# data[].attributes.body
In the first place, students use mobile phones conveniently for studying. Nowadays, students do not need to bring many books, yet they just need mobile phones to go to school. Because students can open e-book (e – books) in the mobile phones. They can use mobile phones to find the knowledge what they do not know. It is conveniently (convenient) to learn with smartphones. Students do not waste time when they find main idea knowledge in the books.  Students use smartphones to find main ideas on the internet faster than in books. Therefore, students can save time to learn and they can learn more.

Just in the same way, smartphones help students learn easily.
Mobile phones help students connect with the knowledge in the world. Students
can access and learn continue updated knowledge. Therefore, they can update
their own knowledge. According to what I see, the effectiveness of students use
( using) mobile phones for study at school is higher than students do (who do)
not use smartphone (smartphones) for study at school.

# data[].attributes.body
https://mini-ielts.com/reading

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Practice IELTS reading tests with different topics: Recent Actual Tests, Science, Nature and environments, and more...

# data[].attributes.body
1. https://ozdic.com/
2.https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/
3. https://www.thesaurus.com/

# data[].attributes.body
https://myigcseworksheets.files.wordpress.com/2019/02/collocations_in_use_intermediate.pdf

# data[].attributes.body
1. Copy your partner's writing into a post on Padlet.
2. Read and comment on these criteria. In the Grammar, rewrite the wrong words/ sentences. In Idea development, write your suggestions.

A. Grammar:
- Tenses (present simple, future simple)
- Word combination: Adj N, V Adv, to V1, modal verb + V1
- Compound sentences
-Complex sentences
-Spelling
-Contraction

B. Idea development
-Topic sentence
-Main idea 1
- Supporting details 1 (6W+examples+analyze examples)

-Main idea 2
- Supporting details 2 (6W+examples+analyze examples)
Concluding sentence

# data[].attributes.body
I totally disagree with the idea that mobile phones should be banned at school. Fristly, using mobile phone at school have many benefics. You can store the knowledge like record sound then lecture talk if you can not understand all of them. Therefore you can listen more after classtime. Sometime lecture write something really important, but you are not enought time to write down all. Using phone  take the photo will help you paster to store. Moreover, then teacher ask you access to link , file to do the exercise, you can use phone to join this . Maybe you dont know you can search google to find the information.

Secondly, mobile phone more convinient than other device. Mobile phone not only small for you to carry it with you but also it is light to carry all day and wherever you go. It is very cheap, so all of student can have it. Moreover, mobile phone popular for everyone which is very familiar because we have used it a lot. We know to use  ability and function of the phone, so you can not talk that you dont know to use phone. Because mobile phone is very helpful and convinient for student, so mobile phone is no need to ban at school.

# data[].attributes.body
Nowadays, technology is developing very fast and smartphone is one of them. Especially young people come into contact with them and use them everywhere, but I agree that mobile phones should be banned in schools.Firstly, it is important for students at school to focus and interact with their learning. When using a smartphone, there will be many distracting factors WHAT? that ignore lesson information, which is the cause of not being able to interact with teachers ??? => LOSE WHAT? HOW IMPORTANT? . When students start listening to lectures, they will acquire many skills ??? SUCH AS , so using the phone will make students miss, making students passive when constantly using the phone. => CONSEQUENCES? LOSE INTERACTION, CRITICAL THINKING, PROBLEM-SOLVING, COMMUNICATION => HOW IMPORTANT???

(Students using cell phones also affect the teaching of teachers, they will not be able to enhance the lessons for students and affect other students.)

Sencondly, smartphone is a place for students to entertain, but when it is not controlled, it will adversely affect health. Using the phone but not controlling the time will make your eyes weak because of not relaxing, which is the cause of short-sightedness of students.Using the phone will also affect the hours of life, leading to bad health and not being in good shape when at school.Summary, phones are also beneficial, but students cannot control and do not know how to use them properly, so smartphones should be banned from school.

# data[].attributes.body
I entirely agree that we should ban smartphones in class, because of some reasons. Firstly, Using smartphones in class can negatively affect the quality of the study process. Students can only focus on their phones, so they don’t care about the lessons. they can’t remember enough knowledge to do the exam. Next, If students just concentrate on phone, they will lack the interaction with their friends. they will not learn teamwork skill well which is necessary in the 21st century without the interaction. Besides, students can use phones to cheat on exams. ChatGPT or AI can be an assistance to get high points.

In addition, Using the smartphone during the study process can limit the ability of students. Likely, when a student uses ChatGPT or AI on his assignment, his brain will not think anything. So his abilities such as creativity will be faded day by day. As a result, he too depends on AI and he can not do simple tasks without AI. Finally, Students don’t develop their own talents though teachers create opportunities for them. Young people can do everything, we should not waste our time on negative entertainment. Let’s use it effectively. And smartphones are bad for students, we need to make calls to avoid them in our school.

- Tenses (present simple, future simple)

- Word combination: Adj N, V Adv, to V1, modal verb + V1

- Compound sentences

-Complex sentences

-Spelling

-Contraction

B. Idea development

-Topic sentence

-Main idea 1

- Supporting details 1 (6W+examples+analyze examples)

-Main idea 2

- Supporting details 2 (6W+examples+analyze examples)

Concluding sentence

# data[].attributes.body
I totally agree with the idea that the student go to school to learn, not to use phones .So, the phone should be banned at schools. When they use phone in the schools , the quality of lesion is decrease  by of many reasons. The first, Student don’t focus on the lession=>lesson ,what the teacher teach that lead to don’t know inside out. The second, The most common condition in students today is ues=>use phone in class to chatting , play game , it make loss of knowledge , limited ability to communicate lead to feel lazy and sluggish .

I think the most negative effect, that ís=>is the creative ability can be limited by mobile phone. Now a day , technology is very develop, the introduction of AI or ChatGPT make student depend on it . When they ues=>use it lead to the brain don’t think anything , work.  Creativity is a necessary skill, it is practiced when we study or work, it also creates many opportunities for development. Summarize, Smart phones should be banned in the schools , that would surely help their students a lot.

A. Grammar:
- Tenses (present simple: "the student go to school,the phone should be banned, Student don’t focus,  it make loss of knowledge " , future simple: "Smart phones should be banned in the schools , that would surely help their students a lot.")
- Word combination: Adj N: "negative effect,Smart phones, creative ability, schools, students, opportunities "  ,V Adv:" teach that lead to", to V1: "to learn, to feel ", modal verb + V1: "should be banned".
- Compound sentences: I totally agree with the idea that the student go to school to learn, not to use phones.
-Complex sentences: The first, student don’t focus on the lesson , students don't listen what the teacher teach, that lead to don’t know inside out.
-Spelling: ues=>use, ís=>is, lession=>lesson
-Contraction: don’t

B. Idea development
-Topic sentence: Agree
-Main idea 1: The first, Student don’t focus on the lession ,what the teacher teach that lead to don’t know inside out.
- Supporting details 1: "When they use phone in the schools , the quality of lesion is decrease  by of many reasons." (6W+examples+analyze examples)

-Main idea 2: That is the creative ability can be limited by mobile phone.
- Supporting details 2: "When they use it lead to the brain don’t think anything, work." (6W+examples+analyze examples)
Concluding sentence:
+ Smart phones should be banned in the schools, that would surely help their students a lot.
+ it make loss of knowledge , limited ability to communicate lead to feel lazy and sluggish.

