensayo de 2018. El jurado otorgó a Depp 10 millones de dólares en daños compensatorios y 5 millones de dólares en daños punitivos en su demanda por difamación. Heard contrademandó a Depp por 100 millones de dólares y dijo que su violencia se debía a una defensa propia o en defensa de su hermana menor.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Johnny Depp and Amber Heard defamation trial: Summary and timeline

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Although their marriage lasted a matter of months, Depp and Heard’s relationship spanned more than a decade.

# data[].attributes.body
“Amber Heard says she harbors no “ill will” toward Johnny Deep”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/arts-entertainment/2022/06/15/amber-heard-johnny-depp-today/

Resumen

Heard’s appearance on “Today” marks the first time the actress has spoken to the media about the verdict in the high-profile trial sparked by the defamation lawsuit Depp filed over the op-ed she published with The Washington Post. Heard sat down with “Today” show co-anchor Savannah Guthrie for an extensive interview that aired over Tuesday and Wednesday mornings on NBC and will also be the focus of Friday’s “Dateline.” Guthrie pressed Heard on several of her decisions related to the trial, including to write the op-ed after the resurgence of the #MeToo movement.

Traducción

La aparición de Heard en "Today" marca la primera vez que la actriz habla con los medios sobre el veredicto en el juicio de alto perfil, provocado por la demanda de difamación que Depp presentó por el artículo de opinión que publicó en The Washington Post. Heard se sentó con la copresentadora del programa "Today", Savannah Guthrie, para una extensa entrevista que se transmitió el martes y el miércoles por la mañana en NBC y también será el tema central de "Dateline" del viernes. Guthrie presionó a Heard sobre varias de sus decisiones relacionadas con el juicio, incluida la de escribir el artículo de opinión después del resurgimiento del movimiento #MeToo.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Amber Heard is interviewed by "Today" co-anchor Savannah Guthrie about events related to the high-profile trial with Johnny Depp. (NBC News)

Two weeks after a jury found that Amber Heard defamed ex-husband Johnny Depp with a 2018 opinion article in which she described herself as "a public figure representing domestic abuse," Heard said on television that she fears "every step that I take will present another opportunity for this sort of silencing."

"Which is what, I guess, a defamation lawsuit is meant to do," she continued. "It's meant to take your voice."

Heard sat down with "Today" show co-anchor Savannah Guthrie for an extensive interview that aired over Tuesday and Wednesday mornings on NBC and will also be the focus of Friday's "Dateline." Guthrie has previously spoken to lawyers for both Heard and Depp on air and noted before the latter interview that her husband "has done consulting work" for the Depp lawyers, but not for that particular conversation.

Heard's appearance on "Today" marks the first time the actress has spoken to the media about the verdict in the high-profile trial sparked by the defamation lawsuit Depp filed over the op-ed she published with The Washington Post. On June 1, Depp was awarded $15 million in damages. Heard received $2 million after the Fairfax County Circuit Court jury found former Depp lawyer Adam Waldman had defamed her.

In a portion of the conversation teased Monday, Heard pointed to the "hate and vitriol" she received during the trial and said, in response to fervent online support for Depp, that "even if you think I'm lying, you still couldn't look me in the eye and tell me that you think on social media there's been a fair representation." In the extended interview, Heard told Guthrie that she knew she wasn't a "likable" or "perfect victim."

"But when I testified, I asked the jury to just see me as human," Heard said.

Amber Heard says social media frenzy surrounding trial was not 'fair'

Guthrie pressed Heard on several of her decisions related to the trial, including to write the op-ed after the resurgence of the #MeToo movement. The co-anchor asked whether Heard considered that it would be clear she was referring to Depp in the piece, despite not mentioning him by name. Heard responded that it was "important for me to not make it about him," and said she had "teams of lawyers" review drafts of the op-ed to make sure she didn't "do anything like defame him."

Heard said that she didn't intend for Depp to lose work as a result of the op-ed and that the reason she didn't cooperate with police when officers were called to the residence during her marriage was because she "didn't want to get him in trouble." She also denied that she told TMZ when she would be going to the courthouse to get a restraining order against Depp.

