# data[].attributes.body
With the bold words it was more easier for me to understand and identify the mistakes I have had and the changes that copilot did.

# data[].attributes.body
I have had more spelling errors:

Diferents instead of Differents

Thougth instead of Though

Foucused instead of Focused

I used just a few linkers.

# data[].attributes.body
nothing

# data[].attributes.body
I agree because I use a limited range of vocabulary and grammatical structures.

# data[].attributes.body
I totally agree with Copilot.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the assessment criteria because I have some vocabulary problems.

# data[].attributes.body
While I made improvements in grammar and vocabulary, I feel like I can improve more and some transitions between ideas could be smoother, and I sometimes use more casual language in certain parts. Although I think the sentance is clear or at least understandable.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with copilot about the use of words and grammar

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the Vocabulary range and accuracy because there are several spelling mistakes

# data[].attributes.body
I agree because I made some mistakes regarding grammar.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with everything.

# data[].attributes.body
Because we did a very good structure like the rubric we did in class

# data[].attributes.body
Text is well organised and coherent, using a variety of cohesive devices and organisational patterns to generally good effect.

# data[].attributes.body
Anything

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with copilot about the organization structure.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the mark of the essay structure because it maches the rubric.

# data[].attributes.body
I totally agree with Copilot.

# data[].attributes.body
I belive I used a variety of nouns (sinonims) and I applied rich and adecuate vocabulary.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the assessment criteria on language because i have some serious mistakes

# data[].attributes.body
Nothing

# data[].attributes.body
The Task (1) is more formal than the first essay that we did in class, there are more correct sentences and less abbreviations.

The linkers in the Task (1) are better than the linkers in the first essay that we did, even if there are just a few linkers in Task (1).

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the punctuation of the language, as I have made some serious spelling mistakes.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the evaluation of spelling, because fundamental to clear communication. In both texts, there were several spelling mistakes.

# data[].attributes.body
nothing

# data[].attributes.body
Anything

# data[].attributes.body
anything

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with the “Uses a range of simple and complex grammatical forms with control and flexibility.”, because I don’t think it’s one of the most important facts to be considered. As long as the essay is understandable and the grammatical use is correct, I don’t think to be required to use a complex range of this.

# data[].attributes.body
In our opinion, we think this time is more easier because the mistakes are to easy to identify

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with the assessment criterion related to "language use" for the first composition, specifically regarding grammar

# data[].attributes.body
This time it was easier to identify the errors because some of them coincide with those in the previous text

# data[].attributes.body
Nothing

# data[].attributes.body
Because my vocabulary is quite basic, I make some basic mistakes.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion, this time it was easier to identify the errors, because they were underlined and were better understood.

# data[].attributes.body
First

1. Finally

Second

1. To finally

# data[].attributes.body
Rating: 3/5

The essay is generally effective in communicating ideas and stays on topic.

However, it could benefit from a more formal tone and some expressions could be phrased more naturally.

I agree with Copilot because I need to improve my communication and expressions.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes because you know where you have a mistake.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe this because in both texts, I made significant improvements in grammar, especially with verb tenses and word choice. For example, I corrected mistakes like "teached" to "taught" and fixed the use of "survived" to "survive." These changes show that I am aware of my errors and have made efforts to improve my accuracy.

# data[].attributes.body
It has been easier this time thanks to the fact that having the errors in bold made the correction more specific.

# data[].attributes.body
This time, the errors are pointed out more clearly, and the correction is better explained.

# data[].attributes.body
It was easier due to the corrections (more clearly presented).

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, since rewriting the essay has helped me, but even so I still make mistakes that are difficult for me to locate

# data[].attributes.body
I think this time it was easier for me to understand my mistakes, since they were in bold and the explanation was more specific

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, because Copilot gave me a detailed explanation of the mistakes and I understand them. When Ferran gave me corrections, I already knew what I had done wrong before putting it into Copilot.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with The mark that says “all content is relevant to the task. Target reader is fully informed.”, because I think the most important part of a writing is to be capable to understand all that its reading to.

# data[].attributes.body
Mistake: This activity demands a fluency development when...

Corrected: This activity demands fluency development when...

# data[].attributes.body
It's easier this time because the mistakes were corrected more in detail

# data[].attributes.body
One new mistake I noticed is the incorrect use of "it’s" instead of "it is".

I put things like: dinamycs, entartaining...