# data[].attributes.body
I totally agree with the idea that  mobile phones should be banned at schools because of some reason. Mobile phones can be a distraction. Students may be temp to use their phones to play games, chat, or cheat on exams; some people do not connect with their friends and teacher,... For example, In your class, you have just 3 hours to learn and update your knowledge, but you use your phone to play video games, and as a result 3 hours in class, you don’t update your new knowledge, and you take the final exam you can not do. Although the use of mobile phones at school is good, there are the potential risks of allowing mobile phones in schools outweigh the benefits. It makes students dependent on it; students can't concentrate. So, mobile phones should be banned at school.

A. Grammar:
- Tenses (present simple, future simple)
- Word combination: Adj N, V Adv, to V1, modal verb + V1
- Compound sentences
-Complex sentences
-Spelling
-Contraction

B. Idea development
-Topic sentence
-Main idea 1
- Supporting details 1 (6W+examples+analyze examples)

-Main idea 2
- Supporting details 2 (6W+examples+analyze examples)
Concluding sentence

# data[].attributes.body
Phương

I think in my opinion, I disagree with block devices in Education. The first is the benefit of using Mobile phones in school like accessing many knowledge sources, study with games, connecting coaches -> and connecting with coaches and students,... Learning with mobile phones is not bad, feel that good or bad depends on people's mindset. Access to a lot of knowledge, online books can waste time and money to find a good book. Or study with games created by the coach to support students and can have many connections with coach and student. -> Study with games created by teacher will help student and teacher interact with each other. Without interaction will make students feel boring and
don't focus on lessons.

And second is how to apply technology like phones into school, that is-6 we need to invest money to update modern equipment. Investing is a good choice, the best way to increase quality in school and university. Like me, in -> at FPT University I learn with technology, not ban phones and laptops. So that I can easily follow my learning process, play games to learn new words and be more active in the learning process. Now in the 21st century, we need to change and follow the world, updating devices so we shouldn’t ban mobile phones in school.

A. Grammar:

- Tenses (present simple, future simple)

- Word combination: Adj N, V Adv, to V1, modal verb + V1

block -> blocking.

study -> studying.

feel -> feeling.

connect with -> connect to.

ban -> banning.

approach to -> approach to (approach+ N/direct object).

- Compound sentences

-Complex sentences

-Spelling

-Contraction

B. Idea development

-Topic sentence: Disagree.

-Main idea 1: The benefit of using Mobile phones in school

- Supporting details 1 (6W+examples+analyze examples)

Examples: ‘accessing many knowledge sources, studying with games, connecting coaches and students,...’

Analyze examples:

Accessing many knowledge sources -> Online books can waste time and money to find a good book.

Study with games, connecting coaches and students -> Study with games created by the coach to support and connections with students.

-Main idea 2: How to apply technology like phones in school.

- Supporting details 2 (6W+examples+analyze examples)
We need to invest money to update modern equipment       -> good choice, the best way to increase quality in school and university.

Examples: ‘In FPT University I learn with technology, not ban phones and laptops.’

Analyze example: I can easily follow my learning process, play games to learn new words, and be more active in the learning process.

Concluding sentence: Now in the 21st century, we need to change and follow the world, updating devices so we shouldn’t ban mobile phones in school.

I totally agree with the idea that mobile phones should be banned at schools because of some reason. Firstly, using the phone during in school hours will affect the quality of the lesson. Students just focus on phones for chatting or playing game and don’t care about class, losing important knowledge leading to understand the lesson. It will make the teacher unhappy and feel very angry. A positive class when between teachers and students with interactions together, which wil help students accept knowledge easily and remember longer. If they lack interaction, the ability to accept wil decrease and shortcoming knowledge. Beside that, using the phone will affect quality of result in the exam because students will depend on the phone to cheat and could find answer.

Next, using the phone can limit a student’s creativity. They will passive in thinking and actions, unable to develop their own creative skills. Since then, they feel that they are lazy and slow compared to everyone. That limitation makes everything go backwards, just relying on the phone without trying to develop the mindset themself. For example, when the students have difficulty in homework, instead of studying and trying to find the answer, they depend on AI, ChatGPT or apps on the phone. As the result, they still do not understand about that problem and can not do it easily by themself. In short, banned mobile phones in school is a good idea. This should more care in school, so students can focus on lessons. When unnecessary, students should limit use phones, especially in learning.

# data[].attributes.body
A. Grammar: You use basic grammar correctly, but you haven't used more diverse grammar

- Tenses (present simple, future simple): good !!!

- Word combination: Adj N, V Adv, to V1, modal verb + V1

- Compound sentences

-Complex sentences :You have used it but not much

-Spelling :

-Contraction : No

I totally agree with the idea because when schools taboo mobile phones, we can easily see the benefits for students. Firstly, schools can connect students together like students can converse in break time, they have more activity to connect with teachers and new friends.??? => BENEFITS? DETAILS? (6W)

Secondly, No mobile phones will help students develop themself in learning. They easily focus the lesson, confidently asking more questions if they do not understand. They share ideas with teachers and friends. Students do not depend much on mobile phones in class time. For example, when students learn English, they do not understand the word. If they want to understand the word, they can ask a teacher or friend, but do not translate it on the internet. In conclusion, I think schools need to ban mobile phones for students.

# data[].attributes.body
I completely disagree with the idea that mobile phones should be banned at school.

Firstly, mobile phones can be used for accessing online resources, finding information, and taking notes easily.

-->Main idea 1: lack of supporting details

Secondly, teachers can enhance their students' learning experience by creating onlines (online) games, applications or interactive online lessons between teachers and students. Therefore, students can learn and remember lessons effectively and be interested in the study.
--> Main idea 2: lack of supporting details

Finally, students should have the freedom to choose when and how to use their phones responsibly. Schools should have clear rules abouts (about) it, teachers can also educate students on responsible mobile phone use to not affect their learning and students should be responsibles (responsible) for that. In conclusion, mobile phones are part of our modern society and schools should adapt to them

# data[].attributes.body
In the current 4.0 era, the issue of cell phone use in schools has become a topic of full debate. I think it should be banned because phones can be distracting and affect learning. The ban will create a more focused learning environment, making it easier for students to access knowledge and interact with friends in a more realistic way.

Furthermore, banning cell phone use at school can also reduce the risk of unhealthy use or safety violations. It is easy for students to get caught up in surfing the web, playing games or accessing inappropriate content. By eliminating phones, schools can better protect student concentration and create a healthy learning environment.

In conclusion, Banning students from using cell phones should be applied early so that students can develop their best

A. Grammar:
- Tenses (present simple, future simple): good
- Word combination: Adj N, V Adv, to V1, modal verb + V1: good
- Compound sentences: no. Should use compound sentences
-Complex sentences: oke
-Spelling : clear
-Contraction: no

B. Idea development
-Topic sentence ok
-Main idea 1: ok
- Supporting details 1 (6W+examples+analyze examples): should give example or Compare with a certain problem

-Main idea 2: ok
- Supporting details 2 (6W+examples+analyze examples):
should give example or Compare with a certain problem
Concluding sentence

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with this topic that students will not be allowed to use mobile phones at their school for two reasons. Firstly, mobile phones provide a lot of benefits for students in their studying. When their teacher gives any topic, students can use mobile phones to search for necessary information that they can deeper understand about the topic. Moreover, using mobile phones can help students increase their interaction with teachers. For example, when students learn any subject, such as English, Math, History,.. they can use their mobile phones to access the teacher by quizizz, quizlet,etc. This action has a positive effect on the teaching of teachers to enhance one’s personal understanding (1).