"I love him," Heard said. "I loved him with all my heart. And I tried the best I could to make a deeply broken relationship work. And I couldn't. I have no bad feelings or ill will toward him at all. I know that might be hard to understand, or it might be really easy to understand if you've ever loved anyone."

Last week, Depp lawyers Benjamin Chew and Camille Vasquez discussed the weeks-long trial on multiple morning shows. Chew said on "Good Morning America" that Depp was "over the moon" with the verdict. Vasquez said she didn't think the outcome would discourage abuse victims from coming forward.

The day after the verdict, Heard lawyer Elaine Bredehoft said on multiple shows that Heard intended to appeal the verdict and "has some excellent grounds for it." Bredehoft said that the verdict sent "a horrible message" and that "there were a lot of influences here that were beyond our control."

Heard agreed with Bredehoft during her "Today" interview, especially regarding social media attacking her character. But Heard also said of the overall experience, "No matter what, it will mean something."

She added, "I did the right thing."

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Amber Heard says she harbors no 'ill will' toward Johnny Depp

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Two weeks after a jury found that Amber Heard defamed ex-husband Johnny Depp with a 2018 opinion article in which she described herself as "a public figure representing domestic abuse," Heard said on television that she fears "every step that I take will present another opportunity for this sort of silencing."

# data[].attributes.headline
Tercera entrega: 2 Videos (y un pequeño resumen en inglés) y 3 imágenes (con su justificación en inglés).                                                            VIDEO 1

# data[].attributes.subject
Tercera entrega: 2 Videos (y un pequeño resumen en inglés) y 3 imágenes (con su justificación en inglés).                                                            VIDEO 1

# data[].attributes.body
Elección del video (español)

Nosotros elegimos este video porque es corto y fácil de entender.  En ese video, Johnny Depp explica la situación de violencia que sufrió por parte de Amber Heard. El actor cuenta el momento en el que Amber le tiró una botella contra su mano y, a causa de eso, le sacó un dedo. Él dice: "Miraba a mi mano y veía el hueso. La parte de carne del dedo no estaba ahí, había un montón de sangre".

Elección del video (inglés)

We chose this video because it is short and easy to understand.  In this video, Johnny Depp explains the violent situation he suffered at the hands of Amber Heard. The actor tells the story of the moment when Amber threw a bottle against his hand and, as a result, took off his finger. He says: "I looked at my hand and saw the bone. The flesh part of the finger wasn't there, there was a lot of blood".

Descripción:

Descripción del video: Johnny Depp ha vuelto a declarar este miércoles en Virginia (EEUU), en el juicio en el que se enfrenta a su exmujer, la también actriz Amber Heard, después de que el actor la demandara por difamación —por lo que le pide 50 millones de dólares— a raíz de un artículo que escribió en 2018 para el Washington Post en el que lo acusaba de violencia doméstica. El protagonista de Piratas del Caribe asegura que ha sido víctima de abuso. Johnny Depp cuenta cómo perdió parte de un dedo cuando Amber Heard le lanzó una botella de vodka: "Miraba a mi mano y veía el hueso. La parte de carne del dedo no estaba ahí, había un montón de sangre"

Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ONk3v45Ea0

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Johnny Depp explica cómo perdió parte de un dedo cuando Amber Heard le lanzó una botella de vodka

# data[].attributes.body
Link: https://www.clarin.com/espectaculos/cine/pasara-amber-heard-johnny-depp-gana-juicio-difamacion_0_99UeBXCV71.amp.html

Justificación de la elección (español)

Elegimos esta foto porque muestra a la demandada Amber Heard en los inicios del juicio en la que se puede ver cómo actúa ante sus primeras declaraciones.

Justificación de la elección (ingles)

We chose this photo because it shows the defendant, Amber Heard, at the beginning of the trial in which you can see how she acts before her first statements.

Descripción de la foto (español)

Amber Heard, en pleno llanto en el juicio que le inició Johnny Depp por 50 millones de dólares.

Descripción de la foto (inglés)

Amber Heard, in a crying fit at her $50 million lawsuit against Johnny Depp.

