# data[].attributes.body
I think that machines can communicate like humans. First of all, AI can talk with humans using chat. For instance recentry we use chat GPT. In the chat GPT, the AI will respond to a person's question with an answer that is in line with the question. This can be called communication.

In addition, we use auto-correct. For example, We use a keyboard to type. At that time, the keyboard gives us auto-correct. In auto-correct, the AI takes the words we want to say and suggests conversions, which I think goes into communication because it thinks about what we want to say now.

Finally, AI can speak. When I went to my friend's house, I had the lights, TV, etc. turned on by speaking into the Google speaker. Thus, I think that machines can communicate like humans.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that machine can't communicate like human.

Before I tell you why I feel this, let me define communication. Communication has two main meanings. One is to convey information and the other is to convey intention.

Machines are better than humans at communicating information. However, this only tells others (other machines or humans) what they need to know and leaves out the useless parts. In other words, it's sometimes hard to understand. People realize that the other person does not understand and offer supplementary explanations about that part, but a machine does not. This doesn't mean that the information is being conveyed properly.

Machines have no feelings or will. Recently, AI with conversational functionality exists, but do they have emotions? They understand the emotions of others by the tone of their voice and facial expressions. And they adapt their words back to the situation.

From the above, the machine cannot perform communication.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that machines can communicate like humans. First of all, AI is equipped with language processing technology functions. For instance, Although the range of conversation is limited, the AI can instantly find appropriate answers to questions. “Chat GPT” is an example of application. Now, many student and working adult use this to do homeworks and businesses.

Second, Machines can translate other languages. Because the translation of foreign languages can be done instantly, machines can response logically after the translation. Examples of applications are “pocketalk”

and “Google Translate”, which include some of these functions. When I traveled to Taiwan, I had the experience that "Google Translate" was very useful.

Finally, Machines can input and output audio.

For instance, machines can think of response to what it hears and speak with voice. “Siri” and “Alexa” are examples of applications. I also use that tool for weather and directions.

Thus, I think that machines can communicate like humans.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that machines can communicate like humans. First of all, Al can recognize words and respond to them. For instance, conversational Al such as Siri, Alexia did not exist over 20 years ago. In addition, since they were developed, they are getting better year by year. Second, there is an artificial brain that learns by itself like the human brain. It called "SOINN (Self-Organizing Incremental Neural Network)." In anticipation of an era in which each individual will have their own AI, SOINN Co., Ltd. is also working on the development of an Al for individuals that can be nurtured on smartphones. Finally, Al can translate. For example, "Google Translate", "POCKETALK". They are understands words and translate them into other languages and outputs them. From the above, if conversational Al and SOINN are combined, they will grow as they converse, so they will become good at conversation. Thus, I think machines can communicate like humans.

# data[].attributes.body
I think machines can't communicate like humans.
I have three reasons.First, Machines cannot make sense of conversations like humans. For example, to describe a zebra to someone who is unfamiliar with it, you say, "It looks like a horse and has stripes." and the human might imagine it. But the machine cannot imagine even if it is explained as it is now. This is because they do not understand words and symbols. This is called the "symbol grounding problem".
The second reason, which is also similar to the first reason, is that machine translation such as google translation does not understand the meaning of the sentence. For example, the sentence "He saw a woman in the garden through a telescope'' can be understood by humans as "The woman in the garden is the man who is watching.'' However, the machine sometimes translates this sentence as "The one in the garden is a man...". From the point of view of human beings, this is empirically very unnatural, so it is not translated in this way. Machines do not understand this unnaturalness. However, this is not currently the case. This works well because the sentences are made stochastically.
The third is that there is no interaction from the machine. Empirically, automated voice systems such as Alexa and Siri never speak to you. If you are a human being, it is very natural for you to initiate dialogue.
Therefore, I think machines can't communicate like humans.

# data[].attributes.body
I think machines can't communicate like humans.
I have three reasons.First, Machines cannot make sense of conversations like humans. For example, to describe a zebra to someone who is unfamiliar with it, you say, "It looks like a horse and has stripes." and the human might imagine it. But the machine cannot imagine even if it is explained as it is now. This is because they do not understand words and symbols. This is called the "symbol grounding problem".
The second reason, which is also similar to the first reason, is that machine translation such as google translation does not understand the meaning of the sentence. For example, the sentence "He saw a woman in the garden through a telescope'' can be understood by humans as "The woman in the garden is the man who is watching.'' However, the machine sometimes translates this sentence as "The one in the garden is a man...". From the point of view of human beings, this is empirically very unnatural, so it is not translated in this way. Machines do not understand this unnaturalness. However, this is not currently the case. This works well because the sentences are made stochastically.
The third is that there is no interaction from the machine. Empirically, automated voice systems such as Alexa and Siri never speak to you. If you are a human being, it is very natural for you to initiate dialogue. From the comment, the machine interact with human from the machine if human make system to interact from the machine. As my opinion, the system is no will. Machines are nothing more than controlled by the program.
Therefore, I think machines can't communicate like humans.