Secondly, in today’s interconnected world, schools are not allowed to use mobile phones, so that students can not develop their soft skills. Mobile phones are helpful tools for time management. They use mobile phones to plan and avoid wasting time. Furthermore, many mobile apps encourage their problem solving and creativity. They can understand many aspects of issues. For instance, about global problem-pollution, thanks to the use of mobile phones, many university students know more causes of pollution. From there, they invent products made from friendly materials to reduce pollution such as organic brick, straws made from volcano seeds,…In sum, using mobile phones bring teachers and students many benefits (2). So, schools are not allowed to use mobile phones that are not necessary.

A. Grammar:

- Tenses (present simple, future simple)

- Word combination:
Paragraph 1: "for"→"due to" or "because of"
Paragraph 2:  + "their"→ " students' "
+ "thanks to"→ "because of"
+ "that"→ "which"

- Compound sentences

- Complex sentences:
+(1)→"This action has a positive effect on teachers' ability to enhance their personal understanding."
+(2)→"In summary, using mobile phones provide numerous benefits for both teachers and students"

- Spelling: "quizizz, quizlet" →"Quizizz, Quizlet"

- Contraction

B. Idea development

- Topic sentence: Disagree

- Main idea 1: The use of mobile phones provides many benefits to students, including easier access to information, increased interaction with teachers, and better time management

- Supporting details 1 (6W+examples+analyze examples)

Example: "Students use their mobile phones to access teachers by Quizizz, Quizlet, etc."
Analyze example: "This action has a positive effect on the teaching of teachers to enhance one's personal understanding."

- Main idea 2: Schools should not ban mobile phones as it could hinder the development of students' soft skills, including problem-solving and creativity

- Supporting details 2 (6W+examples+analyze examples)
Example: "They can understand many aspects of issues. For instance, about global problem-pollution, thanks to the use of mobile phones, many university students know more causes of pollution."
Analyze example: "This action has a positive effect on the increase of students' consciousness about global problems."

Concluding sentence:
Schools are not allowed to use mobile phones that are not necessary.

# data[].attributes.body
I completely agree with the idea that mobile phones should be banned at schools because of some reason. The primary cause of this is interaction between students and teachers is reduced. When students are using their phones
(1), they are not interested in the lesson and miss them. In addition (Moreover), it can also have a negative effect on student’s learning result. There is a research that students who use mobile phones in class are more likely to get a lower scores. So we should not use mobile phones in classtime.

In addition to the reason above, the mobile phones also affect our health, such as short-sighted, lack of sleep,....When they are staring at small screen for a long time can cause eye strain. In addition (On the other hand), it also makes us tried and lack of sleep, so it can affect learning. In conclusion, I strongly agree that mobile phones should be banned at schools.
A. Grammar:

- Tenses (present simple, future simple)
(1)->students use their mobile phones.
(2)

- Word combination: Adj N, V Adv, to V1, modal verb + V1

- Compound sentences

-Complex sentences

-Spelling: some reasons,  students' learning results, research is not article.

-Contraction

B. Idea development

-Topic sentence: agree

-Main idea 1: negative effect on their learning.

- Supporting details (6W+examples+analyze examples): should give at least a example + analyze to boarden the topic.

-Main idea 2: bad effect on their health

- Supporting details 2:  should give at least a example + analyze to boarden the topic.(6W+examples+analyze examples)

Concluding sentence

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the idea that mobile phones should not be used in school. Although it is very useful for learn -> Learning, it can help students learn, do homework at home, connect and learn with friends, research what they don’t know,... But it also has a lot of bad sides. In school, many students still use mobile phones in class to play video games and teachers can not see that. They used mobile phones all time and it bring -> brings a lot of negative effects for -> on students in the future.
Many students rarely communication -> communicate with friends, become to lazy, cannot learn better and -> besides, some students use mobile for cheating,...Finally, i agree with the idea that mobile phones should not be used in school.

A. Grammar:

- Tenses (present simple, future simple)

- Word combination: Adj N, V Adv, to V1, modal verb + V1

- Compound sentences

-Complex sentences

-Spelling

-Contraction

B. Idea development

-Topic sentence

-Main idea 1

- Supporting details 1 (6W+examples+analyze examples)

-Main idea 2

- Supporting details 2 (6W+examples+analyze examples)

Concluding sentence

# data[].attributes.body
I completely disagree with the idea that mobile phones should banned at school. because of a several reasons.

Firstly, Mobile phone(s) help us to Access knowledge on the world a way easier due to we can learn everything on the internet. If you want to learn about business, you could learn all knowledge

about it on the internet. We can learn what thing we need a way active, instead of passive to access knowledge From teacher.

Secondly, the mobile phone(s) has a lot of applications with features that help us to learn effectively. For example, Quizlet is an application for the mobile phone(s). It helps us to memorize new knowledge easier and many other ones. so great! When we can meet with our friends whether we are at home through mobile phone(s). Finally, I completely disagree with the idea that mobile phones should be banned at school.

We are through mobile phones at home

A. Grammar
- Tenses (present simple, future simple)

- Word combination: Adj N, V Adv, to V1, modal verb + V1

- Compound sentences

-Complex sentences

-Spelling

-Contraction

We are through mobile phones at home.

B. Idea development

-Topic sentence

-Main idea 1

- Supporting details 1 (6W+examples+analyze examples)

-Main idea 2

- Supporting details 2 (6W+examples+analyze examples)

Concluding sentence

# data[].attributes.body
i->I disagree that->with theidea ( without topic sentence)

With the world developing towards technology, it is necessary for students to have early access to technology, being used in schools for the purpose of learning is a must-do nowadays with many websites, games-> and games that serve Services for learning are more and more popular and used in the world. With many->Many lessons transformed into challenges, functions, uses, and rewards stimulate students' interest in learning.( this is learning by games to create interest of students, but not enough to accept using mobile phones at school.)

Unlike traditional university 1 teacher / many students can not manage at the same time but learning on the phone with games and learning websites teachers can know what the students are doing making it easy In student management, most of the lessons on the phone will have games that challenge students to work in groups to increase social skills and team work, many web sites with a large amount of knowledge are posted. from-> From big and famous schools in the world and they are completely free easy to access and improve the level of knowledge even necessary for future jobs. In my opinion, mobile phone-> phones shouldn't be banned be-> at schools.

A. Grammar:
- Tenses (present simple, future simple)
- Word combination: Adj N, V Adv, to V1, modal verb + V1
- Compound sentences
-Complex sentences
-Spelling
-Contraction

B. Idea development
Topic sentence: disagree.
-Main idea 1: The world developing towards technology-> So accepting using mobile phones at school is good.
- Supporting details 1:
+Learning by using mobile phones may help students feel interested in E-game.

-Main idea 2: Compare traditional learning with learning using mobile phones.
- Supporting details 2:
+ Help teachers easier to control their students.
+ Create the opportunity for students to practice important skills: teamwork, etc.

