# data[].attributes.body
From A to C there was growth overall for each standard.

# data[].attributes.body
Notice: 8 grades improved on average score from A to C. Not meeting grew from A to C and partially meeting dropped.

Wonder: Why is the cut score so high by the time students take part C? compared to other grade levels Why are their scores going down from A to C?

# data[].attributes.body
Across all standards the lowest 40% area decreased and their proficiency increased!

# data[].attributes.body
There was only one standards where students did not grow from Linkit B- LInkit C ACEDA!- something that needs to be reviewed with students? skill that students forgot?

# data[].attributes.body
One of the challenges seems to occur with Standard F-IF.B.4. There seems to be able the same % of students in meeting, approaching, and below

# data[].attributes.body
The average scores increase by around 10% from A to B and from B to C.

# data[].attributes.body
The data increased after each benchmark

# data[].attributes.body
A success was that there was growth in majority of the standards from the beginning of the year. A challenge is that a large amount of students scores were still not at the Bubble or meeting.

# data[].attributes.body
6th Grade

We noticed in LINK-IT C, the not meeting category increased to 19% from 0.

We also noticed that percent of not meeting and partially meeting remained the same.

# data[].attributes.body
Fewer students are approaching in Link-It c.

There is an increase in meeting and bubble in Link-It C.

# data[].attributes.body
Average scores show improvement

# data[].attributes.body
Challenges: Geometry and Functions

Success: 12% are not meeting for 8.EE.1

Bubble students grew in the Geometry standards

The margin is closing from student achieving in the Expressions and Equations (growth)

# data[].attributes.body
Scores showed improvement from Form A to Form C.

# data[].attributes.body
In comparing Form A to Form B, I wonder why more students did not meet expectation in Form B.

# data[].attributes.body
Challenges also occur in the standard

A-CED.A.1. Looking back at on of the questions, there was a complete exponential growth / decay. It asked the students to make to the equation to find the value and many were thrown off by the rational exponent.

# data[].attributes.body
Notice: The scores of Form A are more clumped together whereas form C had a wider range of scores. However, each of the graphs are following a normally distributed pattern

# data[].attributes.body
Standard G-CO.B.6 only increased 6% in the met or exceeding category.

# data[].attributes.headline
The scores increased from the first benchmark

# data[].attributes.subject
The scores increased from the first benchmark

# data[].attributes.body
1. We wonder which category the students who were partially meeting, fell into (since Linkit A)?

2. Did the students who did not take the assessment transfer or were absent on the day of the assessment?

# data[].attributes.headline
There was growth from A to B to C.  7.NS had the highest proficiency. 

# data[].attributes.subject
There was growth from A to B to C.  7.NS had the highest proficiency. 