# data[].attributes.body
I don’t think that machines can communicate like humans.
First , AI has no emotions and cannot produce emotional sentences.For example, chat GPTs and robots are emotionless AI software. It may know what I mean about not having feelings, but I don't know how you feel.

Second , Sometimes they give out wrong information.  For example, Wikipedia and translation applications can teach incorrect information and grammar.

Finally , Everything is not on the screen unless you pay for it.For example ,  if you have a chat GPT long explanation, it usually doesn't show up until the end, and you may end up not knowing what you wanted to say.

So , I don’t think machines can communicate like humans.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that machines can communicate like humans. First, of all, machines respond to us questions. For instance, Google and other search and Chat GPT. Whenever I wanted to know something, I said "Hey Siri" and asked a question and it was immediately answered with voice. Also, machines can do voice input and voice output. When searching Google and using Siri, Alexa. Finally, machines can translate. Now, I use a translation app and it tells me what I want to know. To use an English analogy, you have to change the words you use based on emotion, proportion, etc., but they get that to some extent. So, I think machines can communicate like humans.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think that machines can communicate like humans. To begin with, machines can't understand people's emotions. for example, machines don't know if I'm happy or sad to consult with you, so machines may not be able to return the important things. When I use Siri, I said "sad". Siri doesn't know what sad such as regrettable, impressed, or usually sad. second, machines can't choose words. Machines have manual comments and not always correct. That's why sometimes machines can't choose the write words. Third, machines can't put intonation in this words. Machines are always stick reading unlike people. In human conversation, the volume of the voice usually changes depending on the  conversation at the time. So, when you talk to a machine, your emotions will not change. Therefore, Machine can talk, but I don't think they can have real conversation.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that machines can't communicate like humans. I have three reasons. First, machines don’t have emotions. For example, humans share emotions each other. I didn’t feel that I shared my feeling and machine’s feeling when I was talking to AI. Machine isn't laughing, angry and crying with humans. Second, machines don’t have creativity. In addition, humans can think ideas about creating more than machines. I think creativity ideas are problems which have no answer. Finally, machines communicate based on engine and program. For instance, machines learn only informations at a certain point. Thus, I think that machines can't communicate like humans.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that machines can communicate like humans. First of all, AI is equipped with language processing technology functions. For instance, Although the range of conversation is limited, the AI can instantly find appropriate answers to questions. “Chat GPT” is a example of application.

Second, Machines can translate other languages. Because the translation of foreign languages can be done instantly, machines can response logically after the translation. Examples of applications are “pocketalk”

and “Google Translate”, which include some of these functions.

Finally, Machines can input and output audio.

For instance, machines can think of response to what it hears and speak with voice. “Siri” and “Alexa” are examples of applications.

Thus, I think that machines can communicate like humans.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that machines can communicate like humans. First of all, machines speak with voice. So machines can talk to humans. For example, I asked the artificial intelligent installed in my smartphone about the weather. The artificial intelligence was able to answer the questions accurately with its own voice. In addition, machines can predict danger and consider risks in advance. In fact, in the class I am talking, I use programming to make predictions. Among them, we used actual data. And, We predicted the number of daily traffic accidents and the number of people infected with infectious diseases. Finally, Modern robots are humanoid and can run, jump and song. For instance,  this is Yamaha's communication robot Charlie. Charlie speaks with music in conversation like in a musical. Thus, I think that machines can communicate like humans.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think that machines can communicate like humans. To begin with,machines do not have human emotions. In practice, I have never been angry with a machine. In addition, machines make mistakes sometimes. Bugs happen to machines. For example, errors in system processing performance assumptions lead to bugs in the inability to handle large numbers of accesses. In comparison, when humans get a lot of access, they can calm down and process it as fast as they can. Finally, when you speak to the machine,  it does not respond until you wait a few seconds. machines need time to think about it. Thus, I don't think that machines can communicate like humans.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that machines can communicate like humans. I have three. reasons. First, Machines don’t have emotions. For example, machine is laugh, angry and crying with humans. Second, machines don’t have creativity. In addition, humans can think ideas about creative more than machines. Finally, machines communicate based on engine and program.