# data[].attributes.body
Name: NGUYỄN NGỌC HUY.
I agree with the idea that mobile phones should be banned at school because of some reason.Firstly, using mobile phones at school easy to make student  -> students lack of interaction with the lesson of teacher because it make student just focus to the screen.Although, using mobile phones at school may help student learn more than the lesson of teacher by research online about it, most of student use phones just to play video game , facebook or somethings else. Learning at school not only about the lesson of teacher it also an opportunity to student learn more about important skills such as social skills , critical thinking when they interact with their teachers and classmates, so using mobile phones at school is dangerous for student because it makeS student lack of interaction with their teacher -> teaches and classmates.

Then, using mobile phones a lot of -> (too much)leads to effect -> effect bad or goodto the health of students. Most of problem about eyes such as short-sighted often happen to students who use their phones too much.After a long time use phone  or other electronic devices at home, studying at school is a time for students to relax before the bad impact of the phone screen, so mobile phones should be banned at school.Finally , in my mind i think that we need ban-> benned mobile phones at school.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the idea that mobile phone should be banned at school. Because of using phone in class, make student just want to focus on their phones instead of their lessons. In some situation, phone will make students hate learning. It is extremely serious for student who had been controlled by phone. Image coaches teach on the board, but student just focus on their phone. How was the coach feeling? Coaches feel they don’t have any value with students, and they don’t care about student learning. First time, students use phones in school and still not give them any trouble. But they won’t have good jobs or a good life in the future because of using phones.
Although students always use phones at home, they use phones in school. Using the phone many times will make your health go down such as student eyes tired or memory sickness. Defect that students aren’t work quality before. So, that is why I agree with the idea that mobile phones should be banned at school.

A. Grammar:
- Tenses (present simple, future simple)
- Word combination: Adj N, V Adv, to V1, modal verb + V1
Student -> Students, phone -> phones
Not-> does not
- Compound sentences
-Complex sentences
-Spelling
Won't -> will not
-Contraction

B. Idea development
-Topic sentence
-Main idea 1
- Supporting details 1 (6W+examples+analyze examples)

-Main idea 2
- Supporting details 2 (6W+examples+analyze examples)
Concluding sentence

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, I agree with the idea that smartphones should be banned in schools because smartphones have many potential harms if students do not know how to use it properly. Firstly, the use of smartphones will make students lose their learning. Students do not pay attention to lectures, do not participate in direct interactions with teachers and group activities that leads to students not learning the lesson and trying to cheat in the exam.

Not only that, (depending on smartphones will make students passive, not developing their own talents.) Students become passive, not actively learning and cultivating more knowledge to develop themselves. Instead of wanting to learn, they become lazy, get bored and just want the time to learn quickly. Besides, some students also use AI to solve the exercises instead of (thinking for themselves.) This leads to students not being able to actively do anything even simple and make the brain unable to develop. From ( Throw many ) such harms, it is necessary to ban students from using smartphones at school.

(depending on smartphones will make students passive, not developing their own talents.) replace by students is being passive by depend on smartphone. Also they can not develop their own talent or good at something.
(thinking for themselves.) replace by solving by themselves.
A. Grammar:
- Tenses (present simple, future simple)
- Word combination: Adj N, V Adv, to V1, modal verb + V1
- Compound sentences
-Complex sentences
-Spelling
-Contraction

B. Idea development
-Topic sentence
-Main idea 1
- Supporting details 1 (6W+examples+analyze examples)

-Main idea 2
- Supporting details 2 (6W+examples+analyze examples)
Concluding sentence

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the idea that mobile phone should be banned at school.

Because students use phone in class will make students no focus learning. When use phone in class students just want play video game and play Facebook, TikTok, Instagram,.... Long time will make students boring with studying and hate research learning, using phone in long time will make students don't have knowledges and don't focus on coaches when they teaching. In the future maybe students can will not have good job above in the world. If students using phone too much but no want learning can will make students can't become global citizens.

Using phone in long time will make students bad health, students feel tired and special is about eyes and memory. When students using phone too much, students will depending on mobile phone and can't thinking about learning, research about problem something in life. In the future maybe students can will not have good job in the world.

A. Grammar:
- Tenses : will depending --> will depend
- Word combination:
+ long time -->long use phone time ,
+ focus learning --> focus on learning
+ they teaching --> they are teaching
+ can will --> can/will
+ above in the world --> above/in the world
+ want play --> want to play
- Compound sentences
-Complex sentences :
Student don't focus on learning in class because they use phone
-Spelling
-Contraction

B. Idea development
-Topic sentence : agree
-Main idea 1: make students no focus on  learning
- Supporting details 1 (6W+examples+analyze examples)
+ just want play video game and play Facebook, TikTok, Instagram
+ boring with studying and hate research learning
+ don't have knowledges
+ depend on mobile phone and can't thinking about learning

-Main idea 2; make students bad health
- Supporting details 2 :(6W+examples+analyze examples)
+ students feel tired
+
Concluding sentence:
+ In the future maybe students can will not have good job in the world.

# data[].attributes.body
nowaday using moocs in university has become popular . To make learning more interesting, teachers used moocs in teaching method, So i disagree with the idea that Mobile phones should be banned at schools .
Firstly using phone help a lot in studying such as translating , saving document , play game to support learning… using phone to participate in games like quizz, blooket to make learning more interesting.
Secondly phone is a device that everyone has,so it is very convenient and popular . because the phone is small and light should be-> , it should easy to carry, So The phone is the right(suitable) device to support learning . therefore mobile phones should not be banned at school
A. Grammar: use grammar correctly

- Tenses (present simple, future simple): good

- Word combination: Adj N, V Adv, to V1, modal verb + V1

- Compound sentences

-Complex sentences : no

-Spelling : just don’t have s/es at some word

-Contraction : No

B. Idea development

-Topic sentence: using phone help a lot in studying

-Main idea 1

- Supporting details 1 :
+ Can teacher manage using mobile phone in class?
-> teacher manage using mobile phone during lesson

-Main idea 2:

- Topic sentence :the phone is very convenient and popular

- Supporting details :
+ What skill of student when using mobile phone in class?
-> student will have new skill such as use new technology, update new knowledge on the word,....

# data[].attributes.body
Trần Nguyễn Hữu Thịnh

I agree with the idea that mobile phones should not be allowed at schools because of some reasons.Although there are many benefits of using mobile phones at school, mobile phones is more interesting the lessons at class (Feedback: mobile phones make lessons more interesting in class ). So that, more students focus on mobile phone that make the result of student get low in the long term ( make student achievement results low in the long term ) . According to the study in 2015, 6% the student not using mobile phone have better point than the student using phone at school. So we can conclude using mobile phones at school make the students lack learning lesson in class

in 21 century, the mobile phone is a means to connect with the world but not except for the agents that effect to student's method health. Such as eyes tired and memory sickness. In the long term, there problem can make the brain of students who using mobile phones at school become more weakness. Overall, using mobile phones should not allow at schools
A. Grammar:
- Tenses (present simple, future simple) : good
- Word combination: Adj N, V Adv, to V1, modal verb + V1 : good
- Compound sentences : No
-Complex sentences : Although there are many benefits of using mobile phones at school
-Spelling : No
-Contraction:

B. Idea development
-Topic sentence : Agree
-Main idea 1 : more students focus on mobile phone that make the result of student get low in the long term
- Supporting details :
How does it affect specific learning?
-> student using phone play game and do own work , don't listening lesson
Why using phone in class is bad ?
+ attract students to use mobile phones to play games or do own work
+ distract students from studying because Notifications from the phone

-Main idea 2 : effect to student's method health
- Supporting details 2 :

# data[].attributes.body
(paragraph 2)

Explanation for Internet anger of a prof- Art Markman- the University of Texas
People who post these comments are anonymous
1.  Do not know personal information of commenter

Real name,face, where they form

—> do not explain their actions

—> chance of arguing with others who have ideas different from theirs.
2. The target of their anger are not actually in the same room

Lose  self-consciousness

—> become offensive.
3. It is  easier to be nasty in writing than in speech

Use devices to commnet.