# data[].attributes.body
Elección del video (español)

Elegimos este video porque demuestra un resumen de las evidencias que la abogada de Jhonny Deep expuso en contra de Amber Heard.

En el video a Amber le preguntan “Usted expuso todas sus mentiras al mundo, ¿Es verdad?”. A lo que Amber heard comienza a negar todo, sin embargo, la abogada de Jhonny Deep comienza a exponer algunos  de los testimonios que fueron confirmados como falsos a lo largo del caso. Como por ejemplo que Jhonny Deep nunca la agarró del brazo, nunca le pegó, y ella organizó un plan para que un paparazzi le tomara fotos con supuestos “golpes”.

Elección del video (inglés)

We chose this video because it presents a summary of the evidence that Johnny Deep's lawyer exposed against Amber Heard.

In the video Amber is asked "Your lies have been exposed to the word multiple times, ¿Rigth?". To which Amber Heard begins to deny everything, however, Jhonny Deep's lawyer begins to expose some of the testimonies that were confirmed as false throughout the case. Like for example that Jhonny Deep never grabbed her arm, never hit her, and she organized a plan for a paparazzi to take pictures of him with alleged "hits".

Link: https://youtu.be/0RhjrC9B_7E

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
CAMILLE VASQUEZ  acorrala a AMBER HEARD: "TUS MENTIRAS HAN SIDO EXPUESTAS"

# data[].attributes.body
Link: https://www.lanacion.com.ar/estados-unidos/donde-esta-johnny-depp-el-actor-no-presencio-el-veredicto-en-el-juicio-vs-amber-heard-y-desperto-un-nid01062022/

Justificación de la elección (español)

Elegimos esta foto del momento en que los abogados de Johnny Depp celebran su victoria.

Justificación de la elección (inglés)

We chose this picture of the moment when the lawyers of Johnny Depp celebrate his victory

Descripción de la foto (español)

Johnny Depp no asistió al veredicto del juicio contra Amber Heard el último día.

Descripción de la foto (inglés)

Johnny Depp did not attend the verdict of the trial against Amber Heard on the last day.

# data[].attributes.body
Link: https://www.hola.com/actualidad/20220521210167/johnny-depp-amber-heard-fans-guerra/

Justificación de la elección (español)

Elegimos esta foto porque creemos que demuestra el gran apoyo que recibió el actor de parte de sus fans. El juicio generó reacciones en todo el mundo y gran parte del público apoyó a Johnny Depp.

Justificación de la elección (inglés)

We chose this photo because we think it shows the great support the actor received from his fans. The trial generated reactions all over the world and a large part of the public supported Johnny Depp.

Descripción de la foto (español)

Los fans apoyan a Johnny Depp durante su juicio.

Descripción de la foto (inglés)

Fans support Johnny Depp throughout his trial.

# data[].attributes.headline
Cuarta entrega: Resumen y conclusión integradoras 

# data[].attributes.subject
Cuarta entrega: Resumen y conclusión integradoras 

# data[].attributes.body
SUMMARY

This year we worked as a team, closely investigating the so-called "trial of the year" that lasted 6 weeks in the state of Virginia, on the Atlantic coast of the southern United States

Our team is made up of 5 members: Barbaro Agustín, Cabral Simón, Calderón Giuliana, Pistagnesi Giuliana and Tarre María Pilar.

We chose this topic, because as future communicators we wanted to be aware of American show business and the international news . The case was very controversial news in April 2022, all the media talked about the former couple, the trial was televised and it was a trend on twitter throughout its duration.

Johnny Depp is an American actor and musician who was known for his eclectic and unconventional film choices. He achieved perhaps his greatest success as Capt. Jack Sparrow in the Pirates of the Caribbean series. Amber Hear is an American actress too.

In 2015 Depp wed the actress Amber Heard, and their tumultuous marriage became tabloid fodder. Heard notably accused him of physically assaulting her and alleged that he had substance abuse issues. They divorced in 2016, and two years later Heard wrote an op-ed for The  Washington Post claiming that she was a “public figure representing domestic abuse.” Also in 2018 The Sun, a British newspaper, referred to Depp as a “wife beater.”

