# data[].attributes.body
Xue Zhang - Some points for your consideration as elaborated during the discussion.

1. The pre- post- study design

2. The linkage between the literature review and your research question and hypothesis.

3. Limitations of the study

# data[].attributes.body
Xue Zhang

The study is well-designed with a good number of respondents. Some potential areas for improvement:

1. A more comprehensive literature review with better linkage to the research question and hypothesis.

2. More information about the recruitment process and design of the questionnaire.

3. How did you test the significance of the pre- and post- differences?

4. More information on how you propose the solutions.

# data[].attributes.body
What biases might arise from using snowball sampling, particularly when the sample is drawn exclusively from a single school like RI? This needs to be acknowledged.

To what extent did the questionnaire effectively capture the detailed perspectives of students on fact-checking and POFMA, considering that definitions were provided for these terms?

What factors could explain the lack of significant correlation between social media usage and the perceived importance of fact-checking among RI students? This needs to be discussed in detail in the paper.

What might account for the differences in how Subgroup A and Subgroup B's perceptions of the articles change after being presented with POFMA corrections - again, more reasoning is necessary to be touched upon in your discussion.

How do you think this study contributes to the broader understanding of teenagers' use of digital media in Singapore?

# data[].attributes.headline
Feedback Guidelines (for Panellist Reference)

# data[].attributes.subject
Feedback Guidelines (for Panellist Reference)

# data[].attributes.body
Thank you for spending time with us this morning to help our young researchers! You may consider giving feedback to projects based on their presentation delivery and on the following points:

1. Mastery of subject knowledge

- Does the project demonstrate extensive knowledge of subject?

- Is there convincing evidence to support ideas and conclusions?

- Are all questions answered with clear elaboration?

2. Organisation of presentation

- Is the organisation of the argument clear and logical?

3. Significance of project

- Is the project relevant or important to the field?

- Will it make a significant contribution?

~ HSSRP 2024 Organising Committee.

# data[].attributes.body
To add a comment to a post, click the space that says: Add comment. Alternatively, you can add a post by pressing the "+" under the project tag heading you are commenting on. When leaving a comment, please begin with your project tag/name.
For example:
Dr Smith: this group has demonstrated extensive knowledge of the subject. However, you can try to make more eye contact with the audience.
XYZP9: the presentation was well organised but the slides were too cluttered and difficult to read. You spoke energetically!