—> actively think of words that can deeply hurt their opponents

PART B:

Questions 6 – 8
6. W
7. S
8.S
9.A
10.A

# data[].attributes.body
PART A:

Choose a paragraph and outline it:
Make an Outline: Paragraph 2
Main Idea: Internet Anger
- Art Markman, a professor of psychology at the University of Texas, has an explanation for this:
+ First, he points out that the people who post these comments are anonymous. Nobody knows their real name, their face or where they are from.
+ Second, the commenter and the person who is the target of their anger are not actually in the same room.
+ Third, it is much easier to be nasty in writing than in speech, according to Professor Markman.
PART B:
Questions 6 – 8

Classify the following inferences about the FINDINGS as strong or weak. Write S for strong and W for weak.

6. Professor Markman himself has accidentally become involved in online arguments. (W)

7. It is more difficult for people to come up with things to say when they are having face-to-face arguments. (W)

8. Angry Internet fights result from the lack of successful listening and sharing of ideas between commenters. (S)

Questions 9 – 10

Choose from the letter A, B, C, or D that corresponds to the correct answer.

9. Which is the best interpretation of the following sentence?

“If, on a website, comments that are making personal attacks in the nastiest way are left up, you're sending the message that this is acceptable human behavior."

A. Leaving unpleasant comments online shows that you have misbehaved.
B. There is too much undesirable behavior of commenters on web pages.
C. Web pages themselves are criticizing commenters’ bad behavior.
D. It is thoughtless of web pages to clearly display violent comments.

10. In the last paragraph, what is the purpose of the writer when he says “Unfortunately, it seems to be a skill that some commenters are not familiar with”?

A. to express his disapproval of how commenters communicate
B. to raise the problem of websites showing too many comments
C. to justify his refusal to participate in online arguments
D. to compare the behavior of commenters with that of administrators
Answer:
9.D
10.A

# data[].attributes.body
Paragraph 2. explain why everyone is so angry on the Internet?

Nobody knows their real name, their face or where they are from, which means that they do not have to explain their actions
+  They hide behind their keyboard and jump at the chance of arguing with someone who happens to have ideas different from theirs

The commenter and the person who is the target of their anger are not actually in the same room
+ The distance between them makes the commenter lose his self-consciousness, and so he becomes more offensive

it is much easier to be nasty in writing than in speech
+ When people type on their devices, they actively think of words that can deeply hurt their opponents

PART B:

Questions 6 – 8

Classify the following inferences about the FINDINGS as strong or weak. Write S for strong and W for weak.

6. Professor Markman himself has accidentally become involved in online arguments.
Weak

7. It is more difficult for people to come up with things to say when they are having face-to-face arguments.

weak

8. Angry Internet fights result from the lack of successful listening and sharing of ideas between commenters.

strong

Questions 9 – 10

Choose from the letter A, B, C, or D that corresponds to the correct answer.

9. Which is the best interpretation of the following sentence?

“If, on a website, comments that are making personal attacks in the nastiest way are left up, you're sending the message that this is acceptable human behavior."

A . Leaving unpleasant comments online shows that you have misbehaved.

B. There is too much undesirable behavior of commenters on web pages.

C. Web pages themselves are criticizing commenters’ bad behavior.

D. It is thoughtless of web pages to clearly display violent comments.

10. In the last paragraph, what is the purpose of the writer when he says “Unfortunately, it seems to be a skill that some commenters are not familiar with”?

A . to express his disapproval of how commenters communicate

B. to raise the problem of websites showing too many comments

C. to justify his refusal to participate in online arguments

D. to compare the behavior of commenters with that of administrators

# data[].attributes.body
Choose a paragraph and outline it: paragraph 1
Argument offline and online
-> offline: people have usually conducted
their argument face-to-face
=> disagreement occurs
=> want to make his or her views
know
->  online: internet has changed
=>getting involved in
arguments
online
=>take place in the comment
section
=>articles on news websites or
random thoughts of certain
people on popular social
networking
PART B:
Questions 6 – 8

Classify the following inferences about the FINDINGS as strong or weak. Write S for strong and W for weak.

6. Professor Markman himself has accidentally become involved in online arguments. S

7. It is more difficult for people to come up with things to say when they are having face-to-face arguments. S

8. Angry Internet fights result from the lack of successful listening and sharing of ideas between commenters. W

Questions 9 – 10

Choose from the letter A, B, C, or D that corresponds to the correct answer.

9. Which is the best interpretation of the following sentence?

“If, on a website, comments that are making personal attacks in the nastiest way are left up, you're sending the message that this is acceptable human behavior."

A

10. In the last paragraph, what is the purpose of the writer when he says “Unfortunately, it seems to be a skill that some commenters are not familiar with”?

A

# data[].attributes.body
PART A:

Choose a paragraph and outline it:
Paragraph 2
* Explanation of Art Markman, a professor of psychology at the University of Texas.
- Points out that the people who post these comments are anonymous.
+ Nobody knows their real name, face or where they are from -> do not have to explain their actions.
+ have ideas different from theirs -> They hide behind their keyboard and jump at the chance of arguing.
- The commenter and the person -> not actually in the same room.
+ The distance between them -> lose his self-consciousness, becomes more offensive.
- According to Professor Markman.
much easier to be nasty in writing than in speech.
+ people type on their devices -> think of words that can deeply hurt their opponents.

PART B:
Questions 6 – 8

Classify the following inferences about the FINDINGS as strong or weak. Write S for strong and W for weak.

6. Professor Markman himself has accidentally become involved in online arguments.  ( W )

7. It is more difficult for people to come up with things to say when they are having face-to-face arguments. ( S )

8. Angry Internet fights result from the lack of successful listening and sharing of ideas between commenters. ( S )

Questions 9 – 10

Choose from the letter A, B, C, or D that corresponds to the correct answer.

9. Which is the best interpretation of the following sentence?

“If, on a website, comments that are making personal attacks in the nastiest way are left up, you're sending the message that this is acceptable human behavior."

A. Leaving unpleasant comments online shows that you have misbehaved.

10. In the last paragraph, what is the purpose of the writer when he says “Unfortunately, it seems to be a skill that some commenters are not familiar with”?

D. to compare the behavior of commenters with that of administrators

# data[].attributes.body
1. People have usually conducted their arguments face-to-face:

-  A disagreement occurs

- Wants to make his or her views know

- The internet has changed all this

1. More people are getting involved in arguments online:

in the comment section that follows below articles on news websites

random thoughts of certain people on popular social networking sites such as Facebook or Reddit

some of the posts on these threads can be extremely aggressive

everyone so angry on the internet.

PART B:

Questions 6 – 8

Classify the following inferences about the FINDINGS as strong or weak. Write S for strong and W for weak.

