# data[].attributes.body
Sometimes, it was hard to tell people what to do and keep good time management. I felt I was a bit harsh when I had to tell people to "shut up", listen to others, and move on to the next topic. On the other hand, we did a great duo with Tejo because he was more of a good cop who wanted to listen to everyone and was more open up for ideas and different resolutions, and I was the bad one because sometimes I had to be more strict when things started to escalate

# data[].attributes.body
cooperation, leadership, participation from all group members, equality (all equal tasks), good communication leading to trust, safe space (non violent), all willing to work and be active instructors, being supportive on new ideas and really efficient!

# data[].attributes.body
Our group leader, instructing skills, self-leadership, we returned things on time, commitment, communication, flexibility and we asked help from others when needed and that we got help <3

# data[].attributes.body
Organisational part of picking up the next group (time management). Challenging to swap what to instruct in our activity.

# data[].attributes.body
When we were left out with three person in the group and then one of us got sick, rehearsal, different perspective,

# data[].attributes.body
Again being more aware of the organisational part of group work/activity. Being more aware how to respond and being more prepared. Time management was really important. Focus also on individual tasks like knowing how to explain things instead of “reading” a script.

Also we learned how important it is to give clear instructions to a group, while the instructions would be already really clear for us as instructors.

# data[].attributes.headline
No, YOU are clearly putting in more work

# data[].attributes.subject
No, YOU are clearly putting in more work

# data[].attributes.body
From the start we made it pretty clear what our roles would be. I (Tejo) would take up the communicational and some organizational responsibilities. Kinga worked on more administrative responsibilities, such as the project plan, but organizational responsibilities too. We found that Kinga was a lot busier than me at the beginning of this project, but over the weekend we noticed that it flipped. We always thought the other person put in more work, which made us very supportive towards each other throughout the process

# data[].attributes.body
About ourselves how we work in a group, always have a plan B, do a good and clear lesson plan and adjust it if needed, ask help, put right person in the right position, have to instruct together

# data[].attributes.body
We did very good!

Equal amount of work divided with participants.

Resposibilites were handled.

Communication worked, with inside the team and between leader group.

We used time efficiently, which made working easier.

We were able to adapt during planning and during activity.

Disagreements were solved with reasoning and we came to agreement with everything, even last minute changes.

We could improve conversation facilitating still.

# data[].attributes.body
Group dynamic and lydership sharing: not exactly equal distribution of the workload

Strengths: adaptation, open-minded ness.

Challenges: Figuring out the activity to make it work in practice, a lot of open gaps in the activity, frustrating and unclear schedule and deadlines.

Learnt: adaptability to different approaches

IMPROVISE, ADAPT, OVERCOME

# data[].attributes.body
1. Everyone has different strengths and talents (technical skills, project management, visual design). Attitude towards the project got better. Execution went as good as we expected. Big learnings.

2. Personality crashed -> Communication between group members (but got better at the end). No driver in our group.

3. Taking different (leadership) roles, focusing on details, lot of room for improvement when it comes to organization. Different Personality trades. Project managing. Cultural learnings

# data[].attributes.body
Despite our clearly divided roles, during moments in class it is nicer to have two people in charge of the day, especially with a class our size. There was some improvisation required throughout the week; discussions would pop-up that we didn't foresee, and sometimes issues would arrise that we would have to pick up even though it was not 'officially' my task or Kinga's. Good communication was required.

We met those requirements.