He sued the paper for libel, and the trial ended in 2020 with the judge ruling against Depp, stating, “I accept that Mr. Depp put [Heard] in fear of her life.” During this time Depp also sued Heard, for defamation over her article in the Post. She in turn countersued, alleging that Depp defamed her when one of his lawyers called her abuse claims a hoax.

The televised trial began in April 2022, and it became something of a media circus; the trial was especially popular on social media. After six weeks of testimony which included both sides accusing each other of domestic abuse.

The first news story talks about the jury’s lack of credibility with the actress, Amber Heard. The jury said the testimony “did not seem credible” because her emotion were euphoric and then cold Also, some jurors described Heard’s testimony as “cocodrile tears”

Heard’s lawyers blamed hate from people on social media directed at the actress for, in part, influencing the jury’s decision. However, the jury denied that claim, saying that three of the seven jurors did not even have a Twitter account

The trial reacted around the world and much of the public supported Johnny Depp, the fans were perent throughout the trial.

The case was controversial for showing the man as a victim of domestic violence.  In our second news talks about how Johnny Depp is appearing in the defamation trial. In particular, it talks about the violence that the actor suffered from Amber Heard as a slap, throwing the remote control of the Tv to his head, despite this the actress denies everything. There was  something talk of Depp’s drug addictions.

The couple split in 2016 and subsequently clashed in court over an op-ed Heard wrote for The Washington Post in 2018, in which she described the domestic violence she suffered, without mentioning Depp by name. Depp sued for $50 million in damages. Heard has sued Johnny Depp fot $100 millon, saying his violence was in self-defense or in defense of his younger sister.

In another of the videos we chose,  Amber is asked “Your lies have been exposed to the word multiple times, Right?. To which Amber Heard begins to deny everything, however, Johnny Deep’s lawyer begins to expose some of the testimonies that were confirmed as false throughout the case. Like for example that Jhonny Deep never grabbed her arm, never hit her, and she organized a plan for a paparazzi to take pictures of him with alleged “hits”

Throughout Amber's testimony, viewers noticed that Johnny didn't so much as glance in his ex-wife's direction. During her redirect examination on May 18, Amber explained to the jury why she believes her ex-husband won't look at her. "He's guilty, and know he's lying. Otherwise, why can't he look at me?"

Jhonny's attorney Camille  claimed she knew exactly why Johnny wouldn't look at her: "He promised you'd never see his eyes again"

We also choose a video where Johnny Depp explains the violent situation he suffered at the hands of Amber Heard. The actor tells the story of the moment when Amber threw a bottle against his hand and, as a result, took off his finger. He says: “i looked at my hand and saw the bone. THe flesh part of the finger wasn’t there, there was a lot of blood”

Amber’s legal team asked for a mistral. A couple of days after Heard’s calls for a mistral, Depp’s legal team responded saying that the court should deny her request because Heard didn’t prove that the wrong juror was unfairly prejudiced against her so a mistral would be an “extraordinary remedy” to such a mistake.

Finally, the jury ruled for Depp in his lawsuit, finding that Heard had acted with “actual malice.” Depp was awarded $15 million in compensatory and punitive damages, though the judge lowered the amount to $10.35 million. The jury also found that Heard had been defamed by Depp’s attorney, but she did not prevail on two other counts. She was given $2 million in compensatory damages.

By choosing to lie about her husband for her own personal benefit, Amber Heard chose to ruin his reputation.

it was dIfficult to do the work when the trial ended, because we did not have more information, however on June 15 Amber Heard appeared for the first time in “Today” mark the first time the actress has spoken to the media about the verdict in the high-profile trial sparked by the defamation lawsuit Depp filed over the op-ed she published with The Washington Post. Heard sat down with “Today” show co-anchor Savannah Gathrie for an extensive interview that aired over Tuesday and Wednesday mornings on NBC and will also be the focus of Frida’s “Dateline”. Guthrie pressed Heard on several of her decisions related to the trial, including to write the op-ed after the resurgence of the ·MeToo movement.