6. Professor Markman himself has accidentally become involved in online arguments. W

7. It is more difficult for people to come up with things to say when they are having face-to-face arguments. S

8. Angry Internet fights result from the lack of successful listening and sharing of ideas between commenters. W

Questions 9 – 10

Choose from the letter A, B, C, or D that corresponds to the correct answer.

9. Which is the best interpretation of the following sentence?

“If, on a website, comments that are making personal attacks in the nastiest way are left up, you're sending the message that this is acceptable human behavior."

A. Leaving unpleasant comments online shows that you have misbehaved.

B. There is too much undesirable behavior of commenters on web pages.

C. Web pages themselves are criticizing commenters’ bad behavior.

D. It is thoughtless of web pages to clearly display violent comments.

10. In the last paragraph, what is the purpose of the writer when he says “Unfortunately, it seems to be a skill that some commenters are not familiar with”?

A. to express his disapproval of how commenters communicate

B. to raise the problem of websites showing too many comments

C. to justify his refusal to participate in online arguments

D. to compare the behavior of commenters with that of administrators

# data[].attributes.body
I. Internet anger

1.Why is everyone so angry on the Internet?

a.more and more people are getting involved in arguments online.

2.Their actions

a. They hide behind their keyboard and jump at the chance of arguing with someone who happens to have ideas different from theirs.

b.The distance between them makes the commenter lose his self-consciousness, and so he becomes more offensive

c. they actively think of words that can deeply hurt their opponents.

3. He regards online arguments as a complete waste of time

a. there is a complete absence of communication and the only thing they have achieved is to work themselves up into a rage.

4.What is the solution

a.Having a conversation with someone you don't agree with is a skill

6 W
7 W
8  S

9  A
10D

# data[].attributes.body
Choose a paragraph and outline it:

Paragraph 1 : -people have conducted their arguments face-to-face and they conducted what views they knows

- Now people have conducted their arguments online

-they comments, follows in famous website and aways use extremely aggressive

PART B:

Questions 6 – 8

Classify the following inferences about the FINDINGS as strong or weak. Write S for strong and W for weak.

6. S

7. W

8. S

9. A
10.B

# data[].attributes.body
Choose a paragraph and outline it:

Paragraph 3.

•Professor Markman believes in self-expression

A/ He considers online debates a waste of time.

The purpose of an argument is to try to convince the other person to agree with you.

B/ How to do this

The people involved have to listen to each other.

C/ This sort of interaction is lacking on the Internet

People focus on their opinions

Write lengthy monologues to justify themselves.

They believe they are right and do not listen to others

PART B:

Questions 6 – 8

Classify the following inferences about the FINDINGS as strong or weak. Write S for strong and W for weak.

6. Professor Markman himself has accidentally become involved in online arguments.

W

7. It is more difficult for people to come up with things to say when they are having face-to-face arguments.

W

8. Angry Internet fights result from the lack of successful listening and sharing of ideas between commenters.

S

Questions 9 – 10

Choose from the letter A, B, C, or D that corresponds to the correct answer.

9. Which is the best interpretation of the following sentence?

A

“If, on a website, comments that are making personal attacks in the nastiest way are left up, you're sending the message that this is acceptable human behavior."

A. Leaving unpleasant comments online shows that you have misbehaved.

B. There is too much undesirable behavior of commenters on web pages.

C. Web pages themselves are criticizing commenters’ bad behavior.

D. It is thoughtless of web pages to clearly display violent comments.

10. In the last paragraph, what is the purpose of the writer when he says “Unfortunately, it seems to be a skill that some commenters are not familiar with”?

D

A. to express his disapproval of how commenters communicate

B. to raise the problem of websites showing too many comments

C. to justify his refusal to participate in online arguments

D. to compare the behavior of commenters with that of administrators

# data[].attributes.body
Hiếu Văn
Outline Par 1
Main idea: Introduction of Internet affect people feeling
I. Now:
a. Conduct their argument face to face.
b. Each side want to make his or her views known.
II. In the past:
a. Internet has changed.
1. Today, people are getting involved in arguments online.
2. Many arguments online follows below articles on news websites or random thoughts of certain people on popular social networking sites such as Facebook or Reddit.
3. The tone of some of the posts can be extremely aggressive.
Part B.
6. W
7.S
8.S
9. D
10.D

# data[].attributes.body
PART A:

Choose a paragraph and outline it: par 2

Art Markman explain why is everyone so angry on the internet:

-People post comment are anonymous:

Do not know their face, real name or where they are from -> can not explain they actions.

Hide and chance of arguing with someone have different ideas.

-Commenter and their target are not the same room:

The commenter lose his self-consciousness -> becomes more offensive.

-Easier to be nasty in writing than in speech:

Using words that can deeply hurt opponents.

PART B:

Questions 6 – 8

Classify the following inferences about the FINDINGS as strong or weak. Write S for strong and W for weak.

6. Professor Markman himself has accidentally become involved in online arguments. S

7. It is more difficult for people to come up with things to say when they are having face-to-face arguments. W

8. Angry Internet fights result from the lack of successful listening and sharing of ideas between commenters. W

Questions 9 – 10

Choose from the letter A, B, C, or D that corresponds to the correct answer.

9. Which is the best interpretation of the following sentence?

“If, on a website, comments that are making personal attacks in the nastiest way are left up, you're sending the message that this is acceptable human behavior."

A. Leaving unpleasant comments online shows that you have misbehaved.

B. There is too much undesirable behavior of commenters on web pages.

C. Web pages themselves are criticizing commenters’ bad behavior.

D. It is thoughtless of web pages to clearly display violent comments.

10. In the last paragraph, what is the purpose of the writer when he says “Unfortunately, it seems to be a skill that some commenters are not familiar with”?

A. to express his disapproval of how commenters communicate

B. to raise the problem of websites showing too many comments

C. to justify his refusal to participate in online arguments

D. to compare the behavior of commenters with that of administrators

# data[].attributes.body
Outline paragraph1.

Main idea: Many pp usually conducted their arguments face-to-face

1. Their take place in the comment section and follows platform fb or reddit.

2.The tone of some of the posts on these threads can be extremely aggressive.

6. Professor Markman himself has accidentally become involved in online arguments.(strong)

7. It is more difficult for people to come up with things to say when they are having face-to-face arguments.(weak)

8. Angry Internet fights result from the lack of successful listening and sharing of ideas between commenters.(strong)

Questions 9 – 10

Choose from the letter A, B, C, or D that corresponds to the correct answer.

9. Which is the best interpretation of the following sentence?

“If, on a website, comments that are making personal attacks in the nastiest way are left up, you're sending the message that this is acceptable human behavior."

A. Leaving unpleasant comments online shows that you have misbehaved.

B. There is too much undesirable behavior of commenters on web pages.

C. Web pages themselves are criticizing commenters’ bad behavior.

D. It is thoughtless of web pages to clearly display violent comments.

10. In the last paragraph, what is the purpose of the writer when he says “Unfortunately, it seems to be a skill that some commenters are not familiar with”?

A. to express his disapproval of how commenters communicate

B. to raise the problem of websites showing too many comments

C. to justify his refusal to participate in online arguments

D. to compare the behavior of commenters with that of administrators.
9.C
10.B

# data[].attributes.body
Choose a paragraph and outline it:

choose a paragraph 1:

Main idea: people have usually conducted their arguments face-to-face, but the Internet has changed all this.

