# data[].attributes.body
Google is one of the largest corporate lobbying entities in the U.S. Its influence is widespread and far-reaching, affecting policy debates on privacy, competition, and the role of tech companies in society. Google holds its immense amount of economic power, vast user base, and its major role in the digital economy to lobby for favorable policies. It influences both Congress and state legislators through direct lobbying, campaign contributors, and funding research groups that align with its interests.

# data[].attributes.body
Strengths

Google is consistently ranked among the top corporate spenders in lobbying. Its large financial reserves allow it to fund lobbying efforts over an extensive period, ensuring consistent pressure on policymakers.

Google's brand and services are integral to the daily lives of millions, giving it the ability to frame its lobbying efforts as beneficial to consumers, innovation, and economic growth.

With its prominence in tech industry, Google has created strong relationships with lawmakers and regulatory bodies, granting it frequent access to discussions on key technology policy issues.

Google has a deep understanding of complex tech and data issues, giving the company an advantage in navigating and shaping legislative frameworks.

Weaknesses

Google's lobbying efforts have received criticism in recent years due to its dominant market position. Allegations of monopolistic practices and data privacy concerns have put Google under intense scrutiny by lawmakers and regulatory bodies.

Many smaller companies/competitors have argued that Google's lobbying is self-serving, seeking to create regulatory barriers that protect its monopoly power rather than promoting fair competition.

While Google has a strong influence at the federal level, state legislatures (especially in Texas and California), have increasingly passed tech-focused laws that may run counter to Google's interests, particularly around data privacy and content regulation.

# data[].attributes.body
A major policy outcome influenced by Google's lobbying efforts is the weakening of net neutrality rules in the U.S. In 2017, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) repealed net neutrality regulations, which had previously required internet service providers to treat all data equally. Google publicly supported the net neutrality, however its lobbying efforts behind the scenes helped create a rollback of strict regulations, aligning with its corporate interests in maintaining flexibility in managing data and online services. Google has preferred a looser regulatory framework that allows for more control over its vast infrastructure and operations, especially concerning the prioritization of data.

# data[].attributes.body
Through my research of Google as a lobbying group, I was able to learn and gain a deeper understanding of the role of corporate lobbying in American politics, specifically through Google and its major scale of influence. A key takeaway I noted is the complexity of policy influence-- lobbyists don't always directly control outcomes but can shape the legislative environment over time through constant engagement and building relationships with lawmakers.

Google's successes include its ability to influence policy in ways that protect its business interests. By lobbying on issues like data privacy, intellectual property, and competition, Google has helped shape policies that favor its continued growth and dominance in the tech industry.

# data[].attributes.body
1. https://about.google/commitments/reports/

2. https://businessmodelanalyst.com/google-swot-analysis/

3. https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2023/10/google-ramped-up-federal-lobbying-ahead-of-doj-antitrust-showdown/

4. https://www.fcc.gov/

5. https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-releases-restoring-internet-freedom-order

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Review Key Google Reports By Topic - Google

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Access key Google reports on topics like transparency, sustainability, diversity, and economic impact.