# data[].attributes.body
"Have to have" should be "need"

# data[].attributes.body
I use an adjective in an incorrect form.

# data[].attributes.body
I still make several mistakes, and sometimes I realize that it's not easy, especially because my English is mostly learned through conversation, not through writing. When I write, I tend to overthink sometimes, and that doesn't help me choose the correct words.

# data[].attributes.body
Repetition of mistakes: Since I had already reviewed the first composition and identified some common issues (like verb tense inconsistencies and awkward phrasing), I was more prepared to recognize similar errors in the new composition. This made it easier to spot recurring patterns and address them more efficiently.

# data[].attributes.body
First

1. To conclude

Second

1. In conclusion

# data[].attributes.body
It was easier to find the mistakes because the corrected text had fewer problems and was clearer. Comparing both versions helped to see the errors. Also, knowing the text before made it quicker to spot what needed to be improved.

# data[].attributes.body
It was so much easier thanks to the words in bold.

# data[].attributes.body
This time I made less mistakes and the correction of the ones I made was easy to understand.

# data[].attributes.body
no

# data[].attributes.body
While the second composition uses simple and clear vocabulary, it lacks variety or sophistication. If marked highly in this area, I would disagree, as more complex sentence structures and diverse word choices could elevate the overall quality.

# data[].attributes.body
The focus on correcting grammar and spelling errors was essential. Mistakes such as “differents countrius” and “desenvolupated” are fundamental and needed to be addressed to improve clarity and professionalism. The correction of these reflects an appropriate emphasis on accuracy.

# data[].attributes.body
"In the other way" → should be "On the other hand".

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, it was easier to identify mistakes this time. The second composition has clearer organization and fewer grammatical errors, making individual mistakes more noticeable. Additionally, the corrections provided a clear basis for comparison and understanding of previously made errors.

# data[].attributes.body
quotidiane life --> daily life

# data[].attributes.body
I put the "its" instead of "it's."

# data[].attributes.body
I have become more aware of common patterns in my writing errors through practice and feedback. This helped me recognize mistakes more quickly, such as improper sentence structures or misuse of cohesive devices.

# data[].attributes.body
I have improved in missing words.

# data[].attributes.body
I have improved in the correct use of several verb tenses

# data[].attributes.body
In Task 1, the phrase “vocabulary is crucial because it is the fundamental and priority information” could be simplified to avoid redundancy. This issue did not appear in the first composition.

# data[].attributes.body
Original: "I think that the least appropriate vocabulary learning activity is Glossing, the teacher only gives you a list of vocabulary."

Revised: "In my opinion, the least appropriate vocabulary learning activity is glossing, where the teacher only gives you a list of vocabulary."

Reason: "Glossing" is not typically capitalized, and the phrase "the teacher only gives you a list of vocabulary" needed to be introduced with "where" for better clarity and flow.

# data[].attributes.body
Since the mistakes in the first composition were already pointed out, I had a clearer understanding of what needed to be corrected.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree because I think that I have a basic organisation but I think that it's more clear with new linkers.

# data[].attributes.body
Changed from “this” to “these” for correct plural form.

# data[].attributes.body
"surgery school student’s are not ready" → Incorrect apostrophe use for plural "students."

# data[].attributes.body
"Vocabulary, is a micro-skill that study and teach the words of every language." --> "Vocabulary is a micro-skill that studies and teaches the words of every language."

# data[].attributes.body
Incorrect

1. Finally, I like to explain...

2. First of all, many students...

3. The original text had activitaties which was spelling error.

Correct

1. Finally I would like to explain...

2. Firstly, many students...

3. The original text had activities which was spelling error.

# data[].attributes.body
I realized that in Task 1, I made a mistake with the verb "survived." In the first text, I wrote "I learned how 'survived' by my own," which is wrong.

# data[].attributes.body
In the first composition, verb tenses were inconsistent, such as “Never I like this language” and “go to the academy.” In the second composition, this issue has been corrected, as seen in “I chose this activity” and “I attended an academy.”

# data[].attributes.body
I have improved the structure of the essay.

# data[].attributes.body
In the second essay there is lack of clarity in some sentence structures

# data[].attributes.body
the excessive use of articles

"the teachers need to change the vocabulary activities."