More and more people are getting involved in arguments online

Comment under the news websites

comment people on popular social networking sites

the tone can be  extremely aggressive

PART B:

Questions 6 – 8

Classify the following inferences about the FINDINGS as strong or weak. Write S for strong and W for weak. W

6. Professor Markman himself has accidentally become involved in online arguments. W

7. It is more difficult for people to come up with things to say when they are having face-to-face arguments.  W

8. Angry Internet fights result from the lack of successful listening and sharing of ideas between commenters. S

9.B
10.A

# data[].attributes.body
the solution

it is the news outlets themselves who should be responsible for the content of the thread.

administrators remove the offending remarks from the comment thread.

1. W

2. W

3. S

4. C

5. D

# data[].attributes.body
#OUTLINE  pararagraph 1

1 Until now, people have usually conducted their arguments face-to-face

A disagreement occurs and each side wants to make his or her views known

2 Today, more and more people are getting involved in arguments online

Take place in the comment section that follows below articles on news websites or random thoughts of certain people on popular social networking sites

The tone of some of the posts on these threads can be extremely aggressive

6. Professor Markman himself has accidentally become involved in online arguments.  S

7. It is more difficult for people to come up with things to say when they are having face-to-face arguments. S

8. Angry Internet fights result from the lack of successful listening and sharing of ideas between commenters. W

9. A
10A

# data[].attributes.body
OUTLINE

internet anger

1-benefit of internet

more and more people are getting involved in arguments online

Many of these take place in the comment section such as Facebook or Reddit

The tone of some of the posts on these threads can be extremely aggressive

2- internet anger stem form

2.1 Nobody knows their real name

They hide behind their keyboard and jump at the chance of arguing with someone who happens to have ideas different from theirs

2.2  the commenter and targeter are not in the same room

distance between them makes the commenter lose his self-consciousness

2.3  it is much easier to be nasty in writing than in speech

PART B:

Questions 6 – 8

Classify the following inferences about the FINDINGS as strong or weak. Write S for strong and W for weak.

6. Professor Markman himself has accidentally become involved in online arguments. (W)

7. It is more difficult for people to come up with things to say when they are having face-to-face arguments. (S)

8. Angry Internet fights result from the lack of successful listening and sharing of ideas between commenters (W).

Questions 9 – 10

Choose from the letter A, B, C, or D that corresponds to the correct answer.

9. Which is the best interpretation of the following sentence?

“If, on a website, comments that are making personal attacks in the nastiest way are left up, you're sending the message that this is acceptable human behavior."

D. It is thoughtless of web pages to clearly display violent comments.

10. In the last paragraph, what is the purpose of the writer when he says “Unfortunately, it seems to be a skill that some commenters are not familiar with”?

A. to express his disapproval of how commenters communicate

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Create a new document and edit with others at the same time -- from your computer, phone or tablet. Get stuff done with or without an internet connection. Use Docs to edit Word files. Free from Google.

# data[].attributes.body
Paragraph 1: Outline.

In the past, people have usually conducted their arguments face-to-face.

-Their try to discuss with each other.

Today, more and more people are getting involved in arguments online.

-Their topic about:

+Articles

+News websites

+Famous people

-People toxic when they arguments online.

+The posts.

+Comments.

6.W

7.W

8.S

9.A

10.B

# data[].attributes.body
OUTLINE

I) Internet anger: a new trend.

A) More and more people are getting involved in arguments online.

a)Take place in the comment section that follows below articles on news websites or     random thoughts of certain people on popular social networking sites such as Facebook or Reddit.

1) The tone of some of the posts on these threads can be extremely aggressive.

PART B:

6) WEAK

7) STRONG

8) STRONG

9) A

10)A

# data[].attributes.body
PART A:

Choose a paragraph and outline it:

Paragraph 1. Until now, people have usually conducted their arguments face-to-face. A disagreement occurs and each side wants to make his or her views known. But in the past few years, the Internet has changed all this. Today, more and more people are getting involved in arguments online. Many of these take place in the comment section that follows below articles on news websites or random thoughts of certain people on popular social networking sites such as Facebook or Reddit. The tone of some of the posts on these threads can be extremely aggressive. So why is everyone so angry on the Internet?

Main idea: So why is everyone so angry on the Internet?

SP1: Now

people have usually conducted their arguments face-to-face.

A disagreement occurs and each side wants to make his or her views known.

Today, more and more people are getting involved in arguments online. Many of these take place in the comment section that follows below articles on news websites or random thoughts of certain people on popular social networking sites such as Facebook or Reddit. The tone of some of the posts on these threads can be extremely aggressive

SP2: Past

in the past few years, the Internet has changed all this.

PART B:

Questions 6 – 8

Classify the following inferences about the FINDINGS as strong or weak. Write S for strong and W for weak.

6. Professor Markman himself has accidentally become involved in online arguments. W

7. It is more difficult for people to come up with things to say when they are having face-to-face arguments. W

8. Angry Internet fights result from the lack of successful listening and sharing of ideas between commenters. S

Questions 9 – 10

Choose from the letter A, B, C, or D that corresponds to the correct answer.

9. Which is the best interpretation of the following sentence?

“If, on a website, comments that are making personal attacks in the nastiest way are left up, you're sending the message that this is acceptable human behavior."

A. Leaving unpleasant comments online shows that you have misbehaved.

B. There is too much undesirable behavior of commenters on web pages.

C. Web pages themselves are criticizing commenters’ bad behavior.

D. It is thoughtless of web pages to clearly display violent comments.

10. In the last paragraph, what is the purpose of the writer when he says “Unfortunately, it seems to be a skill that some commenters are not familiar with”?

A. to express his disapproval of how commenters communicate

B. to raise the problem of websites showing too many comments

C. to justify his refusal to participate in online arguments

D. to compare the behavior of commenters with that of administrators

# data[].attributes.body
Choose a paragraph and outline it:

Outline

A.Transition from face-to-face arguments to online discussions

1. Growing trend of engaging in online debates

2.A. Observation of aggressive behavior in online discussions

PART B:

Questions 6 – 8

Classify the following inferences about the FINDINGS as strong or weak. Write S for strong and W for weak.

6. Professor Markman himself has accidentally become involved in online arguments. ( W)

7. It is more difficult for people to come up with things to say when they are having face-to-face arguments. ( W)

8. Angry Internet fights result from the lack of successful listening and sharing of ideas between commenters.  (S)

Questions 9 – 10

Choose from the letter A, B, C, or D that corresponds to the correct answer.

9. Which is the best interpretation of the following sentence?

“If, on a website, comments that are making personal attacks in the nastiest way are left up, you're sending the message that this is acceptable human behavior."

C. Web pages themselves are criticizing commenters’ bad behavior.

10. In the last paragraph, what is the purpose of the writer when he says “Unfortunately, it seems to be a skill that some commenters are not familiar with”?

A. to express his disapproval of how commenters communicate

# data[].attributes.body
Choose a paragraph and outline it:

Paragraph 2:

Main idea: The explanation of Art Markman

1. People in the internet are anonymous

1. Nobody knows their full names

2. Needn’t explain their actions

3. Hide behind the keyboard

2. Commenters are not in the same room.

1. The distance between them is so far

3. Commenters are easy to be nasty in writing than in speech

1. They think easily nasty works for opponents

PART B:

Questions 6 – 8

Classify the following inferences about the FINDINGS as strong or weak. Write S for strong and W for weak.