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think that machines can communicate like humans. To begin with,  machines have no personality. I often talk with the chat AI ,chatGPT or Siri but it is boring to ask their opinions because they only give me universal answers to avoid making enemies.For instance, when I asked Siri if there is a god, Siri said "It's a total mystery for me."  Also, machines have no emotion in its voice. For example, the chat AI Siri can express emotions such as sadness or happiness in text when spoken to, but we cannot hear them because there is no emotion in its voice. Lastly, machines don't have the long-term memory to speak like humans, not mere memory. Most people, when talking to others, also talk about past events with the person they are talking to. Human do that when He is interested in someone, and the someone realize he is interested in the someone. But machines can't do that. if machines remember  past content, it's difficult to imcorporate past content into current conversations for machines.  So, I don't think machines can communicate like humans.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that machines can communicate like humans.First of all, machines can talk with voice. It is important in communication, because the method of communication most frequently used by humans is to speak. For instance, Siri and Alexa. In addition, machines can chat with people. They have recently developed the ability to produce sentences. For example, chatGPT. Finally, machines read human emotion from facial expressions, documents, and voices. For instance, Affdex can understand emotions from human facial expressions, and User Local can read what emotions are in a document. Thus, I think that machines can communicate like humans.

# data[].attributes.body
I think machines can't communicate with humans. I have three reasons for this.  First, I think machins have limited contextual understanding.Understanding humor, sarcasm, or cultural references requires a deep understanding of context, which machines currently lack.  Second, Machines lack of Emotional Intelligence. Machines lack the ability to understand and express emotions, which is a fundamental aspect of human communication.   In the end, Machines can't shared human experience. Human communication is shaped by shared experiences, culture, and knowledge. Machines lack personal experiences and can't relate to human experiences in the same way.  In this way, I don't think machines can communicate with humans.

# data[].attributes.body
I think machines can't communicate with humans. I have three reasons for this.
First, I think machins have limited contextual understanding.Understanding humor, sarcasm, or cultural references requires a deep understanding of context, which machines currently lack.
Second, Machines lack of Emotional Intelligence. Machines lack the ability to understand and express emotions, which is a fundamental aspect of human communication.  For instance, when someone expresses sadness over the loss of a loved one, machines may struggle to offer genuine condolences or provide the same level of comfort and understanding that a human can.
In the end, Machines can't shared human experience. Human communication is shaped by shared experiences, culture, and knowledge. Machines lack personal experiences and can't relate to human experiences in the same way.
In this way, I don't think machines can communicate with humans.

# data[].attributes.body
I think machines can communicate like humans. First of all, machines have evolved tremendously. It is on par with humans.In the future, we may be helped from machines. For example, in terms of study and behavior.  Also, machines can handle any field. It can handle trivia. Machines help people in  many ways. Finally, machines can help human. I was helped many times when I was in trouble. For example, when I was high school student, when I came across an English word I didn't understand, I used a machine to look up the detailed meanings.  In conclusion, I think machines can communicate like humans.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that machines can communicate like humans. First of all, AI can taik with humans using chat. For instance recentry we use chat GPT. In addition, we use predictive conversion. For example, We use a keyboard to type. At that time, the keyboard gives us predictive conversions. Finally, AI can speak. When I went to my friend's house, I had the lights, TV, etc. turned on by speaking into the Google speaker.Thus, I think that machines can communicate like humans.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Topic sentenceと段落の目的は明確か？

2. 理由が三つ明確に提示されているか？
3. 三つの理由について、それぞれ説明・例があるか？
4. Concluding sentenceは全体のまとめになっているか？
5. 全部で８文以上あるか？
6. 文全体の内容がテーマと沿っているか？

# data[].attributes.body
I don't think that machines can communicate like humans. First of all, machines unable to respond in their own words. For instance, it respond to certain things in same phrases every time. Second, machines can't make idea. Machines can only return what they are programmed to return, so they cannot think up new ones on their own. Finally, taking to machines doesn't make my opinion better.  For example, "Chat GPT" is atypical conversation service. It does answer the question, but it cannot talk about differences of opinion and look for better opinions together. I think those are important of communication. Thus, I don't think that machines can communicate like humans.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that machines can communicate like humans. First of all, AI can talk with humans. For example, since the spread of smartphones, we got to use Siri. We can ask Siri to tell us anything when we don't know something. If we want to know what weather, we can ask Siri. In addition, AI can also communicate with us with gestures. For instance, in recent years, pet-type robots have developed. I think some people are satisfied with pet robots. Finally, AI can predict words. For example, recently searched words will rise to the top if we use the search function. In conclusion, I think that machines can communicate like humans.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that machines can communicate like humans. First of all, AI can talk with humans. For example, since the spread of smartphones, we got to use Siri. We can ask Siri to tell us anything when we don't know something. In addition, AI can also communicate with us with gestures. For instance, in recent years, pet-type robots have developed. I think some people are satisfied with pet robots. Finally, AI can predict words. For example, recently searched words will rise to the top if we use the search function. In conclusion, I think that machines can communicate like humans.