In conclusion, the trial was very interesting and kept society awake  We liked being able to work on the subject and learn the English language by watching the trial

CONCLUSIÓN

Nuestro proyecto anual sobre el juicio que Johnny Depp le inició a Amber Heard, tuvo varios recorridos a lo largo del año en los que realizamos 4 entregas que consistían en la busqueda de imagenes, noticias y videos implicadas con el tema, a los que luego aportamos una elaboración escrita tanto en inglés como en español de los ejes tratados en cada entrega. En base a estas, nos encargamos de utilizar diferentes recursos que nos proporciona la web como por ejemplo, las búsquedas avanzadas, el cambio de idioma, youtube y el traductor; Linguee ( https://www.linguee.es/espanol-ingles/traduccion/traductor+ingl%C3%A9s+espa%C3%B1ol.html). También, para realizar la entrega final de nuestro portafolio utilizamos la página web, padlet (https://es.padlet.com/dashboard).

Las búsquedas avanzadas nos permitieron buscar precisamente por medio de filtros de fecha, nombres y documentos lo que quisiéramos encontrar del caso de manera más rápida y hábil. Luego, con la herramienta de cambio de idioma logramos encontrar las noticias en inglés de manera más fácil. También, con la plataforma de YouTube, además de encontrar los videos necesarios, con la opción de colocar subtítulos pudimos entender de lo que se hablaba en los videos así como también, con la opción de generar transcripción tuvimos una manera más sencilla de obtener las palabras mencionadas en los videos y así poder traducir las que no entendíamos. De la mano con esto último mencionado, para traducir las palabras utilizamos Linguee, que es un traductor online con la opción de Inglés (británico) -Español muy fácil de utilizar. Y por último, con la plataforma Patlet recomendada por la cátedra, fue con la que pudimos organizar toda  la información que recolectamos a lo largo de las entregas.

El proyecto surgió a partir de un tema visto en la unidad 1 de la materia Inglés I, llamado “What the difference between Broadsheet Newspaper and Tabloids?” (¿Qué diferencia hay entre diarios y revistas?). En conjunto elegimos la temática de revistas porque nos parecen más entretenidos los temas que hay dentro de estas. Además, de que se trataba de un juicio de dos personas famosas en el ámbito del cine y Hollywood.

El tema que elegimos tuvo mucha difusión y controversia en la mitad de este año y, junto con el grupo decidimos que podría ser un tema de bastante interés ya que, el juicio se transmitió en vivo día a día por un mes, y cada vez salían más declaraciones e información al respecto por parte de los medios de comunicación de todo el mundo. Por lo que seguimos el juicio en sus diferentes momentos hasta su veredicto final, aunque haya durado solo un mes tuvimos bastante por recorrer del mismo y, pudimos extraer los momentos más relevantes del juicio y los que nos parecieron más oportunos para presentar en el proyecto que cabe destacar, son los que luego expondremos a nuestros compañeros y profesoras.

El aprendizaje que obtuvimos de este trabajo es la capacidad de investigar los diferentes significados de las palabras para comprender el contexto de las noticias y de los videos, así como también aprendimos a filtrar las búsquedas con determinadas herramientas para que los resultados de las mismas sean más específicos y correctos.

Como grupo, nos pudimos organizar de forma tal que cada uno tenía una tarea determinada de cada entrega y si surgía alguna duda o en el caso de tener que dar algún punto de vista grupal, consultabamos a modo de foro en nuestro grupo de whatsapp y así retroalimentar el trabajo de cada uno de los participantes. También, al finalizar cada tarea, revisábamos y corregíamos las traducciones, los videos y fotos en conjunto para que la entrega sea lo más correcta posible.

En conclusión, con este trabajo grupal logramos familiarizarnos más con el idioma y también, pudimos articular los conceptos vistos en clase de manera que la forma de trabajar y llevar a cabo cada consigna fuese mucho más práctica y enriquecedora para cada uno de nosotros. Temas como el presente simple y el pasado simple, se fueron entrelazando con las clases y las entregas para poder poner en práctica dichos contenidos en la elaboración de nuestros escritos en inglés.