# data[].attributes.body
In the corrected version, the sentence "Finally, this activity permits more interaction with all the classmates, is attractive and does not bore the kids and not only improves vocabulary but also affects positively their reading and writing."

Issue: The sentence is grammatically correct, but it is overly long and lacks parallel structure, making it less clear.

Solution: Break the sentence into two parts and adjust the phrasing for conciseness and coherence. For example:

"Finally, this activity permits more interaction with classmates. It is attractive, does not bore the kids, and improves not only their vocabulary but also their reading and writing skills."

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, because having the mistakes in bold made it easier to find them.

# data[].attributes.headline
Incorrect article usage and Sentence clarity

# data[].attributes.subject
Incorrect article usage and Sentence clarity

# data[].attributes.body
1. In both the first and second compositions, there is inconsistency in the use of articles, such as “an English” in the first composition and “a languge international” in the second. Both should be corrected to “English” and “an international language,” respectively.

2. The issue of unclear sentences persists. For example, in the first composition: “Since 2007 at 2016 go to the academy, but no learned,” and in the second: “for desenvolupated a good level of english.” While corrected in the revision, it shows a recurring difficulty with crafting clear, grammatically correct sentences.

# data[].attributes.body
I am used to write fast and not check the spelling of all the words. That's the reason that I make spelling mistakes of basic words. Such as children = childeren

# data[].attributes.body
In the last essay (unlike the first one), I added a conclusion, summarizing the entire text.

# data[].attributes.body
I think it was easier this time, because my mistakes were more related to the articles use or ways to write some phrases.

# data[].attributes.body
"Learn more English every course" to "every year"

# data[].attributes.body
I have improved the structure by writing an introduction and using more academic words.

# data[].attributes.body
in the first text. I wrote "lenguag" (incorrect) and corrected it to "language" (correct).

# data[].attributes.body
I agree because I have some frequent errors in grammar and vocabulary.

# data[].attributes.body
I’ve realized that in the second text, I improved my use of vocabulary. For example, in the first text, I wrote "teached," which is incorrect. In the second version, I corrected it to "taught," which is the proper past tense form of "teach." also I started to use different way to connect the prhases .

# data[].attributes.body
1. Subject-verb error:

first-day: So I consider that my English don’t have a good level.

last: "it has" instead of "this have"

2. prepositions:

first-day: in this aspects

last: "on these" instead of "in this"

# data[].attributes.body
I still have grammatical errors:

Original: "It is believed that in school are some activities that there aren’t appropriate."

Revised: "In today's educational landscape, it is believed that certain activities in schools aren’t appropriate."

Reason: The original sentence had incorrect word order and grammar. The revised version provides clearer and more formal phrasing suitable for an opinion essay.

Original: "Firstly, this activity is very boring for the students, because they don’t have to interactive with nobody”.

Revised: "Firstly, this activity is very boring for the students, because they do not interact with anyone."

Reason: "He" should be "the," "interactive" should be "interact," and "nobody" should be "anyone" to correct grammatical errors.

# data[].attributes.body
Now is more consistent compared to essay task 0, where I mixed past and present tenses.

# data[].attributes.body
I have improved the spelling of the words

# data[].attributes.body
In my first composition I didn't use commas and in my second one I have learned to use them correctly.

# data[].attributes.body
“intensive learning” instead of “an intensive learning”.

Original: “it implies an intensive learning”

Corrected version: “it implies intensive learning”

The article “an” was removed, but the original phrasing was not explicitly marked as incorrect. Removing it created a subtle change that was not required.

# data[].attributes.body
Original: ''It is apropiate for her nivel of profiency''

Correction: ''It is appropiate for their level of proficiency

Reason:

apropiate → spelling error, corrected to appropriate.

her → changed to their because it is more appropriate when referring to a general group of children.

nivel of profiency → a mix of Spanish and English ("nivel"), corrected to level of proficiency.

# data[].attributes.body
In Essay 1, the phrase "learning the meaning it could be more easy than do an activity without them" --> incorrect use of "more easy"--> "easier."

In Essay 2, this was corrected to "the lesson is easier to learn," which uses the correct comparative form, "easier."

# data[].attributes.body
I have improved the use of connectors and transitions, and the second essay includes more phrases to structure my ideas more clearly and logically.

# data[].attributes.body
This time I put more complex Linkers for example “Furthermore”.

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, because copilot was very clear about my mistakes and the explication. I understood the vast majority.