6. Professor Markman himself has accidentally become involved in online arguments. (W)

7. It is more difficult for people to come up with things to say when they are having face-to-face arguments.  (S)

8. Angry Internet fights result from the lack of successful listening and sharing of ideas between commenters. (S)

Questions 9 – 10

Choose from the letter A, B, C, or D that corresponds to the correct answer.

9. Which is the best interpretation of the following sentence?

“If, on a website, comments that are making personal attacks in the nastiest way are left up, you're sending the message that this is acceptable human behavior."

A. Leaving unpleasant comments online shows that you have misbehaved.

B. There is too much undesirable behavior of commenters on web pages.

C. Web pages themselves are criticizing commenters’ bad behavior.

D. It is thoughtless of web pages to clearly display violent comments.

10. In the last paragraph, what is the purpose of the writer when he says “Unfortunately, it seems to be a skill that some commenters are not familiar with”?

A. to express his disapproval of how commenters communicate

B. to raise the problem of websites showing too many comments

C. to justify his refusal to participate in online arguments

D. to compare the behavior of commenters with that of administrators

# data[].attributes.body
Outline: Paragraph 1

People usually conducted arguments face-to-face

The internet changed all

getting involved in argument online

many of these take place in the comment section

follows below articles and people on popular social networking sites

6.S
7.S
8.W
9.A
10.B

# data[].attributes.body
OUT LINE

*usuallyconducted their arguments face to face.

- A disagreement occurs, each side wants to make his or her views known.

- in the past, the Internet has changed all this

*more and more people are getting involved in arguments online.

- Many of these take place in the comment section.

+follows below articles on news websites,

random thoughts of certain people on popular social networking sites such as Facebook or Reddit.

- The tone of some of the posts on these threads can be extremely aggressive.

6 S

7 W

8 S

9 D

10 B

# data[].attributes.body
Please copy and paste your work in a post.

# data[].attributes.body
https://quizlet.com/join/K7nWkfZqd

Join our class's Quizlet and learn by heart the vocabulary in those folders.

# data[].attributes.body
PART1: Outline:
Paragraph 2:
Art Markman has an explanation:
1. Point out the people post these comments are anoymous.
_Nobody knows their information->they don't explain their actions.
_They hide and argue with someone happen->ideas different from theirs.
2. The commenter and the person is the target of their anger.
_Not actually in the same room.
_The commenter lose his self-consciousness because of the distance->more offensive.
3. Easier to be nasty in writing than in speech.
_They actively think of words can deeply hurt their opponents.
PART2:
6. S
7. W
8. S
PART3:
9. C
10. D

# data[].attributes.body
I totally disagree with the idea that mobile phones should be forbidden at schools because of some reason. Firstly, the mobile phone can access information quickly, we can seek information anytime. We can search for information, and documents. We can learn about the internet, and knowledge, lots of documents about you need but we do not through reading, just we need to research. It is instead of a learning method passive. It helps you be sensitive and flexible. Simultaneously, mobile phones help you be more creative and explore knowledge effectively through we play e-game and do exercises with groups.

Secondly, mobile phones can be valuable educational tools. With the advancement of technology, smartphones can provide students with access to a vast amount of information instantly. They can use their phones to conduct research, access educational apps, and even connect with classmates for collaborative projects. In this way, mobile phones can enhance learning opportunities and improve students' academic performance. In short, I disagree with the idea that we need to use the right purpose to improve  learning.

A. Grammar:
- Tenses (present simple, future simple)
- Word combination: Adj N, V Adv, to V1, modal verb + V1
- Compound sentences
-Complex sentences
-Spelling
-Contraction

B. Idea development
-Topic sentence
-Main idea 1
- Supporting details 1 (6W+examples+analyze examples)

-Main idea 2
- Supporting details 2 (6W+examples+analyze examples)
Concluding sentence

# data[].attributes.body
I totally agree with the idea that school should ban mobile phones because of some reason. Firstly, mobile phones make our hard to focus when learning at school. In school, sometime we will feel bored or tired when we learn, so we will find something to make our happier and then solution is used phone. For examples, we are learn a new lessons ( lesson )in school (,) but it is difficult to understand or it bored to know, so we will use phone to waste time. Then we will be not know more new skills and knowlegde ( knowledge) to do the exam or using it in real life.

Secondly, (The ) student use phone to cheat in exam or test. We can see that most student today are using phone to cheat when they have a (an ) exam or test. This is a burning problem in schools and this greatly affects how difficult it is for teachers to evaluate students. In this way, (The )teacher can not know what student can learn and student can not know more knowlegde ( knowledge). In conclusion, I totally agree that school should ban mobile phones.
( Need more compound and complex in paragraph )

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the idea that students should not be allowed to use phones in school. Firsly, students who use phone in class will not focus on their lesson and just think about phones. They will surf the web, play video games or chat with friends while their teacher is not in control, teachers can't make learning fun. Using the phone for a long time will make their learning downfall and in the future that may be influence their result of studying.

Secondly, students who use phones continue day to day make their health bad. The most noticeable thing is the eyes problem, vision is reduced the most. In learning, students cannot scan or skim text quickly. In life, vision loss when driving is reduced, causing traffic accidents. When use phone in the school, they just concentrate on their phones and don’t care about the people around them, do not participate communicate or teamwork. In summary, using the phone in school is not bad and we need to ban this.

A. Grammar:

- Tenses: present simple(the idea that students should not be allowed to use phones in school), future simple(They will surf the web,)

- Word combination: Happy-Happiness

Learn-learning

Study-studying

Use-using

B. Idea development

-Topic sentence: argee

-Main idea 1: student do not focus lesson, use phone to play games.

- Supporting details 1 (6W+examples+analyze examples)

Teacher is not in control, this creates happiness and hate learning

-Main idea 2: student use phone to affect health

- Supporting details 2 (6W+examples+analyze examples)

Affect eyes, vision reduce

Concluding sentence

# data[].attributes.body
i totally agree with the idea that mobile phones should be banned at schools. Although we know some benefits of mobile  phones have helped the environment learning can be favorable  , but it affect to study such as do can not( can not) focus on studying or cheating on learning . Mobile phone can(can make or make) they do not focus when study , because some app on phone like game , social network , tiktok ,.. will make do not focus on study more(need example to explain how some app can make them do not focus on study). asa result , they dont(contraction) understand the  lesson learn(lesson learned or lessons) , can not do exam and affect learning result

Worse thing about they will can cheating( can cheat or will be able to cheat) in mobile phone to pass the test , because  they dont(contraction) understand the lesson learn(lesson learned or lessons) , they dont(contraction) focus on study , so they will used(will+V0) cheating to pass exam . In conclusion, i totally agree with the idea that mobile phone should be banned at schools , because it not totally help we learn

(Need examples to explain why they cheat)

A. Grammar:
- Tenses (present simple, future simple)
- Word combination: Adj N, V Adv, to V1, modal verb + V1
- Compound sentences: need more
-Complex sentences
-Spelling
-Contraction

B. Idea development
-Topic sentence
-Main idea 1
- Supporting details 1 (6W+examples+analyze examples)

-Main idea 2
- Supporting details 2 (6W+examples+analyze examples)
Concluding sentence